Pharmacotherapeutic group: Anti-hypertensives, other anti-hypertensives, ATC code: C02KX02
Mechanism of action
Ambrisentan is an orally active, propanoic acid-class, ERA selective for the endothelin A (ETA) receptor. Endothelin plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of PAH.
Ambrisentan is an ETA antagonist (approximately 4 000-fold more selective for ETA as compared to ETB).
Ambrisentan blocks the ETA receptor subtype, localised predominantly on vascular smooth muscle cells and cardiac myocytes. This prevents endothelin-mediated activation of second messenger systems that result in vasoconstriction and smooth muscle cell proliferation.
The selectivity of ambrisentan for the ETA over the ETB receptor is expected to retain ETB receptor mediated production of the vasodilators nitric oxide and prostacyclin.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Two randomised, double-blind, multi-centre, placebo controlled, Phase 3 pivotal studies were conducted (ARIES-1 and 2). ARIES-1 included 201 patients and compared ambrisentan 5 mg and 10 mg with placebo. ARIES-2 included 192 patients and compared ambrisentan 2.5 mg and 5 mg with placebo. In both studies, ambrisentan was added to patients' supportive/background medication, which could have included a combination of digoxin, anticoagulants, diuretics, oxygen and vasodilators (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors). Patients enrolled had IPAH or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (PAH-CTD). The majority of patients had WHO functional Class II (38.4%) or Class III (55.0%) symptoms. Patients with pre-existent hepatic disease (cirrhosis or clinically significantly elevated aminotransferases) and patients using other targeted therapy for PAH (e.g. prostanoids) were excluded. Haemodynamic parameters were not assessed in these studies.
The primary endpoint defined for the Phase 3 studies was improvement in exercise capacity assessed by change from baseline in 6minute walk distance (6MWD) at 12 weeks. In both studies, treatment with ambrisentan resulted in a significant improvement in 6MWD for each dose of ambrisentan.
The placebo-adjusted improvement in mean 6MWD at week 12 compared to baseline was 30.6 m (95% CI: 2.9 to 58.3; p=0.008) and 59.4 m (95% CI: 29.6 to 89.3; p<0.001) for the 5 mg group, in ARIES-1 and 2 respectively. The placebo-adjusted improvement in mean 6MWD at week 12 in patients in the 10 mg group in ARIES-1 was 51.4 m (95% CI: 26.6 to 76.2; p<0.001).
A pre-specified combined analysis of the Phase 3 studies (ARIES-C) was conducted. The placebo-adjusted mean improvement in 6MWD was 44.6 m (95% CI: 24.3 to 64.9; p<0.001) for the 5 mg dose, and 52.5 m (95% CI: 28.8 to 76.2; p<0.001) for the 10 mg dose.
In ARIES-2, ambrisentan (combined dose group) significantly delayed the time to clinical worsening of PAH compared to placebo (p<0.001), the hazard ratio demonstrated an 80% reduction (95% CI: 47% to 92%). The measure included: death, lung transplantation, hospitalisation for PAH, atrial septostomy, addition of other PAH therapeutic agents and early escape criteria. A statistically significant increase (3.41 ± 6.96) was observed for the combined dose group in the physical functioning scale of the SF-36 Health Survey compared with placebo (-0.20 ± 8.14, p=0.005). Treatment with ambrisentan led to a statistically significant improvement in Borg Dyspnea Index (BDI) at week 12 (placebo-adjusted BDI of -1.1 (95% CI: -1.8 to -0.4; p=0.019; combined dose group)).
Long term data
Patients enrolled into ARIES-1 and 2 were eligible to enter a long-term open label extension study ARIES-E (n=383). The combined mean exposure was approximately 145 ± 80 weeks, and the maximum exposure was approximately 295 weeks. The main primary endpoints of this study were the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with long-term exposure to ambrisentan, including serum LFTs. The safety findings observed with long-term ambrisentan exposure in this study were generally consistent with those observed in the 12 week placebo-controlled studies.
The observed probability of survival for subjects receiving ambrisentan (combined ambrisentan dose group) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 93%, 85% and 79% respectively.
In an open label study (AMB222), ambrisentan was studied in 36 patients to evaluate the incidence of increased serum aminotransferase concentrations in patients who had previously discontinued other ERA therapy due to aminotransferase abnormalities. During a mean of 53 weeks of treatment with ambrisentan, none of the patients enrolled had a confirmed serum ALT >3xULN that required permanent discontinuation of treatment. Fifty percent of patients had increased from 5 mg to 10 mg ambrisentan during this time.
The cumulative incidence of serum aminotransferase abnormalities >3xULN in all Phase 2 and 3 studies (including respective open label extensions) was 17 of 483 subjects over a mean exposure duration of 79.5 weeks. This is an event rate of 2.3 events per 100 patient years of exposure for ambrisentan. In the ARIES-E open label long term extension study, the 2 year risk of developing serum aminotransferase elevations >3xULN in patients treated with ambrisentan was 3.9%.
Other clinical information
An improvement in haemodynamic parameters was observed in patients with PAH after 12 weeks (n=29) in a Phase 2 study (AMB220). Treatment with ambrisentan resulted in an increase in mean cardiac index, a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure, and a decrease in mean pulmonary vascular resistance.
Decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressures has been reported with ambrisentan therapy. In placebo controlled clinical trials of 12 weeks duration mean reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures from base line to end of treatment were 3 mm Hg and 4.2 mm Hg respectively. The mean decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures persisted for up to 4 years of treatment with ambrisentan in the long-term open label ARIES E study.
No clinically meaningful effects on the pharmacokinetics of ambrisentan or sildenafil were seen during a drug-drug interaction study in healthy volunteers, and the combination was well tolerated. The number of patients who received concomitant ambrisentan and sildenafil in ARIES-E and AMB222 was 22 patients (5.7%) and 17 patients (47%), respectively. No additional safety concerns were identified in these patients.
Clinical efficacy in combination with tadalafil
A multicentre, double-blind, active comparator, event-driven, Phase 3 outcome study (AMB112565/AMBITION) was conducted to assess the efficacy of initial combination of ambrisentan and tadalafil vs. monotherapy of either ambrisentan or tadalafil alone, in 500 treatment naive PAH patients, randomised 2:1:1, respectively. No patients received placebo alone. The primary analysis was combination group vs. pooled monotherapy groups. Supportive comparisons of combination therapy group vs. the individual monotherapy groups were also made. Patients with significant anaemia, fluid retention or rare retinal diseases were excluded according to the investigators' criteria. Patients with ALT and AST values >2xULN at baseline were also excluded.
At baseline, 96% of patients were naive to any previous PAH-specific treatment, and the median time from diagnosis to entry into the study was 22 days. Patients started on ambrisentan 5 mg and tadalafil 20 mg and were titrated to 40 mg tadalafil at week 4 and 10 mg ambrisentan at week 8, unless there were tolerability issues. The median double-blind treatment duration for combination therapy was greater than 1.5 years.
The primary endpoint was the time to first occurrence of a clinical failure event, defined as:
– death, or
– hospitalisation for worsening PAH,
– disease progression;
– unsatisfactory long-term clinical response.
The mean age of all patients was 54 years (SD 15; range 18–75 years of age). Patients WHO FC at baseline was II (31%) and FC III (69%). Idiopathic or heritable PAH was the most common aetiology in the study population (56%), followed by PAH due to connective tissue disorders (37%), PAH associated with medicines and toxins (3%), corrected simple congenital heart disease (2%), and HIV (2%). Patients with WHO FC II and III had a mean baseline 6MWD of 353 metres.
Outcome endpoints
Treatment with combination therapy resulted in a 50% risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.502; 95% CI: 0.348 to 0.724; p=0.0002) of the composite clinical failure endpoint up to final assessment visit when compared to the pooled monotherapy group [Figure 1 and Table 1]. The treatment effect was driven by a 63% reduction in hospitalisations on combination therapy, was established early and was sustained. Efficacy of combination therapy on the primary endpoint was consistent on the comparison to individual monotherapy and across the subgroups of age, ethnic origin, geographical region, aetiology (iPAH/hPAH and PAH-CTD). The effect was significant for both FC II and FC III patients.
Figure 1
Table 1
| | Ambrisentan + Tadalafil (N=253) | Monotherapy Pooled (N=247) | Ambrisentan monotherapy (N=126) | Tadalafil monotherapy (N=121) |
| Time to First Clinical Failure Event (Adjudicated) |
| Clinical failure, no. (%) | 46 (18) | 77 (31) | 43 (34) | 34 (28) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) | | 0.502 (0.348, 0.724) | 0.477 (0.314, 0.723) | 0.528 (0.338, 0.827) |
| P-value, Log-rank test | | 0.0002 | 0.0004 | 0.0045 |
| Component as First Clinical Failure Event (Adjudicated) |
| Death (all-cause) | 9 (4%) | 8 (3%) | 2 (2) | 6 (5) |
| Hospitalisation for worsening PAH | 10 (4%) | 30 (12%) | 18 (14) | 12 (10) |
| Disease progression | 10 (4%) | 16 (6%) | 12 (10) | 4 (3) |
| Unsatisfactory long-term clinical response | 17 (7%) | 23 (9%) | 11 (9) | 12 (10) |
| Time to First Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH (Adjudicated) |
| First hospitalisation, no (%) | 19 (8%) | 44 (18%) | 27 (21%) | 17 (14%) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) | | 0.372 | 0.323 | 0.442 |
| P-value, Log-rank test | | 0.0002 | <0.0001 | 0.0124 |
Secondary endpoints
Secondary endpoints were tested:
Table 2
| Secondary Endpoints (change from baseline to week 24) | Ambrisentan + Tadalafil | Monotherapy pooled | Difference and Confidence Interval | p-value |
| NT-proBNP (% reduction) | −67.2 | −50.4 | % difference -33.8; 95% CI: -44.8, -20.7 | p<0.0001 |
| % subjects achieving a satisfactory clinical response at week 24 | 39 | 29 | Odds ratio 1.56; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.32 | p=0.026 |
| 6MWD (metres, median change) | 49.0 | 23.8 | 22.75 m; 95% CI: 12.00, 33.50 | p<0.0001 |
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
A study of 492 patients (ambrisentan N=329, placebo N=163) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 11% of which had secondary pulmonary hypertension (WHO group 3), has been conducted, but was terminated early when it was determined that the primary efficacy endpoint could not be met (ARTEMIS-IPF study). Ninety events (27%) of IPF progression (including respiratory hospitalisations) or death were observed in the ambrisentan group compared to 28 events (17%) in the placebo group. Ambrisentan is therefore contraindicated for patients with IPF with or without secondary pulmonary hypertension (see section 4.3).
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with the reference medicinal product containing ambrisentan in the subset of the paediatric population aged below 1 year in treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).