Pharmacotherapeutic group: Pituitary and hypothalamic hormones and analogues, somatostatin and analogues, ATC code: H01CB02
Mechanism of action
Octreotide is a synthetic octapeptide derivative of naturally occurring somatostatin with similar pharmacological effects, but with a considerably prolonged duration of action. It inhibits pathologically increased secretion of GH and of peptides and serotonin produced within the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) endocrine system.
In animals, octreotide is a more potent inhibitor of GH, glucagon and insulin release than somatostatin is, with greater selectivity for GH and glucagon suppression.
In healthy subjects, octreotide has been shown to inhibit:
• release of GH stimulated by arginine, exercise- and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia,
• post-prandial release of insulin, glucagon, gastrin, other peptides of the GEP endocrine system, and arginine-stimulated release of insulin and glucagon,
• thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-stimulated release of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH).
Unlike somatostatin, octreotide inhibits GH secretion preferentially over insulin and its administration is not followed by rebound hypersecretion of hormones (i.e. GH in patients with acromegaly).
Pharmacodynamic effects
Octreotide substantially reduces and, in many cases, normalizes IGF-1 and GH levels in patients with acromegaly.
Single doses of octreotide given subcutaneously have been shown to inhibit gallbladder contractility and to decrease bile secretion in healthy volunteers. In clinical studies, the incidence of gallstone or biliary sludge formation was markedly increased (see sections 4.4 and 4.8).
Octreotide may cause clinically significant suppression of TSH (see sections 4.4 and 4.8).
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of octreotide were established in two phase 3 studies in patients with acromegaly: a 24-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study (study 1) and a 52-week, open-label, multi-centre study (study 2). Patients completing study 1 could roll over to study 2. Patients in both studies were on stable treatment with standard of care with injectable long-acting octreotide or lanreotide at time of enrolment.
Study 1 (HS-18-633)
The study enrolled biochemically controlled patients who had IGF-1 levels below or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN; mean of two measurements, adjusted for age and sex) at screening. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive either octreotide or placebo for 24 weeks. At baseline, the mean age of patients was 55 years, 56% were women, and 96% were White.
The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders, i.e. patients with IGF-1 levels below or equal to the ULN at the end of the randomised, double-blind period (mean of the measurements at week 22 and week 24). Patients who discontinued treatment or were switched to rescue medication were regarded as non-responders in the analysis.
Study 1 met the primary endpoint of statistical superiority for octreotide over placebo (Table 2). Key secondary endpoints were also met, including the proportion of patients that were responders for both IGF-1 below or equal to ULN and GH below 2.5 mcg/L.
Table 2: Primary and key secondary efficacy endpoint outcomes
| | octreotide responders (N= 48) | placebo responders (N=24) | Difference in response rate for octreotide – placebo (95% CI)a | p-value |
| Primary efficacy endpoint Proportion of patients with mean IGF-1 ≤ 1×ULN at week 22/24 | 72.2% | 37.5% | 34.6% (11.3-57.9) | 0.0018 |
| First key secondary efficacy endpoint Proportion of patients with mean IGF-1 ≤ 1×ULN at week 22/24, including patients with dose reductionb | 72.2% | 37.5% | 34.6% (11.3-57.9) | 0.0018 |
| Second key secondary efficacy endpoint Proportion of patients with mean IGF-1 ≤ 1×ULN at week 22/24 and mean GH < 2.5 mcg/L at week 24 | 70.0% | 37.5% | 32.3% (8.8-55.7) | 0.0035 |
a Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common risk difference accounting previous treatment (long-acting octreotide or lanreotide) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and upper-tail p-values.
b No patients required dose reduction in the study.
Mean IGF-1 levels were stable below the ULN in patients receiving octreotide and increased above ULN in the placebo arm (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Mean IGF-1/1×ULN over time
In an ANCOVA analysis of the change from baseline to the mean of week 22/24 in IGF-1/ULN, the LS Mean change from baseline was 0.04 in the octreotide arm and 0.52 in the placebo arm. The mean difference between the treatment arms (placebo) was -0.48 (95% CI: -0.75, -0.22). The p-value was 0.0003.
The median time to loss of IGF-1 response was not reached for patients receiving octreotide and was 8.4 weeks for patients in the placebo arm.
The proportions of patients with GH levels < 1.0 mcg/L at week 24 were assessed as secondary endpoint in study 1. The proportion of patients with mean GH < 1.0 mcg/L at Week 24 was 59.9% in the octreotide arm and 37.5% in the placebo arm. The difference between the treatment arms (‑placebo) was 21.3% (95% CI: -2.6%, 45.1%). The p-value was 0.0404.
Study 1 included several patient-reported outcomes, including the acromegaly quality of life questionnaire (AcroQoL) and treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM). The AcroQoL Total Score and TSQM convenience score increased from baseline (i.e. during treatment with long-acting octreotide or lanreotide) to week 24 in both treatment arms, with a larger increase in the octreotide arm than in the placebo arm; the differences between octreotide and placebo were not significant.
Study 2 (HS-19-647)
Long-term safety and efficacy of octreotide were assessed in 135 patients with acromegaly enrolled in study 2. Fifty-four (54) patients were roll-over patients from Study 1 (36 randomized to octreotide and 18 to placebo) and 81 patients (both biochemically controlled and uncontrolled) were directly enrolled in Study 2.
For roll-over- patients who received octreotide in study 1, the mean IGF-1 values remained stable and below 1×ULN during 52 weeks of octreotide treatment. For roll-over patients who received placebo in study 1, IGF-1 values returned to normal after switching to treatment with octreotide in study 2 (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Mean IGF-1/ULN during long-term treatment for roll-over patients
N=number of patients with evaluable data at the certain visit.
Population analyses of efficacy data in Study 1 and Study 2
A population PKPD model describing the impact of octreotide on IGF-1 was developed. The structural model used model-based exposure of octreotide and was an indirect response model with medicinal product effects on the zero-order production rate constant. Medicinal product effects of octreotide were described as an inhibitory Emax function.
Simulations of the effect of octreotide on IGF-1 using the model showed a similar IGF-1 response for Oczyesa 20 mg given every 4 weeks compared to subcutaneous short-acting octreotide 0.25 mg given three times per day. Furthermore, comparable effects on IGF-1 concentrations over time were observed for dosing intervals ranging from 3 to 5 weeks.