Pharmacotherapeutic group: Ophthalmologicals, other ophthalmologicals, ATC code: S01XA18.
Mechanism of action
Ciclosporin is a calcineurin inhibitor with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant properties. Calcineurin inhibition leads to various secondary effects (a) blockage of the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) thereby inhibiting activation of caspases in the mitochondria, which in turn blocks apoptosis of inflamed conjunctival cells and restores goblet cell density (b) in activated T cells on the ocular surface MPTP are opened, resulting in the activation of apoptosis (c) the nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) translocation and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is blocked, inhibiting the transcription and secretion of inflammatory cytokines and subsequent T cell recruitment.
The spreading properties of the water-free vehicle reduce friction and thereby contribute to the efficacy.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy of Vevizye for the treatment of dry eye disease was assessed by two randomised, multi-centre, double-masked, vehicle-controlled studies (ESSENCE-1 and ESSENCE-2). Both studies included moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED) patients as defined by a total corneal staining (tCFS) score of ≥ 10 on the National Eye Institute (NEI) scale, unanaesthetised Schirmer's test score between 1 and 10 mm, total lissamine green conjunctival score of ≥ 2 and the presence of symptoms.
In the ESSENCE-1 study, 328 patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to Vevizye (N=162) or vehicle (N=166) twice daily for 3 months. In the ESSENCE-2 study, 834 patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive Vevizye (N=423) or vehicle (N=411) twice daily for 1 month.
The change from baseline in tCFS score at Day 29 was the primary endpoint in both trials. tCFS score was the sum score (range 0-15) of the 5 cornea subregions (inferior, superior, central, nasal, and temporal), each region was rated by the investigator using the National Eye Institute (NEI) scale from grade 0 (no staining) to grade 3 (heavy staining). Primary symptom endpoints were ocular surface disease index (OSDI, range 0-100) in ESSENCE-1 and dryness score (visual analogue scale, range 0-100) in ESSENCE-2. Key secondary endpoints included tCFS score at Day 15, tCFS responders defined as ≥ 3 grades improvement, conjunctival lissamine green staining score (Oxford sum of temporal and nasal; range 0-10) at Day 29, central corneal fluorescein staining score (cCFS [National Eye Institute scale; range 0-3]), and blurred vision score (visual analogue scale, range 0-100) and Schirmer responder at Day 85 in ESSENCE-1 and Day 29 in ESSENCE-2.
The majority of patients in this clinical program were female (73%), the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 58 (15.2) years and 38% were 65 years and older. The mean (SD) baseline tCFS score was 11.5 (1.35), the mean (SD) baseline cCFS score was 2.1 (0.60), the mean (SD) baseline conjunctival lissamine green staining score was 3.9 (1.71), the mean (SD) baseline unanaesthetised Schirmer's tear test score was 5.0 mm (2.83), the mean (SD) baseline OSDI was 47.1 (19.23), and the mean (SD) baseline dryness score was 69.9 (15.43).
At Day 29, a statistically significant reduction in tCFS favouring Vevizye was observed in both studies (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Mean change (SD) from baseline in tCFS at Day 29

CFS = corneal fluorescein staining; CfB= change from baseline
Responder analyses showed that the proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful tCFS improvement of ≥ 3 grades at Day 29 was statistically significantly different and favouring Vevizye in both studies at Day 29 (see Table 2).
Table 2: Percent of patients achieving ≥ 3 Grades improvement in total corneal fluorescein staining score (tCFS) at Day 29 in studies in patients with dry eye disease
| | ESSENCE-1 | ESSENCE-2 |
| | Vevizye | Vehicle | Vevizye | Vehicle |
| Number of subjects at Day 29 | 157 | 165 | 409 | 395 |
| ≥ 3 grades improvement in tCFS at Day 29 (% of subjects) | 52.9% | 40.6% | 71.6% | 59.7% |
| Difference (95% CI) | 12.3% (1.3%, 23.0%) | 12.6% (6.0%, 19.3%) |
| p-value | 0.0337 | 0.0002 |
In ESSENCE-1, the second hierarchically tested primary symptom endpoint change from baseline in OSDI at Day 29 showed numerical improvement in the Vevizye group (least squares [LS] mean -8.8) but did not reach statistical significance when compared to vehicle (LS mean -6.8) (p=0.2634).
In ESSENCE-2, the second hierarchically tested primary symptom endpoint, dryness score, improved statistically significantly compared to baseline in both groups: Vevizye LS mean -12.2 and vehicle LS mean -13.6 the between group difference was not significant (p=0.3842).
All other key secondary ocular surface sign endpoints (tCFS at Day 15, conjunctival staining at Day 29 and central corneal staining at Day 29) showed statistically significant effects favouring Vevizye in both studies (see Figure 2).
In addition, patients with significant central staining scores at baseline treated with Vevizye showed statistically significantly larger reductions in the blurred vision score at Day 29 compared to this group of patients treated with vehicle in both studies (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Mean change (SD) from baseline in key secondary endpoints in both pivotal studies
* Subgroup with high central staining; CFS = corneal fluorescein staining; CfB= change from baseline
Statistically significantly higher proportions of responders to Schirmer`s tear test in the active arm compared to vehicle were demonstrated in ESSENCE-1 at Day 85 (Δ 6.74% [95% CI 0.50-12.98%] p=0.0344) and in ESSENCE-2 at Day 29 (Δ 3.92% [95% CI 0.02%-7.82%] p=0.0487).
A total of 202 patients who completed ESSENCE 2 entered an open label extension study for 12 months (ESSENCE-2-OLE). Eligible patients receive Vevizye bilaterally twice-daily for 1 additional year. More than 80% of the patients were responder (≥ 3 grades in tCFS) after 4 weeks and this response was maintained throughout the observation period.
Paediatric population
The MHRA has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Vevizye in all subsets of the paediatric population in dry eye disease (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).