Pharmacotherapeutic group: Ophthalmologicals, other ophthalmologicals, ATC code: S01XA19
Mechanism of action and pharmacodynamic effects
The mechanism of action of Holoclar is the replacement of corneal epithelium and lost limbal stem cells in patients in which the limbus has been destroyed by ocular burns. During the corneal repair process, the administered stem cells are intended to multiply symmetrically and asymmetrically, producing differentiation and migration to regenerate corneal epithelium, as well as maintaining a reservoir of stem cells that can continually regenerate the corneal epithelium.
Conventional pharmacodynamic studies for Holoclar have not been performed.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of the medicinal product was evaluated in three retrospective, case-series, non-randomised, non controlled studies (HLSTM01, HLSTM02 and HLSTM04), gathering all clinical information from all treated patients with available source documentation with a follow-up of up to 10 years. Efficacy and safety of Holoclar has also been evaluated in a prospective interventional, multinational, multicentre, open-label, uncontrolled study (HLSTM03 or HOLOCORE) involving a total of 80 patients and in its long term follow-up (HOLOCORE FOLLOW-UP or HOLOCORE-FU).
The HLSTM01 pivotal study was a multicentre, case-series, non-controlled, non- randomised, retrospective clinical study performed to assess the potential efficacy and safety of Holoclar in a set of 106 patients of both genders, presenting a moderate to severe limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) due to ocular burns. Moderate to severe LSCD was defined according to an invasion of at least two quadrants of the corneal surface by superficial neo vessels.
A total of 104 patients, aged between 13 and 79 years (mean 46.8 years) were included in the primary efficacy analysis. At the time of product administration, the mean duration of the condition since the injury was 18 years (median 10 years), 99% of patients had corneal opacity and 90% of them had a severe impairment in visus (1/10th or less at Snellen chart). Success of the procedure was evaluated based on the presence of a stable corneal epithelium (i.e. absence of epithelial defects) without significant recurrence of neovascularisation (no more than one quadrant without central corneal involvement) at 12 months post-intervention. A total of 75 (72.1%) treatments were reported with a successful outcome. These results were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis where superficial neovascularisation was evaluated by an independent assessor from blinded photos of patients' eyes taken before and after Holoclar implantation.
Additional clinically-relevant parameters were evaluated as secondary efficacy assessments.
The proportion of patients with symptoms (pain, burning or photophobia) significantly decreased from pre-surgery (40 patients with at least one symptom; 38.5%) to one year after the procedure (12 patients; 11.5%).
Fifty-one patients (49.0%) had an improvement in visual acuity of at least one full line on a Snellen chart (or one category for the severely impaired cases). The proportion of patients with improvement in visual acuity was higher among those without a scar of the corneal stroma (15/18 patients, 83.3%) than in those with scarring (36/81 patients, 44.4%). When categorical values for visual acuity were converted into the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR), 47% of cases (40 over 85 with non-missing values) experienced an improvement equal or greater than 3 Snellen line equivalents.
Fifty-seven patients underwent a keratoplasty after the use of the product with a success rate of 42.1% (N=24) one year after the corneal transplantation (i.e. with a stable corneal epithelium without significant recurrence of neovascularisation).
The HOLOCORE pivotal study was a multinational, multicentre, prospective, open- label, uncontrolled, interventional clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of Holoclar for restoration of corneal epithelium in patients with moderate to severe LSCD due to ocular burns. The study included a total of 76 adults and 4 paediatric patients of both genders. The paediatric patients were included for safety assessment.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a success of transplantation at 12 months from the first treatment. Transplantation success was judged by Independent Assessors on the basis of 2D pictures to be successful in 41% of adult patients with evaluable results one year after the first treatment, and 57.8% patients experienced a lowering in the grade of superficial corneal neo- vascularisation in the same period.
The proportion of patients experiencing success in transplantation as well as other improvements as judged by Site Investigators by direct instrumental and clinical evaluation of the patients was higher than that from Independent Assessors on pictures; specifically, Site Investigators judged the treatment overall outcome to be successful in 77.0% of the patients and 82% of the patients had no epithelial defects.
In addition, the success of transplantation judged by Independent Assessors was higher when assessed according to Global Consensus paper guidelines with 50.9% patients with favourable outcome. Similarly, the improvement in LSCD staging according to the Global Consensus paper guidelines was higher (60.9%) than the rate assessed using the quadrants method (57.8% of patients experienced a lowering in the grade of superficial corneal neo- vascularisation according to Independent Assessors).
At the final visit, 82% of patients who attended had no epithelial defects, 49.2% had normal limbal hyperaemia and 44.3% had normal corneal sensitivity. Long standing LSCD symptoms improved, 75.4% of patients had no burning presence, and 78.7% reported no more presence of pain. The general vision had an improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at all time points statistically significant (p<0.001), while general health was maintained overall.
Patients with successful Holoclar engraftment at the end of the HOLOCORE study (outcome one year after Holoclar implantation) entered the HOLOCORE-FU study designed to establish long term safety and tolerability of Holoclar implantation and to confirm the benefit up to six years from treatment. Efficacy was sustained during the entire follow-up period, with a minimum of 60.0% success at one year from transplantation (Day 1 of the HOLOCORE-FU study) to a maximum of 100% at six years from transplantation (Day 1800 of the HOLOCORE-FU study). For the long term safety and tolerability evaluation, the AEs were pooled for the Main and Follow-Up studies to also ensure the identification of potential safety pattern over an extended follow-up. No new severe adverse event occurred in the Follow-Up study; 1 case of corneal opacity related to Holoclar was reported.
In addition, two years after Holoclar implantation, patients who had undergone keratoplasty showed successful corneal transplantation: 85.7% (n/N = 12/14 on evaluation based on the quadrants method and 93.3% (n/N =14/15) when success was based on Investigator's overall clinical judgement.
The study results also demonstrate the synergy between ACLSCT with Holoclar and keratoplasty in the treatment of LSCD.
Elderly
The HLSTM01 study enrolled a total of seven patients (6.7% of the study population) with an age at baseline of 65 years or above, seven patients (24.1%) were originally enrolled in HLSTM02 and 6 patients (8.2%) were included in HOLOCORE. Although limited with regard to the number of subjects, data from these studies showed a success rate and level of efficacy similar to that observed in the treated patients overall.
The long-term data collected in the HOLOCORE-FU study confirmed the safety of Holoclar as no related adverse events occurred while the efficacy rate was maintained. Two out of 4 patients followed up in the long-term study had a successful outcome: 1 maintained the success as in HOLOCORE and 1 became a success after the keratoplasty. Among the other two with failure outcome based on the measurement of CNV in quadrants, one was judged successful by the Investigator clinical assessment, for a final success rate of 75% by overall investigator judgment.
Paediatric population
The HLSTM01 and HLSTM02 studies enrolled a total of five patients aged 8– 17 years. The profile of adverse reactions in those paediatric patients was not different from the adult population.
The HOLOCORE study enrolled 4 patients ranging from 6 to 13 years (2 males and 2 females). These few patients were not included in the efficacy analysis but all parameters showed level of efficacy similar to that observed in the treated patients overall. In the paediatric group 12 AEs occurred overall, none considered serious, 2 judged possibly related to the surgical procedure associated with Holoclar transplantation but none to Holoclar.
The long-term data collected in the HOLOCORE-FU study on the 2 paediatrics subjects (6 and 13 years) included in the study confirmed the safety of Holoclar as no related adverse events occurred. The efficacy outcome for these patients was unsuccessful, confirming the negative result in HOLOCORE for them at 1-year follow-up. No long-term information was provided on the other two paediatrics treated in the HOLOCORE study with successful outcome at 1-year and not enrolled in the Follow-Up study.