Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents; other antineoplastic agents ATC code: L01XM04
Mechanism of action
Vorasidenib is an inhibitor that targets the mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes. In patients with astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations lead to overproduction of the oncogenic metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), resulting in impaired cellular differentiation contributing to oncogenesis. Inhibition of the IDH1- and IDH2-mutated proteins by vorasidenib inhibits the abnormal production of 2-HG leading to differentiation of malignant cells and a reduction in their proliferation. Pre-clinical studies investigating the ability of vorasidenib to decrease tumour size were not performed.
Pharmacodynamic effects
A therapeutic daily dose of Voranigo decreases 2-HG tumour concentrations in subjects with IDH1 or IDH2 mutated glioma. The posterior median percentage reduction (95% credible interval) in tumour 2-HG was 92.6% (76.1%, 97.6%) in tumours from subjects treated with Voranigo, relative to tumours from subjects in the untreated group.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of vorasidenib were evaluated in the INDIGO trial, a phase 3, randomised (1:1), multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 331 adults and adolescents ≥ 12 years old weighing ≥ 40 kg. Eligible patients were required to have Grade 2 astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma as defined by 2016 WHO criteria with an IDH1 R132 mutation or IDH2 R172 mutation, had surgery including biopsy, sub-total resection, or gross-total resection as their only treatment and were not in immediate need of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the opinion of the investigator. Patients who had MRI-evaluable, measurable, non-enhancing disease, as confirmed by the blinded independent review committee (BIRC) were enrolled. Patients with centrally-confirmed enhancing disease were permitted to enrol provided that the enhancement was minimal, non-nodular, non-measurable and had not changed between the 2 most recent scans. The INDIGO trial excluded patients who received prior anti-cancer treatment, including chemotherapy or radiation therapy. IDH1 or IDH2 mutation status was prospectively determined using the Oncomine Dx Target Test.
Patients were randomised to receive either vorasidenib 40 mg orally once daily or matched placebo until radiographic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified by local 1p19q status (co-deleted or not co-deleted) and baseline tumour size (diameter ≥ 2 cm or < 2 cm).
Patients who were randomised to placebo were allowed to cross over to receive vorasidenib after documented radiographic disease progression provided that they were not in need of immediate chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the opinion of the investigator.
The primary efficacy outcome measure was radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) as evaluated by a BIRC according to modified response assessment in neuro-oncology for low grade glioma (RANO-LGG) criteria (radiographic progression only). Time to next intervention (TTNI), the time from randomisation to the initiation of first subsequent anticancer therapy or death due to any cause, was a key secondary outcome measure. Tumour Growth Rate (TGR), another secondary endpoint, was defined as the on-treatment percentage change in tumour volume every 6 months.
Patient demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between the treatment arms. Among the 168 patients randomised to vorasidenib, the median age was 41 years (range: 21 to 71 years), with 98.8% aged 18-64 years. A majority of patients were male (60.1%), 74.4% were White, 3.0% Asian, 1.2% Black, 1.2% other, 19.6% not reported and 53.6% had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 100. Most patients had at least 1 prior surgery for glioma (75%) and 25% had ≥ 2 prior surgeries. Across both arms, 95% of patients had an IDH1 R132 mutation and 5% had an IDH2 R172 mutation.
Efficacy results for PFS and TTNI are summarised in Table 4, Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Table 4: Efficacy results for the INDIGO trial (Study AG881-C-004)
| Efficacy parameter | Voranigo 40 mg daily (n=168)a | Placebo (n=163) |
| Progression-free survival (PFS) |
| Number of Events, n (%) Progressive disease Death | 47 (28.0) 0 | 88 (54.0) 0 |
| Median PFS, months (95% CI)b | 27.7 (17.0, NE) | 11.1 (11.0, 13.7) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)c | 0.39 (0.27, 0.56) |
| p-valued | 0.000000067 |
| Time to next intervention (TTNI) |
| Number of Events, n (%) First subsequent therapy Crossover to VORANIGO | 19 (11.3) 0 | 6 (3.7) 52 (31.9) |
| Median TTNI, months (95% CI)b | NE (NE, NE) | 17.8 (15.0, NE) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)c | 0.26 (0.15, 0.43) |
| p-valued | 0.000000019 |
Abbreviations: CI = Confidence Interval; NE = Not Estimable
a The full analysis set included all patients who had undergone randomisation.
b The 95% confidence interval for the median was calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
c Estimated with Cox proportional hazard model adjusted by the following stratification factors: 1p19q status and baseline tumour size.
d Estimated from one-sided stratified log-rank test.
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curve for progression-free survival per BIRC review in INDIGO trial
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Time to Next Intervention in INDIGO Trial
An updated PFS by BIRC analysis, carried out at 96% (N = 158) of events, confirmed the benefit of vorasidenib compared to placebo (hazard ratio: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.49]). At 24 months, the progression-free survival rate was 59% (95% CI: 48.4, 67.8) in the vorasidenib arm and 26% (95% CI: 17.9, 35.3) in the placebo arm. The median PFS was not estimable (95% CI: 22.1, NE) for the vorasidenib arm and was 11.4 (95% CI: 11.1, 13.9) months for the placebo arm.
Updated analysis for TTNI also showed improved results for the vorasidenib arm compared with the placebo arm (hazard ratio: 0.25 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.40]). At 24 months, the likelihood of survival without an intervention was 85% (95% CI: 77.3, 89.6) in the vorasidenib arm and 41% (31.0, 51.5) in the placebo arm. The median TTNI was not estimable (95% CI: NE, NE) in the vorasidenib arm and was 20.1 (95% CI: 17.5, 27.1) months in the placebo arm.
The post-treatment tumour volume decreased in subjects randomized to vorasidenib by a mean of 2.5% every 6 months (TGR of -2.5%; 95% CI: -4.7 to -0.2), while tumour volume increased by a mean of 13.9% every 6 months (TGR of 13.9%; 95% CI: 11.1 to 16.8) for the placebo arm.
The preliminary efficacy and safety of vorasidenib was evaluated in a phase 1, multicenter, open label dose-escalation study in subjects with advanced solid tumours, including IDH1- and IDH2-mutant gliomas, in a total of 93 subjects across 6 dose levels. For all subjects with glioma (N=52), the objective response rate (ORR) was 11.5% (95% CI: 4.35%, 23.44%). The ORR in subjects with non- enhancing glioma (n=22) was 22.7% and in subjects with enhancing glioma (n=30) the ORR was 3.3%. The median PFS for all glioma subjects (N=52) was 7.5 (95% CI: 3.7, 12.9) months with 75% of events reported. Among the 22 subjects with non-enhancing gliomas, the median PFS was 36.8 (95% CI:14.9, 60.2) months with 63.6% of events reported. Of the 30 subjects with enhancing gliomas, the median PFS was 3.6 (95% CI:1.9, 7.5) months with 83.3% of events reported.
Paediatric population
Adolescents from 12 to less than 18 years of age
Use of vorasidenib in patients aged 12 years to less than 18 years with IDH1 or IDH2 mutant astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma is supported by pharmacokinetic data demonstrating that age had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of vorasidenib (see section 5.2).