Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, protein kinase inhibitors, ATC code: L01EH03.
Mechanism of action
Tucatinib is a reversible, potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2. In cellular signalling assays, tucatinib is >1000‑fold more selective for HER2 compared to epidermal growth factor receptor. In vitro, tucatinib inhibits phosphorylation of HER2 and HER3, resulting in inhibition of downstream cell signalling and cell proliferation, and induces death in HER2 driven tumour cells. In vivo, tucatinib inhibits the growth of HER2 driven tumours and the combination of tucatinib and trastuzumab showed enhanced anti‑tumour activity in vitro and in vivo compared to either medicinal product alone.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Cardiac electrophysiology
Multiple doses of tucatinib 300 mg twice a day did not have an effect on the QTc interval in a TQT study in healthy subjects.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy of tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine was evaluated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator, global study (HER2CLIMB). Patients enrolled had locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2‑positive breast cancer, with or without brain metastases, and had prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) separately or in combination, in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. HER2 overexpression or amplification was confirmed by central laboratory analysis.
Patients with brain metastases, including those with untreated or progressing lesions, were eligible to enrol provided they were neurologically stable and did not require immediate brain radiation or surgery. Patients who required immediate local intervention could receive local therapy and be subsequently enrolled. The study included patients with untreated brain metastases and patients with treated brain metastases that were either stable or progressing since last brain radiation or surgery. Patients were excluded from the study if they received systemic corticosteroids (≥2 mg total daily of dexamethasone or equivalent) for control of symptoms of CNS metastases <28 days prior to the first dose of study treatment. The study also excluded patients with leptomeningeal disease. Patients who had previously been treated with HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded with the exception of patients who received lapatinib for ≤21 days and was discontinued for reasons other than disease progression or severe toxicity. For patients with hormone receptor positive tumors, endocrine therapy was not permitted as concomitant therapy, with the exception of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists used for ovarian suppression in premenopausal women.
A total of 612 patients were randomised 2:1 to receive tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine (N=410) or placebo in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine (N=202). Randomisation was stratified by the presence or history of brain metastases (yes vs. no), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs. 1), and region (U.S., Canada, or rest of world).
Patient demographics were balanced between treatment arms. The median age was 54 years (range, 25 to 82); 116 (19%) patients were aged 65 years or older. 444 patients were white (73%) and 607 were female (99%). 314 patients (51%) had an ECOG performance status of 1 and 298 patients (49%) had an ECOG performance status of 0. Sixty percent had oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive disease. Forty-eight percent of patients had a presence or history of brain metastases; of these, 23% had untreated brain metastases, 40% had treated but stable brain metastases, and 37% had treated but radiographically progressing brain metastases. Additionally, 49% of patients had lung metastases, 35% had liver metastases, and 14% had skin metastases. Patients had a median of 4 (range, 2 to 17) prior lines of systemic therapy and a median of 3 (range, 1 to 14) prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. All patients received prior trastuzumab‑based treatments and trastuzumab emtansine, while all but two patients had prior pertuzumab‑based treatment.
Tucatinib or placebo, 300 mg orally twice per day, was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Trastuzumab was administered intravenously as a loading dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of each subsequent 21‑day cycle. An alternate dosing option for trastuzumab was a fixed dose of 600 mg administered subcutaneously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Capecitabine, 1000 mg/m2 orally twice per day, was administered on Days 1 through 14 of each 21‑day cycle.
The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the first 480 randomized patients. In this population, the median duration of exposure to tucatinib was 7.3 months (range <0.1, 35.1) for patients on the tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine arm compared to 4.4 months (range <0.1, 24.0) of placebo for patients on the placebo + trastuzumab + capecitabine arm. Similar differences in exposure to trastuzumab and capecitabine were observed.
Secondary endpoints were evaluated in all randomized patients (N=612) and included overall survival (OS), PFS among patients with a history or presence of brain metastases (PFSBrainMets) and confirmed objective response rate (ORR).
Primary and key secondary endpoint results were consistent across pre-specified subgroups: hormone receptor status, presence or history of brain metastases, ECOG status, and region. PFS as determined by the investigator was consistent with PFS as assessed by BICR.
Efficacy results from the primary analysis are summarized in Table 5 and Figures 1 and 2.
Table 5. Efficacy results from the HER2CLIMB study (primary analysis)
| | Tucatinib + Trastuzumab + Capecitabine | Placebo + Trastuzumab + Capecitabine |
| PFS1 | N=320 | N=160 |
| Number of events (%) | 178 (56) | 97 (61) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 | 0.54 (0.42, 0.71) |
| P-value3 | <0.00001 |
| Median (months) (95% CI) | 7.8 (7.5, 9.6) | 5.6 (4.2, 7.1) |
| OS | N=410 | N=202 |
| Number of deaths, n (%) | 130 (32) | 85 (42) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 | 0.66 (0.50, 0.87) |
| P-value3 | 0.00480 |
| Median OS, months (95% CI) | 21.9 (18.3, 31.0) | 17.4 (13.6, 19.9) |
| PFSBrainMets4 | N=198 | N=93 |
| Number of events (%) | 106 (53.5) | 51 (54.8) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 | 0.48 (0.34, 0.69) |
| P-value3 | <0.00001 |
| Median (months) (95% CI) | 7.6 (6.2, 9.5) | 5.4 (4.1, 5.7) |
| Confirmed ORR for Patients with Measurable Disease | N=340 | N=171 |
| ORR (95% CI)5 | 40.6 (35.3, 46.0) | 22.8 (16.7, 29.8) |
| P-value6 | 0.00008 |
| CR (%) | 3 (0.9) | 2 (1.2) |
| PR (%) | 135 (39.7) | 37 (21.6) |
| DOR | | |
| Median DOR in months (95% CI) 7 | 8.3 (6.2, 9.7) | 6.3 (5.8, 8.9) |
BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; PFS=progression-free survival; OS=overall survival; ORR=objective response rate; CR=complete response; PR=partial response; DOR=duration of response.
1. Primary PFS analysis conducted in first 480 randomized patients. PFS based on Kaplan-Meier analyses.
2. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals are based on stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model controlling for stratification factors (presence or history of brain metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, and region of world)
3. Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure controlling for stratification factors
4. Analysis includes patients with history or presence of parenchymal brain metastases at baseline, including target and non-target lesions. Does not include patients with dural lesions only.
5. Two-sided 95% exact confidence interval, computed using the Clopper-Pearson method
6. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test controlling for stratification factors (presence or history of brain metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, and region of world)
7. Calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method
Figure 1. Kaplan‑Meier curves of progression-free survival (per BICR)

Figure 2. Kaplan‑Meier curves of progression-free survival (per BICR) in patients with brain metastases

As planned per protocol, approximately two years after last patient randomized, the final OS analysis was performed based on 370 events, which corresponded to a median follow-up of 29.6 months. Median OS was 24.7 months (95% CI: 21.6, 28.9) for patients on the tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine arm compared to 19.2 months (95% CI: 16.4, 21.4) for patients on the placebo + trastuzumab + capecitabine arm (HR = 0.725; 95% CI: 0.585, 0.898). The final OS analysis is present in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Kaplan‑Meier curves of overall survival (final analysis)

Paediatric population
The MHRA has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with TUKYSA in all subsets of the paediatric population in malignant breast neoplasms (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).