Pharmacotherapeutic group: Bile and liver therapy, Other drugs for bile therapy
ATC code: A05AX06
Mechanism of action
Elafibranor and its main active metabolite GFT1007 are dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α/δ agonists.
Activation of PPARα decreases bile acid (BA) synthesis, increases BA detoxification, and modulates BA output, resulting in decreased bile toxicity, and less injury to cholangiocytes and hepatocytes.
Activation of PPARδ also regulates transporters that absorb and secrete bile components, contributing this way to decreased bile toxicity and improving cholestasis.
Activation of PPARα and PPARδ also has anti-inflammatory effects by acting on different pathways of inflammation, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) pathways, respectively.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In the pivotal phase 3 ELATIVE study, treatment with elafibranor resulted in a marked reduction from baseline in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as early as 4 weeks which was sustained through week 52. In alignment with the observed biochemical response, greater reductions in biomarkers of BA synthesis including the BA precursor 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 (FGF-19), a BA synthesis regulator, were observed with elafibranor treatment. Significant decreases in Immunoglobulin M (IgM), Immunoglobulin G (IgG), and anti-inflammatory markers, were observed in participants treated with elafibranor compared to placebo in alignment with the in vitro demonstration of anti-inflammatory properties of elafibranor.
In vitro studies in human macrophages, monocytes and endothelial cells showed the capacity of elafibranor and/or GFT1007 to decrease the secretion of inflammatory markers such as Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) through combined PPARα and PPARδ activation and parallel PPAR-independent mechanisms.
Anti-fibrotic properties of elafibranor were demonstrated in human primary hepatic stellate cells (hHSCs), pivotal for fibrogenesis in the liver. Elafibranor inhibits Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)-stimulated hHSC proliferation in a dose-dependent manner via modulation of PDGFRβ phosphorylation. Additionally, elafibranor inhibits Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFβ1)–induced hHSC activation at the gene level, by down-regulating, in a dose-dependent manner, the expression of several fibrosis markers, such as alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (αSMA), Collagen 1 alpha 1 (Col1α1) and Collagen 4 alpha 1 (Col4α1), but without inhibiting the kinase activity of the TGFβ1 receptors.
Cardiac electrophysiology
Thorough QT (TQT) analysis excluded any prolongation effect of elafibranor on QT/QTc interval at repeat doses of up to 300 mg for 14 days.
In clinical studies, no clinically meaningful changes in vital signs or in electrocardiogram (ECG) (including QTc interval) were observed in participants treated with elafibranor.
Clinical efficacy
The efficacy of elafibranor was evaluated in Study GFT505B-319-1 (ELATIVE), a phase 3, randomised, DB, placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long-term extension (OLE) in 161 adults with PBC with an inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA. Participants were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive elafibranor 80 mg or placebo once daily for at least 52 weeks. When applicable, participants continued their pre-study dose of UDCA throughout the study. Participants were included in the study if their ALP was ≥ 1.67 x ULN and total bilirubin (TB) was ≤ 2 x ULN. Participants were excluded in case of decompensated cirrhosis or other causes of liver disease.
Overall, the mean age was 57.1 years, and the mean weight was 70.8 kg. The study population was predominately female (96%) and white (91%). The baseline mean ALP concentration was 321.9 U/L and 39% of participants had a baseline ALP concentration > 3 x ULN.
The mean baseline TB concentration was 9.6 µmol/L and 96% of participants had a baseline TB concentration less than or equal to ULN. The mean baseline liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography was 10.1 kPa. The baseline mean PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score was 3.3 and 41% had moderate-to-severe pruritus at baseline (PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4); for those with moderate-to-severe pruritus, the baseline mean PBC Worst Itch NRS score was 6.2 for participants in the elafibranor 80 mg group and 6.3 for participants in the placebo group. The majority (95%) of participants received treatment in combination with UDCA or as monotherapy in 5% of participants who were unable to tolerate UDCA.
The primary endpoint was cholestasis response at week 52 as defined as the composite endpoint: ALP < 1.67 x ULN and TB ≤ ULN and ALP decrease ≥ 15%. The key secondary endpoints were ALP normalisation at week 52 and the change in pruritus from baseline through week 52 and through week 24 based on the PBC Worst Itch NRS score in participants with moderate-to-severe pruritus at baseline.
Table 1 shows the primary composite endpoint of cholestasis response and the key secondary endpoint of ALP normalisation.
Table 1. Percentage of Adult Participants with PBC Achieving the Primary Efficacy Composite Endpoint of Cholestasis Response and Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint of ALP Normalisation at Week 52
| Analysis Population | Elafibranor 80 mg (N=108) | Placebo (N=53) | Treatment Difference (95% CI) [3] | Odds Ratio (95% CI) [4] | P-value [4] |
| Primary Composite Endpoint: Cholestasis Response [1] |
| ITT | 51% | 4% | 47% (32, 57) | 37.6 (7.6, 302.2) | <0.0001 |
| Key Secondary Endpoint: ALP Normalisation [2] |
| ITT | 15% | 0 | 15% (6, 23) | Infinity (2.8, infinity) | 0.0019 |
ITT: Intention-to-treat
[1] Cholestasis response is defined as ALP <1.67x ULN and TB ≤ULN and ALP decrease from baseline ≥ 15% at week 52. Participants who stopped prematurely the study treatment (intercurrent event 1) or used rescue therapy for PBC (intercurrent event 2) prior to week 52 assessment were considered as non-responders. In case of missing data at week 52 for participants without an intercurrent event, the closest non-missing assessment from the DB treatment period was taken into account.
[2] Normalisation of ALP at week 52 defined as proportion of participants with ALP ≤1.0× ULN. The approach to handle intercurrent events or missing data is the same as for the primary endpoint.
[3] The response rate differences between the treatment groups and 95% CI were calculated using the Newcombe method stratified by randomisation strata for cholestasis response and unstratified for ALP normalisation.
[4] Odds ratios of response and p-values to compare treatments were from the exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by the randomisation strata.
A significant decrease from baseline was seen as early as week 4 and was sustained over 52 weeks of treatment in the elafibranor group compared to placebo (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Mean Change from Baseline in ALP Over Time - ITT analysis set
Patient- reported outcomes
In participants with moderate-to-severe pruritus at baseline, a greater decrease from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score through Week 52 and Week 24 was observed in participants randomised to elafibranor compared to placebo but this did not reach statistical significance (Table 2).
Table 2. Change in Pruritus from Baseline Through Week 52 and Week 24 as Measured by PBC WI-NRS in those with Moderate-to-Severe Pruritus at Baseline
| | Elafibranor 80 mg (N=44) | Placebo (N=22) | Treatment Difference | P-value |
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Change Through Week 52 [1] |
| Least Squares Mean (95% CI) | -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3) | -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2) | -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4) | 0.1970 |
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Change Through Week 24 [1] |
| Least Squares Mean (95% CI) | -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0) | -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3) | -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8) | 0.5522 |
[1] Analysis used the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, 4-week period and treatment by 4-week period interaction as fixed factors and adjusting for baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS and the stratification factor of ALP >3 x ULN or TB >ULN. An unstructured correlation structure is used. Treatment effect through week 52 is the average of NRS score changes from baseline for the thirteen 4-week periods. Treatment effect through week 52 and week 24 is the average treatment effects of NRS score changes from baseline over the first thirteen 4-week periods and first six 4-week periods, respectively. The assessments of PBC Worst Itch NRS scores after participants stopped prematurely the study treatment or took a rescue therapy for pruritus were considered as missing.
Treatment with elafibranor was associated with an improvement in pruritus as evidenced by a reduction in the PBC-40 Itch and 5-D Itch total scores compared to placebo at Week 52 (Table 3).
Table 3. Change in Pruritus from Baseline to Week 52 in PBC-40 Itch and 5-D Itch total scores in those with Moderate-to-Severe Pruritus at Baseline
| | Elafibranor 80 mg (N=44) | Placebo (N=22) | Treatment Difference | P-value |
| PBC-40 Itch total score: Change at Week 52 [1] |
| Least Squares Mean (95% CI) | -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6) | -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3) | -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7) | 0.0070 |
| 5-D Itch total score: Change at Week 52 [1] |
| Least Squares Mean (95% CI) | -4.2 (-5.6, -2.9) | -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9) | -3.0 (-5.5, -0.5) | 0.0199 |
[1] Analysis uses the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visits (until week 52) and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factor and adjusting for baseline score and the stratification factor of ALP > 3x ULN or TB > ULN.
Lipid parameters
Elafibranor demonstrated a favourable effect on lipid parameters. The mean reduction in very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) was greater in participants treated with elafibranor compared to placebo at Week 52. The LSM means difference from placebo in VLDL-C was -0.1 mmol/L [(95% CI: -0.2, -0.1); p<0.001] and for TG was -0.3 mmol/L [(95% CI: -0.4, -0.1)]; p<0.001]. High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) remained stable on treatment with elafibranor.
Mean reduction in IgM
The mean reduction in IgM was greater in participants treated with elafibranor compared to placebo at Week 52. The LSM means difference from placebo in IgM was -0.6 g/L [(95% CI: -0.9, -0.3); p<0.001].
Mean reduction in biomarkers of BA synthesis
The mean reduction in C4 and in FGF-19 was greater in participants treated with elafibranor compared to placebo at Week 52. The LSM means difference from placebo in C4 was -5.176 ug/L [(95% CI: -10.291; -0.062); p=0.0474]; and in FGF-19 it was -86.95 pg/mL [(95% CI: -170.37; -3.53); p=0.0412].
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Iqirvo in all subsets of the paediatric population in primary biliary cholangitis as per paediatric investigation plan (PIP) decision, for the granted indication.