Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other dermatological preparations, agents for dermatitis, excluding corticosteroids; ATC code: D11AH08
Mechanism of action
Cibinqo is a Janus kinase (JAK)1 inhibitor. JAKs are intracellular enzymes which transmit signals arising from cytokine or growth factor-receptor interactions on the cellular membrane to influence cellular processes of haematopoiesis and immune cell function. JAKs phosphorylate and activate Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STATs) which modulate intracellular activity including gene expression. Inhibition of JAK1 modulates the signalling pathways by preventing the phosphorylation and activation of STATs.
In biochemical assays, abrocitinib has selectivity for JAK1 over the other 3 JAK isoforms JAK2 (28‑fold), JAK3 (> 340-fold) and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2, 43-fold). In cellular settings, it preferentially inhibits cytokine-induced STAT phosphorylation by signalling pairs involving JAK1, and spares signalling by JAK2/JAK2, or JAK2/TYK2 pairs. The relevance of selective enzymatic inhibition of specific JAK enzymes to clinical effect is not currently known.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Treatment with Cibinqo was associated with dose-dependent reduction in serum markers of inflammation, including high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-31 (IL‑31) and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC). These changes returned to near baseline within 4 weeks of drug discontinuation.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of Cibinqo as monotherapy and in combination with background medicated topical therapies over 12-16 weeks were evaluated in 1,616 patients in 3 pivotal Phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (MONO-1, MONO‑2, and COMPARE). In addition, the efficacy and safety of Cibinqo in monotherapy over 52 weeks (with the option of rescue treatment in flaring patients) was evaluated in 1,233 patients in a Phase 3 induction, randomised withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (REGIMEN). The patients in these 4 studies were 12 years of age and older with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis as defined by Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16, BSA involvement ≥ 10%, and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) ≥ 4 at baseline prior to randomisation. Patients who had a prior inadequate response or for whom topical treatments were medically unadvisable, or who had received systemic therapies were eligible for inclusion. All patients who completed the parent studies were eligible to enrol into the long-term extension study EXTEND.
Baseline characteristics
In the placebo-controlled studies (MONO-1, MONO-2, COMPARE) and the open label induction, randomised withdrawal study (REGIMEN) across all treatment groups 41.4% to 51.1% were female, 59.3% to 77.8% were Caucasian, 15.0% to 33.0% were Asian and 4.1% to 8.3% were Black, and the mean age was 32.1 to 37.7 years. In these studies, 32.2% to 40.8% had a baseline IGA of 4 (severe atopic dermatitis), and 41.4% to 59.5% of patients had received prior systemic treatment for atopic dermatitis. The baseline mean EASI score ranged from 28.5 to 30.9, the baseline PP-NRS ranged from 7.0 to 7.3 and the baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ranged from 14.4 to 16.0.
Clinical response
12-week monotherapy (MONO-1, MONO-2) and 16-week TCS combination (COMPARE) studies
A significantly larger proportion of patients achieved both primary or key secondary endpoints IGA 0 or 1 and/or EASI‑75 with 100 mg or 200 mg once daily Cibinqo compared with placebo at Week 12 or Week 16 (see Table 3 and Table 4).
A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved at least a PP-NRS 4-point improvement with 100 mg or 200 mg once daily Cibinqo compared with placebo. Improvement was observed as early as Week 2 and persisting through Week 12 (Figure 1).
In the COMPARE study, superiority of Cibinqo 200 mg compared with dupilumab at Week 2 was demonstrated for the proportion of patients achieving PP-NRS 4-point improvement with significantly higher itch responses seen as early as Day 4 after the first dose.
Treatment effects in subgroups (e.g. weight, age, sex, race and prior systemic immunosuppressant treatment) in MONO-1, MONO-2 and COMPARE were consistent with the results in the overall study population.
| Table 3. Efficacy results of Cibinqo in monotherapy at Week 12 |
| | MONO-1c | MONO-2c |
| Week 12 | Week 12 |
| CBQ monotherapy | PBO N=77 | CBQ monotherapy | PBO N=78 |
| 200 mg QD N=154 | 100 mg QD N=156 | 200 mg QD N=155 | 100 mg QD N=158 |
|
| | % Responders (95% CI) |
| IGA 0 or 1a | 43.8d (35.9, 51.7) | 23.7d (17.0, 30.4) | 7.9 (1.8, 14.0) | 38.1d (30.4, 45.7) | 28.4d (21.3, 35.5) | 9.1 (2.7, 15.5) |
| EASI-75b | 62.7d (55.1, 70.4) | 39.7d (32.1, 47.4) | 11.8 (4.6, 19.1) | 61.0d (53.3, 68.7) | 44.5d (36.7, 52.3) | 10.4 (3.6, 17.2) |
| EASI-90b | 38.6e (30.8, 46.3) | 18.6e (12.5, 24.7) | 5.3 (0.2, 10.3) | 37.7e (30.0, 45.3) | 23.9e (17.2, 30.6) | 3.9 (0.0, 8.2) |
| PP-NRS (0 or 1) | 35.4e (27.2, 43.6) | 21.1e (13.9, 28.4) | 3.2 (0.0, 7.5) | 32.4e (24.5, 40.2) | 21.3e (14.5, 28.0) | 5.5 (0.3, 10.7) |
| PSAADf | -3.2d (-3.6, -2.8) | -2.2d (-2.6, -1.9) | -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6) | -3.0d (-3.3, -2.7) | -2.4d (-2.8, -2.1) | -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3) |
| Abbreviations: CBQ=Cibinqo; CI=confidence interval; EASI=Eczema Area and Severity Index; IGA=Investigator Global Assessment; N=number of patients randomised; PBO=placebo; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; PSAAD=Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis; QD=once daily. a. IGA responders were patients with IGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (on a 5‑point scale) and a reduction from baseline of ≥ 2 points. b. EASI-75 and -90 responders were patients with ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% improvement, respectively, in EASI from baseline. c. Cibinqo in monotherapy. d. Statistically significant with adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo. e. Statistically significant without adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo. f. Results shown are least squares mean change from baseline. |
| Table 4. Efficacy results of Cibinqo in combination with topical therapy at Week 12 and Week 16 |
| | COMPAREc |
| Week 12 | Week 16 |
| CBQ + topicals | PBO + topicals N=131 | DUP + topicals N=243 | CBQ + topicals | PBO + topicals N=131 | DUP + topicals N=243 |
|
| 200 mg N=226 | 100 mg N=238 | 200 mg N=226 | 100 mg N=238 |
| | % Responders (95% CI) |
| IGA 0 or 1a | 48.4d (41.8, 55.0) | 36.6d (30.4, 42.8) | 14.0 (8.0, 19.9) | 36.5 (30.4, 42.6) | 47.5d (40.9, 54.1) | 34.8d (28.6, 40.9) | 12.9 (7.0, 18.8) | 38.8 (32.5, 45.1) |
| EASI-75b | 70.3d (64.3, 76.4) | 58.7d (52.4, 65.0) | 27.1 (19.5, 34.8) | 58.1 (51.9, 64.3) | 71.0d (65.1, 77.0) | 60.3d (53.9, 66.6) | 30.6 (22.5, 38.8) | 65.5 (59.4, 71.6) |
| EASI-90b | 46.1e (39.5, 52.7) | 36.6e (30.4, 42.8) | 10.1 (4.9, 15.3) | 34.9 (28.8, 40.9) | 48.9e (42.3, 55.5) | 38.0e (31.7, 44.3) | 11.3 (5.7, 16.9) | 38.8 (32.5, 45.1) |
| PP-NRS (0 or 1) | 36.9e (30.4, 43.3) | 21.1e (15.7, 26.4) | 7.4 (2.8, 12.1) | 24.9 (19.2, 30.5) | 32.0e (25.0, 38.9) | 24.7e (18.2, 31.2) | 11.7 (5.2, 18.2) | 24.2 (18.1, 30.3) |
| PSAADf | -3.6e (-3.8, -3.3) | -2.7e (-3.0, -2.5) | -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3) | -3.2 (-3.5, -3.0) | -3.6e (-3.8, -3.4) | -2.8e (-3.1, -2.6) | -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3) | -3.4 (-3.6, -3.2) |
| Abbreviations: CBQ=Cibinqo; CI=confidence interval; DUP=Dupilumab; EASI=Eczema Area and Severity Index; IGA=Investigator Global Assessment; N=number of patients randomised; PBO=placebo; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; PSAAD=Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis. a. IGA responders were patients with IGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (on a 5‑point scale) and a reduction from baseline of ≥ 2 points. b. EASI-75, -90 and responders were patients with ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% improvement, respectively, in EASI from baseline. c. Cibinqo in combination with topical therapy. d. Statistically significant with adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo. e. Statistically significant without adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo. f. Results shown are least squares mean change from baseline. |
The proportion of patients who achieved PP-NRS4 over time in studies MONO-1, MONO-2 and COMPARE are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Proportion of patients who achieved PP-NRS4 over time in MONO-1, MONO-2 and COMPARE
Abbreviations: PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; QD=once daily.
PP-NRS4 responders were patients with ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritis Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) from baseline.
a. Cibinqo used in monotherapy.
b. Cibinqo used in combination with medicated topical therapy.
* Statistically significant with adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo.
** Statistically significant without adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo.
*** Statistically significant with adjustment for multiplicity versus dupilumab.
Health related outcomes
Treatment with either dose of Cibinqo as monotherapy or combination therapy resulted in improved patient-reported outcomes at 12 weeks compared with placebo. Higher proportions of the treatment groups had clinically meaningful reductions in DLQI total scores from baseline to Week 12 compared with placebo (defined as a 4-point improvement): 72.6-86.4% and 67.2-74.7% with 200 mg and 100 mg of medicinal product, respectively, versus 32.3-56.5% for placebo and separately, a DLQI score < 2 representing “no effect” of their disease on their quality of life (26.6‑31.9% and 20.3-21.9% with 200 mg and 100 mg of medicinal product, respectively, versus 5.7‑12.1% for placebo). Both groups also improved patient-reported atopic dermatitis symptoms, sleep disruption, and anxiety and depression symptoms compared with placebo at 12 weeks as measured by the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) [least squares mean (LSM) changes were -10.6 to -12.6 and ‑6.8 to -9.6 for Cibinqo 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively, compared with -3.6 to -5.1 for placebo], SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) sleep loss subscale (LSM changes were -3.7 to -4.6 and -2.1 to -3.8 with 200 mg and 100 mg of medicinal product, respectively, compared with -2.4 to -4.6 for placebo), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, respectively.
Open label induction, randomised withdrawal study (REGIMEN)
A total of 1,233 patients received open label Cibinqo. Seven-hundred ninety-eight (798) induction responders were randomised to 200 mg or 100 mg of medicinal product or placebo.
Continuous treatment (200 mg continuous) and induction-maintenance treatment (200 mg for 12 weeks followed by 100 mg) prevented flare with 81.1% and 57.4% probability, respectively, versus 19.1% among patients who withdrew treatment (randomised to placebo) after 12 weeks of induction. Three-hundred fifty-one (351) patients including 16.2% of 200 mg, 39.2% of 100 mg and 76.4% of placebo patients received rescue medication of 200 mg Cibinqo in combination with topical therapy.
Table 5. Efficacy results of Cibinqo in REGIMEN
| | CBQ monotherapy Open label induction, Week 12 200 mg N=1233 |
| IGA 0 or 1a % responders (95% CI) | 65.9 (63.3, 68.6) |
| EASI-75b % responders (95% CI) | 75.6 (73.1, 78.0) |
| PP-NRS 4-point improvementc % responders (95% CI) | 68.3 (65.3, 71.3) |
| Abbreviations: CBQ=Cibinqo; CI=confidence interval; EASI=Eczema Area and Severity Index; IGA=Investigator Global Assessment; N=number of patients randomised; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale. a. IGA responders were patients with IGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (on a 5‑point scale) and a reduction from baseline of ≥ 2 points. b. EASI-75 responders were patients with ≥ 75% improvement in EASI from baseline. c. PP-NRS4 responders were patients with ≥ 4-point improvement in PP-NRS from baseline. |
Figure 2. Time to protocol-defined flare
Cibinqo used in monotherapy
Protocol-defined flare=A loss of at least 50% of the EASI response at Week 12 and an IGA score of 2 or higher.
Multiplicity-controlled p < 0.0001 200 mg versus placebo; 100 mg versus placebo; 200 mg versus 100 mg.
A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of successfully decreasing the dose from 200 mg to 100 mg and remaining flare-free for at least 12 weeks after the dose decrease. In that analysis, patients who had not received prior systemic agents (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2, 2.6) and patients who had ≤ 50% BSA involvement before starting abrocitinib (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2, 2.6) were almost twice as likely to remain protocol-defined flare-free than those who had received prior systemic agents and who had ˃ 50% BSA involvement.
Long-term efficacy
Eligible patients who completed the full treatment period of a qualifying parent study (e.g. MONO-1, MONO‑2, COMPARE, REGIMEN) were considered for enrolment in the long-term extension study EXTEND. In EXTEND, patients received Cibinqo with or without background medicated topical therapy. Patients who were previously randomised to medicinal product 100 mg or 200 mg once daily in parent studies continued the same dose in EXTEND as in the parent study, and the blind was maintained.
Among patients who achieved response after 12 weeks of treatment and entered EXTEND, the majority of patients who supplied data at Week 96 of cumulative treatment maintained their response for both doses of Cibinqo [64% and 72% for IGA (0 or 1) response, 87% and 90% for EASI-75, and 75% and 80% for PP-NRS4 with 100 mg once daily and 200 mg once daily, respectively (based on observed data)].
Among patients who did not achieve response after 12 weeks of treatment and entered EXTEND, a proportion of patients achieved late-onset response by Week 24 (from baseline) of continued treatment with Cibinqo [22% and 27% for IGA (0 or 1) response, and 45% and 52% for EASI-75 with 100 mg once daily and 200 mg once daily, respectively (based on non-responder imputation)].
Patients who received dupilumab in the COMPARE study and subsequently entered EXTEND were randomized to either 100 mg or 200 mg of abrocitinib once daily upon entering EXTEND. Among non-responders to dupilumab, a substantial proportion of patients achieved response 12 weeks after switching to abrocitinib [34% and 47% for IGA (0 or 1) response, and 68% and 80% for EASI-75 with 100 mg once daily or 200 mg once daily, respectively (based on non-responder imputation)].
Paediatric population
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Cibinqo in 1 or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (see section 4.2).
The efficacy and safety of Cibinqo as monotherapy was evaluated in 2 Phase 3 randomised, double‑blind, placebo-controlled studies (MONO-1, MONO‑2) which included 124 patients who were 12 to less than 18 years of age. The efficacy and safety were also evaluated in open label induction, randomised withdrawal study (REGIMEN) which included 246 patients who were 12 to less than 18 years of age. In these studies, the results in the adolescent subgroup were consistent with the results in the overall study population.
The efficacy and safety of Cibinqo in combination with background medicated topical therapy was evaluated in the Phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study TEEN. The study included 287 patients who were 12 to less than 18 years of age with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis as defined by IGA score ≥ 3, EASI score ≥ 16, BSA involvement ≥ 10%, and PP‑NRS ≥ 4 at the baseline visit prior to randomisation. Patients who had a prior inadequate response or who had received systemic therapy, were eligible for inclusion.
Baseline characteristics
In TEEN, across all treatment groups 49.1% were female, 56.1% were Caucasian, 33.0% were Asian and 6.0% were Black patients. The median age was 15 years and the proportion of patients with severe atopic dermatitis (IGA of 4) was 38.6%.
Table 6. Adolescent efficacy results of Cibinqo in TEEN
| | TEENd |
| CBQ | PBO N=96 |
| 200 mg QD N=94 | 100 mg QD N=95 |
| IGA 0 or 1a % responders (95% CI) | 46.2e (36.1, 56.4) | 41.6e (31.3, 51.8) | 24.5 (15.8, 33.2) |
| EASI-75b % responders (95% CI) | 72.0e (62.9, 81.2) | 68.5e (58.9, 78.2) | 41.5 (31.5, 51.4) |
| PP-NRS4c % responders (95% CI) | 55.4e (44.1, 66.7) | 52.6 (41.4, 63.9) | 29.8 (20.0, 39.5) |
| Abbreviations: CBQ=Cibinqo; CI=confidence interval; EASI=Eczema Area and Severity Index; IGA=Investigator Global Assessment; N=number of patients treated; PBO=placebo; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; QD=once daily. a. IGA responders were patients with IGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (on a 5‑point scale) and a reduction from baseline of ≥ 2 points. b. EASI-75 responders were patients with ≥ 75% improvement in EASI from baseline. c. PP-NRS4 responders were patients with ≥ 4-point improvement in PP-NRS from baseline. d. Cibinqo used in combination with medicated topical therapy. e. Statistically significant with adjustment for multiplicity versus placebo. |
Among adolescent patients who achieved response after 12 weeks of treatment and entered long-term extension study EXTEND, the majority of patients who supplied data at week 96 of cumulative treatment maintained their response for both doses of abrocitinib [62% and 78%, for IGA (0 or 1) response, 89% and 93% for EASI-75, and 77% and 76% for PP-NRS4] with 100 mg and 200 mg once daily, respectively (based on observed data).
Among adolescent patients who did not achieve response after 12 weeks of treatment and entered EXTEND, a proportion of patients achieved late-onset response by Week 24 (from baseline) of continued treatment with both doses of abrocitinib [32% and 26% for IGA (0 or 1) response, and 37% and 50% for EASI-75] with 100 mg and 200 mg once daily, respectively (based on non-responder imputation).