Pharmacotherapeutic group: other antineoplastic agents, ATC code: L01XX74
Mechanism of action
Belzutifan is an inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2α). HIF-2α is a transcription factor that plays a role in oxygen sensing by regulating genes that promote adaptation to hypoxia. Under normal oxygen levels, HIF-2α is targeted for ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation by VHL protein. Lack of functional VHL protein results in stabilization and accumulation of HIF-2α. Upon stabilization, HIF-2α translocates into the nucleus and interacts with hypoxia-inducible factor 1 beta (HIF-1b) to form a transcriptional complex that regulates expression of downstream genes, including genes associated with cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumour growth (including CCND1, VEGFA, SLC2A1 (GLUT1), IGFBP3, TGFa, AXL, CXCR4, IL6). Belzutifan binds to HIF-2α, and in conditions of hypoxia or impairment of VHL protein function, belzutifan blocks the HIF-2α-HIF-1b interaction, leading to reduced transcription and expression of HIF-2α target genes. In vivo, belzutifan demonstrated anti-tumour activity in mouse xenograft models of renal cell carcinoma.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Circulating plasma levels of EPO were monitored in patients as a pharmacodynamic marker of HIF‑2α inhibition. Reductions in EPO were observed to be dose/exposure dependent and showed a plateauing effect on reduction at exposures achieved with doses above 120 mg once daily. The maximum EPO suppression occurred following 2 weeks of consecutive dosing of WELIREG (mean percent decrease from baseline of approximately 60%). Mean EPO levels gradually returned to baseline values after 12 weeks of treatment.
Pharmacogenomics
Belzutifan is primarily metabolised by UGT2B17 and CYP2C19. The activity of these enzymes varies among individuals who carry different genetic variants, which may impact belzutifan concentrations. Poor metabolisers are individuals who are considered to have no enzyme activity. Approximately 15% of Caucasians, 11% of Latinos, 6% of African Americans, 38% of South Asians, and 70% of East Asians are UGT2B17 poor metabolisers. Approximately 2% of Caucasians, 1% of Latinos, 5% of African Americans, 8% of South Asians, and 13% of East Asians are CYP2C19 poor metabolisers. Approximately 0.3% of Caucasians, 0.1% of Latinos, 0.3% of African Americans, 3% of South Asians, and 9% of East Asians are dual UGT2B17 and CYP2C19 poor metabolisers.
The impact of CYP2C19 and UGT2B17 poor metabolisers on belzutifan exposure was assessed in a population PK analysis. Based on the population PK model, patients who are CYP2C19 UGT2B17, or dual UGT2B17 and CYP2C19 poor metabolisers, are projected to have 1.3‑, 2.7‑ or 3.3‑fold the exposures (steady‑state AUC0-24), respectively, compared to a typical reference patient (UGT2B17 extensive metaboliser, CYP2C19 extensive/intermediate metaboliser) for the recommended dose. No dose adjustment is recommended based on exposure‑response analyses for efficacy and safety and the risk‑benefit profile.
Clinical efficacy
Clinical efficacy in adult patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease associated tumours
The efficacy of belzutifan was investigated in LITESPARK-004, an open‑label Phase 2 clinical study in 61 patients with confirmed VHL disease, based on a VHL germline alteration, who had at least one measurable solid tumour (as defined by RECIST v1.1) localised to the kidney and who did not require immediate surgery. Enrolled patients had other VHL-associated tumours including CNS hemangioblastomas and pNET, identified by radiological appearance. The study excluded patients who had any evidence of metastatic disease, either RCC or other VHL disease‑associated tumours. Other exclusion criteria were immediate need for surgical intervention for tumour treatment, any major surgical procedure completed within 4 weeks prior to study enrolment, any major cardiovascular event within 6 months prior to study drug administration, or prior systemic treatments for VHL disease‑associated RCC. Patients were monitored for anaemia and hypoxia before initiation of belzutifan, and then every 2 weeks for the first month, monthly for the next 5 months, and then every 3 months thereafter throughout treatment.
The study population characteristics were: median age of 41 years [range 19-66 years], 3.3% age 65 or older; 52.5% male; 90.2% White; and 82.0% had an ECOG PS of 0 and 16.4% had an ECOG PS of 1. Seventy-seven percent of patients had prior RCC surgical procedures encompassing ablative procedures, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy.
The median diameter of RCC target lesions per central independent review committee (IRC) was 2.2 cm (range 1-6.1). Median time from initial radiographic diagnosis of VHL‑associated RCC tumours that led to enrolment on LITESPARK-004 to the time of treatment with WELIREG was 17.9 months (range 2.8‑96.7).
Patients received belzutifan at a dose of 120 mg once daily. Patients were evaluated radiologically approximately 12 weeks after initiation of treatment and every 12 weeks thereafter. Treatment was continued until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. The effect of intermittent use and long treatment interruptions of belzutifan have not been evaluated.
The primary efficacy endpoint for the treatment of VHL disease‑associated RCC was objective response rate (ORR) measured by radiology assessment using RECIST v1.1 as assessed by IRC. Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and time to surgery (TTS).
Table 4 summarises the efficacy results for VHL disease‑associated RCC tumours in LITESPARK-004 at a median follow-up time of 29.2 months (range 4.2-37.5). The median duration of exposure was 28.9 months (range 1.9-37.5).
Table 4: Efficacy results in VHL disease‑associated RCC tumours in LITESPARK-004
| Endpoint | Belzutifan 120 mg daily n=61 |
| Objective response rate | |
| ORR* (95% CI) | 59.0% (45.7, 71.4) |
| Complete response | 3.3% |
| Partial response | 55.7% |
| Stable disease | 39.3% |
| Disease control rate† | 98.4% |
| Response duration‡ | |
| Median in weeks (range) | NE (36.1+, 119.9+) |
| % (n) with duration ≥ 18 months | 95.0% (19) |
| Time to response | |
| Median in weeks (range) | 47.6 (11.6, 96.6) |
| Time to surgery | |
| Median in weeks (95% CI) | NE (NE, NE) |
| PFS‡ | |
| Median in weeks (95% CI) | Median not estimated§ |
| 24-month PFS rate | 94.6% |
| * Response: Best objective response as confirmed complete response or partial response † Based on best response of stable disease or better ‡ Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates § Reliable median could not be estimated due to the number of progression events (n=7) and a progression event that occurred at the latest timepoint when only 1 patient was at risk. NE = Not estimable |
During this period of treatment, two out of 61 (3.3%) patients required an RCC tumour reduction procedure. For comparison, in one retrospective natural history study of VHL patients with RCC, 28.7% of patients had their first tumour reduction procedure within 24 months of follow-up.
Objective response rates were in other VHL diseases associated tumours: 38% CNS hemangioblastomas (95% CI: 24.7, 52.8; 19 out of 50 patients), and 90% for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (95% CI: 68.3, 98.8; 18 out of 20 patients).
Clinical efficacy in adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
The efficacy of belzutifan was evaluated in LITESPARK-005, an open-label, randomised, active-controlled Phase 3 clinical study comparing belzutifan with everolimus in 746 patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC that has progressed following PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors and VEGF receptor targeted therapies either in sequence or in combination. Patients could have received up to 3 prior treatment regimens and must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 120 mg belzutifan or 10 mg everolimus by oral administration once daily. Randomisation was stratified by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk categories (favourable versus intermediate versus poor) and number of prior VEGF receptor targeted therapies (1 versus 2-3).
Patients were evaluated radiologically at Week 9 from the date of randomisation, then every 8 weeks through Week 49, and every 12 weeks thereafter.
Among the 746 patients in LITESPARK-005, the baseline characteristics were: median age 63 years [range: 22-90 years], 42% age 65 or older; 78% male; 79% White; 12% Asian; 1.1% Black or African American; 43% ECOG performance status 0 and 55% ECOG performance status 1. Prior therapies: 13% of patients had 1 prior line of therapy, 43% had 2 prior lines of therapy and 43% had 3 prior lines of therapy; 49% received 2 to 3 prior VEGF receptor targeted therapies. Patient distribution by IMDC risk categories was 22% favorable, 66% intermediate, and 12% poor.
The primary efficacy endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) measured by BICR using RECIST v1.1, and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) by BICR using RECIST v1.1.
The study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement of PFS for patients randomized to belzutifan compared with everolimus. The efficacy results for advanced RCC in LITESPARK-005 are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5- Efficacy Results (BICR assessment) for Belzutifan in LITESPARK-005
| Efficacy Outcome Measure | Belzutifan n=374 | Everolimus n=372 |
| PFS, % (n)* | |
| Number of events | 69% (257) | 70% (262) |
| Progressive disease | 63% (234) | 60% (222) |
| Median PFS in months (95% CI)† | 5.6 (3.9, 7.0) | 5.6 (4.8, 5.8) |
| Hazard ratio‡ (95% CI) | 0.75 (0.63, 0.90) |
| p-Value | 0.00077 |
| OS, % (n)* | |
| Number of events | 45% (169) | 50% (186) |
| Median OS in months (95% CI) | 21.0 (17.2, 24.3) | 17.2 (15.3, 19.0) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) | 0.87 (0.71, 1.07) |
| p-Value | NS |
| ORR, % (n) (95% CI) § | 22% (82) (17.8, 26.5) | 3.5% (13) (1.9, 5.9) |
| Complete response | 2.7% (10) | 0% (0) |
| Partial response | 19% (72) | 3.5% (13) |
| p-Value | <0.00001 |
| *Based on first pre-specified interim analysis with a median follow up time of 14 months. †From product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data ‡ Based on the stratified Cox regression model. +Indicates there is no progressive disease by the time of last disease assessment. §Based on Kaplan-Meier estimation. NS – not statistically significant |
At a subsequent pre-specified analysis with median follow-up time of 17.8 months (range: 0.2 - 39.1 months) there were 289 PFS events for WELIREG and 276 PFS events for everolimus. The median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.8, 6.5) for WELIREG versus 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8, 5.8) for everolimus. The PFS hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.88) (Figure 1). The median duration of response was 19.5 (range: 1.9 - 31.6+) for WELIREG versus 13.7 (range: 3.8 – 21.2+) for everolimus. Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, patients with a DOR ≥ 12 months was 73% for WELIREG versus 62% for everolimus. At the pre-specified interim analysis, OS favoured belzutifan over everolimus, but did not reach statistical significance. The median OS was 21.4 months (95% CI 18.2, 24.3) for WELIREG versus 18.1 months (95% CI 15.8, 21.8) for everolimus resulting in a HR of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.07) (Figure 2).
The median Time to Response (TTR) was 3.8 months (range: 1.7 - 22.0) in the belzutifan group and 3.7 months (range: 1.8 - 5.4) in the everolimus group. ORR analysis demonstrated ORR of 22.7% for WELIREG versus 3.5% for everolimus.
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Radiographic Progression-free Survival in LITESPARK-005
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meir Curve for Overall Survival in LITESPARK-005
Paediatric population
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with belzutifan in all subsets of the paediatric population in renal neoplasms (see section 4.2).