Except for the treatment of infantile spasms, Sabril should not be initiated as monotherapy.
| Visual field defects (VFD) have been reported in patients receiving vigabatrin with a high prevalence (about 1/3 of patients). Frequencies found in an open clinical study are presented in section 5.1. The onset is usually after months to years of vigabatrin therapy. The degree of visual field restriction may be severe. Most of the patients with perimetry-confirmed defects have been asymptomatic. Hence, this undesirable effect can only be reliably detected by systematic perimetry which is usually possible only in patients with a developmental age of more than 9 years. For infants, children and those not able to perform perimetry, electroretinography (ERG), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and/or other methods appropriate for the patient can be considered. Patients should undergo systematic screening examination when starting vigabatrin and at regular intervals for detection of visual field defects and reduced visual acuity (see Visual Field Defects and Visual Acuity). Vision assessment is recommended at baseline (no later than 4 weeks after starting vigabatrin), every 3 to 6 months during therapy, and about 3 to 6 months after the discontinuation of therapy. Available data suggests that visual field defects are irreversible even after discontinuation of vigabatrin. A deterioration of VFD after the treatment is discontinued cannot be excluded. Therefore, vigabatrin should only be used after a careful assessment of the balance of benefits and risk compared with alternatives. Because of the risk of visual loss, a gradual withdrawal should start immediately if no meaningful improvement is observed following an adequate treatment attempt. Patient response to and continued need for vigabatrin should be periodically reassessed. Vigabatrin is not recommended for use in patients with any pre-existing clinically significant visual field defect. |
Visual Field Defects (VFD)
Based on available data, the usual pattern is a concentric constriction of the visual field of both eyes, which is generally more marked nasally than temporally. In the central visual field (within 30 degree of eccentricity), frequently an annular nasal defect is seen. However, the VFDs reported in patients receiving vigabatrin have ranged from mild to severe. Severe cases may be characterized by tunnel vision. Blindness was also reported in severe cases.
Most patients with perimetry confirmed defects had not previously spontaneously noticed any symptoms, even in cases where a severe defect was observed in perimetry. Available evidence suggests that the VFD is irreversible even after discontinuation of vigabatrin. A deterioration of VFD after the treatment is discontinued cannot be excluded.
Pooled data from prevalence surveys suggest that as many as 1/3 of patients receiving vigabatrin therapy have VFDs. Males may be at greater risk than females. Frequencies found in an open clinical study are presented in section 5.1. A possible association between the risk of visual field defects and the extent of vigabatrin exposure, both in terms of daily dose (from 1 gram to more than 3 grams) and in terms of duration of treatment (maximum during the first three years) has been shown in this study.
All patients should have ophthalmological consultation with visual field examination before the initiation of vigabatrin treatment.
Monitoring of vision by an ophthalmic professional with expertise in visual field interpretation and the ability to perform dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy of the retina is recommended. Because vision testing in infants is difficult, vision loss may not be detected until it is severe. For patients receiving vigabatrin, visual field and/or retinal assessment is recommended at baseline (no later than 4 weeks after starting vigabatrin), every 3 to 6 months while on therapy, and about 3-6 months after the discontinuation of therapy. The diagnostic approach should be individualised for the patient and clinical situation.
In adults and cooperative paediatric patients, perimetry is recommended, preferably by automated threshold visual field testing. Additional testing may also include electrophysiology (e.g., electroretinography [ERG]), retinal imaging (e.g., optical coherence tomography [OCT]), and/or other methods appropriate for the patient. In patients who cannot be tested, treatment may continue according to clinical judgment, with appropriate patient counseling. Because of variability, results from ophthalmic monitoring must be interpreted with caution, and repeat assessment is recommended if results are abnormal or uninterpretable. Repeat assessment in the first few weeks of treatment is recommended to establish if, and to what degree, reproducible results can be obtained, and to guide selection of appropriate ongoing monitoring for the patient.
The patient and/or caregiver must be given a thorough description of the frequency and implications of the development of VFD during vigabatrin treatment. Patients should be instructed to report any new visual problems and symptoms which may be associated with visual field constriction. If visual symptoms develop, the patient should be referred to an ophthalmologist.
If a visual field constriction is observed during follow-up, consideration should be given to gradual discontinuation of vigabatrin. If the decision to continue treatment is made, consideration should be given to more frequent follow-up (perimetry) in order to detect progression or sight threatening defects.
Vigabatrin should not be used concomitantly with other retinotoxic drugs.
Visual acuity
The prevalence of reduced visual acuity in vigabatrin treated patients is unknown.
Retinal disorder, blurred vision, optic atrophy or optic neuritis may lead to decrease in visual acuity (see section 4.8). Visual acuity should be assessed during ophthalmological consultations, before initiation of vigabatrin treatment and at six-month intervals during treatment.
Neurological and psychiatric conditions
In view of the results of the animal safety studies (see section 5.3), it is recommended that patients treated with vigabatrin are closely observed for adverse effects on neurological function.
Rare reports of encephalopathic symptoms such as marked sedation, stupor and confusion in association with non-specific slow wave activity on electroencephalogram have been described soon after the initiation of vigabatrin treatment. Risk factors for the development of these reactions include higher than recommended starting dose, faster dose escalation at higher steps than recommended, and renal failure. These events have been reversible following dose reduction or discontinuation of vigabatrin (see section 4.8).
Cases of abnormal brain MRI findings have been reported, in particular in young infants treated for infantile spasms with high doses of vigabatrin. The clinical significance of these findings is currently unknown. Additionally, cases of intramyelinic oedema (IME) have been reported, particularly in infants treated for infantile spasms (see section 4.8 and 5.3). IME has been reported to be reversible following drug discontinuation, and it is therefore recommended to progressively discontinue vigabatrin when IME is observed.
Movement disorders including dystonia, dyskinesia and hypertonia, have been reported in patients treated for infantile spasms. The benefit/risk of vigabatrin should be evaluated on an individual patient basis. If new movement disorders occur during treatment with vigabatrin, consideration should be given to dose reduction or a gradual discontinuation of treatment.
As with other antiepileptic medicinal products some patients may experience an increase in seizure frequency or the onset of new types of seizures with vigabatrin (see section 4.8). These phenomena may also be the consequence of an overdose, a decrease in plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic treatment, or a paradoxical effect.
As with other antiepileptic medicinal products, abrupt withdrawal may lead to rebound seizures. If a patient is to be withdrawn from vigabatrin treatment, it is recommended that this is done by gradual dose reduction over a 2‑ to 4‑week period.
Vigabatrin should be used with caution in patients with a history of psychosis, depression or behavioural problems. Psychiatric events (e.g., agitation, depression, abnormal thinking, paranoid reactions) have been reported during vigabatrin treatment. These events occurred in patients with and without a psychiatric history, and were usually reversible when vigabatrin doses were reduced or gradually discontinued.
Suicidal ideation and behaviour
Suicidal ideation and behaviour have been reported in patients treated with antiepileptic agents in several indications. A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials of antiepileptic medicinal products has also shown a small increased risk of suicidal ideation and behaviour. The mechanism of this effect is not known and the available data do not exclude the possibility of an increased risk for vigabatrin.
Therefore, patients should be monitored for signs of suicidal ideation and behaviour, and appropriate treatment should be considered. Patients (and caregivers of patients) should be advised to seek medical advice immediately should signs of suicidal ideation or behaviour emerge.
Older people and patients with renal impairment
Since vigabatrin is eliminated via the kidney, caution should be exercised in patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 60 ml/min and in older people. These patients should be monitored closely for undesirable effects such as sedation and confusion (see section 4.2).
Interactions to be taken into account
The concomitant use of vigabatrin and clonazepam may exacerbate the sedative effect (see section 4.5). Need for concomitant use must be carefully assessed.
Sabril film-coated tablet contains sodium. This medicine contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per tablet, that is to say essentially 'sodium-free'.