Pharmacotherapeutic group: Psychoanaleptics; Other antidepressants, ATC code: N06AX27.
Mechanism of action
Esketamine is the S‑enantiomer of racemic ketamine. It is a non‑selective, non‑competitive, antagonist of the N‑methyl‑D‑aspartate (NMDA) receptor, an ionotropic glutamate receptor. Through NMDA receptor antagonism, esketamine produces a transient increase in glutamate release leading to increases in α‑amino‑3‑hydroxy‑5‑methyl‑4‑isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) stimulation and subsequently to increases in neurotrophic signalling which may contribute to the restoration of synaptic function in these brain regions involved with the regulation of mood and emotional behaviour. Restoration of dopaminergic neurotransmission in brain regions involved in the reward and motivation, and decreased stimulation of brain regions involved in anhedonia, may contribute to the rapid response.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Abuse potential
In a study of abuse potential conducted in recreational polydrug users (n=41), single doses of esketamine nasal spray (84 mg and 112 mg) and the positive control drug intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg infused over 40 minutes) produced significantly greater scores than placebo on subjective ratings of “drug liking” and on other measures of subjective drug effects.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray was investigated in five Phase 3 clinical studies (TRD3001, TRD3002, TRD3003, TRD3004, and TRD3005) in adult patients (18 to 86 years) with treatment‑resistant depression (TRD) who met DSM‑5 criteria for major depressive disorder and were non‑responders to at least two oral antidepressants (ADs) treatments, of adequate dosage and duration, in the current major depressive episode. 1,833 adult patients were enrolled, of which 1,601 patients were exposed to esketamine. Additionally, 202 patients were randomised (122 patients received esketamine) in Phase 2 study TRD2005 in Japan, 252 patients were randomised (126 patients received esketamine) in Phase 3 study TRD3006 primarily in China, and 676 patients were randomised (334 patients received esketamine) in Phase 3 study TRD3013.
The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray was investigated in two Phase 3 clinical studies in adult patients (18 to 64 years) with moderate to severe MDD (MADRS total score >28) who had affirmative responses to Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) questions B3 (“Think [even momentarily] about harming or of hurting or of injuring yourself: with at least some intent or awareness that you might die as a result; or think about suicide [i.e., about killing yourself]?”) and B10 (“Intend to act on thoughts of killing yourself in the past 24 hours?”). 456 adult patients were enrolled, of which 227 patients were exposed to esketamine.
Treatment‑resistant depression – Short‑term studies
Esketamine was evaluated in three Phase 3 short‑term (4‑week) randomised, double‑blind, active‑controlled studies in patients with TRD. Studies TRANSFORM‑1 (TRD3001) and TRANSFORM‑2 (TRD3002) were conducted in adults (18 to < 65 years) and Study TRANSFORM‑3 (TRD3005) was conducted in adults ≥ 65 years of age. Patients in TRD3001 and TRD3002 initiated treatment with esketamine 56 mg plus a newly initiated daily oral AD or a newly initiated daily oral AD plus placebo nasal spray on day 1. Esketamine dosages were then maintained on 56 mg or titrated to 84 mg or matching placebo nasal spray administered twice‑weekly during a 4‑week double‑blind induction phase. Esketamine doses of 56 mg or 84 mg were fixed in Study TRD3001 and flexible in Study TRD3002. In Study TRD3005, patients (≥ 65 years) initiated treatment with esketamine 28 mg plus a newly initiated daily oral AD or a newly initiated daily oral AD plus placebo nasal spray (day 1). Esketamine dosages were titrated to 56 mg or 84 mg or matching placebo nasal spray administered twice‑weekly during a 4‑week double‑blind induction phase. In the flexible dose studies, TRD3002 and TRD3005, up titration of esketamine dose was based on clinical judgement and dose could be down titrated based on tolerability. A newly initiated open‑label oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) was initiated on day 1 in all studies. The selection of the newly initiated oral AD was determined by the investigator based on the patient's prior treatment history. In all short‑term studies, the primary efficacy endpoint was change in MADRS total score from baseline to day 28.
Baseline demographic and disease characteristics for patient in TRD3002, TRD3001, and TRD3005 are presented in Table 4.
| Table 4: Baseline demographic characteristics for TRD3002, TRD3001, and TRD3005 (full analysis sets) |
| | Study TRD3002 (N=223) | Study TRD3001 (N=342) | Study TRD3005 (N=137) |
| Age, years |
| Median (Range) | 47.0 (19; 64) | 47.0 (18; 64) | 69.0 (65; 86) |
| Sex, n (%) |
| Male | 85 (38.1%) | 101 (29.5%) | 52 (38.0%) |
| Female | 138 (61.9%) | 241 (70.5%) | 85 (62.0%) |
| Race, n (%) |
| White | 208 (93.3%) | 262 (76.6%) | 130 (94.9%) |
| Black or African American | 11 (4.9%) | 19 (5.6%) | ‑‑ |
| Prior oral antidepressants with nonresponse (i.e., failed antidepressants) |
| Number of specific antidepressants, n (%) |
| 2 | 136 (61.0%) | 167 (48.8%) | 68 (49.6%) |
| 3 or more | 82 (36.8%) | 167 (48.8%) | 58 (42.3%) |
| Newly initiated oral antidepressant medication initiated at randomisation, n (%) |
| SNRI | 152 (68.2%) | 196 (57.3%) | 61 (44.5%) |
| SSRI | 71 (31.8%) | 146 (42.7%) | 76 (55.5%) |
| Withdrawn from study (for any reason), n/N (%) | 30/227 (13.2%) | 31/346 (9.0%) | 16/138 (11.6%) |
In the flexible dose study TRD3002, at day 28, 67% of the patients randomised to esketamine were on 84 mg. In study TRD3002, esketamine plus a newly initiated oral AD demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistical superiority compared to a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray (Table 5), and symptom reduction was observed as early as 24 hours post‑dose.
In study TRD3001, a clinically meaningful treatment effect in change in MADRS total scores from baseline at the end of the 4‑week induction phase was observed favouring esketamine plus newly initiated oral AD compared with a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray (Table 5). In Study TRD3001, the treatment effect for the esketamine 84 mg plus oral AD group compared with oral AD plus placebo was not statistically significant.
In study TRD3005, at day 28, 64% of the patients randomised to esketamine were on 84 mg, 25% on 56 mg, and 10% on 28 mg. In study TRD3005, a clinically meaningful but not statistically significant treatment effect in change in MADRS total scores from baseline at the end of the 4‑week induction phase was observed favouring esketamine plus newly initiated oral AD compared with a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray (Table 5). Subgroup analyses suggest limited efficacy in the population over 75 years old.
| Table 5: Primary efficacy results for change in MADRS total score for 4‑week clinical trials (ANCOVA BOCF*) |
| Study no. | Treatment group§ | Number of patients | Mean baseline score (SD) | LS mean change from baseline to end of week 4 (SE) | LS mean difference (95% CI)† |
| TRD3001 | Spravato 56 mg + oral AD | 115 | 37.4 (4.8) | ‑18.9 (1.3) | ‑4.3 (‑7.8, ‑0.8)# |
| Spravato 84 mg + oral AD | 114 | 37.8 (5.6) | ‑16.2 (1.3) | ‑1.2 (‑4.7, 2.3)# |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 113 | 37.5 (6.2) | ‑14.7 (1.3) | |
| TRD3002 | Spravato (56 mg or 84 mg) + oral AD | 114 | 37.0 (5.7) | ‑17.7 (1.3) | ‑3.5 (‑6.7, ‑0.3)‡ |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 109 | 37.3 (5.7) | ‑14.3 (1.3) | |
| TRD3005 (≥ 65 years) | Spravato (28 mg, 56 mg or 84 mg) + oral AD | 72 | 35.5 (5.9) | ‑10.1 (1.7) | ‑2.9 (‑6.5, 0.6)# |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 65 | 34.8 (6.4) | ‑6.8 (1.7) | |
| SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; LS Mean = least‑squares mean; CI = confidence interval; AD = antidepressant *ANCOVA analysis using Baseline Observation Carried Forward, which means that for a patient who discontinues from treatment, it is assumed that the depression level returns to the baseline level (i.e. the depression level is the same as before start of treatment) § Nasally administered esketamine or placebo; oral AD = a newly initiated AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) † Difference (Spravato + oral AD minus Oral AD + placebo nasal spray) in least‑squares mean change from baseline ‡ Treatment group that was statistically significantly superior to Oral AD + placebo nasal spray # Median unbiased estimate (i.e., weighted combination of the LS means of the difference from Oral AD + placebo nasal spray), and 95% flexible confidence interval |
Response and remission rates
Response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the MADRS total score from baseline of the induction phase. Based on the reduction in MADRS total score from baseline, the proportion of patients in Studies TRD3001, TRD3002 and TRD3005 who demonstrated response to esketamine plus oral AD treatment was greater than for oral AD plus placebo nasal spray throughout the 4‑week double‑blind induction phase (Table 6).
Remission was defined as a MADRS total score ≤ 12. In all three studies, a greater proportion of patients treated with esketamine plus oral AD were in remission at the end of the 4‑week double‑blind induction phase than for oral AD plus placebo nasal spray (Table 6).
| Table 6: Response and remission rates in 4‑week clinical trials based on BOCF* data |
| Study No. | Treatment group§ | Number of patients (%) |
| Response rate† | Remission rate‡ |
| 24 hours | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 4 |
| TRD3001 | Spravato 56 mg + oral AD | 20 (17.4%) | 21 (18.3%) | 29 (25.2%) | 52 (45.2%) | 61 (53.0%) | 40 (34.8%) |
| Spravato 84 mg + oral AD | 17 (14.9%)# | 16 (14.0%) | 25 (21.9%) | 33 (28.9%) | 52 (45.6%) | 38 (33.3%) |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 8 (7.1%) | 5 (4.4%) | 15 (13.3%) | 25 (22.1%) | 42 (37.2%) | 33 (29.2%) |
| TRD3002 | Spravato 56 mg or 84 mg + oral AD | 18 (15.8%) | 15 (13.2%) | 29 (25.4%) | 54 (47.4%) | 70 (61.4%) | 53 (46.5%) |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 11 (10.1%) | 13 (11.9%) | 23 (21.1%) | 35 (32.1%) | 52 (47.7%) | 31 (28.4%) |
| TRD3005 (≥ 65 years) | Spravato 28 mg, 56 mg or 84 mg + oral AD | NA | 4 (5.6%) | 4 (5.6%) | 9 (12.5%) | 17 (23.6%) | 11 (15.3%) |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | NA | 3 (4.6%) | 8 (12.3%) | 8 (12.3%) | 8 (12.3%) | 4 (6.2%) |
| AD = antidepressant; NA = not available * Baseline Observation Carried Forward, which means that for a patient who discontinues from treatment, it is assumed that the depression level returns to the baseline level (i.e. the depression level is the same as before start of treatment). § Nasally administered Spravato or placebo; oral AD = a newly initiated AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) † Response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the MADRS total score from baseline ‡ Remission was defined as MADRS total score ≤ 12 # First dose was Spravato 56 mg + oral AD |
Treatment‑resistant depression – Long‑term studies
Relapse‑prevention study
The maintenance of antidepressant efficacy was demonstrated in a relapse prevention trial. Study SUSTAIN‑1 (TRD3003) was a long‑term randomised, double‑blind, parallel‑group, active‑controlled, multicentre, relapse prevention study. The primary outcome measure to assess the prevention of depressive relapse was measured as time to relapse. Overall a total of 705 patients were enrolled; 437 directly enrolled; 150 transferred from TRD3001, and 118 transferred from TRD3002. Patients directly enrolled were administered esketamine (56 mg or 84 mg twice weekly) plus oral AD in a 4‑week open label induction phase. At the end of the open label induction phase, 52% of patients were in remission (MADRS total score ≤ 12) and 66% of patients were responders (≥ 50% improvement in MADRS total score). Patients who were responders (455), continued receiving treatment with esketamine plus oral AD in a 12‑week optimisation phase. After the induction phase, patients received esketamine weekly for 4 weeks and starting from week 8, an algorithm (based on the MADRS) was used to determine the dosing frequency; patients in remission (i.e., MADRS total score was ≤ 12) were dosed every other week, however, if the MADRS total score increased to > 12, then the frequency was increased to weekly dosing for the next 4 weeks; with the objective of maintaining the patient on the lowest dosing frequency to maintain response/remission. At the end of 16 weeks of treatment period, patients in stable remission (n=176) or stable response (n=121) were randomised to continue with esketamine or stop esketamine and switch to placebo nasal spray. Stable remission was defined as MADRS total score ≤ 12 in at least 3 of the last 4 weeks of the optimisation phase and stable response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the MADRS total score from baseline for the last 2 weeks of the optimisation phase, but not in stable remission.
Stable remission
Patients in stable remission who continued treatment with esketamine plus oral AD experienced a statistically significantly longer time to relapse of depressive symptoms than did patients on a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray (Figure 1). Relapse was defined as a MADRS total score ≥ 22 for 2 consecutive weeks or hospitalisation for worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event indicative of relapse. The median time to relapse for a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray group was 273 days, whereas the median was not estimable for esketamine plus oral AD, as this group never reached 50% relapse rate.
Figure 1: Time to relapse in patients in stable remission in study TRD3003 (full analysis set)

For patients in stable remission, the relapse rate based on Kaplan‑Meier estimates during the 12‑ and 24‑weeks double‑blind follow up period was 13% and 32% for esketamine and 37% and 46% for placebo nasal spray, respectively.
Stable response
The efficacy results were also consistent for patients in stable response who continued treatment with esketamine plus oral AD; patients experienced a statistically significantly longer time to relapse of depressive symptoms than did patients on a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray (Figure 2). The median time to relapse for a newly initiated oral AD (SNRI: duloxetine, venlafaxine extended release; SSRI: escitalopram, sertraline) plus placebo nasal spray group (88 days) was shorter compared to esketamine plus oral AD group (635 days).
Figure 2: Time to relapse in patients in stable response in study TRD3003 (full analysis set)

For patients in stable response, the relapse rate based on Kaplan‑Meier estimates during the 12‑ and 24‑weeks double‑blind follow up period was 21% and 21% for esketamine and 47% and 56% for placebo nasal spray, respectively.
Enrollment in TRD3003 was staggered over approximately 2 years. The maintenance phase was of variable duration and continued until the individual patient had a relapse of depressive symptoms or discontinued for any other reason, or the study ended because the required number of relapse events occurred. Exposure numbers were influenced by the study stopping at a pre‑determined number of relapses based on the interim analysis. After an initial 16 weeks of treatment with esketamine plus oral AD, the median duration of exposure to esketamine in the maintenance phase was 4.2 months (range: 1 day to 21.2 months) in esketamine‑treated patients (stable remission and stable response). In this study, 31.6% of patients received esketamine for greater than 6 months and 7.9% of patients received esketamine for greater than 1 year in the maintenance phase.
Dosing frequency
The dosing frequency used the majority of the time during the maintenance phase is shown in Table 7. Of the patients randomised to Spravato, 60% received 84 mg and 40% received 56 mg dose.
| Table 7: Dosing frequency used the majority of the time; maintenance phase (Study TRD3003) |
| | Stable Remission | Stable Responders |
| Spravato + Oral AD (N=90) | Oral AD + Placebo Nasal Spray (N=86) | Spravato + Oral AD (N=62) | Oral AD + Placebo Nasal Spray (N=59) |
| Majority dosing frequency | | | | |
| Weekly | 21 (23.3%) | 27 (31.4%) | 34 (54.8%) | 36 (61.0%) |
| Every other week | 62 (68.9%) | 48 (55.8%) | 21 (33.9%) | 19 (32.2%) |
| Weekly or every other week | 7 (7.8%) | 11 (12.8%) | 7 (11.3%) | 4 (6.8%) |
Study TRD3013 (ESCAPE-TRD)
The efficacy of Spravato was evaluated in a long‑term randomised, open-label, rater-blinded, active-controlled study (TRD3013) where esketamine was compared with quetiapine prolonged/extended-release (XR) in 676 adult patients (18–74 years) with TRD who continued to take their current oral AD (an SSRI or SNRI). Patients received treatment with flexibly dosed esketamine (28, 56, or 84 mg) or quetiapine XR, in line with the dosing recommendations in the SmPCs in use at the time of study initiation.
The primary efficacy endpoint was remission (MADRS total score of ≤ 10) at Week 8 and the key secondary endpoint was remaining relapse-free through Week 32 after remission at Week 8. Relapse was defined as a MADRS total score ≥ 22 for 2 consecutive weeks or hospitalisation for worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event indicative of relapse.
The baseline demographic and disease characteristics of patients were similar between the esketamine plus oral AD and quetiapine XR plus oral AD groups. The mean (SD) baseline MADRS total scores were 31.4 (6.06) for the esketamine plus oral AD group and 31.0 (5.83) for the quetiapine XR plus oral AD group.
Esketamine plus oral AD demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistical superiority compared to quetiapine XR plus oral AD on both the primary (Table 8) and key secondary (Table 9) efficacy measure.
| Table 8: Primary efficacy results for TRD3013 Studya |
| Treatment group | Spravato + oral AD | Quetiapine XR + oral AD |
| Number of patients in remission at Week 8 | 91/336 (27.1%) | 60/340 (17.6%) |
| Difference in percentage (95% CI) | 9.44 (3.19, 15.68) | – |
| Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.74 (1.20, 2.52) P = 0.003b | – |
CI = confidence interval; AD = antidepressant; XR = extended release
a A patient who discontinued study intervention before Week 8 was considered as a negative outcome (i.e. non-remission). For patients for whom no MADRS result was available at the Week 8 visit but who did not discontinue study intervention or withdraw from study before Week 8, LOCF of MADRS was applied.
b P-value for Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH), adjusting for age groups (18-64; >=65) and total number of treatment failures.
| Table 9: Key secondary efficacy results for TRD3013 Studya |
| Treatment group | Spravato + oral AD | Quetiapine XR + oral AD |
| Number of patients both in remission at Week 8 and relapse-free at Week 32 | 73/336 (21.7%) | 48/340 (14.1%) |
| Difference in percentage (95% CI) | 7.61 (1.85, 13.37) | – |
| Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.72 (1.15, 2.57) P = 0.008b | – |
CI = confidence interval; AD = antidepressant; XR = extended release
a A patient who discontinued study intervention was considered as a negative outcome. For patients for whom no MADRS result was available at the Week 8 visit but who did not discontinue study intervention or withdraw from study before Week 8, LOCF of MADRS was applied.
b P-value for CMH, adjusting for age groups (18-64; >=65) and total number of treatment failures.
Remission and Response Rates
Rate of remission at Week 32 was 55.0% for patients in the Spravato plus oral AD group and 37.0% in the quetiapine XR plus oral AD group, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.09 (1.53, 2.85). Rate of response (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the MADRS total score from baseline or MADRS total score is ≤ 10) at Week 32 was 75.5% for patients in the Spravato plus oral AD group and 55.5% in the quetiapine XR plus oral AD group, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.48 (1.78, 3.46). Figure 3 depicts the percentage of patients in remission and/or in response in the Treatment phase.
| Figure 3: Percentage of patients in remission and/or in response (LOCF) in study TRD3013, treatment phase; full analysis set |
|  |
| Percentages are based on the number of patients in the indicated population at each timepoint. Remission is defined as a MADRS total score of ≤10. A patient is defined as a responder at a given time point if the percent improvement in MADRS total score from baseline is ≥50% or if the MADRS total score is ≤10. |
Treatment discontinuation rates over the 32-week treatment period due to adverse events, lack of efficacy, and overall were 4.2%, 8.3%, and 23.2% respectively for patients in the esketamine plus oral AD group and 11.5%, 15.0%, and 40.3% respectively for patients in the quetiapine XR plus oral AD group.
Treatment-resistant depression – Short-term study in Japanese patients
The efficacy of Spravato was also evaluated in a short‑term (4‑week) randomised, double‑blind, active‑controlled study (TRD2005) in 202 adult Japanese patients with TRD. Patients received 4 weeks of induction treatment with esketamine fixed-dose of 28 mg, 56 mg, 84 mg or placebo nasal spray in addition to continued current oral AD. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in MADRS total score from baseline to day 28. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics of patients were similar between the esketamine plus AD and placebo nasal spray plus AD groups.
In study TRD2005, no statistically significant difference in change in MADRS total scores from baseline at the end of the 4‑week induction phase was observed for any of the esketamine plus oral AD dosages compared with oral AD plus placebo nasal spray (Table 10).
| Table 10: Primary efficacy results for change in MADRS total score for 4‑week TRD2005 Study in Japanese patients (MMRM) |
| Treatment group | Number of patients | Mean baseline score (SD) | LS mean change from baseline to end of week 4 (SE) | LS mean difference (90% CI)†,# |
| Spravato 28 mg + oral AD | 41 | 38.4 (6.1) | -15.6 (1.8) | -1.0 -5.77; 3.70 |
| Spravato 56 mg + oral AD | 40 | 37.9 (5.4) | -14.0 (1.9) | 0.6 -4.32; 5.47 |
| Spravato 84 mg + oral AD | 41 | 35.9 (5.3) | -15.5 (1.8) | -0.9 -5.66; 3.83 |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 80 | 37.7 (5.7) | -14.6 (1.3) | |
| SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; LS Mean = least‑squares mean; CI = confidence interval; AD = antidepressant. † Difference (Spravato + oral AD minus Oral AD + placebo nasal spray) in least‑squares mean change from baseline. # Confidence interval is based on the Dunnett adjustment. |
Treatment‑resistant depression – Short-term study in Chinese patients
The efficacy of Spravato was also evaluated in a short‑term (4‑week) randomised, double‑blind, active‑controlled study (TRD3006) in 252 adult patients (224 Chinese patients, 28 non-Chinese patients) with TRD.
Patients received 4 weeks of induction treatment with flexibly dosed esketamine (56 mg or 84 mg) or placebo nasal spray, in addition to a newly initiated oral AD. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in MADRS total score from baseline to day 28. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics of patients were similar between the esketamine plus AD and placebo nasal spray plus AD groups.
In study TRD3006, no statistically significant difference in change in MADRS total scores from baseline at the end of the 4‑week induction phase was observed for esketamine plus oral AD compared with oral AD plus placebo nasal spray (Table 9).
| Table 11: Primary efficacy results for change in MADRS total score for 4‑week TRD3006 Study (MMRM) |
| Treatment group | Number of patients# | Mean baseline score (SD) | LS mean change from baseline to end of week 4 (SE) | LS mean difference (95% CI)† |
| All patients |
| Spravato (56 mg or 84 mg) + oral AD | 124 | 36.5 (5.21) | -11.7 (1.09) | -2.0 -4.64; 0.55 |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 126 | 35.9 (4.50) | -9.7 (1.09) | |
| Chinese population |
| Spravato (56 mg or 84 mg) + oral AD | 110 | 36.2 (5.02) | -8.8 (0.95) | -0.7 -3.35; 1.94 |
| Oral AD + placebo nasal spray | 112 | 35.9 (4.49) | -8.1 (0.95) | |
| SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; LS Mean = least‑squares mean; CI = confidence interval; AD = antidepressant. # Two patients did not receive oral AD and were not included in the efficacy analysis. † Difference (Spravato + oral AD minus Oral AD + placebo nasal spray) in least‑squares mean change from baseline. |
Acute short-term treatment of psychiatric emergency due to Major Depressive Disorder
Spravato was investigated in two identical Phase 3 short‑term (4‑week) randomised, double‑blind, multicentre, placebo‑controlled studies, Aspire I (SUI3001) and Aspire II (SUI3002) in adult patients with moderate to severe MDD (MADRS total score >28) who had affirmative responses to MINI questions B3 (“Think [even momentarily] about harming or of hurting or of injuring yourself: with at least some intent or awareness that you might die as a result; or think about suicide [i.e., about killing yourself]?”) and B10 (“Intend to act on thoughts of killing yourself in the past 24 hours?”). In these studies, patients received treatment with esketamine 84 mg or placebo nasal spray twice‑weekly for 4 weeks. All patients received comprehensive standard of care (SOC) treatment, including an initial inpatient hospitalisation and a newly initiated or optimised oral antidepressant (AD) therapy (AD monotherapy or AD plus augmentation) as determined by the investigator. In the physician's opinion, acute psychiatric hospitalisation was clinically warranted due to the subject's immediate risk of suicide. After the first dose, a one-time dose reduction to esketamine 56 mg was allowed for patients unable to tolerate the 84 mg dose.
The baseline demographic and disease characteristics of patients in SUI3001 and SUI3002 were similar between the esketamine plus SOC or placebo nasal spray plus SOC groups. The median patient age was 40 years (range 18 to 64 years), 61% were female; 73% Caucasian and 6% Black; and 63% of patients had at least one prior suicide attempt. Prior to entering the study, 92% of the patients were receiving antidepressant therapy. During the study, as part of standard of care treatment, 40% of patients received AD monotherapy, 54% of patients received AD plus augmentation regimen, and 6% received both AD monotherapy/AD plus augmentation regimen.
The primary efficacy measure was the reduction of symptoms of MDD as measured by the change from baseline MADRS total score at 24 hours after first dose (Day 2).
In SUI3001 and SUI3002, Spravato plus SOC demonstrated statistical superiority on the primary efficacy measure compared to placebo nasal spray plus SOC (see Table 12).
| Table 12: Primary efficacy results for change from baseline in MADRS total score at 24 hours after first dose (Studies SUI3001 and SUI3002) (ANCOVA BOCF*) |
| Study No. | Treatment Group‡ | Number of Patients | Mean Baseline Score (SD) | LS Mean Change from Baseline to 24 hr Post First Dose (SE) | LS Mean Difference (95% CI)§ |
| Study 1 (SUI3001) | Spravato 84 mg + SOC | 112 | 41.2 (5.87) | -15.7 (1.05) | -3.7 (-6.41; -0.92)¶ P=0.006 |
| Placebo nasal spray + SOC | 112 | 41.0 (6.29) | -12.1 (1.03) | – |
| Study 2 (SUI3002) | Spravato 84 mg + SOC | 114 | 39.5 (5.19) | -15.9 (1.02) | -3.9 (-6.65; -1.12)¶ P=0.006 |
| Placebo nasal spray + SOC | 113 | 39.9 (5.76) | -12.0 (1.06) | – |
| Pooled Studies 1 and 2 | Spravato 84 mg + SOC | 226 | 40.3 (5.60) | -15.8 (0.73) | -3.8 (-5.69; -1.82) |
| Placebo nasal spray + SOC | 225 | 40.4 (6.04) | -12.1 (0.73) | – |
| SD=standard deviation; SE=standard error; LS Mean=least-squares mean; CI=confidence interval; SOC=standard of care * ANCOVA analysis using Baseline Observation Carried Forward: In S12TUI3001, 2 subjects (1 subject in each group) did not have the Day 2 (24 hours post first dose) MADRS total score and in SUI3002, 6 subjects (4 subjects in Esketamine and 2 subjects in Placebo) did not have the Day 2 (24 hours post first dose) MADRS total score. For these subjects, it is assumed that the depression level returns to the baseline level (i.e. the depression level is the same as the start of treatment) and the MADRS total scores from baseline were carried forward for the analysis ‡ 12TNasally administered esketamine or placebo § Difference (Spravato + SOC minus placebo nasal spray + SOC) in least‑squares mean change from baseline ¶ Treatment groups that were statistically significantly superior to placebo nasal spray + SOC. |
The treatment differences (95% CI) in change from baseline in MADRS total score at Day 2 (24 hours post first dose) between esketamine + SOC and placebo + SOC were ‑4.70 (‑7.16; ‑2.24) for the subpopulation that reported a prior suicide attempt (N=284) and ‑2.34 (‑5.59; 0.91) for the subpopulation that did not report a prior suicide attempt (N=166).
Time course of treatment response
In both SUI3001 and SUI3002, esketamine's treatment difference compared to placebo was observed starting at 4 hours. Between 4 hours and Day 25, the end of the treatment phase, both the esketamine and placebo groups continued to improve; the difference between the groups generally remained but did not appear to increase over time through Day 25. Figure 4 depicts time course of the primary efficacy measure of change in MADRS total score using pooled studies SUI3001 and SUI3002.
Figure 4: Least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS total score over time in SUI3001 and SUI3002* (pooled data, safety analysis set) – ANCOVA BOCF

* Note: In these studies, after the first dose, a one-time dose reduction to Spravato 56 mg was allowed for patients unable to tolerate the 84 mg dose. Approximately 16% of patients had reduction in Spravato dosage from 84 mg to 56 mg twice weekly.
Remission rates
In the Phase 3 studies, the percentage of patients who achieved remission (MADRS total score ≤12 at any given time during the study) was greater in the esketamine + SOC group than in the placebo + SOC group at all timepoints during the 4-week double-blind treatment phase (Table 11).
| Table 13: Patients who achieved remission of MDD; double-blind treatment phase; full efficacy analysis set |
| | SUI3001 | SUI3002 | Pooled Studies (SUI3001 and SUI3002) |
| Placebo + SOC 112 | Spravato + SOC 112 | Placebo + SOC 113 | Spravato + SOC 114 | Placebo + SOC 225 | Spravato + SOC 226 |
| Day 1, 4 hours post first dose Patients with Remission of MDD | 9 (8.0%) | 12 (10.7%) | 4 (3.5%) | 12 (10.5%) | 13 (5.8%) | 24 (10.6%) |
| Day 2, 24 hours post first dose Patients with Remission of MDD | 10 (8.9%) | 21 (18.8%) | 12 (10.6%) | 25 (21.9%) | 22 (9.8%) | 46 (20.4%) |
| Day 25 (predose) Patients with Remission of MDD | 38 (33.9%) | 46 (41.1%) | 31 (27.4%) | 49 (43.0%) | 69 (30.7%) | 95 (42.0%) |
| Day 25 (4 hours postdose) Patients with Remission of MDD | 42 (37.5%) | 60 (53.6%) | 42 (37.2%) | 54 (47.4%) | 84 (37.3%) | 114 (50.4%) |
| SOC = standard of care Note: Remission is based on a MADRS total score of ≤12. Subjects who did not meet such criterion or discontinued prior to the time point for any reason are not considered to be in remission. |
Effects on suicidality
Overall patients in both treatment groups experienced improvement in the severity of their suicidality as measured by the Clinical Global Impression – Severity of Suicidality - revised (CGI-SS-r) scale at the 24-hour endpoint, though there was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups.
The long-term efficacy of esketamine to prevent suicide has not been established.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Spravato in the treatment of major depressive disorder in one or more subsets of the paediatric population (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).