REZOLSTA 800 mg/150 mg film coated tablets

REZOLSTA is indicated, in combination with other antiretroviral medicinal products, for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus‑1 (HIV‑1) infection in adults and paediatric patients (aged 6 years and older, weighing at least 25 kg).

Genotypic testing should guide the use of REZOLSTA (see sections 4.2, 4.4 and 5.1).

Therapy should be initiated by a healthcare provider experienced in the management of HIV infection.

Posology

Adults and paediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg

ART‑naïve patients

The recommended dose regimen is one 800 mg darunavir/150 mg cobicistat tablet once daily taken with food.

ART‑experienced patients

One 800 mg darunavir/150 mg cobicistat tablet once daily taken with food may be used in patients with prior exposure to antiretroviral medicinal products, but without darunavir resistance associated mutations (DRV‑RAMs)* and who have plasma HIV‑1 RNA < 100,000 copies/mL and CD4+ cell count ≥ 100 cells x 10⁶/L (see section 4.1).

* DRV‑RAMs: V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54M, I54L, T74P, L76V, I84V, L89V.

Paediatric patients aged 6 years and older weighing at least 25 kg to less than 40 kg

ART‑naïve paediatric patients

The recommended dose regimen is one 675 mg darunavir/150 mg cobicistat tablet once daily taken with food.

ART‑experienced paediatric patients

One 675 mg darunavir/150 mg cobicistat tablet once daily taken with food may be used in patients with prior exposure to antiretroviral medicinal products, but without DRV-RAMs* and who have plasma HIV‑1 RNA < 100,000 copies/mL and CD4+ cell count ≥ 100 cells x 10⁶/L (see section 4.1).

* DRV‑RAMs: V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54M, I54L, T74P, L76V, I84V, L89V.

In all other ART‑experienced patients or if HIV‑1 genotype testing is not available, the use of REZOLSTA is not appropriate and another antiretroviral regimen should be used. Refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics of other antiretroviral medicinal products for dosing information.

Advice on missed doses

If REZOLSTA is missed within 12 hours of the time it is usually taken, patients should be instructed to take the prescribed dose with food as soon as possible. If this is noticed later than 12 hours of the time it is usually taken, the missed dose should not be taken and the patient should resume the usual dosing schedule.

If a patient vomits within 4 hours of taking the medicine, another dose of REZOLSTA should be taken with food as soon as possible. If a patient vomits more than 4 hours after taking the medicine, the patient does not need to take another dose until the next regularly scheduled time.

Special populations

Elderly

Limited information is available in this population, and therefore, REZOLSTA should be used with caution in patients above 65 years of age (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).

Hepatic impairment

There are no pharmacokinetic data regarding the use of REZOLSTA in patients with hepatic impairment.

Darunavir and cobicistat are metabolised by the hepatic system. Separate trials of darunavir/ritonavir and cobicistat suggest no dose adjustment is recommended in patients with mild (Child‑Pugh Class A) or moderate (Child‑Pugh Class B) hepatic impairment, however, REZOLSTA should be used with caution in these patients.

There are no data regarding the use of darunavir or cobicistat in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Severe hepatic impairment could result in an increase of darunavir and/or cobicistat exposure and a worsening of its safety profile. Therefore, REZOLSTA must not be used in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child‑Pugh Class C) (see sections 4.3, 4.4 and 5.2).

Renal impairment

Cobicistat has been shown to decrease estimated creatinine clearance due to inhibition of tubular secretion of creatinine. REZOLSTA should not be initiated in patients with creatinine clearance less than 70 mL/min, if any co‑administered medicinal product (e.g. emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil (as fumarate, phosphate or succinate), or adefovir dipivoxil) requires dose adjustment based on creatinine clearance (see sections 4.4, 4.8 and 5.2).

Based on the very limited renal elimination of cobicistat and darunavir, no special precautions or dose adjustments of REZOLSTA are required for patients with renal impairment. Darunavir, cobicistat, or the combination of both have not been studied in patients receiving dialysis, and therefore no recommendation can be made for these patients (see section 5.2).

For more information consult the cobicistat Summary of Product Characteristics.

Paediatric population

The safety and efficacy of darunavir in combination with cobicistat in paediatric patients aged 3 to < 6 years, or weighing < 25 kg, have not been established. No data are available yet. Darunavir in combination with cobicistat should not be used in paediatric patients below 3 years of age because of safety concerns related to toxicity and mortality observed in juvenile rats dosed with darunavir up to days 23 to 26 of age (see section 5.3).

Pregnancy and postpartum

Treatment with darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg during pregnancy results in low darunavir exposure (see sections 4.4 and 5.2). Therefore, this combination should not be initiated during pregnancy, and women who become pregnant during therapy with REZOLSTA should be switched to an alternative regimen (see sections 4.4 and 4.6). Darunavir/ritonavir may be considered as an alternative.

Method of administration

Oral use

To ensure administration of the entire dose of both darunavir and cobicistat, the tablet should be swallowed whole.

Patients should be instructed to take REZOLSTA within 30 minutes after completion of a meal (see sections 4.5 and 5.2).

Adults and paediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg

For patients unable to swallow the 800 mg/150 mg tablet whole, the tablet may be split into two pieces using a tablet‑cutter. Each piece should be consumed immediately after splitting to ensure the entire dose is administered.

Paediatric patients aged 6 years and older weighing at least 25 kg to less than 40 kg

For patients unable to swallow the 675 mg/150 mg tablet whole, the scored tablet may be split by hand into two pieces. Each piece should be consumed immediately after splitting to ensure the entire dose is administered.

Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.

Patients with severe (Child‑Pugh Class C) hepatic impairment.

Co‑administration with strong CYP3A inducers such as the medicinal products listed below due to the potential for loss of therapeutic effect (see section 4.5):

- carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin

- rifampicin

- lopinavir/ritonavir

- St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum).

Co‑administration with medicinal products such as those products listed below due to the potential for serious and/or life‑threatening adverse reactions (see section 4.5):

- alfuzosin

- amiodarone, bepridil, dronedarone, ivabradine, quinidine, ranolazine

- astemizole, terfenadine

- colchicine, when used in patients with renal and/or hepatic impairment (see section 4.5)

- rifampicin

- ergot derivatives (e.g. dihydroergotamine, ergometrine, ergotamine, methylergonovine)

- cisapride

- dapoxetine

- domperidone

- naloxegol

- lurasidone, pimozide, quetiapine, sertindole (see section 4.5)

- elbasvir/grazoprevir

- triazolam, midazolam administered orally (for caution on parenterally administered midazolam, see section 4.5)

- sildenafil ‑ when used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, avanafil

- simvastatin, lovastatin and lomitapide (see section 4.5)

- ticagrelor.

Regular assessment of virological response is advised. In the setting of lack or loss of virological response, resistance testing should be performed.

Darunavir binds predominantly to α₁‑acid glycoprotein. This protein binding is concentration dependent indicative for saturation of binding. Therefore, protein displacement of medicinal products highly bound to α₁‑acid glycoprotein cannot be ruled out (see section 4.5).

ART‑experienced patients

REZOLSTA should not be used in treatment‑experienced patients with one or more DRV‑RAMs or HIV‑1 RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL or CD4+ cell count < 100 cells x 10⁶/L (see section 4.2).

Combinations with optimised background regimens (OBRs) other than ≥ 2 NRTIs have not been studied in this population. Limited data is available in patients with HIV‑1 clades other than B (see section 5.1).

Pregnancy

Treatment with darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg during the second and third trimester has been shown to result in low darunavir exposure, with a reduction of around 90% in C_min levels (see section 5.2). Cobicistat levels decrease and may not provide sufficient boosting. The substantial reduction in darunavir exposure may result in virological failure and an increased risk of mother to child transmission of HIV infection. Therefore, this combination should not be initiated during pregnancy, and women who become pregnant during therapy with REZOLSTA should be switched to an alternative regimen (see sections 4.2 and 4.6). Darunavir given with low dose ritonavir may be considered as an alternative.

Elderly

As limited information is available on the use of REZOLSTA in patients aged 65 and over, caution should be exercised, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic function and of concomitant disease or other therapy (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).

Severe skin reactions

During the darunavir/ritonavir clinical development program (N = 3,063), severe skin reactions, which may be accompanied with fever and/or elevations of transaminases, have been reported in 0.4% of patients. DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) and Stevens‑Johnson syndrome has been rarely (< 0.1%) reported, and during post‑marketing experience toxic epidermal necrolysis and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis have been reported. REZOLSTA should be discontinued immediately if signs or symptoms of severe skin reactions develop. These can include, but are not limited to, severe rash or rash accompanied with fever, general malaise, fatigue, muscle or joint aches, blisters, oral lesions, conjunctivitis, hepatitis and/or eosinophilia.

Rash occurred more commonly in treatment‑experienced patients receiving regimens containing darunavir/ritonavir + raltegravir compared to patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir without raltegravir or raltegravir without darunavir/ritonavir (see section 4.8).

Sulphonamide allergy

Darunavir contains a sulphonamide moiety. REZOLSTA should be used with caution in patients with a known sulphonamide allergy.

Hepatotoxicity

Drug‑induced hepatitis (e.g. acute hepatitis, cytolytic hepatitis) has been reported with darunavir/ritonavir. During the clinical development program (N = 3,063), hepatitis was reported in 0.5% of patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy with darunavir/ritonavir. Patients with pre‑existing liver dysfunction, including chronic active hepatitis B or C, have an increased risk for liver function abnormalities including severe and potentially fatal hepatic adverse reactions. In case of concomitant antiviral therapy for hepatitis B or C, please refer to the relevant product information for these medicinal products.

Appropriate laboratory testing should be conducted prior to initiating therapy with REZOLSTA and patients should be monitored during treatment. Increased AST/ALT monitoring should be considered in patients with underlying chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or in patients who have pre‑treatment elevations of transaminases, especially during the first several months of treatment.

If there is evidence of new or worsening liver dysfunction (including clinically significant elevation of liver enzymes and/or symptoms such as fatigue, anorexia, nausea, jaundice, dark urine, liver tenderness, hepatomegaly) interruption or discontinuation of treatment should be considered promptly.

Patients with coexisting conditions

Hepatic impairment

The safety and efficacy of darunavir and/or cobicistat have not been established in patients with severe underlying liver disorders. REZOLSTA is, therefore, contraindicated in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Due to an increase in the unbound darunavir plasma concentrations, REZOLSTA should be used with caution in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (see sections 4.2, 4.3 and 5.2).

Renal impairment

Cobicistat has been shown to decrease estimated creatinine clearance due to inhibition of tubular secretion of creatinine. This effect on serum creatinine, leading to a decrease in the estimated creatinine clearance, should be taken into consideration when REZOLSTA is administered to patients, in whom the estimated creatinine clearance is used to guide aspects of their clinical management, including adjusting doses of co‑administered medicinal products. For more information consult the cobicistat Summary of Product Characteristics.

REZOLSTA should not be initiated in patients with creatinine clearance less than 70 mL/min when co‑administered with one or more agent requiring dose adjustment based on creatinine clearance (e.g. emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil (as fumarate, phosphate or succinate) or adefovir dipivoxil) (see sections 4.2, 4.8 and 5.2).

No special precautions or dose adjustments are required in patients with renal impairment. As darunavir and cobicistat are highly bound to plasma proteins, it is unlikely that they will be significantly removed by haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).

There are currently inadequate data to determine whether co‑administration of tenofovir disoproxil and cobicistat is associated with a greater risk of renal adverse reactions compared with regimens that include tenofovir disoproxil without cobicistat.

Haemophiliac patients

There have been reports of increased bleeding, including spontaneous skin haematomas and haemarthrosis in patients with haemophilia type A and B treated with HIV PIs. In some patients additional factor VIII was given. In more than half of the reported cases, treatment with HIV PIs was continued or reintroduced if treatment had been discontinued. A causal relationship has been suggested, although the mechanism of action has not been elucidated. Haemophiliac patients should, therefore, be made aware of the possibility of increased bleeding.

Weight and metabolic parameters

An increase in weight and in levels of blood lipids and glucose may occur during antiretroviral therapy. Such changes may in part be linked to disease control and life style. For lipids, there is in some cases evidence for a treatment effect, while for weight gain there is no strong evidence relating this to any particular treatment. For monitoring of blood lipids and glucose reference is made to established HIV treatment guidelines. Lipid disorders should be managed as clinically appropriate.

Osteonecrosis

Although the aetiology is considered to be multifactorial (including corticosteroid use, alcohol consumption, severe immunosuppression, higher body mass index), cases of osteonecrosis have been reported particularly in patients with advanced HIV disease and/or long‑term exposure to combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). Patients should be advised to seek medical advice if they experience joint aches and pain, joint stiffness or difficulty in movement.

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)

In HIV infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic pathogens may arise and cause serious clinical conditions, or aggravation of symptoms. Typically, such reactions have been observed within the first weeks or months of initiation of CART. Relevant examples are cytomegalovirus retinitis, generalised and/or focal mycobacterial infections and pneumonia caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly known as Pneumocystis carinii). Any inflammatory symptoms should be evaluated and treatment instituted when necessary. In addition, reactivation of herpes simplex and herpes zoster has been observed in clinical trials with darunavir co‑administered with low dose ritonavir.

Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease and autoimmune hepatitis) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reactivation; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment (see section 4.8).

Interactions with medicinal products

Life‑threatening and fatal drug interactions have been reported in patients treated with colchicine and strong inhibitors of CYP3A and P‑glycoprotein (see section 4.5).

REZOLSTA should not be used in combination with another antiretroviral that requires pharmacoenhancement since dosing recommendations for such combination have not been established. REZOLSTA should not be used concurrently with products containing ritonavir or regimens containing ritonavir or cobicistat.

Unlike ritonavir, cobicistat is not an inducer of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or UGT1A1. If switching from ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer to cobicistat, caution is required during the first two weeks of treatment with REZOLSTA, particularly if doses of any concomitantly administered medicinal products have been titrated or adjusted during use of ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer.

Excipients

REZOLSTA contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per tablet, that is to say essentially 'sodium‑free'.

As REZOLSTA contains darunavir and cobicistat, interactions that have been identified with darunavir (in combination with cobicistat or with low dose ritonavir) or with cobicistat determine the interactions that may occur with REZOLSTA. Interaction trials with darunavir/cobicistat, darunavir/ritonavir and with cobicistat have only been performed in adults.

Medicinal products that may be affected by darunavir/cobicistat

Darunavir is an inhibitor of CYP3A, a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 and an inhibitor of P‑gp. Cobicistat is a mechanism based inhibitor of CYP3A, and a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor. Cobicistat inhibits the transporters p‑glycoprotein (P‑gp), BCRP, MATE1, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Cobicistat is not expected to inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9 or CYP2C19. Cobicistat is not expected to induce CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, UGT1A1, or P‑gp (MDR1). Co‑administration of darunavir/cobicistat and medicinal products primarily metabolised by CYP3A or transported by P‑gp, BCRP, MATE1, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 may result in increased systemic exposure to such medicinal products, which could increase or prolong their therapeutic effect and adverse reactions (see section 4.3 or table below).

REZOLSTA must not be combined with medicinal products that are highly dependent on CYP3A for clearance and for which increased systemic exposure is associated with serious and/or life‑threatening events (narrow therapeutic index).

Co‑administration of REZOLSTA with medicinal products that have active metabolite(s) formed by CYP3A may result in reduced plasma concentrations of these active metabolite(s) potentially leading to loss of their therapeutic effect. These interactions are described in the interaction table below.

Medicinal products that affect darunavir/cobicistat exposure

Darunavir and cobicistat are metabolised by CYP3A. Medicinal products that induce CYP3A activity would be expected to increase the clearance of darunavir and cobicistat, resulting in lowered plasma concentrations of darunavir and cobicistat (e.g. efavirenz, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin, rifapentine, rifabutin, St John's Wort) (see section 4.3 and interaction table below).

Co‑administration of REZOLSTA and other medicinal products that inhibit CYP3A may decrease the clearance of darunavir and cobicistat and may result in increased plasma concentrations of darunavir and cobicistat (e.g. azole antifungals such as clotrimazole). These interactions are described in the interaction table below.

REZOLSTA should not be used concurrently with products or regimens containing ritonavir or cobicistat. REZOLSTA should not be used in combination with the individual components of REZOLSTA (darunavir or cobicistat). REZOLSTA should not be used in combination with another antiretroviral that requires pharmacoenhancement since dosing recommendations for such combination have not been established.

Interaction table

Expected interactions between REZOLSTA and antiretroviral and non‑antiretroviral medicinal products are listed in the table below and are based on the identified interactions with darunavir/ritonavir, darunavir/cobicistat and with cobicistat.

The interaction profile of darunavir depends on whether ritonavir or cobicistat is used as pharmacokinetic enhancer, therefore there may be different recommendations for the use of darunavir with concomitant medicine. In the table below it is specified when recommendations for REZOLSTA differ from those for darunavir boosted with low dose ritonavir. Refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics for PREZISTA for further information.

The below list of examples of drug-drug interactions in Table 1 is not comprehensive and therefore the label of each drug that is co-administered with REZOLSTA should be consulted for information related to the route of metabolism, interaction pathways, potential risks, and specific actions to be taken with regards to co‑administration.

Pregnancy

There are no adequate and well controlled trials with darunavir, or cobicistat, in pregnant women. Studies in animals do not indicate direct harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryonal/foetal development, parturition or postnatal development (see section 5.3).

Treatment with darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg during pregnancy results in low darunavir exposure (see section 5.2), which may be associated with an increased risk of treatment failure and an increased risk of HIV transmission to the child. Therefore, this combination should not be initiated during pregnancy, and women who become pregnant during therapy with REZOLSTA should be switched to an alternative regimen (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).

Breast‑feeding

It is not known whether darunavir or cobicistat are excreted in human milk. Studies in rats have demonstrated that darunavir is excreted in milk and at high levels (1,000 mg/kg/day) resulted in toxicity of the offspring. Studies in animals have demonstrated that cobicistat is excreted in milk. Because of the potential for adverse reactions in breast‑fed infants, women should be instructed not to breast‑feed if they are receiving REZOLSTA.

In order to avoid transmission of HIV to the infant it is recommended that women living with HIV do not breast‑feed.

Fertility

No human data on the effect of darunavir or cobicistat on fertility are available. There was no effect on mating or fertility in animals (see section 5.3). Based on animal studies, no effect on mating or fertility is expected with REZOLSTA.

REZOLSTA may have a minor influence on the ability to drive and use machines. Dizziness has been reported in some patients during treatment with regimens containing darunavir administered with cobicistat and should be borne in mind when considering a patient's ability to drive or operate machinery.

Summary of the safety profile

The overall safety profile of REZOLSTA is based on available clinical trial data from darunavir boosted with either cobicistat or ritonavir, from cobicistat and from post‑marketing data from darunavir/ritonavir.

As REZOLSTA contains darunavir and cobicistat, the adverse reactions associated with each of the individual compounds may be expected.

The most frequent adverse reactions reported in the pooled data of the Phase III study GS-US-216-130 and the REZOLSTA arm of Phase III study TMC114FD2HTX3001 were diarrhoea (23%), nausea (17%), rash (13%), and headache (10%). Serious adverse reactions were diabetes mellitus, (drug) hypersensitivity, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and vomiting. All of these serious ADRs occurred in one (0.1%) subject except for rash in 4 (0.6%) subjects.

The most frequent adverse reactions reported during the darunavir/ritonavir clinical development program and as spontaneous reports are diarrhoea, nausea, rash, headache, and vomiting. The most frequent serious reactions are acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, thrombocytopenia, osteonecrosis, diarrhoea, hepatitis, and pyrexia.

In the 96 week analysis, the safety profile of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily in treatment‑naïve subjects was similar to that seen with darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily in treatment‑experienced subjects except for nausea which was observed more frequently in treatment‑naïve subjects. This was driven by mild intensity nausea.

Tabulated list of adverse reactions

Adverse reactions are listed by system organ class (SOC) and frequency category in Table 2. Within each frequency category, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness. Frequency categories are defined as follows: very common (≥ 1/10), common (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10), uncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100), rare (≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000) and not known (frequency cannot be estimated from the available data).

Description of selected adverse reactions

Rash

In clinical trials with darunavir/ritonavir and darunavir/cobicistat, rash was mostly mild to moderate, often occurring within the first four weeks of treatment and resolving with continued dosing (see section 4.4). The pooled data of a single‑arm trial investigating darunavir 800 mg once daily in combination with cobicistat 150 mg once daily and other antiretrovirals and one arm of a trial in which REZOLSTA 800/150 mg once daily and other antiretrovirals were administered, showed that 1.9% of patients discontinued treatment due to rash.

Metabolic parameters

Weight and levels of blood lipids and glucose may increase during antiretroviral therapy (see section 4.4).

Musculoskeletal abnormalities

Increased CPK, myalgia, myositis and, rarely, rhabdomyolysis have been reported with the use of HIV protease inhibitors, particularly in combination with NRTIs.

Cases of osteonecrosis have been reported, particularly in patients with generally acknowledged risk factors, advanced HIV disease or long‑term exposure to combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). The frequency of this is unknown (see section 4.4).

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

In HIV infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic infections may arise. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease and autoimmune hepatitis) have also been reported; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment (see section 4.4).

Bleeding in haemophiliac patients

There have been reports of increased spontaneous bleeding in haemophiliac patients receiving antiretroviral protease inhibitors (see section 4.4).

Decrease estimated creatinine clearance

Cobicistat has been shown to decrease estimated creatinine clearance due to inhibition of renal tubular secretion of creatinine. An increase in serum creatinine due to the inhibitory effect of cobicistat generally does not exceed 0.4 mg/dL.

The effect of cobicistat on serum creatinine was investigated in a Phase I trial in subjects with normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 80 mL/min, n = 12) and mild to moderate renal impairment (eGFR:50‑79 mL/min, n = 18). Change of estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by Cockcroft‑Gault method (eGFR_CG) from baseline was observed within 7 days after start of treatment with cobicistat 150 mg among subjects with normal renal function (‑9.9 ± 13.1 mL/min) and mild to moderate renal impairment (‑11.9 ± 7.0 mL/min). These decreases in eGFR_CG were reversible after cobicistat was discontinued and did not affect the actual glomerular filtration rate, as determined by the clearance of probe drug iohexol.

In the Phase III single‑arm trial (GS‑US‑216‑130), a decrease in eGFR_CG was noted at week 2, which remained stable through week 48. The mean eGFR_CG change from baseline was –9.6 mL/min at week 2, and –9.6 mL/min at week 48. In the REZOLSTA arm of Phase III trial TMC114FD2HTX3001, mean eGFR_CG change from baseline was -11.1 mL/min at week 48 and mean eGFR_{cystatin C} change from baseline was +2.9 mL/min/1.73 m² at week 48.

For more information consult the cobicistat Summary of Product Characteristics.

Paediatric population

The safety of darunavir in combination with cobicistat was evaluated through clinical study GS-US-216-0128 in virologically suppressed adolescents aged 12 to less than 18 years, weighing at least 40 kg (cohort 1; N = 7) and in children aged 6 to less than 12 years, weighing at least 25 kg (cohort 2; N = 8). Safety analyses of this study in a limited number of adolescent and paediatric subjects aged at least 6 years did not identify new safety concerns compared to the known safety profile in adult subjects.

Other special populations

Patients co‑infected with hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus

Limited information is available on the use of REZOLSTA in patients co‑infected with hepatitis B and/or C virus. Among 1,968 treatment‑experienced patients receiving darunavir co‑administered with ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily, 236 patients were co‑infected with hepatitis B or C. Co‑infected patients were more likely to have baseline and treatment emergent hepatic transaminase elevations than those without chronic viral hepatitis (see section 4.4).

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme Website: https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store.

Human experience of acute overdose with REZOLSTA or darunavir in combination with cobicistat is limited. Single doses up to 3,200 mg of darunavir as oral solution alone and up to 1,600 mg of the tablet formulation of darunavir in combination with ritonavir have been administered to healthy volunteers without untoward symptomatic effects.

There is no specific antidote for overdose with REZOLSTA. Treatment of overdose consists of general supportive measures including monitoring of vital signs and observation of the clinical status of the patient. Since darunavir and cobicistat are highly protein bound, dialysis is unlikely to be beneficial in significant removal of the active substances.

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antivirals for systemic use, antivirals for treatment of HIV infection, combinations ATC code: J05AR14

Mechanism of action

Darunavir is an inhibitor of the dimerisation and of the catalytic activity of the HIV‑1 protease (K_D of 4.5 x 10^‑12M). It selectively inhibits the cleavage of HIV encoded Gag‑Pol polyproteins in virus infected cells, thereby preventing the formation of mature infectious virus particles.

Cobicistat is a mechanism‑based inhibitor of cytochromes P450 of the CYP3A subfamily. Inhibition of CYP3A‑mediated metabolism by cobicistat enhances the systemic exposure of CYP3A substrates, such as darunavir, where bioavailability is limited and half‑life is shortened due to CYP3A‑dependent metabolism.

Antiviral activity in vitro

Darunavir exhibits activity against laboratory strains and clinical isolates of HIV‑1 and laboratory strains of HIV‑2 in acutely infected T‑cell lines, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and human monocytes/macrophages with median EC₅₀ values ranging from 1.2 to 8.5 nM (0.7 to 5.0 ng/mL). Darunavir demonstrates antiviral activity in vitro against a broad panel of HIV‑1 group M (A, B, C, D, E, F, G) and group O primary isolates with EC₅₀ values ranging from < 0.1 to 4.3 nM. These EC₅₀ values are well below the 50% cellular toxicity concentration range of 87 µM to > 100 µM.

Cobicistat has no detectable antiviral activity against HIV‑1 and does not antagonise the antiviral effect of darunavir.

Resistance

In vitro selection of darunavir‑resistant virus from wild type HIV‑1 was lengthy (> 3 years). The selected viruses were unable to grow in the presence of darunavir concentrations above 400 nM. Viruses selected in these conditions and showing decreased susceptibility to darunavir (range: 23‑50‑fold) harboured 2 to 4 amino acid substitutions in the protease gene. The decreased susceptibility to darunavir of the emerging viruses in the selection experiment could not be explained by the emergence of these protease mutations.

The resistance profile of REZOLSTA is driven by darunavir. Cobicistat does not select any HIV resistance mutations, due to its lack of antiviral activity. The resistance profile of REZOLSTA is supported by two Phase III trials conducted with darunavir/ritonavir in treatment‑naïve (ARTEMIS) and treatment‑experienced (ODIN) patients and the analysis of 48 week data from trial GS‑US‑216‑130 in treatment‑naïve and treatment‑experienced patients.

Low rates of developing resistant HIV‑1 virus were observed in ART‑naïve patients who are treated for the first time with REZOLSTA or darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily in combination with other ART, and in ART‑experienced patients with no darunavir RAMs receiving REZOLSTA or darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily in combination with other ART. Table 3 below shows the development of HIV‑1 protease mutations and loss of susceptibility to HIV PIs in virologic failures at endpoint in the GS-US-216-130, ARTEMIS and ODIN trials.

^a Virologic failures selected for resistance testing were defined as: never suppressed: HIV‑1 RNA < 1 log₁₀ reduction from baseline and ≥ 50 copies/mL at week 8, confirmed at the following visit; rebound: HIV‑1 RNA < 50 copies/mL followed by confirmed HIV‑1 RNA to ≥ 400 copies/mL or confirmed > 1 log₁₀ HIV‑1 RNA increase from the nadir; discontinuations with HIV‑1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at last visit

^b Virologic failures based on TLOVR non‑VF censored algorithm (HIV‑1 RNA > 50 copies/mL)

^c IAS‑USA lists

^d In GS-US-216-130 baseline phenotype was not available

Cross‑resistance

In the virologic failures of the GS-US-216-130 trial no cross‑resistance with other HIV PIs was observed. Refer to the table above for information on ARTEMIS and ODIN.

Clinical results

The antiretroviral effect of REZOLSTA is due to the darunavir component. The activity of cobicistat as a pharmacokinetic enhancer to darunavir has been demonstrated in pharmacokinetic trials. In these pharmacokinetic trials, the exposure of darunavir 800 mg boosted with cobicistat 150 mg was consistent with that observed when boosted with ritonavir 100 mg. Darunavir as a component of REZOLSTA is bioequivalent to darunavir 800 mg once daily in combination with cobicistat 150 mg once daily co-administered as single medicinal products (see section 5.2).

The evidence of efficacy of REZOLSTA once daily is based on the analysis of 48 week data from trial GS‑US‑216‑130 in ART‑naïve and ART‑experienced patients, trial TMC114FD2HTX3001 in ART‑naïve patients, and two Phase III trials ARTEMIS and ODIN conducted with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg q.d. in ART‑naïve and ART‑experienced patients, respectively.

Description of clinical studies of REZOLSTA in adults

Efficacy of darunavir 800 mg once daily co‑administered with 150 mg cobicistat once daily in ART‑naïve and ART‑experienced patients

GS‑US‑216‑130 is a single‑arm, open‑label, Phase III trial evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of darunavir with cobicistat in 313 HIV‑1 infected adult patients (295 treatment‑naïve and 18 treatment‑experienced). These patients received darunavir 800 mg once daily in combination with cobicistat 150 mg once daily with an investigator selected optimised background regimen (OBR) consisting of 2 active NRTIs.

HIV‑1 infected patients who were eligible for this trial had a screening genotype showing no darunavir RAMs and plasma HIV‑1 RNA ≥ 1,000 copies/mL. Table 4 below shows the efficacy data of the 48 week analyses from the GS‑US‑216‑130 trial:

Efficacy of darunavir/cobicistat fixed-dose combination 800/150 mg once daily in ART‑naïve patients

TMC114FD2HTX3001 is a randomised, active-controlled, double blind, Phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide versus darunavir/cobicistat fixed-dose combination + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. In the darunavir/cobicistat fixed-dose combination treatment arm, 363 HIV‑1 infected, adult, treatment‑naïve patients were treated.

HIV‑1 infected patients who were eligible for this trial had a plasma HIV‑1 RNA ≥ 1,000 copies/mL. Table 5 below shows the 48-week efficacy data of the darunavir/cobicistat arm of the TMC114FD2HTX3001 trial:

Description of clinical studies of darunavir/ritonavir in adults

Efficacy of darunavir 800 mg once daily co‑administered with 100 mg ritonavir once daily in ART‑naïve patients

The evidence of efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily is based on the analyses of 192 week data from the randomised, controlled, open‑label Phase III trial ARTEMIS in antiretroviral treatment‑naïve HIV‑1 infected patients comparing darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily with lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg per day (given as a twice‑daily or as a once‑daily regimen). Both arms used a fixed background regimen consisting of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily and emtricitabine 200 mg once daily.

Table 6 below shows the efficacy data of the 48 week and 96 week analyses from the ARTEMIS trial:

Non‑inferiority in virologic response to the darunavir/ritonavir treatment, defined as the percentage of patients with plasma HIV‑1 RNA level < 50 copies/mL, was demonstrated (at the pre‑defined 12% non‑inferiority margin) for both Intent‑To‑Treat (ITT) and On Protocol (OP) populations in the 48 week analysis. These results were confirmed in the analyses of data at 96 weeks of treatment in the ARTEMIS trial. These results were sustained up to 192 weeks of treatment in the ARTEMIS trial.

Efficacy of darunavir 800 mg once daily co‑administered with 100 mg ritonavir once daily in ART‑experienced patients

ODIN is a Phase III, randomised, open‑label trial comparing darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily versus darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily in ART‑experienced HIV‑1 infected patients with screening genotype resistance testing showing no darunavir RAMs (i.e. V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54M, I54L, T74P, L76V, I84V, L89V) and a screening HIV‑1 RNA > 1,000 copies/mL. Efficacy analysis is based on 48 weeks of treatment (see Table 7 below). Both arms used an optimised background regimen (OBR) of ≥ 2 NRTIs.

At 48 weeks, virologic response, defined as the percentage of patients with plasma HIV‑1 RNA level < 50 copies/mL, with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily treatment was demonstrated to be non‑inferior (at the pre‑defined 12% non‑inferiority margin) compared to darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily for both ITT and OP populations.

REZOLSTA should not be used in patients with one or more darunavir resistance associated mutations (DRV‑RAMs) or HIV‑1 RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL or CD4+ cell count < 100 cells x 10⁶/L (see sections 4.2 and 4.4). Limited data is available in patients with HIV‑1 clades other than B.

Paediatric population

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiviral activity of darunavir and cobicistat, at the doses and formulations approved as single agents, and in combination with other antiretroviral agents was assessed in an open label study (GS-US-216-0128) in HIV-1 virologically suppressed adolescents (cohort 1, n = 7) and children (cohort 2, n = 8) from the age of 6 years to less than 18 years and weighing at least 25 kg.

Adolescent participants aged 12 to less than 18 years old received darunavir 800 mg and cobicistat 150 mg (administered as separate tablets) and at least 2 NRTIs once daily. Children aged 6 to less than 12 years old and weighing at least 25 kg received darunavir (600, 675, or 800 mg, depending on body weight) and 150 mg cobicistat (administered as separate tablets) and at least 2 NRTIs once daily.

Table 8 below shows the main endpoints related to antiviral activity for these two cohorts.

The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with REZOLSTA in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the condition of treatment of HIV‑1 infection.

Darunavir exposure was shown to be comparable in a bioavailability trial between REZOLSTA and darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg q.d. at steady‑state and fed conditions in healthy subjects.

The bioequivalence between REZOLSTA and darunavir/cobicistat co‑administered as single agents was established for 800/150 mg under fed and fasted conditions and for 675/150 mg under fed conditions in healthy subjects.

Absorption

Darunavir

The absolute oral bioavailability of a single 600 mg dose of darunavir alone is approximately 37%.

Darunavir was rapidly absorbed following oral administration of REZOLSTA in healthy volunteers. Maximum plasma concentration of darunavir in the presence of cobicistat is generally achieved within 3 to 4.5 hours. Following oral administration of REZOLSTA in healthy volunteers, maximum plasma concentrations of cobicistat were observed 2 to 5 hours post‑dose.

When administered with food, the relative exposure of darunavir is 1.7‑fold higher as compared to intake without food. Therefore, REZOLSTA tablets should be taken with food. The type of food does not affect exposure to REZOLSTA.

Distribution

Darunavir

Darunavir is approximately 95% bound to plasma protein. Darunavir binds primarily to plasma α₁‑acid glycoprotein.

Following intravenous administration, the volume of distribution of darunavir alone was 88.1 ± 59.0 L (Mean ± SD) and increased to 131 ± 49.9 L (Mean ± SD) in the presence of 100 mg twice‑daily ritonavir.

Cobicistat

Cobicistat is 97 to 98% bound to human plasma proteins and the mean plasma to blood‑drug concentration ratio was approximately 2.

Biotransformation

Darunavir

In vitro experiments with human liver microsomes (HLMs) indicate that darunavir primarily undergoes oxidative metabolism. Darunavir is extensively metabolised by the hepatic CYP system and almost exclusively by isozyme CYP3A4. A ¹⁴C‑darunavir trial in healthy volunteers showed that a majority of the radioactivity in plasma after a single 400/100 mg darunavir with ritonavir dose was due to the parent active substance. At least 3 oxidative metabolites of darunavir have been identified in humans; all showed activity that was at least 10‑fold less than the activity of darunavir against wild type HIV.

Cobicistat

Cobicistat is metabolised via CYP3A (major)- and CYP2D6 (minor)‑mediated oxidation and does not undergo glucuronidation. Following oral administration of ¹⁴C‑cobicistat, 99% of circulating radioactivity in plasma was unchanged cobicistat. Low levels of metabolites are observed in urine and faeces and do not contribute to the CYP3A inhibitory activity of cobicistat.

Elimination

Darunavir

After a 400/100 mg ¹⁴C‑darunavir with ritonavir dose, approximately 79.5% and 13.9% of the administered dose of ¹⁴C‑darunavir could be retrieved in faeces and urine, respectively. Unchanged darunavir accounted for approximately 41.2% and 7.7% of the administered dose in faeces and urine, respectively. The terminal elimination half‑life of darunavir was approximately 15 hours when combined with ritonavir.

The intravenous clearance of darunavir alone (150 mg) and in the presence of low dose ritonavir was 32.8 L/h and 5.9 L/h, respectively.

Cobicistat

Following oral administration of ¹⁴C‑cobicistat, 86% and 8.2% of the dose were recovered in faeces and urine, respectively. The median terminal plasma half‑life of cobicistat following administration of REZOLSTA is approximately 3‑4 hours.

Special populations

Paediatric population

Available pharmacokinetic data for the different components of REZOLSTA indicate there were no clinically relevant differences in darunavir or cobicistat exposures between adults and adolescents or children weighing at least 25 kg after single administration of DRV/COBI as separate agents in HIV-1 patients (see Table 9 below).

Elderly

Darunavir

Limited information is available in this population. Population pharmacokinetic analysis in HIV infected patients showed that darunavir pharmacokinetics are not considerably different in the age range (18 to 75 years) evaluated in HIV infected patients (n = 12, age ≥ 65 years) (see section 4.4). However, only limited data were available in patients above the age of 65 years.

Cobicistat

Pharmacokinetics of cobicistat have not been fully evaluated in older people (65 years of age and older).

Gender

Darunavir

Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed a slightly higher darunavir exposure (16.8%) in HIV infected females compared to males. This difference is not clinically relevant.

Cobicistat

No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic differences due to gender have been identified for cobicistat.

Renal impairment

REZOLSTA has not been investigated in patients with renal impairment.

Darunavir

Results from a mass balance study with ¹⁴C‑darunavir with ritonavir showed that approximately 7.7% of the administered dose of darunavir is excreted in the urine unchanged.

Although darunavir has not been studied in patients with renal impairment, population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the pharmacokinetics of darunavir were not significantly affected in HIV infected patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl between 30‑60 mL/min, n = 20) (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).

Cobicistat

A trial of the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat was performed in non‑HIV‑1 infected subjects with severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min). No meaningful differences in cobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between subjects with severe renal impairment and healthy subjects, consistent with low renal clearance of cobicistat.

Hepatic impairment

REZOLSTA has not been investigated in patients with hepatic impairment.

Darunavir

Darunavir is primarily metabolised and eliminated by the liver. In a multiple dose trial with darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg) twice daily, it was demonstrated that the total plasma concentrations of darunavir in subjects with mild (Child‑Pugh Class A, n = 8) and moderate (Child‑Pugh Class B, n = 8) hepatic impairment were comparable with those in healthy subjects. However, unbound darunavir concentrations were approximately 55% (Child‑Pugh Class A) and 100% (Child‑Pugh Class B) higher, respectively. The clinical relevance of this increase is unknown, therefore, darunavir/ritonavir should be used with caution. The effect of severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir has not been studied (see sections 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4).

Cobicistat

Cobicistat is primarily metabolised and eliminated by the liver. A trial of the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat was performed in non‑HIV‑1 infected subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child‑Pugh Class B). No clinically relevant differences in cobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between subjects with moderate impairment and healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment of REZOLSTA is necessary for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment (Child‑Pugh Class C) on the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat has not been studied.

Hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus co‑infection

There were insufficient pharmacokinetic data in the clinical trials to determine the effect of hepatitis B and/or C virus infection on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and cobicistat (refer to sections 4.4 and 4.8).

Pregnancy and postpartum

Treatment with darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily during pregnancy results in low darunavir exposure. In women receiving REZOLSTA during the second trimester of pregnancy, mean intra-individual values for total darunavir C_max, AUC_24h and C_min were 49%, 56% and 92% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum; during the third trimester of pregnancy, total darunavir C_max, AUC_24h and C_min values were 37%, 50% and 89% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum. The unbound fraction was also substantially reduced, including around 90% reductions of C_min levels. The main cause of these low exposures is a marked reduction in cobicistat exposure as a consequence of pregnancy-associated enzyme induction (see Table 10).

The exposure to cobicistat was lower during pregnancy, potentially leading to suboptimal boosting of darunavir. During the second trimester of pregnancy, cobicistat C_max, AUC_24h, and C_min were 50%, 63%, and 83% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum. During the third trimester of pregnancy, cobicistat C_max, AUC_24h, and C_min, were 27%, 49%, and 83% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum.

Darunavir

Animal toxicology studies have been conducted at exposures up to clinical exposure levels with darunavir alone, in mice, rats and dogs and in combination with ritonavir in rats and dogs.

In repeated‑dose toxicology studies in mice, rats and dogs, there were only limited effects of treatment with darunavir. In rodents the target organs identified were the haematopoietic system, the blood coagulation system, liver and thyroid. A variable but limited decrease in red blood cell‑related parameters was observed, together with increases in activated partial thromboplastin time.

Changes were observed in liver (hepatocyte hypertrophy, vacuolation, increased liver enzymes) and thyroid (follicular hypertrophy). In the rat, the combination of darunavir with ritonavir lead to a small increase in effect on RBC parameters, liver and thyroid and increased incidence of islet fibrosis in the pancreas (in male rats only) compared to treatment with darunavir alone. In the dog, no major toxicity findings or target organs were identified up to exposures equivalent to clinical exposure at the recommended dose.

In a study conducted in rats, the number of corpora lutea and implantations were decreased in the presence of maternal toxicity. Otherwise, there were no effects on mating or fertility with darunavir treatment up to 1,000 mg/kg/day and exposure levels below (AUC‑0.5 fold) of that in human at the clinically recommended dose. Up to same dose levels, there was no teratogenicity with darunavir in rats and rabbits when treated alone nor in mice when treated in combination with ritonavir. The exposure levels were lower than those with the recommended clinical dose in humans. In a pre‑ and postnatal development assessment in rats, darunavir with and without ritonavir, caused a transient reduction in body weight gain of the offspring pre‑weaning and there was a slight delay in the opening of eyes and ears. Darunavir in combination with ritonavir caused a reduction in the number of pups that exhibited the startle response on day 15 of lactation and a reduced pup survival during lactation. These effects may be secondary to pup exposure to the active substance via the milk and/or maternal toxicity. No post weaning functions were affected with darunavir alone or in combination with ritonavir. In juvenile rats receiving darunavir up to days 23‑26, increased mortality was observed with convulsions in some animals. Exposure in plasma, liver and brain was considerably higher than in adult rats after comparable doses in mg/kg between days 5 and 11 of age. After day 23 of life, the exposure was comparable to that in adult rats. The increased exposure was likely at least partly due to immaturity of the drug‑metabolising enzymes in juvenile animals. No treatment related mortalities were noted in juvenile rats dosed at 1,000 mg/kg darunavir (single dose) on day 26 of age or at 500 mg/kg (repeated dose) from day 23 to 50 of age, and the exposures and toxicity profile were comparable to those observed in adult rats.

Due to uncertainties regarding the rate of development of the human blood brain barrier and liver enzymes REZOLSTA should not be used in paediatric patients below 3 years of age.

Darunavir was evaluated for carcinogenic potential by oral gavage administration to mice and rats up to 104 weeks. Daily doses of 150, 450 and 1,000 mg/kg were administered to mice and doses of 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg were administered to rats. Dose‑related increases in the incidences of hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas were observed in males and females of both species. Thyroid follicular cell adenomas were noted in male rats. Administration of darunavir did not cause a statistically significant increase in the incidence of any other benign or malignant neoplasm in mice or rats. The observed hepatocellular and thyroid tumours in rodents are considered to be of limited relevance to humans. Repeated administration of darunavir to rats caused hepatic microsomal enzyme induction and increased thyroid hormone elimination, which predispose rats, but not humans, to thyroid neoplasms. At the highest tested doses, the systemic exposures (based on AUC) to darunavir when co‑administered with ritonavir were between 0.4‑ and 0.7‑fold (mice) and 0.7‑ and 1‑fold (rats), relative to those observed in humans at the recommended therapeutic doses.

After 2 years administration of darunavir at exposures at or below the human exposure, kidney changes were observed in mice (nephrosis) and rats (chronic progressive nephropathy).

Darunavir was not mutagenic or genotoxic in a battery of in vitro and in vivo assays including bacterial reverse mutation (Ames), chromosomal aberration in human lymphocytes and in vivo micronucleus test in mice.

Cobicistat

Non‑clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity, and toxicity to reproduction and development. No teratogenic effects were observed in rats and rabbit developmental toxicity studies. In rats, ossification changes in the spinal column and sternebrae of foetuses occurred at a dose that produced significant maternal toxicity.

Ex vivo rabbit studies and in vivo dog studies suggest that cobicistat has a low potential for QT prolongation, and may slightly prolong the PR interval and decrease left ventricular function at mean concentrations at least 10‑fold higher than the human exposure at the recommended 150 mg daily dose.

A long term carcinogenicity study of cobicistat in rats revealed tumourigenic potential specific for this species, that is regarded as of no relevance for humans. A long term carcinogenicity study in mice did not show any carcinogenic potential.

REZOLSTA 800 mg/150 mg tablets

Tablet core

Hypromellose

Colloidal silicon dioxide

Silicified microcrystalline cellulose

Crospovidone

Magnesium stearate

Tablet film‑coat

Polyvinyl alcohol– partially hydrolysed

Macrogol/polyethylene glycol

Titanium dioxide (E 171)

Talc

Iron oxide red (E 172)

Iron oxide black (E 172)

Not applicable

REZOLSTA 800 mg/150 mg film-coated tablets

3 years

6 weeks after opening the bottle.

This medicinal product does not require any special storage conditions.

REZOLSTA 800 mg/150 mg film-coated tablets

White, high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottle containing 30 tablets, fitted with polypropylene (PP) child resistant closure with induction seal.

Pack size of one bottle.

Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.