Pharmacotherapeutic group: Various alimentary tract and metabolism products, ATC code: A16AX16
Mechanism of action
Givosiran is a double-stranded small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) that causes degradation of aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 (ALAS1) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in hepatocytes through RNA interference, resulting in a reduction of induced liver ALAS1 mRNA towards normal. This leads to reduced circulating levels of neurotoxic intermediates aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG), the key causal factors of attacks and other disease manifestations of AHP.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In the placebo-controlled study in patients with AHP receiving givosiran 2.5 mg/kg once monthly (ENVISION), median reductions from baseline in urinary ALA and PBG of 83.7 % and 75.1 %, respectively, were observed 14 days after the first dose. Maximal reductions in ALA and PBG levels were achieved around month 3 with median reductions from baseline of 93.8 % for ALA and 94.5 % for PBG and were sustained with repeated once monthly dosing.
Observed data and modelling demonstrated that once monthly dosing with 2.5 mg/kg givosiran resulted in a greater reduction and less fluctuation in ALA levels compared with doses less than 2.5 mg/kg or dosing once every 3 months.
Clinical efficacy
The efficacy of givosiran was evaluated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study (ENVISION).
ENVISION
A total number of 94 patients with AHP (89 patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), 2 patients with variegate porphyria (VP), 1 patient with hereditary coproporphyria (HCP), and 2 patients with no identified mutation in a porphyria-related gene) were randomised 1:1 to receive once monthly subcutaneous injections of givosiran 2.5 mg/kg or placebo during the 6-month double-blind period. Patients randomised to givosiran included 46 patients with AIP, 1 patient with VP, and 1 patient with HCP. In this study, inclusion criteria specified a minimum of 2 porphyria attacks requiring hospitalisation, urgent healthcare visit, or intravenous (IV) hemin administration at home in the 6 months prior to study entry. Hemin use during the study was permitted for the treatment of acute porphyria attacks. The median age of patients in the ENVISION study was 37.5 years (range 19 to 65 years); 89.4 % of patients were female, and 77.7 % were white. The treatment arms were balanced with respect to historical annualised porphyria attack rate (overall median baseline rate of 8 per year), prior hemin prophylaxis, use of opioid medicinal products, and patient-reported measures of chronic symptoms between attacks.
The major efficacy measure was the annualised attack rate (AAR) of composite porphyria attacks during the 6-month double-blind period and consisted of three components: attacks requiring hospitalisation, urgent healthcare visit, or IV hemin administration at home. This composite efficacy measure was evaluated as the primary endpoint in patients with AIP, and as a secondary endpoint in the overall population of patients with AHP. Treatment with this medicinal product resulted in a significant reduction of the AAR of composite porphyria attacks, compared with placebo, of 74 % in patients with AIP (Table 2). Comparable results were seen in patients with AHP, with a reduction of 73 %. Consistent results were observed for each of the 3 components of the composite porphyria attack endpoint.
The results observed over 6 months were maintained through Month 12, with a median AAR (Q1, Q3) of 0.0 (0.0, 3.5) observed for patients with continued dosing with the medicinal product during the open-label extension period.
Givosiran reduced porphyria attacks compared to placebo in patients with AHP across all pre-specified subgroups, including age, sex, race, region, baseline body mass index (BMI), prior hemin prophylaxis use, historical attack rate, prior chronic opioid use when not having attacks, and the presence of prior chronic symptoms when not having attacks.
Additional clinical efficacy endpoints were studied in AIP patients and are summarised in Table 2.
Table 2: Clinical Efficacy Results in Patients with AIP during the 6-Month Double-Blind Period of the ENVISION Study
| Endpoint | Placebo | Givosiran |
| (N=43) | (N=46) |
| Annualised attack rate of composite porphyria attacksa |
| Mean AAR (95 % CI)b | 12.5 (9.4, 16.8) | 3.2 (2.3, 4.6) |
| Rate ratio (95 % CI)b (givosiran/placebo) | 0.26 (0.16, 0.41) |
| P-valueb | < 0.001 |
| Median AAR, (Q1, Q3) | 10.7 (2.2, 26.1) | 1.0 (0.0, 6.2) |
| Number of patients with 0 attacks (%) | 7 (16.3) | 23 (50.0) |
| Annualised days of hemin use |
| Mean (95 % CI)b | 29.7 (18.4, 47.9) | 6.8 (4.2, 10.9) |
| Ratio (95 % CI)b (givosiran/placebo) | 0.23 (0.11, 0.45) |
| P-valueb | < 0.001 |
| Daily worst pain scorec |
| Baseline, median (Q1, Q3) | 3.3 (1.9, 5.6) | 2.2 (1.2, 4.5) |
| Median of treatment difference (95 %) (givosiran-placebo) | −10.1 (−22.8, 0.9) |
| P-value | < 0.05 |
| PCS of SF-12d |
| Baseline, mean (SD) | 38.4 (9.4) | 39.4 (9.6) |
| Change from baseline at Month 6, LS mean (95 % CI) | 1.4 (−1.0, 3.9) | 5.4 (3.0, 7.7) |
| LS mean difference (95 % CI) (givosiran-placebo) | 3.9 (0.6, 7.3) |
| Nominal P-value | < 0.05 |
AAR, Annualised Attack Rate; AIP, Acute Intermittent Porphyria; CI, Confidence Interval; Q1, Quartile 1; Q3, Quartile 3; LS, Least Square; PCS, Physical Component Summary; SF-12, the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey
a Composite porphyria attacks includes three components: attacks requiring hospitalisation, urgent healthcare visits, or IV hemin administration at home.
b Based on negative binomial regression model. A rate ratio < 1 represents a favourable outcome for givosiran.
c Patients provided a daily self-assessment of their worst pain based on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS). A lower score indicates fewer symptoms. Median of treatment difference and CI were estimated using the Hodges-Lehmann method; p-value was based on Wilcoxon rank sum test, which was conducted post-hoc after data showed a significant deviation from normal distribution.
d A higher score indicates improved health-related quality of life; analysed using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method. The endpoint was not formally tested for statistical significance; a nominal p-value was reported.
In addition to greater improvement from baseline in the SF-12 PCS score compared to patients treated with placebo at Month 6, there was consistent evidence of effect favouring this medicinal product in bodily pain, role-physical, and social functioning domains, but not in the general health, physical functioning, role-emotional, vitality, and mental health domains (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Change from Baseline to Month 6 in SF-12 Domain Scores in Patients with AIP

AIP, Acute Intermittent Porphyria; CI, Confidence Interval; Givo, givosiran; Pbo, placebo; LS, Least Square; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; SF-12, the 12-item Short-Form health survey version 2.
In a patient global assessment (Patient Global Impression of Change – PGIC) a larger proportion of patients with AIP treated with givosiran (61.1 %) than with placebo (20 %) rated their overall status as “very much improved” or “much improved” since the start of the study.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with this medicinal product in all subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of AHP (see section 4.2 and section 5.2 for information on paediatric use).