Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other immunostimulants; ATC code: L03AX16
Mechanism of action
Plerixafor is a bicyclam derivative, a selective reversible antagonist of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor and blocks binding of its cognate ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α), also known as CXCL12. Plerixafor-induced leukocytosis and elevations in circulating haematopoietic progenitor cell levels are thought to result from a disruption of CXCR4 binding to its cognate ligand, resulting in the appearance of both mature and pluripotent cells in the systemic circulation. CD34+ cells mobilised by plerixafor are functional and capable of engraftment with long-term repopulating capacity.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In pharmacodynamic studies in healthy volunteers of plerixafor alone, peak mobilisation of CD34+ cells was observed from 6 to 9 hours after administration. In pharmacodynamic studies in healthy volunteers of plerixafor in conjunction with G-CSF administered at identical dose regimen to that in studies in patients, a sustained elevation in the peripheral blood CD34+ count was observed from 4 to 18 hours after plerixafor administration with peak response between 10 and 14 hours.
In order to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of plerixafor following 0.24 mg/kg based and fixed (20 mg) doses, a trial was conducted in adult patients with NHL (N=61) who were treated with 0.24 mg/kg or 20 mg of plerixafor. The trial was conducted in patients weighing 70 kg or less (median: 63.7 kg , min: 34.2 kg, max: 70 kg). The fixed 20 mg dose showed 1.43-fold higher exposure (AUC0-10h) than the 0.24 mg/kg dose (Table 2). The fixed 20 mg dose also showed numerically higher response rate (5.2% [60.0% vs 54.8%] based on the local lab data and 11.7% [63.3% vs 51.6%] based on the central lab data) in attaining the target of ≥ 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg than the mg/kg-based dose. The median time to reach ≥ 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was 3 days for both treatment groups, and the safety profile between the groups was similar. Body weight of 83 kg was selected as the cut-off point to transition patients from fixed to weight based dosing (83 kg x 0.24 mg = 19.92 mg/kg).
Table 2. Systemic Exposure (AUC0-10h) comparisons of fixed and weight based regimens
| Regimen | Geometric Mean AUC |
| Fixed 20 mg (n=30) | 3991.2 |
| 0.24 mg/kg (n=31) | 2792.7 |
| Ratio (90% CI) | 1.43 (1.32,1.54) |
Clinical efficacy and safety
In two Phase III randomised-controlled studies patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma received plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg or placebo on each evening prior to apheresis. Patients received daily morning doses of G-CSF 10 μg/kg for 4 days prior to the first dose of plerixafor or placebo and on each morning prior to apheresis. Optimal (5 or 6 x 106 cells/kg) and minimal (2 x 106 cells/kg) numbers of CD34+ cells/kg within a given number of days, as well as the primary composite endpoints which incorporated successful engraftment are presented in Tables 3 and 5; the proportion of patients reaching optimal numbers of CD34+ cells/kg by apheresis day are presented in Tables 4 and 6.
Table 3. Study AMD3100-3101 efficacy results - CD34+ cell mobilisation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients
| Efficacy endpointb | Plerixafor and G-CSF (n = 150) | Placebo and G-CSF (n = 148) | p-valuea |
| Patients achieving ≥ 5 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 4 apheresis days and successful engraftment | 86 (57.3%) | 28 (18.9%) | <0.001 |
| Patients achieving ≥ 2 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 4 apheresis days and successful engraftment | 126 (84.0%) | 64 (43.2%) | < 0.001 |
a p-value calculated using Pearson's Chi-Squared test
bStatistically significantly more patients achieved ≥ 5 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 4 apheresis days with plerixafor and G-CSF (n=89; 59.3%) than with placebo and G-CSF (n=29; 19.6%), p<0.001; statistically significantly more patients achieved ≥ 2 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 4 apheresis days with plerixafor and G-CSF (n=130; 86.7%) than with placebo and G-CSF (n=70; 47.3%), p<0.001.
Table 4. Study AMD3100-3101 – Proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg by apheresis day in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients
| Days | Proportiona in Plerixafor and G-CSF (n=147b) | Proportiona in Placebo and G-CSF (n=142b) |
| 1 | 27.9% | 4.2% |
| 2 | 49.1% | 14.2% |
| 3 | 57.7% | 21.6% |
| 4 | 65.6% | 24.2% |
aPercents determined by Kaplan Meier method
b n includes all patients who received at least one day of apheresis
Table 5. Study AMD3100-3102 efficacy results – CD34+ cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma patients
| Efficacy endpointb | Plerixafor and G-CSF (n = 148) | Placebo and G-CSF (n = 154) | p-value a |
| Patients achieving ≥ 6 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 2 apheresis days and successful engraftment | 104 (70.3%) | 53 (34.4%) | <0.001 |
ap-value calculated using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistic blocked by baseline platelet count
bStatistically significantly more patients achieved ≥ 6 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 2 apheresis days with plerixafor and G-CSF (n=106; 71.6%) than with placebo and G-CSF (n=53; 34.4%), p<0.001; statistically significantly more patients achieved ≥ 6 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 4 apheresis days with plerixafor and G-CSF (n=112; 75.7%) than with placebo and G-CSF (n=79; 51.3%), p<0.001; statistically significantly more patients achieved ≥ 2 x 106 cells/kg in ≤ 4 apheresis days with plerixafor and G-CSF (n=141; 95.3%) than with placebo and G-CSF (n=136; 88.3%), p=0.031.
Table 6. Study AMD3100-3102 – Proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 6 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg by apheresis day in multiple myeloma patients
| Days | Proportiona in Plerixafor and G-CSF (n=144b) | Proportiona in Placebo and G-CSF (n=150b) |
| 1 | 54.2% | 17.3% |
| 2 | 77.9% | 35.3% |
| 3 | 86.8% | 48.9% |
| 4 | 86.8% | 55.9% |
aPercents determined by Kaplan Meier method
b n includes all patients who received at least one day of apheresis
Rescue patients
In study AMD3100-3101, 62 patients (10 in the plerixafor + G-CSF group and 52 in the placebo + GCSF group), who could not mobilise sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and thus could not proceed to transplantation, entered into an open-label Rescue procedure with plerixafor and G-CSF. Of these patients, 55 % (34 out of 62) mobilised ≥ 2 x106/kg CD34+ cells and had successful engraftment. In study AMD3100-3102, 7 patients (all from the placebo + G-CSF group) entered the Rescue procedure. Of these patients, 100% (7 out of 7) mobilised ≥ 2 x106/kg CD34+ cells and had successful engraftment.
The dose of haematopoietic stem cells used for each transplant was determined by the investigator and all haematopoietic stem cells that were collected were not necessarily transplanted. For transplanted patients in the Phase III studies, median time to neutrophil engraftment (10-11 days), median time to platelet engraftment (18-20 days) and graft durability up to 12 months post-transplantation were similar across the plerixafor and placebo groups.
Mobilisation and engraftment data from supportive Phase II studies (plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg dosed on the evening or morning prior to apheresis) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, or multiple myeloma were similar to those data for the Phase III studies.
In the placebo-controlled studies, fold increase in peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (cells/μl) over the 24-hour period from the day prior to the first apheresis to just before the first apheresis was evaluated (Table 7). During that 24-hour period, the first dose of plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg or placebo was administered 10-11 hours prior to apheresis.
Table 7. Fold increase in peripheral blood CD34+ cell count following Plerixafor administration
| Study | Plerixafor and G-CSF | Placebo and G-CSF |
| Median | Mean (SD) | Median | Mean (SD) |
| AMD3100-3101 | 5.0 | 6.1 (5.4) | 1.4 | 1.9 (1.5) |
| AMD3100-3102 | 4.8 | 6.4 (6.8) | 1.7 | 2.4 (7.3) |
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with plerixafor in children aged 0 to 1 year in myelosuppression caused by chemotherapy to treat malignant disorders, which requires an autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
The efficacy and safety of plerixafor were evaluated in an open label, multi-center, controlled study in paediatric patients with solid tumors (including neuroblastoma, sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma) or lymphoma who were eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (DFI12860). Patients with leukemia, persistent high percentage marrow involvement prior to mobilization, or previous stem cell transplantation were excluded.
Forty-five paediatric patients (1 to less than 18 years) were randomised, 2:1, using 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor plus standard mobilisation (G-CSF plus or minus chemotherapy) versus control (standard mobilisation alone). Median age was 5.3 years (min: max 1:18) in the plerixafor arm versus 4.7 years (min:max 1:17) in the control arm.
Only one patient aged less than 2 years old was randomized to the plerixafor treatment arm. There was an imbalance between treatment arms in peripheral blood CD34+ counts on the day prior to first apheresis (i.e. prior to administration of plerixafor), with less circulating PB CD34+ in the plerixafor arm. The median PB CD34+ cell counts at baseline were 15 cells/μl in the plerixafor arm versus 35 cells/μl in control arm. The primary analysis showed that 80% of patients in the plerixafor arm experienced at least a doubling of the PB CD34+ count, observed from the morning of the day preceding the first planned apheresis to the morning prior to apheresis, versus, 28.6 % of patients in the control arm (p=0.0019). The median increase in PB CD34+ cell counts from baseline to the day of apheresis was by 3.2 fold in the plerixafor arm versus by 1.4 fold in the control arm.