Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other drugs for disorders of the musculo-skeletal system, ATC code: M09AX03
Mechanism of action
A nonsense mutation in DNA results in a premature stop codon within an mRNA. This premature stop codon in the mRNA causes disease by terminating translation before a full‑length protein is generated. Ataluren enables ribosomal readthrough of mRNA containing such a premature stop codon, resulting in production of a full- length protein.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Nonclinical in vitro experiments in nonsense mutation cellular assays and fish larvae cultured in an ataluren solution have shown that ataluren enabled ribosomal readthrough with a bell‑shaped (inverted-U shaped) concentration-response relationship. It is hypothesised that the in vivo dose response relationship may also be bell-shaped, but in vivo data were too limited to confirm this hypothesis in a mouse model for nmDMD and in humans.
Nonclinical in vitro studies suggest that continuous exposure to ataluren may be important for maximizing activity and that effects of the active substance on ribosomal read-through of premature stop codons reverse shortly after withdrawal of ataluren.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of Translarna were assessed in 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo‑controlled, trials in nmDMD. The primary efficacy endpoint in all three trials was change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) . The efficacy endpoints included in these 3 studies are summarised in Table 2. Patients were required to have documented confirmation of the presence of a nonsense mutation in the dystrophin gene as determined by gene sequencing.
Table 2. Efficacy Endpoints in the 3 Placebo-Controlled Studies in nmDMDa
| | Study 1 & Study 2 | Study 3 |
| Primacy efficacy endpoint: - Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) | At Week 48 | At Week 72 |
| Other endpoints: - Time to persistent 10% worsening in 6MWD - Change in time to run/walk 10 metres - Change in time to climb 4 stairs - Change in time to descend 4 stairs | At Week 48 | At Week 72 |
| Other endpoints: - Change in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) total score | - | At Week 72 |
aStudy 1- PTC124-GD-007-DMD; Study 2- PTC124-GD-020-DMD; Study 3- PTC124-GD-041-DMD
Study 3 evaluated 363 male patients. The study consisted of a 72-week double-blind treatment period, followed by a 72-week open-label treatment period. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ataluren or placebo 3 times per day (morning, midday, and evening). A total of 360 male patients were treated with at least 1 dose of either ataluren 40 mg/kg/day (10, 10, 20 mg/kg) or placebo. Patients were aged 5 to 14 years and received stable doses of concomitant steroids as background therapy.
The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 72 in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), which assessed ambulation. Two populations were assessed for efficacy analysis: the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the modified ITT (mITT) population. The ITT population included all randomised patients with a valid 6MWT baseline and at least one post-baseline 6MWD value. In total, 359 patients were enrolled in the ITT population, with 183 receiving ataluren and 176 receiving placebo. The primary analysis population is the mITT population and included patients from the ITT population who were ≥7 years of age and had a baseline 6MWD of >300 metres and a time to stand from supine of >5 seconds. In total, 185 patients were enrolled in the mITT population, with 92 receiving ataluren and 93 receiving placebo.
In the primary analysis, which is the change from baseline to Week 72 in 6MWD, patients receiving ataluren experienced a smaller mean decline compared to those receiving placebo. In the mITT (primary analysis population) at Week 72 in 6MWD, the ataluren patients showed a decline of 81.83 metres, and the placebo patients showed a decline of 90.09 metres, a treatment difference of 8.26 metres, or a 9% reduction in the rate of decline (p=0.3626). As the primary endpoint, the change in 6MWD from baseline to Week 72 in the primary analysis population did not reach statistical significance (p≤0.05), all other p-values are considered nominal. In the ITT population at Week 72 in 6MWD, ataluren patients showed a decline of 53.01 metres, and the placebo patients showed a decline of 67.43 metres, a treatment difference of 14.42 metres, or a 21% reduction in the rate of decline (p=0.0248), see Figure 1.
Figure 1. Mean Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance in ITT Population (Double-Blind Treatment Period; Study 3)
Time to 10% worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse than baseline. In the study, patients receiving ataluren reached this critical milestone on average later than patients receiving placebo. In the analysis of the mITT population, 63.0% of ataluren patients and 76.3% of placebo patients had a persistent 10% worsening in 6MWD by Week 72. In the ITT population, 48.1% of ataluren patients and 61.9% of placebo patients had a persistent 10% worsening in 6MWD by Week 72. The median time to this milestone was 74.3 weeks in the ataluren arm and 48.0 weeks in the placebo arm (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curve of Time to Persistent 10% 6-Minute Walk Distance Worsening in ITT Population (Double-Blind Treatment Period; Study 3)
The North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) is a functional 16-item scale measuring the ability to independently perform activities of daily living. In the study, the decline in the NSAA total score at Week 72 was numerically smaller in ataluren patients, indicating a preservation of function. In the mITT population, placebo patients showed a greater decline in the NSAA total score, resulting in a treatment difference of 0.9 points. Similarly, in the ITT population, the placebo patients also experienced a greater decline in the NSAA total score, with the same treatment difference of 0.9 points. The separation between the 2 treatments was observed as early as Week 12 and persisted throughout the 72-week treatment period (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Change in Revised NSAA Total Scores Over Time (Double-Blind Treatment Period; Study 3)
In timed function tests (TFTs), tests of time to run/walk 10 metres, time to climb 4 stairs, and time to descend 4 stairs, ataluren-treated patients in Study 3 demonstrated smaller increases in the time it takes to run/walk 10 metres, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 steps, indicating slowing of nmDMD progression relative to placebo.
In the mITT population the change from baseline to Week 72 was better in the ataluren arm than in the placebo arm in time to run/walk 10 metres (better by 0.73 seconds, p=0.1877), time to climb 4 stairs (better by 1.73 seconds, p=0.0179), and time to descend 4 stairs (better by 0.19 seconds, p=0.7997).
Similar results were seen in the ITT population, the change from baseline to Week 72 was better in the ataluren arm than in the placebo arm in time to run/walk 10 metres (better by 0.78 seconds, p=0.0422), time to climb 4 stairs (better by 1.06 seconds, p=0.0293), and time to descend 4 stairs (better by 0.29 seconds, p=0.5749) (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Mean Change in Timed Function Tests (Double-Blind Treatment Period; Study 3)
Study 1 evaluated 174 male patients, aged 5 to 20 years. All patients were required to be able to walk ≥75 metres without the need for assistive devices during a screening 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The majority of patients in all treatment groups were Caucasian (90%). Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio and received ataluren or placebo 3 times per day (morning, midday, and evening), with 57 receiving ataluren 40 mg/kg/day (10, 10, 20 mg/kg), 60 receiving ataluren 80 mg/kg/day (20, 20, 40 mg/kg), and 57 receiving placebo.
In Study 1, a post hoc analysis of the primary endpoint showed that from baseline to Week 48, patients receiving ataluren 40 mg/kg/day had a 12.9 metres mean decline in 6MWD, and patients receiving placebo had a 44.1-meter mean decline in 6MWD (Figure 5). Thus, the mean change in observed 6MWD from baseline to Week 48 was 31.3 metres better in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm than in the placebo arm (p=0.056). In a statistical based model the estimated mean difference was 31.7 metres (adjusted p=0.0367). There was no difference between ataluren 80 mg/kg/day and placebo.
These results indicate that ataluren 40 mg/kg/day slows the loss of walking ability in nmDMD patients.
Figure 5. Mean Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (Study 1)
A post-hoc analysis of time to persistent 10% worsening in 6MWD showed that 26% of patients in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm had progressed at Week 48 compared to 44% in the placebo group (p=0.0652) (Figure 6). There was no difference between ataluren 80 mg/kg/day and placebo. These results indicate that fewer patients receiving ataluren 40 mg/kg/day worsened in 6MWD over 48 weeks.
Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier Curve of Time to Persistent 10% 6MWD Worsening (Study 1)
In timed function tests (TFTs), tests of time to run/walk 10 metres, time to climb 4 stairs, and time to descend 4 stairs, ataluren-treated patients demonstrated smaller increases in the time it takes to run/walk 10 metres, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 steps, indicating slowing of nmDMD progression relative to placebo.
The mean change in timed function tests from baseline to Week 48 was better in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm than placebo in time to run/walk 10 metres (better by 1.5 seconds), time to climb 4 stairs (better by 2.4 seconds), and time to descend 4 stairs (better by 1.6 seconds).
Figure 7. Mean Change in Timed Function Tests (Study 1)
6MWD Results in Patients with a Baseline 6MWD <350 metres.
In patients with a baseline 6MWD <350 metres, the mean change in observed 6MWD from baseline to Week 48 was 68 metres better in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm than in the placebo arm (p=0.0053).
In these patients, the mean change in timed function tests from baseline to Week 48 was better in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm than placebo in time to run/walk 10 metres (better by 3.5 seconds), time to climb 4 stairs (better by 6.4 seconds), and time to descend 4 stairs (better by 5.0 seconds).
Study 2 evaluated 230 male patients, ages 7 to 14 years. All patients were required to be able to walk ≥150 metres and less than 80% predicted without the need for assistive devices during a screening 6MWT. The majority of patients in both treatment groups were Caucasian (76%). Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio and received ataluren 40 mg/kg/day (n=115) or placebo (n=115) 3 times per day (morning, midday, and evening).
Ataluren-treated patients experienced clinical benefit as measured by numerically favourable differences versus placebo across the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. As the primary endpoint (change in 6MWD from baseline to Week 48) did not reach statistical significance (p≤0.05), all other p-values should be considered nominal.
In the ITT population, the difference between the ataluren and placebo arms in mean change in observed 6MWD from baseline to Week 48 was 15.4 metres better in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm than in the placebo arm. In a statistical based model the estimated mean difference was 13.0 metres (p=0.213), Figure 8. Separation between ataluren and placebo was maintained from Week 16 through the end of the study.
Figure 8. Mean Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (Study 2)
Over 48 weeks, ataluren-treated patients showed less decline in muscle function, as evidenced by smaller increases in the time to run/walk 10 metres, climb 4 steps, and descend 4 steps in the ataluren-treated group relative to placebo. The differences favouring ataluren versus placebo in mean changes in timed function tests at Week 48 in the ITT population reached the threshold for a clinically meaningful difference (changes ~1 to 1.5 seconds).
The mean change in timed function tests from baseline to Week 48 was better in the ataluren 40 mg/kg/day arm than placebo in observed time to run/walk 10 metres (better by 1.2 seconds, p=0.117), time to climb 4 stairs (better by 1.8 seconds, p=0.058), and time to descend 4 stairs (better by 1.8 seconds, p=0.012), Figure 9.
Figure 9. Mean Change in Timed Function Tests (Study 2)
Time to 10% worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse than baseline. In the ITT population, the hazard ratio for ataluren versus placebo was 0.75 (p=0.160), representing a 25% reduction in the risk of 10% 6MWD worsening.
Pooled Efficacy Data (Studies 1, 2, and 3)
A pooled analysis of data from Study 1, Study 2, and Study 3 was performed, which included all patients in the ITT Populations of these studies who received 10, 10, 20 mg/kg/day or placebo, for a total of 701 patients. The pooled data from Studies 1, 2, and 3 showed a nominal statistically significant difference between ataluren and placebo for the mean change from baseline to Week 48 in 6MWD (p=0.0002), time to run/walk 10 metres (p=0.0001), time to climb 4 stairs (p=0.0003), and time to descend 4 stairs (p=0.0003) (Table 3). Pooled data from Studies 2 and 3 showed that ataluren treatment resulted in a statistically significant slowing of decline in NSAA total score at Week 48 (p=0.0010).
Table 3: Pooled Efficacy Results (Double-Blind Treatment Period; Studies 1, 2, and 3)
| | Ataluren (N=354) | Placebo (N=347) | Treatment Difference Ataluren- Placebo (p Value) |
| Change in 6-minute walk distance at Week 48 (metres) | -28.1 | -47.4 | 19.32 (p=0.0002) |
| Change in NSAA total score at Week 48* | -2.40 | -3.48 | 1.07 (p=0.0010) |
| Timed function tests (seconds) | | | |
| -Change in time to run/walk 10 metres at Week 48 | 2.46 | 3.77 | -1.31 (p=0.0001) |
| -Change in time to climb 4 stairs at Week 48 | 3.66 | 5.11 | -1.45 (p=0.0003) |
| -Change in time to descend 4 stairs at Week 48 | 3.44 | 4.98 | -1.54 (p=0.0003) |
Abbreviations: NSAA, North Star Ambulatory Assessment
* Pooled NSAA data from Studies 2 and 3 only; N=297 for Translarna and N=290 for placebo.
Paediatric population
The safety, pharmacokinetics and exploratory effectiveness of Translarna were assessed in an open-label study in children between 2 and 5 years of age with nmDMD. The efficacy of Translarna in children aged 2-5 years has been established on extrapolation from patients aged >5years.
In the clinical program investigating the efficacy and safety of monotherapy ataluren in patients with nonsense mutation cystic fibrosis, no statistically significant effect was observed in the primary and key secondary clinical outcome measures (ppFEV1 and pulmonary exacerbation rate) in adults and children aged 6 years and older.
An open-label exploratory study (Study 045) was conducted in 20 subjects with nmDMD aged 2 to 7 years to explore quantitative levels of dystrophin in muscle tissue before and after 40 weeks of treatment with ataluren. Dystrophin was measured using the electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. From each subject, 3 needle biopsies were taken from the gastrocnemius and the tibialis anterior at baseline and at the end of the treatment. Study 045 also included assessment of functional outcomes (i.e., the revised North Star Ambulatory Assessment [rNSAA] and Timed Function Tests [TFTs]).
The baseline median dystrophin levels as measured by ECL was 0.42% of normal (range 0.00% to 41.85%). At the end of the study, the median dystrophin level was 0.33% of normal (range 0.04% to 48.55%).
For IHC, the median percentage of positive fibres at baseline was 73% (range 0.42% to 99.6%). At the end of the study, the median percentage of positive fibres was 66% (range 0.51% to 99.77%).
At the end of the study, the mean (median) worsening from baseline on the rNSAA was 0.1 (1.0) points in total score and the mean (median) change from baseline for the time to stand, to run or walk 10 metres, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs was -1.56 (-0.6), -0.41 (-0.35), -1.09 (-0.5), and -2.43 (-0.7) seconds, respectively.
The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with ataluren in two subsets of the paediatric population from birth to less than 28 days and infants from 28 days to less than 6 months in nmDMD, as per agreed UK-Paediatric Investigation Plan in the granted indication (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
A study was conducted in children aged 6 months to 2 years in accordance with the Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) . This study included PK and safety assessments (see section 4.8 and 5.2).
This medicinal product has been authorised under a so-called 'conditional approval' scheme. This means that further evidence on this medicinal product is awaited. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency will review new information on this medicinal product at least every year and this SmPC will be updated as necessary.