Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other muscle relaxants, peripherally acting agents
ATC code: M03AX01
Mechanism of action
The primary pharmacodynamic effect of botulinum toxin type A is chemical denervation of the treated muscle, resulting in a measurable decrease of the compound muscle action potential. This causes a localized reduction of muscle activity.
When injected intramuscularly, the toxin induces paralysis of the affected muscle which temporarily reduces muscle activity. The effect lasts for sustained periods until the neuromuscular junction has recovered and muscle activity returns.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The data described below reflect results in the Phase III placebo-controlled studies READY‑1, READY‑2 and READY‑3. A total of 1,012 patients were treated in 3 pivotal trials including 806 patients treated with Relfydess and 206 patients treated with placebo. There were also an additional 902 Relfydess-treated patients in an open-label long term safety study (READY‑4). Across all Phase III studies, 1708 subjects were treated with Relfydess.
Onset of action were reported within 1 day (up to 39% and 34% in glabellar and lateral canthal lines, respectively), with a median time to onset of 2 to 3 days. Treatment effect has been demonstrated for 6 months, with up to 75% of patients not returning to baseline.
Patients receiving ≥ 50 units Relfydess (1699 in total) were tested for antidrug antibody (ADA) formation at baseline, and following each treatment. Clinical data suggests the potential for low titer ADA in some individuals following treatment; overall, 1.1% of subjects tested positive for ADA. Low immunogenicity can be concluded for Relfydess.
Glabellar lines (READY‑1 and READY‑3)
In two pivotal Phase III multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies 451 patients were treated in GLs at the recommended dose of 50 units. READY‑1 assessed Relfydess treatment of GL only; READY‑3 assessed combination treatment of GL and LCL.
Primary efficacy was the proportion of responders, defined as achievement of a score of 0 or 1 in glabellar line severity on the GL‑ILA 4‑Point Photographic Scale at maximum frown at the Month 1 visit. The majority of subjects in both the Relfydess or placebo group had severe glabellar lines at baseline as determined by the investigator (74.5% and 75.8% respectively). Patients with excessive skin laxity in the treatment area or periorbital area were excluded from the studies. The proportion of responders was statistically significantly greater (p < 0.001) in the Relfydess group compared to the placebo group at 1 month (Table 4).
Table 4: Investigator Assessment of Glabellar Line Treatment Successa (% and Number of Subjects) at Month 1b in Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies, mITT Populationc
| Study | Relfydess 50 units GL | Relfydess 50 units GL and 60 units LCL | Placebo |
| READY‑1, GL only | 96.3% N = 199 | - | 4.5% N = 67 |
| READY‑3 LCL & GL treatment | 94.3% N = 106 | 96.3% N = 108 | 1.8% N = 55 |
a achieved a score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) in GL severity on GL‑ILA
b Day 30 primary efficacy endpoint; p < 0.001
c The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population included all subjects who were randomized and dispensed the study product and were analyzed according to the randomization scheme. Subjects with a photographic and categorical scale Month 1 assessment via a remote visit were excluded from the mITT population
For subjects in READY-1, response (achieving 0 or 1 on the GL-ILA at maximum frown) was statistically significantly greater in Relfydess compared with placebo from Day 7 through 6 months (p < 0.001), as displayed in Table 5.
Table 5: READY-1 Investigator Live Assessment (ILA) of GL Severity – Responder Ratesa (%) Post-Injection, ITT Populationb
| Timepoint Post-Injection | Relfydess (N=223) | Placebo (N=74) |
| GL-ILA | GL-ILA |
| Day 7 | 93.2% | 4.3% |
| Day 14 | 96.4% | 6.3% |
| Month 1 | 96.4% | 4.7% |
| Month 2 | 92.9% | 8.9% |
| Month 3 | 73.7% | 7.9% |
| Month 4 | 53.7% | 6.3% |
| Month 5 | 39.7% | 6.3% |
| Month 6 | 23.6% | 1.5% |
a Defined as having a GL severity grade of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) at baseline and of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at a given visit as assessed by the GL-ILA severity scale
b The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all subjects who were randomized and dispensed the study product and were analysed according to the randomization scheme
When used in combined treatment with LCL in READY-3, response (achieving 0 or 1 on the GL‑ILA at maximum frown) was statistically significantly higher (nominal p < 0.001) in Relfydess-GL/Relfydess-LCL group compared with placebo GL/placebo LCL throughout the 6 months post-treatment.
Lateral canthal lines (READY‑2 and READY‑3)
In two pivotal Phase III multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies 471 patients were treated in LCLs at the recommended dose of 60 units. READY‑2 assessed Relfydess treatment of LCL only; READY‑3 assessed combination treatment of GL and LCL.
Primary efficacy was the proportion of subjects who were responders, defined as achievement of a score of 0 or 1 in lateral canthal line severity on the LCL‑ILA 4‑Point Photographic Scale (LCL-Investigator Live Assessment) at maximum smile, at the Month 1 visit. Patients with excessive skin laxity in the treatment area or periorbital area were excluded from the study. The proportion of responders was statistically significantly greater (p < 0.001) in the Relfydess group compared to the placebo group at 1 month (Table 6).
Table 6: Investigator Assessment of Lateral Canthal Line Treatment Successa (% and Number of Subjects) at Month 1b in Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies, mITT Populationc
| Study | Relfydess 60 units LCL | Relfydess 60 units LCL & 50 units GL | Placebo |
| READY‑2, LCL only | 87.2% N = 204 | - | 11.9% N = 69 |
| READY‑3, LCL & GL treatment | 78.1% N = 117 | 83.3% N = 108 | 19.3% N = 55 |
a achieved a score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) in LCL severity on LCL‑ILA
b Day 30 primary efficacy endpoint; p < 0.001
c The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population included all subjects who were randomized and dispensed the study product and were analyzed according to the randomization scheme. Subjects with a photographic and categorical scale Month 1 assessment via a remote visit were excluded from the mITT population
For subjects in READY-2, response (achieving 0 or 1 on the LCL-ILA at maximum smile) was statistically significantly greater in Relfydess compared with placebo from Day 7 through 6 months (p≤0.002), as displayed in Table 7.
Table 7: READY-2 Investigator Live Assessment (ILA) of LCL Severity – Responder Ratesa (%) Post-Injection, ITT Populationb
| Timepoint Post-injection | Relfydess (N=230) | Placebo (N=73) |
| LCL-ILA | LCL-ILA |
| Day 7 | 82.5% | 8.5% |
| Day 14 | 89.7% | 11.4% |
| Month 1 | 87.5% | 11.8% |
| Month 2 | 76.3% | 14.3% |
| Month 3 | 59.8% | 14.9% |
| Month 4 | 45.7% | 10.9% |
| Month 5 | 32.1% | 6.2% |
| Month 6 | 23.3% | 7.2% |
a Defined as having a LCL severity grade of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) at baseline and 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at a given visit as assessed by the LCL-ILA severity scale
b The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all subjects who were randomized and dispensed the study product and were analysed according to the randomization scheme
When used in combined treatment with GL in READY-3, response (achieving 0 or 1 on the LCL‑ILA at maximum smile) was statistically significantly higher (nominal p ≤ 0.007) in Relfydess GL/Relfydess LCL group compared with placebo GL/placebo LCL at all post-treatment timepoints except month 6.
Subject Satisfaction and Psychological Function
Subject psychological function was observed using FACE‑Q™ psychological function scale.
The FLTSQ scale (Facial Line Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire) was used to observe subject satisfaction with GL and/or LCL appearance and also to observe subject treatment satisfaction.
FACE-Q™ psychological function scale and FLTSQ scale responses indicated Relfydess-treated subjects showed improvement in psychological function and were more satisfied with their treatment and appearance than placebo subjects at all post-treatment time points. As assessed by FACE-Q™ and FLTSQ, the positive psychological function and subject satisfaction were maintained for 6 months following treatment.
Open Label Study (READY‑4)
In the phase III, multicenter, open-label study READY‑4, Relfydess was administered up to 110 units per treatment and up to 4 repeat treatments in each indication (up to a total of 7 GL and/or LCL treatments over 52 weeks). The responder rates as determined by the investigator at Week 4 were maintained over repeated cycles in glabellar lines at maximum frown in the subgroup of 175 subjects receiving 4 treatment cycles (79.4% in treatment cycle 1 and 80.0% in treatment cycle 4). The corresponding responder rates in 186 subjects receiving 4 treatment cycles for lateral canthal lines at maximum smile were 64.5% in treatment cycle 1 and 60.2% in treatment cycle 4.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Relfydess in all subsets of the paediatric population for treatment of temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown and lateral canthal lines seen at maximum smile (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).