Pharmacotherapeutic group: Retinoids for topical use in acne, ATC code: D10AD06
Mechanism of action
Aklief cream contains 50 micrograms (mcg/g) (w/w) trifarotene, which is a chemically stable, terphenyl acid derivative with retinoid-like activity. It is a potent RARγ agonist (retinoid acid receptor γ agonist), characterized by its high specificity to this receptor over RARα & RARβ (50- and 8-fold, respectively, with no Retinoid X Receptor (RXR) activity).
In addition, trifarotene modulates retinoid target genes (differentiation and inflammatory processes) in immortalized keratinocytes and reconstructed epidermis.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Trifarotene has demonstrated, in the Rhino-mouse model, marked comedolytic activity with the reduction in the comedone count and marked increased epidermis thickness. In this model, trifarotene produced the same comedolytic effect as other known retinoids, at about 10 times lower dose.
Trifarotene has also shown anti-inflammatory and depigmenting activities.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Aklief cream applied once daily in the evening was evaluated for 12 weeks in 2 randomized, multi-center, parallel group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies of identical design. They were conducted in a total of 2420 patients aged, 9 years and older, with moderate facial and truncal acne vulgaris.
Acne severity was evaluated using the 5-point Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scale for the face and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) for the trunk, with moderate acne vulgaris defined as a score of Grade 3-Moderate (see Table 2).
Table 2 Investigator's Global Assessment and Physician's Global Assessment Scales
| 0 | Clear | Clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions. |
| 1 | Almost Clear | A few scattered comedones and a few small papules. |
| 2 | Mild | Easily recognizable; less than half the surface is involved. Some comedones and some papules and pustules. |
| 3 | Moderate | More than half of the surface is involved. Many comedones, papules and pustules. One nodule may be present. |
| 4 | Severe | Entire surface is involved. Covered with comedones, numerous papules and pustules. Few nodules may be present. |
There were three identical co-primary efficacy endpoints in both pivotal studies 1) the success rate based on the IGA and PGA outcome (percentage of subjects “clear” and “almost clear” and with at least a 2-grade change from baseline) and absolute and percentage change from baseline in 2) inflammatory and 3) non-inflammatory lesion counts at Week 12.
Overall, 87% of subjects were Caucasian and 55% were female. Thirty four (1.4%) subjects were 9 to 11 years of age, 1128 (47%) subjects were 12 to 17 years and 1258 (52%) subjects were 18 years and older. All patients had moderate acne vulgaris on the face and 99% on the trunk. At baseline subjects had between 7 and 200 (average 36) inflammatory lesions on the face and between 0 and 220 (average 38) on the trunk. Additionally subjects had 21 to 305 (average 52) non-inflammatory lesions on the face and 0 to 260 (average 46) on the trunk.
The IGA and PGA success rates, mean absolute, and percent reduction in acne lesion counts from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment are presented in the following tables:
Table 3 Facial Acne Improvement in Investigator's Global Assessment and Change in Lesion Counts at Week 12 (Intent-to-Treat; Multiple Imputation)
| Primary Efficacy Endpoints | Study 18251 | Study 18252 |
| | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream |
| N= 612 | N= 596 | N= 602 | N=610 |
| IGA Success Rate (%) (At least 2-grade improvement and IGA of “Clear” (0) or “Almost Clear” (1)) | 29.4 | 19.5 | 42.3 | 25.7 |
| Percent difference from vehicle (95% CI) | 9.8 (4.8, 14.8) p ˂ 0.001 | - | 16.6 (11.3, 22.0) p ˂ 0.001 | - |
| Inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline |
| LS Mean (SE) | -19.0 (0.50) | -15.4 (0.51) | -24.2 (0.51) | -18.7 (0.51) |
| LS Mean Difference from vehicle (95% CI) | -3.6 (-4.9, -2.2) p ˂ 0.001 | - | -5.6 (-6.9, -4.3) p ˂ 0.001 | - |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline (%) |
| Mean (SE) | 15.7 (0.52) | 19.3 (0.64) | 12.0 (0.51) | 17.6 (0.58 ) |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline | -54.4 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -44.8 | -66.2 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -51.2 |
| Non-inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute change from Baseline |
| LS Mean (SE) | -25.0 (0.87) | -17.9 (0.87) | -30.1 (0.71) | -21.6 (0.71) |
| LS Mean Difference from vehicle (95% CI) | -7.1 (-9.4, -4.8) p ˂ 0.001 | - | -8.5 (-10.3, -6.6) p ˂ 0.001 | - |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline (%) |
| Mean (SE) | 28.0 (1.08) | 34.5 (1.22) | 20.6 (0.71) | 28.9 (0.97) |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline | -49.7 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -35.7 | -57.7 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -43.9 |
Table 4 Truncal Acne Improvement in Physician's Global Assessment and Change in Lesion Counts at Week 12 (Intent-to-Treat on the Trunk, Multiple Imputation)
| Secondary Endpoints | Study 18251 | Study 18252 |
| | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream |
| N= 600 | N=585 | N= 598 | N=609 |
| PGA Success Rate (%) (At least 2-grade improvement and PGA of “Clear” (0) or “Almost Clear” (1)) | 35.7 | 25.0 | 42.6 | 29.9 |
| Percent difference from vehicle (95% CI) | 10.7 (5.4, 16.1) p ˂ 0.001 | - | 12.7 (7.2, 18.2) p ˂ 0.001 | - |
| Inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline |
| LS Mean (SE) | -21.4 (0.54) | -18.8 (0.55) | -25.5 (0.59) | -19.8 (0.58) |
| LS Mean Difference from vehicle (95% CI) | -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1) p ˂ 0.001 | - | -5.7 (-7.2, -4.2) p ˂ 0.001 | - |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline (%) |
| Mean (SE) | 15.9 (0.60) | 17.9 (0.64) | 13.5 (0.57) | 18.8 (0.71) |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline | -57.4 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -50.0 | -65.4 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -51.1 |
| Non-inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline |
| LS Mean (SE) | -21.9 (0.93) | -17.8 (0.94) | -25.9 (0.67) | -20.8 (0.66) |
| LS Mean Difference from vehicle (95% CI) | -4.1 (-6.6, -1.7) p = 0.001 | - | -5.0 (-6.8, -3.3) p ˂ 0.001 | - |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline (%) |
| Mean (SE) | 24.5 (1.01) | 29.4 (1.17) | 20.5 (0.78) | 24.5 (0.77) |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline | -49.1 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -40.3 | -55.2 p ˂ 0.001 vs. Vehicle | -45.1 |
Paediatric population
Age group 9 to 11 years: In the phase 3 studies a total of only 34 children of this age group were included – 19 of them in study 18251 and 15 in study 18252. In this age group, patient number was low and efficacy could not be demonstrated.
Age group 12 to 17 years: In the phase 3 studies a total of 1128 children aged 12 to 17 years with moderate acne vulgaris were included: 573 of them in study 18251 and 555 children in study 18252.
The IGA and PGA success rates, mean absolute, and percent reduction in acne lesion counts from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment are presented in the following tables:
Table 5 Facial Acne Improvement in Investigator's Global Assessments and Change in Lesion Counts at Week 12 in 12 to 17 years of age (Intent-to-Treat population; Multiple Imputation).
| Primary Efficacy Endpoints | Study 18251 | Study 18252 |
| | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream |
| (n= 304) | (n=269) | (n= 267) | (n=288) |
| IGA Success Rate (%) At least 2-grade improvement and IGA of “Clear” (0) or “Almost Clear” (1) | 25.6 | 14.7 | 35.8 | 20.4 |
| Percent difference in Success rate from the vehicle (95% CI) | 10.9 (4.3, 17.6) p < 0.001 | - | 15.4 (7.9, 23.0) p < 0.001 | - |
| Inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline | -18.7 | -14.8 | -24.0 | -18.7 |
| Mean difference from the vehicle (95% CI) | -3.8 (-6.5, -1.2) p < 0.001 | - | -5.3 (-8.1, -2.6) p < 0.001 | - |
| Non-inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline | -26.5 | -16.8 | -33.8 | -22.8 |
| Mean difference from the vehicle (95% CI) | -9.6 (-13.8, -5.4) p < 0.001 | - | -11.0 (-15.2, -6.8) p < 0.001 | - |
Table 6 Truncal Acne Improvement in Physician's Global Assessments and Change in Lesion Counts at Week 12 in 12 to 17 years of age (Intent-to-Treat truncal population; Multiple Imputation).
| Secondary Endpoints | Study 18251 | Study 18252 |
| | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream | AKLIEF cream | Vehicle cream |
| (n= 302) | (n=269) | (n= 267) | (n=288) |
| PGA Success Rate (%) At least 2-grade improvement and PGA of “Clear” (0) or “Almost Clear” (1) | 31.8 | 21.0 | 38.7 | 25.8 |
| Percent difference in Success rate from the vehicle (95% CI) | 10.8 (3.5, 18.1) p < 0.001 | - | 12.9 (5.0, 20.8) p < 0.001 | - |
| Inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline | -21.4 | -18.0 | -25.4 | -19.2 |
| Mean difference from the vehicle (95% CI) | -3.4 (-6.3, -0.5) p < 0.001 | - | -6.2 (-9.2, -3.3) p < 0.001 | - |
| Non-inflammatory Lesions Mean Absolute Change from Baseline | -22.2 | -17.2 | -25.7 | -20.1 |
| Mean difference from the vehicle (95% CI) | -5.0 (-9.1, -0.8) p < 0.001 | - | -5.7 (-9.1, -2.2) p < 0.001 | - |
Long-term efficacy
In Study 3, a one-year open label safety study of 453 patients, 9 years and older, with moderate facial and truncal acne vulgaris, Aklief cream demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement with IGA and PGA success rates increasing:
- from 26.6% at Week 12 visit to 65.1% at Week 52 visit for the face and
- from 38.6% at Week 12 visit to 66.9% at Week 52 visit for the trunk, respectively.
IGA and PGA success experienced by the same subject increased from 22.0% at Week 12 to 57.9% at Week 52.
START study
The effect of Aklief cream on acne scarring during the treatment of acne vulgaris was investigated in the START study. The START study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study with intra-individual comparison (right half-face versus left half-face) evaluating atrophic scar counts over 24 weeks of treatment.
The START study consisted mainly of subjects with moderate acne at baseline (over 90% of subjects with IGA score of 3). The 121 subjects enrolled in the study presented atrophic acne scars of mostly mild and moderate severity as assessed by the Investigator Scar Global Assessment on both halves of the face.
The median age for all subjects was 22 years(with a minimum of 17 years, maximum of 34 years). The majority of subjects (102 [84.3%]) were adults ( ≥18 years), female (88 [72.7%] subjects), white (97 [80.2%], and non-Hispanic or Latino (95 [78.5%]).
The primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change from baseline in total atrophic acne scar count per half-face at Week 24. Total number of atrophic acne scars significantly decreased with Aklief compared to vehicle (see Table 7).
Table 7: Change from Baseline in Total Atrophic Acne Scar Count at Week 24 by Imputing Missing Data using Multiple Imputation under the Assumption of Missing At Random (ITT Population)
| Aklief (N=121) | Vehicle (N=121) | Treatment Difference (N=121) |
| Mean Baseline Scar Count | Mean Change from Baseline | Mean Baseline Scar Count | Mean Change from Baseline | Mean (SE) of Difference in Change from Baseline | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value |
| 11.4 | -5.9 | 11.6 | -2.7 | -3.2 (0.60) | -4.4, -2.0 | <0.0001 |
Descriptive statistics showed that trifarotene performed numerically better in 2-4 mm compared to >4 mm atrophic scars.