Pharmacotherapeutic group: nucleoside analogue, ATC Code: J05AF05.
Mechanism of action
Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue which has activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). It is metabolised intracellularly to the active moiety, lamivudine 5'- triphosphate. Its main mode of action is as a chain terminator of viral reverse transcription. The triphosphate has selective inhibitory activity against HIV-1 and HIV-2 replication in vitro; it is also active against zidovudine-resistant clinical isolates of HIV. No antagonistic effects in vitro were seen with lamivudine and other anti retrovirals (tested agents: abacavir, didanosine, nevirapine and zidovudine).
Resistance
HIV-1 resistance to lamivudine involves the development of a M184V amino acid change close to the active site of the viral reverse transcriptase (RT). This variant arises both in vitro and in HIV-1 infected patients treated with lamivudine-containing antiretroviral therapy. M184V mutants display greatly reduced susceptibility to lamivudine and show diminished viral replicative capacity in vitro. In vitro studies indicate that zidovudine-resistant virus isolates can become zidovudine sensitive when they simultaneously acquire resistance to lamivudine. The clinical relevance of such findings remains, however, not well defined.
In vitro data tend to suggest that the continuation of lamivudine in anti-retroviral regimen despite the development of M184V might provide residual anti-retroviral activity (likely through impaired viral fitness). The clinical relevance of these findings is not established. Indeed, the available clinical data are very limited and preclude any reliable conclusion in the field. In any case, initiation of susceptible NRTI's should always be preferred to maintenance of lamivudine therapy. Therefore, maintaining lamivudine therapy despite emergence of M184V mutation should only be considered in cases where no other active NRTI's are available.
Cross-resistance conferred by the M184V RT is limited within the nucleoside inhibitor class of antiretroviral agents. Zidovudine and stavudine maintain their antiretroviral activities against lamivudine-resistant HIV-1. Abacavir maintains its antiretroviral activities against lamivudine-resistant HIV-1 harbouring only the M184V mutation. The M184V RT mutant shows a <4-fold decrease in susceptibility to didanosine; the clinical significance of these findings is unknown. In vitro susceptibility testing has not been standardised and results may vary according to methodological factors.
Lamivudine demonstrates low cytotoxicity to peripheral blood lymphocytes, to established lymphocyte and monocyte-macrophage cell lines, and to a variety of bone marrow progenitor cells in vitro.
Clinical efficacy and safety
In clinical trials, lamivudine in combination with zidovudine has been shown to reduce HIV-1 viral load and increase CD4 cell count. Clinical end-point data indicate that lamivudine in combination with zidovudine, results in a significant reduction in the risk of disease progression and mortality.
Evidence from clinical studies shows that lamivudine plus zidovudine delays the emergence of zidovudine resistant isolates in individuals with no prior antiretroviral therapy.
Lamivudine has been widely used as a component of antiretroviral combination therapy with other antiretroviral agents of the same class (NRTIs) or different classes (PIs, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors).
Clinical trial evidence from paediatric patients receiving lamivudine with other antiretroviral drugs (abacavir, nevirapine/efavirenz or zidovudine) has shown that the resistance profile observed in paediatric patients is similar to that observed in adults, in terms of the genotypic substitutions detected and their relative frequency.
Children receiving lamivudine oral solution concomitantly with other antiretroviral oral solutions in clinical trials developed viral resistance more frequently than children receiving tablets (see the description of the clinical experience in paediatric population (ARROW study) and section 5.2).
Multiple drug antiretroviral therapy containing lamivudine has been shown to be effective in antiretroviral-naive patients as well as in patients presenting with viruses containing the M184V mutations.
The relationship between in vitro susceptibility of HIV to lamivudine and clinical response to lamivudine-containing therapy remains under investigation.
Lamivudine at a dose of 100 mg once daily has also been shown to be effective for the treatment of adult patients with chronic HBV infection (for details of clinical studies, see the prescribing information for Zeffix). However, for the treatment of HIV infection, only a 300 mg daily dose of lamivudine (in combination with other antiretroviral agents) has been shown to be efficacious.
Lamivudine has not been specifically investigated in HIV patients co-infected with HBV.
Once daily dosing (300 mg once a day): a clinical study has demonstrated the non inferiority between Epivir once a day and Epivir twice a day containing regimens. These results were obtained in an antiretroviral naïve-population, primarily consisting of asymptomatic HIV infected patients (CDC stage A).
Paediatric population:a randomised comparison of a regimen including once daily vs twice daily dosing of abacavir and lamivudine was undertaken within a randomised, multicentre, controlled study of HIV-infected, paediatric patients. 1206 paediatric patients aged 3 months to 17 years enrolled in the ARROW Trial (COL105677) and were dosed according to the weight - band dosing recommendations in the World Health Organisation treatment guidelines (Antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection in infants and children, 2006). After 36 weeks on a regimen including twice daily abacavir and lamivudine, 669 eligible subjects were randomised to either continue twice daily dosing or switch to once daily abacavir and lamivudine for at least 96 weeks. Of note, from this study clinical data were not available for children under one year old. The results are summarised in the table below:
Virological Response Based on Plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 80 copies/ml at Week 48 and Week 96 in the Once Daily versus Twice Daily abacavir + lamivudine randomisation of ARROW (Observed Analysis)
| | Twice Daily n/N (%) | Once Daily n/N (%) |
| Week 0 (After ≥36 Weeks on Treatment) |
| Plasma HIV-1 RNA <80 c/ml | 250/331 (76) | 237/335 (71) |
| Risk difference (once daily-twice daily) | -4.8% (95% CI -11.5% to +1.9%), p=0.16 |
| Week 48 |
| Plasma HIV-1 RNA <80 c/ml | 242/331 (73) | 236/330 (72) |
| Risk difference (once daily-twice daily) | -1.6% (95% CI -8.4% to +5.2%), p=0.65 |
| Week 96 |
| Plasma HIV-1 RNA <80 c/ml | 234/326 (72) | 230/331 (69) |
| Risk difference (once daily-twice daily) | -2.3% (95% CI -9.3% to +4.7%), p=0.52 |
In a pharmacokinetic study (PENTA 15), four virologically controlled subjects less than 12 months of age switched from abacavir plus lamivudine oral solution twice daily to a once daily regimen. Three subjects had undetectable viral load and one had plasmatic HIV-RNA of 900 copies/ml at Week 48. No safety concerns were observed in these subjects.
The abacavir + lamivudine once daily dosing group was demonstrated to be non-inferior to the twice daily group according to the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -12%, for the primary endpoint of <80 c/ml at Week 48 as well as at Week 96 (secondary endpoint) and all other thresholds tested (<200c/ml, <400c/ml, <1000c/ml), which all fell well within this non-inferiority margin. Subgroup analyses testing for heterogeneity of once vs twice daily demonstrated no significant effect of sex, age, or viral load at randomisation. Conclusions supported non-inferiority regardless of analysis method.
At the time of randomization to once daily vs twice daily dosing (Week 0), those patients who had received tablet formulations had a higher rate of viral load suppression than those who had received any solution formulations at any time. These differences were observed in each different age group studied. This difference in suppression rates between tablets and solutions remained through Week 96 with once daily dosing.
Proportions of Subjects in the Once Daily versus Twice Daily Abacavir+Lamivudine Randomisation of ARROW with Plasma HIV-1 RNA <80 copies/ml: Subgroup Analysis by Formulation
| | Twice Daily Plasma HIV-1 RNA <80 c/ml: n/N (%) | Once Daily Plasma HIV-1 RNA <80 c/ml: n/N (%) |
| Week 0 (after 36 weeks on Treatment) | | |
| Any solution regimen at any time | 14/26 (54) | 15/30 (50) |
| All tablet based regimen throughout | 236/305 (77) | 222/305 (73) |
| Week 96 | | |
| Any solution regimen at any time | 13/26 (50) | 17/30 (57) |
| All tablet based regimen throughout | 221/300 (74) | 213/301 (71) |
Genotypic resistance analyses were conducted on samples with plasma HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/ml. More cases of resistance were detected among patients who had received lamivudine solution, in combination with other antiretroviral solutions, compared with those who received similar doses of tablet formulation. This is consistent with the lower rates of antiviral suppression observed in these patients.