Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs used in diabetes, insulins and analogues for injection, fast-acting
ATC code: A10AB05.
Mechanism of action
Fiasp is a fast-acting insulin aspart formulation.
The primary activity of Fiasp is the regulation of glucose metabolism. Insulins, including insulin aspart, the active substance in Fiasp, exert their specific action through binding to insulin receptors. Receptor-bound insulin lowers blood glucose by facilitating cellular uptake of glucose into skeletal muscle and adipose tissue and by inhibiting the output of glucose from the liver. Insulin inhibits lipolysis in the adipocyte, inhibits proteolysis and enhances protein synthesis.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Fiasp is a mealtime insulin aspart formulation in which the addition of nicotinamide (vitamin B3) results in a faster initial absorption of insulin compared to NovoRapid.
The onset of action was 5 minutes earlier and time to maximum glucose infusion rate was 11 minutes earlier with Fiasp than with NovoRapid. The maximum glucose-lowering effect of Fiasp occurred between 1 and 3 hours after injection. The glucose-lowering effect during the first 30 minutes (AUCGIR, 0–30 min ) was 51 mg/kg with Fiasp and 29 mg/kg with NovoRapid (Fiasp/NovoRapid ratio: 1.74 [1.47;2.10]95% CI). The total glucose-lowering effect and maximum (GIRmax) glucose-lowering effect were comparable between Fiasp and NovoRapid. Total and maximum glucose-lowering effect of Fiasp increase linearly with increasing dose within the therapeutic dose range.
Fiasp has an earlier onset of action compared to NovoRapid (see section 5.2), leading to a subsequent increased early glucose-lowering effect. This must be considered when prescribing Fiasp.
The duration of action was shorter for Fiasp compared to that of NovoRapid and lasted for 3–5 hours.
The day-to-day variability within-patients in glucose-lowering effect was low for Fiasp both for early (AUCGIR, 0-1h, CV~26%), total (AUCGIR, 0-12h, CV~18%) and maximum glucose-lowering effect (GIRmax, CV~19%).
Clinical efficacy and safety
Fiasp has been studied in 2 068 adult patients with type 1 diabetes (1 143 patients) and type 2 diabetes (925 patients) in 3 randomised efficacy and safety trials (18–26 weeks of treatment). Furthermore, Fiasp has been studied in 777 paediatric subjects with type 1 diabetes in a randomised efficacy and safety trial (26 weeks of treatment). No children below the age of 2 years were randomised in the trial.
Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus
The treatment effect of Fiasp in achieving glycaemic control was assessed when administered at mealtime or postmeal. Fiasp administered at mealtime was non-inferior to NovoRapid in reducing HbA1c, and the improvement in HbA1c was statistically significant in favour of Fiasp. Fiasp administered postmeal achieved similar HbA1c reduction as NovoRapid dosed at mealtime (Table 3).
| Table 3 Results from 26 week basal-bolus clinical trial in patients with type 1 diabetes |
| | Fiasp mealtime + insulin detemir | Fiasp postmeal + insulin detemir | NovoRapid mealtime + insulin detemir |
| N | 381 | 382 | 380 |
| HbA1c (%) | | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 7.6 → 7.3 | 7.6 → 7.5 | 7.6 → 7.4 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -0.32 | -0.13 | -0.17 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -0.15 [-0.23;-0.07]CE | 0.04 [-0.04;0.12]D | |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 59.7 → 56.4 | 59.9 → 58.6 | 59.3 → 57.6 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -3.46 | -1.37 | -1.84 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -1.62 [-2.50;-0.73]CE | 0.47[-0.41;1.36]D | |
| 2-hour postmeal glucose increment (mmol/L)A | | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 6.1 → 5.9 | 6.1 → 6.7 | 6.2 → 6.6 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -0.29 | 0.67 | 0.38 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -0.67 [-1.29;-0.04]CE | 0.30 [-0.34;0.93]D | |
| 1-hour postmeal glucose increment (mmol/L)A | | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 5.4 → 4.7 | 5.4 → 6.6 | 5.7 → 5.9 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -0.84 | 1.27 | 0.34 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -1.18[-1.65;-0.71]CE | 0.93[0.46;1.40]D | |
| Bodyweight (kg) | | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 78.6 → 79.2 | 80.5 → 81.2 | 80.2 → 80.7 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.55 |
| Estimated treatment difference | 0.12 [-0.30;0.55]C | 0.16 [-0.27;0.58]D | |
| Observed rate of severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemiaB per patient year of exposure (percentage of patients) | 59.0 (92.7) | 54.4 (95.0) | 58.7 (97.4) |
| Estimated rate ratio | 1.01 [0.88;1.15]C | 0.92 [0.81;1.06]D | |
| Baseline, end of trial values are based on the mean of the observed last available values. The 95% confidence interval is stated in '[]' A Meal testB Severe hypoglycaemia (episode requiring assistance of another person) or blood glucose (BG) confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as episodes confirmed by plasma glucose < 3.1 mmol/L irrespective of symptoms C The difference is for Fiasp mealtime – NovoRapid mealtime D The difference is for Fiasp postmeal – NovoRapid mealtime E Statistically significant in favour of Fiasp mealtime |
33.3% of patients treated with mealtime Fiasp reached a target HbA1c of < 7% compared to 23.3% of patients treated with postmeal Fiasp and 28.2% of patients treated with mealtime NovoRapid. The estimated odds of achieving HbA1c < 7% were statistically significantly greater with mealtime Fiasp than with mealtime NovoRapid (odds ratio: 1.47 [1.02; 2.13]95% CI). No statistical significant difference was shown between postmeal Fiasp and mealtime NovoRapid.
Fiasp administered at mealtime provided significantly lower 1-hour and 2-hour postmeal glucose increment compared to NovoRapid administrated at mealtime. Fiasp administered postmeal resulted in higher 1-hour postmeal glucose increment and comparable 2-hour postmeal glucose increment to NovoRapid dosed at mealtime (Table 3).
Median total bolus insulin dose at trial end was similar for mealtime Fiasp, postmeal Fiasp and mealtime NovoRapid (change from baseline to end of trial: mealtime Fiasp: 0.33→0.39 units/kg/day; postmeal Fiasp: 0.35→0.39 units/kg/day; and mealtime NovoRapid: 0.36→0.38 units/kg/day). Changes in median total basal insulin dose from baseline to end of trial were comparable for mealtime Fiasp (0.41→0.39 units/kg/day), postmeal Fiasp (0.43→0.42 units/kg/day) and mealtime NovoRapid (0.43→0.43 units/kg/day).
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
The reduction in HbA1c from baseline to end of trial was confirmed to be non-inferior to that obtained with NovoRapid (Table 4).
| Table 4 Results from 26 week basal-bolus clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes |
| | Fiasp + insulin glargine | NovoRapid + insulin glargine |
| N | 345 | 344 |
| HbA1c (%) | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 8.0 → 6.6 | 7.9 → 6.6 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -1.38 | -1.36 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -0.02[-0.15;0.10] |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 63.5 → 49.0 | 62.7 →48.6 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -15.10 | -14.86 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -0.24 [-1.60;1.11] |
| 2-hour postmeal glucose increment (mmol/L)A | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 7.6 → 4.6 | 7.3 → 4.9 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -3.24 | -2.87 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -0.36 [-0.81;0.08] |
| 1-hour postmeal glucose increment (mmol/L)A | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 6.0 → 4.1 | 5.9 → 4.6 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | -2.14 | -1.55 |
| Estimated treatment difference | -0.59 [-1.09;-0.09]C |
| Bodyweight (kg) | | |
| Baseline → End of trial | 89.0 → 91.6 | 88.3 → 90.8 |
| Adjusted change from baseline | 2.68 | 2.67 |
| Estimated treatment difference | 0.00 [-0.60;0.61] |
| Observed rate of severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemiaB per patient year of exposure (percentage of patients) | 17.9 (76.8) | 16.6 (73.3) |
| Estimated rate ratio | 1.09 [0.88;1.36] |
| Baseline, end of trial values are based on the mean of the observed last available values. The 95% confidence interval is stated in '[]' A Meal testB Severe hypoglycaemia (episode requiring assistance of another person) or blood glucose (BG) confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as episodes confirmed by plasma glucose < 3.1 mmol/L irrespective of symptoms C Statistically significant in favour of Fiasp |
Postmeal dosing has not been investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes.
74.8% of patients treated with Fiasp reached a target HbA1c of < 7% compared to 75.9% of patients treated with NovoRapid. There was no statistical significant difference between Fiasp and NovoRapid in the estimated odds of achieving HbA1c < 7%.
Median total bolus insulin dose at trial end was similar for Fiasp and NovoRapid (change from baseline to end of trial: Fiasp: 0.21→0.49 units/kg/day and NovoRapid: 0.21→0.51 units/kg/day). Changes in median total basal insulin dose from baseline to end of trial were comparable for Fiasp (0.56→0.53 units/kg/day) and NovoRapid (0.52→0.48 units/kg/day).
Elderly
In the three controlled clinical trials, 192 of 1,219 (16%) Fiasp treated patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes were ≥ 65 years of age and 24 of 1,219 (2%) were ≥ 75 years of age. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between elderly patients and younger patients.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)
A 6-week, randomised (2:1), double-blind, parallel-group, active controlled trial evaluated compatibility of Fiasp and NovoRapid administered via CSII system in adult patients with type 1 diabetes. There were no microscopically confirmed episodes of infusion set occlusions in either the Fiasp (N=25) or NovoRapid (N=12) groups. There were two patients from the Fiasp group who each reported two treatment-emergent infusion site reactions.
In a 2-week cross-over trial, Fiasp showed a greater postmeal glucose-lowering effect after a standardised meal test with regard to 1-hour and 2-hour postmeal glucose response (treatment difference: -0.50 mmol/L [-1.07; 0.07]95% CI and -0.99 mmol/L [-1.95; -0.03]95% CI), respectively compared to NovoRapid in a CSII setting.
Paediatric population
The efficacy and safety of Fiasp have been studied in a 1:1:1 randomised active controlled clinical trial in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, aged 1 to 18 years, for a period of 26 weeks (N=777). In this trial the efficacy and safety of Fiasp administered at mealtime (0–2 minutes before meal) or postmeal (20 minutes after meal start) and NovoRapid administered at mealtime, both used in combination with insulin degludec, were compared.
Patients in the Fiasp mealtime arm included 16 children aged 2–5 years, 100 children aged 6–11 years and 144 adolescents aged 12–17 years. Patients in the Fiasp postmeal arm included 16 children aged 2–5 years, 100 children aged 6–11 years and 143 adolescents aged 12–17 years.
Fiasp administered at mealtime showed superior glycaemic control compared to NovoRapid mealtime with regards to change in HbA1c (ETD: -0.17% [-0.30; -0.03]95% CI). Fiasp administered postmeal showed non-inferior glycaemic control compared to NovoRapid mealtime (ETD: 0.13% [-0.01; 0.26]95% CI).
Fiasp mealtime showed a statistically significant improvement in 1– hour postmeal glucose increment mean over all three main meals compared to NovoRapid (measured by SMPG). For Fiasp postmeal this comparison favoured NovoRapid mealtime.
No overall increased risk of severe or blood glucose confirmed hypoglycaemia was observed compared to NovoRapid.
The observed effects and the safety profiles were comparable between all age groups.