Pharmacotherapeutic group: Muscle relaxants, other muscle relaxants, peripherally acting agents, ATC code: M03AX01.
Mechanism of action
Botulinum toxin type A blocks peripheral acetylcholine release at presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminals by cleaving SNAP-25, a protein integral to the successful docking and release of acetylcholine from vesicles situated within the nerve endings, thereby leading to denervation of the muscle and a flaccid paralysis.
After injection, there is an initial rapid high-affinity binding of toxin to specific cell surface receptors. This is followed by transfer of the toxin across the plasma membrane by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Finally, the toxin is released into the cytosol with progressive inhibition of acetylcholine release. Clinical signs are manifest within 2-3 days, with peak effect seen within 4 weeks of injection.
Recovery after intramuscular injection takes place normally within 12 weeks of injection as nerve terminals sprout and reconnect with the endplates.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Glabellar lines
540 patients with moderate to severe glabellar lines seen at maximum frown who felt their glabellar lines had an important psychological impact (on mood, anxiety/or depressive symptoms) have been included in the European/Canadian clinical study.
NUCEIVA injections significantly reduced the severity of glabellar lines by 1 point or greater at maximum frown for up to 139 days, as measured by the investigator assessment of glabellar line severity at maximum frown.
Table 2 – Primary Efficacy Endpoint – Glabellar Line Scale Score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at Day 30 by Investigator Assessment at Maximum Contraction, PP Population
| Responders for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint | Placebo | BOTOX | NUCEIVA | Absolute Difference |
| BOTOX Vs. Placebo | NUCEIVA Vs. Placebo | NUCEIVA Vs. BOTOX |
| Number | 2/48 | 202/244 | 205/235 | | | |
| Percentage | 4.2% | 82.8% | 87.2% | 78.6% | 83.1% | 4.4% |
| (% CI) | (0.0, 9.8) | (78.1, 87.5) | (83.0, 91.5) | (66.5, 85.5) | (70.3, 89.4) | (-1.9, 10.8) |
| PValue | | | | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Glabellar Line Scale (GLS); 0=no lines, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe
Two days after injection, 12.2% (6/49) of placebo, 57.0% (139/244) Botox treated patients and 54.2% (130/240) of NUCEIVA were considered by investigators as treatment responders (none or mild severity at maximum frown).
Table 3 – Exploratory Efficacy Endpoint - Glabellar Line Scale Score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at Day 30 by Investigator Assessment at Maximum Contraction for NUCEIVA Treated Subjects, by Baseline GLS Score at Maximum Contraction, ITT Population
| Baseline GLS Score at Maximum Contraction | NUCEIVA (N=245) |
| GLS=0 at Day 30 at Maximum Contraction | GLS=1 at Day 30 at Maximum Contraction |
| 2 (Moderate) | | |
| Number | 35/62 | 25/62 |
| Percentage | 56.5% | 40.3% |
| 3 (Severe) | | |
| Number | 41/179 | 108/179 |
| Percentage | 22.9% | 60.3% |
Glabellar Line Scale (GLS); 0=no lines, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Denominators are based on the number of subjects with the specified baseline severity at maximum contraction who had both baseline and Day 30 GLS scores at maximum contraction by investigator assessment
Table 4 – Exploratory Efficacy Endpoint - Glabellar Line Scale Score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at Day 30 by Investigator Assessment at Maximum Contraction for NUCEIVA Treated Subjects, by Baseline GLS Categories at Rest, ITT Population
| Baseline GLS Category at Rest | NUCEIVA (N=245) |
| GLS=0 at Day 30 at Maximum Contraction | GLS=1 at Day 30 at Maximum Contraction |
| ≤1 (i.e., none or mild) | | |
| Number | 61/103 | 40/103 |
| Percentage | 59.2% | 38.8% |
| >1 (i.e., moderate or severe) | | |
| Number | 15/138 | 93/138 |
| Percentage | 10.9% | 67.4% |
Glabellar Line Scale (GLS); 0=no lines, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Denominators are based on the number of subjects with the specified baseline severity at rest who also had both baseline and Day 30 GLS scores at maximum contraction by investigator assessment
NUCEIVA injections also reduced the severity of glabellar lines at rest, an exploratory endpoint.
Table 5 – Exploratory Efficacy Endpoint – Glabellar Line Scale Score >/=2 points better at day 30 by Investigator Assessment At Rest, PP Population
| Responders for the Exploratory Efficacy Endpoint | Placebo | BOTOX | NUCEIVA | Absolute Difference |
| BOTOX Vs. Placebo | NUCEIVA Vs. Placebo | NUCEIVA Vs. BOTOX |
| Number | 0/27 | 36/149 | 32/133 | | | |
| Percentage | 0% | 24.2% | 24.1% | 24.2% | 24.1% | -0.1% |
| (% CI) | (0.0, 12.8) | (17.5, 31.8) | (17.1, 32.2) | (11.4, 32.3) | (11.3, 32.4) | (-10.1, 9.9) |
| PValue | | | | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.984 |
There are limited phase 3 clinical data with NUCEIVA in patients older than 65 years. Duration of response in the phase 3 study was 139 days, based on a 1 point GLS improvement.
A total of 922 patients participated in two 1 year open label uncontrolled studies, and over the course of these studies, the average patient received 3 treatments.
The psychological impact of glabellar lines was confirmed at study entry and although a beneficial effect could not be demonstrated on psychological wellbeing, significant effects on patient reported outcomes were demonstrated as compared to placebo. Further, the effects of NUCEIVA on psychological wellbeing and patient reported outcomes were comparable to BOTOX, the active control used in the pivotal study.