Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antivirals for systemic use, neuraminidase inhibitors
ATC code: J05AH01
Mechanism of action
Zanamivir is an inhibitor of influenza virus neuraminidase, an enzyme that releases viral particles from the plasma membrane of infected cells and promotes virus spread in the respiratory tract.
In vitro activity
Neuraminidase inhibition occurred at very low zanamivir concentrations in vitro, with median inhibitory (IC50) values of 0.33 nM to 5.77 nM against influenza A and B strains respectively.
Resistance
Resistance selection during zanamivir treatment is rare. Reduced susceptibility to zanamivir is associated with mutations that result in amino acid changes in the viral neuraminidase or viral hemagglutinin or both. Neuraminidase substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to zanamivir have emerged during treatment with zanamivir in human viruses and those with zoonotic potential: E119D, E119G, I223R, R368G, G370D, N434S (A/H1N1); N294S, T325I (A/H3N2); R150K (B); R292K (A/H7N9). The neuraminidase substitution Q136K (A/H1N1 and A/H3N2), confers high level resistance to zanamivir but is selected during adaptation to cell culture and not during treatment.
The clinical impact of reduced susceptibility in these viruses is unknown, and the effects of specific substitutions on virus susceptibility to zanamivir may be strain-dependent.
Cross‑resistance
Cross‑resistance between zanamivir and oseltamivir or peramivir has been observed in neuraminidase inhibition assays. A number of neuraminidase amino acid substitutions that arise during oseltamivir or peramivir treatment result in reduced susceptibility to zanamivir. The clinical impact of substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility to zanamivir and other neuraminidase inhibitors is variable and may be strain-dependent.
The H275Y substitution is the most common neuraminidase resistance substitution and is associated with reduced susceptibility to peramivir and oseltamivir. This substitution has no effect on zanamivir; therefore, viruses with the H275Y substitution retain full susceptibility to zanamivir.
Clinical efficacy
Human challenge study
A double-blind, randomised study to examine the prophylactic antiviral activity and efficacy of repeat dose zanamivir 600 mg every 12 hours intravenously compared to placebo in healthy male volunteers against infection from inoculation with influenza A/Texas/91 (H1N1) virus was conducted. Zanamivir had a significant prophylactic effect against an experimental challenge with influenza A virus as demonstrated by the low infection rate (14% vs. 100% positive serology in placebo group, p <0.005), isolation of virus by viral culture (0% vs. 100% in placebo group, p <0.005), as well as reductions in fever (14% vs. 88% in placebo group, p <0.05), upper respiratory tract illness (0% versus 100% in placebo group, p<0.005) and total symptom scores (1 vs. 44 median score in placebo group, p<0.001).
Bronchoalveolar lavage study
A Phase I, open-label study to evaluate serum and lower respiratory pharmacokinetics following administration of intravenous and inhaled zanamivir to healthy adult subjects utilising bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was conducted. The 600 mg dose given intravenously best approximated epithelial lining fluid concentrations achieved by the approved 10 mg dose of zanamivir inhalation powder which demonstrated efficacy in large clinical studies in uncomplicated influenza.
Phase III study in patients with complicated influenza
A Phase III, double-blind, study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, antiviral activity and safety of zanamivir 600 mg twice daily intravenously compared to oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily and 300 mg zanamivir twice daily intravenously in hospitalised patients (>16 years of age) with influenza. The median patient age was 57 years and 35% (218/615) of patients were ≥65 years, of which 17% (n=103) were 65 to <75; 14% (n=84) were 75 to <85, and 5% (n=31) were ≥85 years of age. Patients were stratified at randomisation based on time from onset of symptoms to initiation of treatment (≤4 days and 5 to 6 days). Eligible patients were not to have had >3 days of prior antiviral treatment. The initial 5 day treatment course could be extended for up to 5 additional days if clinical symptoms or patient characteristics warranted further treatment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical response (TTCR); clinical response was defined as a composite of vital sign stabilisation (temperature, oxygen saturation, respiratory status, heart rate and systolic blood pressure) or hospital discharge. The primary analysis was performed on the Influenza Positive Population (IPP) comprised of 488 patients. The study did not meet its pre-specified primary objective of demonstrating superiority of 600 mg zanamivir to oral oseltamivir or to 300 mg zanamivir in TTCR. There were no significant differences in TTCR across treatment comparisons in the overall IPP or in two pre-specified subgroups (Table 6).
Table 6: Statistical comparisons of TTCR between the 600 mg zanamivir group and each other group (IPP)
| | Zanamivir solution for infusion 300 mg | Zanamivir solution for infusion 600 mg | Oseltamivir 75 mg |
| Influenza Positive Population, N | 163 | 162 | 163 |
| Median TTCR, days | 5.87 | 5.14 | 5.63 |
| Median difference between treatments, days (95% CI) | -0.73 (-1.79, 0.75) | -0.48 (-2.11, 0.97) |
| p-value from Wilcoxon rank-sum 2-sided test | 0.25 | 0.39 |
| Intensive Care Unit/Mechanical Ventilation subgroup, N | 68 | 54 | 68 |
| Median TTCR, days | 11.26 | 12.79 | 14.58 |
| Median difference between treatments, days (95% CI) | 1.53 (-4.29, 8.34) | -1.79 (-11.1, 6.92) |
| p-value from Wilcoxon rank-sum 2-sided test | 0.87 | 0.51 |
| Symptom onset ≤4 days subgroup, N | 127 | 131 | 121 |
| Median TTCR, days | 5.63 | 4.80 | 4.80 |
| Median difference between treatments, days (95% CI) | -0.83 (-1.98, 0.56) | 0.00 (-1.05, 0.97) |
| p-value from Wilcoxon rank-sum 2-sided test | 0.09 | 0.82 |
This medicinal product has been authorised under 'exceptional circumstances'.
This means that for scientific reasons it has not been possible to obtain complete information on this medicinal product.
The European Medicines Agency will review any new information which may become available every year and this SmPC will be updated as necessary.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Dectova in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment and prevention of influenza (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).