Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other dermatological preparations, agents for dermatitis, excluding corticosteroids, ATC code: D11AH12
Mechanism of action
Nemolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody of the IgG2 subclass that inhibits IL-31 signaling by binding selectively to IL-31RA. IL-31 is a neuroimmune cytokine that drives pruritus and inflammation, which are important pathophysiological components of atopic dermatitis and prurigo nodularis. IL-31 has an additional barrier dysfunction effect in atopic dermatitis, and epidermal differentiation and profibrotic effect in prurigo nodularis. Multiple cell types express IL-31RA and are activated by IL-31. Those involved in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis and prurigo nodularis include immune cells (e.g. mononuclear phagocytes, granulocytes) and structural cells (e.g. neurons, fibroblasts, keratinocytes). Blocking IL-31RA with nemolizumab ameliorates pruritus and inhibits inflammatory responses in both atopic dermatitis and prurigo nodularis. Additionally, nemolizumab restores barrier integrity in atopic dermatitis and normalizes epidermal differentiation by blocking profibrotic processes in prurigo nodularis. The mechanism of action of nemolizumab has not been definitively established.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In exploratory biomarker studies conducted in the Phase 3 program, nemolizumab was found to modulate gene expression related to the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis, with a primary impact on immune system processes, by decreasing the inflammatory and proliferative profile of specific immune cells (T-cells and monocytes/macrophages) without leading to immunosuppression.
In prurigo nodularis, nemolizumab was found to modulate molecular processes related to the pathophysiology of prurigo nodularis, with impact on pruritus, inflammation, epidermal differentiation and fibrosis.
Clinical efficacy and safety in atopic dermatitis
Adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis
The efficacy and safety of Nemluvio with concomitant topical background therapy was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal studies (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2) that enrolled a total of 1728 subjects 12 years of age and older with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled by topical treatments. Disease severity was defined by an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 (moderate) and 4 (severe) in the overall assessment of atopic dermatitis, an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of ≥16, a minimum body surface area (BSA) involvement of ≥10%, and a Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) score of ≥ 4.
Subjects in the studies received initial subcutaneous injections of either Nemluvio 60 mg, followed by 30 mg injections every 4 weeks (Q4W), or matching placebo. Concomitant low and/ or medium potency TCS and/or TCI were administered both in Nemluvio and placebo groups for at least 14 days prior to baseline and continued during the trial. Based on disease activity, these concomitant therapies could be tapered and/or discontinued at investigator discretion.
After 16 weeks, subjects achieving either EASI-75 or IGA success continued into the trial maintenance period for another 32 weeks to evaluate the maintenance of response achieved at Week 16. Nemluvio responders were re-randomized to either Nemluvio 30 mg every 4 weeks, Nemluvio 30 mg every 8 weeks or placebo every 4 weeks (all groups continued background TCS/TCI). Subjects randomized to placebo in the initial treatment period who achieved the same clinical response at Week 16 continued to receive placebo every 4 weeks. Non-responders at Week 16, subjects who lost clinical response during the maintenance period and subjects who completed maintenance period had the opportunity to enrol into the open-label trial (ARCADIA LTE) and receive treatment with Nemluvio 30 mg every 4 weeks up to 200 weeks.
Endpoints
Both ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 assessed the primary endpoints of:
• Proportion of subjects with an IGA success (defined as an IGA of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] and a ≥2-point reduction from baseline) at Week 16
• Proportion of subjects with EASI-75 (≥75% improvement in EASI from baseline) at Week 16
Key secondary endpoints included PP NRS improvement ≥4 from baseline at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 16, PP NRS <2 at Week 4 and Week 16, Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) improvement ≥4 from baseline at Week 16, subjects with both EASI-75 and PP NRS improvement ≥4 from baseline at Week 16, and subjects with both IGA success and PP NRS improvement ≥4 from baseline at Week 16. Other secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 16 in PP NRS, SD NRS, AD-associated pain frequency and intensity and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
Baseline characteristics
In these studies, at baseline, 51.0% of subjects were male, 79.9% were White, and 15.4% of subjects were 12-17 years of age. 70% of subjects had a baseline IGA score of 3 (moderate AD), and 30% of subjects had a baseline IGA score of 4 (severe AD). The mean baseline EASI score was 27.5, the baseline weekly average PP NRS was 7.1 (severe itch), baseline weekly average SD NRS was 5.8 and the mean baseline DLQI was 15.0. Overall, 63.3% of patients received other previous systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis.
Clinical Response
ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 – Adults and Adolescents - induction period, week 0 to week 16
Nemluvio was statistically significantly superior to placebo with respect to skin-related co-primary endpoints IGA success and EASI‑75 over 16 weeks (Table 2).
Table 2 – Efficacy Results of Nemluvio (30 mg Q4W) with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 at Week 16
| | ARCADIA 1 | ARCADIA 2 |
| Nemluvio + TCS/ TCI | Placebo + TCS/ TCI | Nemluvio + TCS/ TCI | Placebo + TCS/ TCI |
| Number of subjects randomized (Baseline PP NRS ≥4) | 620 | 321 | 522 | 265 |
| % of subjects with IGA 0 or 1a | 35.6 | 24.6 | 37.7 | 26.0 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 11.5# (5.5, 17.5) | 12.2# (5.6, 18.8) |
| % of subjects with EASI-75a | 43.5 | 29.0 | 42.1 | 30.2 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 14.9* (8.7, 21.1) | 12.5# (5.6, 19.3) |
| Number of subjects with severe pruritus (Baseline PP NRS≥7) | 406 | 210 | 316 | 164 |
| % of subjects with IGA 0 or 1a | 35.5 | 21.4 | 36.7 | 22.0 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 14.3# (7.1, 21.5) | 14.9# (6.7, 23.1) |
| % of subjects with EASI-75a | 41.6 | 23.8 | 41.1 | 25.0 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 18.1* (10.7, 25.5) | 16.3# (7.8, 24.8) |
a Subjects who received rescue treatment or with missing data were considered as non-responders
*p-value <0.0001, #p-value <0.001
Strata adjusted p-value is based on the CMH test stratified by PP NRS (≥7, <7) and IGA score (3= moderate, 4=severe) at baseline
Figure 1a. and Figure 1b. represent the proportion of subjects with IGA success and EASI-75 from baseline to Week 16 in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2.
Figure 1 – Proportion of subjects with IGA success and EASI-75 from baseline to Week 16 in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2
Significant improvement in pruritus for patients treated with Nemluvio in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 compared to placebo based on PP NRS improvements ≥4 and PP NRS percent change from baseline was observed starting at Week 1 and was maintained up to Week 16 (Table 3, Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Table 3 – Efficacy results on Itch for Nemluvio with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 up to Week 16
| | ARCADIA 1 | ARCADIA 2 |
| Nemluvio + TCS/TCI | Placebo + TCS/TCI | Nemluvio + TCS/ TCI | Placebo + TCS/ TCI |
| Number of subjects randomized (Baseline PP NRS ≥4)a | 620 | 321 | 522 | 265 |
| % of subjects with PP NRS improvement ≥4a |
| At Week 1 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 0.4 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 3.4§ (1.4, 5.5) | 6.4* (4.1, 8.7) |
| At Week 2 | 17.7 | 3.1 | 16.9 | 1.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 14.6* (11.1, 18.2) | 15.1* (11.5, 18.7) |
| At Week 4 | 27.4 | 6.5 | 26.1 | 5.3 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 20.9* (16.5, 25.4) | 20.9* (16.3, 25.5) |
| At Week 16 | 42.7 | 17.8 | 41.0 | 18.1 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 24.9* (19.2, 30.7) | 23.2* (17.0, 29.4) |
| % of subjects with PP NRS <2a |
| At Week 4 | 16.0 | 3.7 | 15.9 | 2.6 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 12.2* (8.7, 15.8) | 13.2* (9.5, 16.8) |
| At Week 16 | 30.6 | 11.2 | 28.4 | 11.3 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 19.5* (14.5, 24.4) | 17.1* (11.7, 22.5) |
| LS Mean change from baseline (%)b |
| At Week 16 | -56.1 | -30.6 | -55.6 | -30.3 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -25.5^ (-30.3, -20.6) | -25.2^ (-30.3, 20.2) |
| Number of subjects with severe pruritus (Baseline PP NRS≥7) | 406 | 210 | 316 | 164 |
| % of subjects with PP NRS improvement ≥4a |
| At Week 1 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 8.5 | 0.6 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 4.3§ (1.3, 7.3) | 8.0# (4.7, 11.3) |
| At Week 2 | 20.7 | 3.8 | 19.3 | 3.0 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 16.9* (12.2, 21.6) | 16.3* (11.2, 21.4) |
| At Week 4 | 28.3 | 7.1 | 30.4 | 7.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 21.2* (15.6, 26.8) | 22.5* (15.9, 29.0) |
| At Week 16 | 46.1 | 18.6 | 48.4 | 21.3 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 27.5* (20.4, 34.7) | 27.1* (18.7, 35.4) |
| % of subjects with PP NRS <2a |
| At Week 4 | 12.6 | 2.9 | 11.1 | 1.2 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 9.7* (5.8, 13.6) | 9.9# (6.1, 13.8) |
| At Week 16 | 27.8 | 7.6 | 26.9 | 8.5 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 20.3* (14.6, 25.9) | 18.4* (11.9, 24.9) |
| LS Mean change from baseline (%) |
| At Week 16 | -55.5 | -27.9 | -57.0 | -30.2 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -27.7^ (-33.5, -21.8) | -26.8^ (-33.0, -20.6) |
a Subjects who received rescue treatment or with missing data were considered as non-responders
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
*p-value <0.0001, #p-value <0.001, §p-value <0.05
^nominal p-value <0.0001
Strata adjusted p-value is based on the CMH test stratified by PP NRS (≥7, <7) and IGA score (3= moderate, 4=severe) at baseline
Figure 2 –Proportion of subject with PP NRS improvement of ≥4 from baseline up to Week 16 in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2
Figure 3 – Mean percent change from baseline in PP NRS up to Week 16 in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2
The SD NRS is a daily scale used by the subjects to report the degree of their sleep loss related to atopic dermatitis. A significant improvement in sleep disturbance was observed at Week 16 when compared to placebo (Table 4).
Table 4 – Efficacy on Sleep Disturbance for Nemluvio with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 at Week 16
| | ARCADIA 1 | ARCADIA 2 |
| Nemluvio + TCS/TCI | Placebo + TCS/TCI | Nemluvio + TCS/ TCI | Placebo + TCS/ TCI |
| Number of subjects randomized(Baseline PP NRS ≥4)a | 620 | 321 | 522 | 265 |
| % of subjects with SD NRS improvement ≥4a | 37.9 | 19.9 | 33.5 | 16.2 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 17.9* (12.1, 23.7) | 17.5* (11.6, 23.4) |
| LS Mean change from baseline (%)b | -64.6 | -38.1 | -59.7 | -35.4 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -26.4^ (-32.6, -20.3) | -24.3^ (-32.1, -16.4) |
| Number of subjects with severe pruritus (Baseline PP NRS≥7) | 406 | 210 | 316 | 164 |
| % of subjects with SD NRS improvement ≥4a | 42.1 | 22.4 | 42.7 | 20.7 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 19.7* (12.3, 27.1) | 21.9* (13.7, 30.2) |
| LS Mean change from baseline (%)b | -62.6 | -37.0 | -60.7 | -42.0 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -25.6^ (-33.5, -17.6) | -18.6^ (-26.7, -10.5) |
a Subjects who received rescue treatment or with missing data were considered as non-responders
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
*p-value <0.0001
^nominal p-value <0.0001
Strata adjusted p-value is based on the CMH test stratified by PP NRS (≥7, <7) and IGA score (3= moderate, 4=severe) at baseline
ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 – Adults and Adolescents – maintenance period, week 16 to week 48
The clinical response in Nemluvio responders (IGA 0/1 or EASI-75 at Week 16) was evaluated between Week 16 and Week 48 in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 studies. For the maintenance treatment period, 507 Nemluvio responders were re-randomized to Nemluvio 30 mg Q4W, Nemluvio 30 mg Q8W or placebo Q4W (Nemluvio withdrawal) with concomitant TCS/TCI. The pooled efficacy results for this period in the pivotal studies (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2) with Nemluvio at Week 48 are presented in Table 5.
Table 5 –Maintenance Period Pooled Efficacy Results for Nemluvio with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 at Week 48
| | Nemluvio + TCS/TCI Q4W N=169 | Nemluvio + TCS/TCI Q8W N=169 | Placebo + TCS/TCI Q4W (Nemluvio withdrawal) N=169 |
| % of subjects with IGA 0 or 1a,b |
| Week 16 (maintenance baseline) | 84.0 | 84.0 | 77.5 |
| Week 48 | 61.5 | 60.4 | 49.7 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 11.8* (1.3, 22.3) | 10.7* (0.3, 21.0) | |
| % of subjects with EASI-75a,b |
| Week 16 (maintenance/baseline) | 96.4 | 96.4 | 92.9 |
| Week 48 | 76.3 | 75.7 | 63.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 12.4* (2.7, 22.0) | 11.8* (2.1, 21.5) | |
a Subjects who received rescue treatment or with missing data were considered as non-responders
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
*nominal p-value <0.05
Strata adjusted p-value is based on the CMH test stratified by PP NRS (≥7, <7) and IGA score (3= moderate, 4=severe) at baseline
Treatment effects in subgroups (weight, age, gender race, and prior treatment, including immunosuppressants) in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were generally consistent with the results in the overall study population.
Other patient-reported outcomes
In both studies (ARACADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2), Nemluvio significantly improved patient-reported symptoms and the impact of atopic dermatitis on health-related quality of life as measured by DLQI total score, at week 8 and week 16 compared to placebo (Table 6).
Table 6 –Efficacy results on DLQI for Nemluvio with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 up to week 16
| | ARCADIA 1 | ARCADIA 2 |
| Nemluvio + TCS/TCI N=620 | Placebo + TCS/TCI N=321 | Nemluvio + TCS/ TCI N=522 | Placebo + TCS/ TCI N=265 |
| LS Mean change in DLQI from baselinea,b |
| At Week 8 | -6.9 | -4.7 | -6.1 | -4.6 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -2.3* (-3.3, -1.2) | -1.6# (-2.6, -0.6) |
| At Week 16 | -7.8 | -5.3 | -7.0 | -4.5 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -2.5* (-3.6, -1.4) | -2.4* (-3.6, -1.3) |
a If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data after receipt of rescue therapy is considered treatment failure and the data set to the worst possible value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ANCOVA MI-MAR model is used for the change from Baseline as the dependent variable including treatment group and the randomization stratification variables (IGA severity [3=moderate, 4=severe] and PP NRS [>=7, <7] for full population; IGA severity only for Baseline PP NRS >=7 population) as factors and the Baseline DLQI as a covariate.
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
*nominal p-value <0.0001, #nominal p-value =0.0022 Strata adjusted p-value using the randomized stratification variables
In assessments of other patient reported outcomes, improvements in signs and symptoms related to pain frequency and intensity were observed at Week 16 when compared to placebo.
Adolescents with atopic dermatitis (12 to 17 years of age)
The efficacy results of the ARCADIA 1, ARCADIA 2 studies at Week 16 for paediatric patients 12 to 17 years of age are presented in Table 7 and Table 8, respectively. The results in the paediatric patient population were generally consistent with the results in the adult patient population.
Table 7 – Efficacy Results for Nemluvio (30 mg Q4W) with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 at Week 16 in paediatric patients 12 to 17 years of age
| | ARCADIA 1 AND ARCADIA 2 |
| Nemluvio + TCS/TCI | Placebo + TCS/TCI |
| Number of subjects randomized (Baseline PP NRS ≥4) | 176 | 90 |
| % of subjects with IGA 0 or 1 a,b | 48.9 | 34.4 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 12.7* (0.3, 25.1) |
| % of subjects with EASI-75 a,b | 53.4 | 43.3 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 8.6§ (-4.1, 21.3) |
| Number of subjects with severe pruritus (Baseline PP NRS≥7) | 120 | 61 |
| % of subjects with IGA 0 or 1 a,b | 54.2 | 32.8 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 18.9* (4.3, 33.5) |
| % of subjects with EASI-75 a,b | 57.5 | 42.6 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 12.7# (-2.5, 27.9) |
a Subjects who received rescue treatment or with missing data were considered as non-responders
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
*nominal p-value <0.05, #nominal p-value =0.1025, §nominal p-value =0.1824
Strata adjusted p-value is based on the CMH test stratified by PP NRS (≥7, <7) and IGA score (3= moderate, 4=severe) at baseline
Table 8 – Efficacy results on Itch and Sleep Disturbance for Nemluvio (30mg Q4W) with concomitant TCS/TCI in ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 at Week 16 for paediatric patients 12 to 17 years of age
| | ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 |
| Nemluvio + TCS/TCI | Placebo + TCS/TCI |
| Number of subjects randomized (Baseline PP NRS ≥4) | 176 | 90 |
| % of subjects with PP-NRS improvement ≥4 a,b | 40.9 | 17.8 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 21.7# (11.2, 32.3) |
| % of subjects with PP NRS <2 a,b | 30.1 | 6.7 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 22.8* (14.3, 31.3) |
| % of subjects with SD NRS improvement ≥4 a,b | 31.8 | 20.0 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 10.9§ (0.2, 21.6) |
| Number of subjects with severe pruritus (Baseline PP NRS≥7) | 120 | 61 |
| % of subjects with PP-NRS improvement ≥4 a,b | 48.3 | 21.3 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 25.4# (11.8, 39.1) |
| % of subjects with PP NRS <2 a,b | 30.0 | 4.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 24.6# (14.7, 34.5) |
| % of subjects with SD NRS improvement ≥4 a,b | 35.8 | 21.3 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 13.7∞ (0.2, 27.2) |
a Subjects who received rescue treatment or with missing data were considered as non-responders
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
*nominal p-value <0.0001, #nominal p-value <0.001, §nominal p-value =0.0591, ∞nominal p-value =0.0606
Strata adjusted p-value is based on the CMH test stratified by PP NRS (≥7, <7) and IGA score (3= moderate, 4=severe) at baseline
Clinical efficacy and safety in adults with prurigo nodularis
The efficacy and safety of Nemluvio as monotherapy was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal studies (OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2) that enrolled a total of 560 subjects 18 years of age and older with prurigo nodularis. Disease severity was defined using an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) in the overall assessment of prurigo nodularis nodules on a severity scale of 0 to 4. Subjects enrolled in these two studies had an IGA score ≥ 3, severe pruritus as defined by a weekly average of the peak pruritus numeric rating scale (PP-NRS) score of ≥7 on a scale of 0 to 10, and greater than or equal to 20 nodular lesions. OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2 assessed the effect of Nemluvio monotherapy on the signs and symptoms of prurigo nodularis, targeting improvement in skin lesions and pruritus over 16 weeks. OLYMPIA 1 had a 24-week treatment period and OLYMPIA 2 a 16-week treatment period.
Subjects completing OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2 had the opportunity to enrol into the open-label trial (OLYMPIA LTE) and receive treatment with Nemluvio every 4 weeks up to 184 weeks.
Subjects weighing less than 90 kg in the Nemluvio monotherapy group received subcutaneous injections of Nemluvio 60 mg (2 injections of 30 mg) at Week 0, followed by 30 mg injections every 4 weeks. Subjects weighing 90 kg or more in the Nemluvio monotherapy group received subcutaneous injections of Nemluvio 60 mg (2 injections of 30 mg) at Week 0 and every 4 weeks.
Endpoints
Both OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2 assessed the same two primary endpoints:
• Proportion of subjects with an improvement of ≥4 from baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Week 16
• Proportion of subjects with an IGA success (defined as an IGA of 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear], and a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) at Week 16
Key secondary endpoints included PP NRS improvement ≥4 from baseline at Week 4, PP NRS <2 at Week 4 and Week 16, SD NRS improvement ≥4 from baseline at Week 4 and 16. Other secondary endpoints included the change from baseline to week 16 in PP NRS, SD NRS, PN-associated pain frequency and intensity and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
Baseline characteristics
In these studies, at baseline, 59.6% of subjects were female, 81.4% were white, 25.4% of subjects were older than 65 years of age. The baseline weekly average PP NRS score was a mean (SD) of 8.4 (0.9). Fifty-eight (58) % of subjects had a baseline IGA score of 3 (moderate prurigo nodularis), 42% of subjects had a baseline IGA of 4 (severe prurigo nodularis) and the mean baseline DLQI was 16.9.
Clinical Response
Monotherapy studies (OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2) – week 0 to week 16
Results of the pivotal studies evaluating treatment of Nemluvio in OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2 are presented in Table 9 and show significant improvement in Nemluvio treated subjects, compared to placebo for both primary endpoints (Figure 4 and Figure 5) and key secondary endpoints (Figure 6).
Table 9 - Efficacy Results for Nemluvio monotherapy (Q4W) in OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2
| | OLYMPIA 1 | OLYMPIA 2 |
| Nemluvio | Placebo | Nemluvio | Placebo |
| Number of subjects randomized | 190 | 96 | 183 | 91 |
| % of subjects with improvement of PP NRS ≥4 from baselinea |
| Week 4 | 41.1 | 6.3 | 41.0 | 7.7 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 31.7* (23.0, 40.4) | 33.4* (24.3, 42.4) |
| Week 16 | 58.4 | 16.7 | 56.3 | 20.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 40.1* (29.4, 50.8) | 37.4* (26.3, 48.5) |
| % of subjects with PP NRS <2 a |
| Week 4 | 21.6 | 1.0 | 19.7 | 2.2 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 18.7* (12.3, 25.0) | 18.8* (12.0, 25.7) |
| Week 16 | 34.2 | 4.2 | 35.0 | 7.7 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 30.5* (22.3, 38.7) | 30.0* (21.3, 38.6) |
| LS Mean change from baseline (%) in PP NRS at Week 16b,c | -54.7 | -18.7 | -56.2 | -18.9 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -36.0§ (-44.9, -27.1) | -37.4§ (-46.8, -28.0) |
| % of subjects with IGA 0 or 1 at Week 16a | 26.3 | 7.3 | 37.7 | 11.0 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 14.6# (6.7, 22.6) | 28.5* (18.8, 38.2) |
| % of subjects with improvement of SD NRS ≥4 from baselinea |
| Week 4 | 31.1 | 5.2 | 37.2 | 9.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 22.7* (14.7, 30.7) | 27.9* (18.4, 37.5) |
| Week 16 | 50.0 | 11.5 | 51.9 | 20.9 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 38.0* (27.8, 48.2) | 31.9* (20.7, 43.2) |
| LS Mean change from baseline (%) in SD NRS at Week 16 b,c | -52.5 | -18.8 | -53.1 | -9.6 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -33.6§ (-46.1, -21.2) | -43.6§ (-62.2. -24.9) |
a If a subject received any rescue therapy, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
c If a subject received any rescue therapy the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value. Missing data is imputed by multiple imputation, assuming missing at random. Least square (LS) means and LS mean differences are strata-adjusted using ANCOVA MI-MAR, based on the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and baseline body weight (<90 kg, ≥90 kg).
*p-value <0.0001, #p-value =0.0025 Strata adjusted using the randomized stratification variables (analysis centre and baseline body weight (<90 kg, ≥90 kg)
§nominal p-value <0.0001 Strata-adjusted using the randomized stratification variables
Figure 4 – Proportion of Subjects with PP-NRS Improvement ≥4 from baseline to Week 16
Figure 5 – Proportion of IGA responders from baseline to Week 16
Figure 6 – Proportion of Subjects achieving PP-NRS <2 at Week 4 and Week 16
Treatment effects in subgroups (weight, age, gender, race, history of atopy, and prior treatment, including immunosuppressants) in OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2 were generally consistent with the results in the overall study population.
Other Patient-reported outcomes
In both monotherapy studies (OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2), Nemluvio significantly improved patient-reported symptoms of PN-associated pain frequency and intensity, and health-related quality of life as measured by DLQI total score (Table 10), at 16 weeks compared to placebo.
Table 10 –Efficacy results on DLQI of Nemluvio Monotherapy (Q4W) in OLYMPIA 1 and OLYMPIA 2 up to week 16
| | OLYMPIA 1 | OLYMPIA 2 |
| Nemluvio N=190 | Placebo N=96 | Nemluvio N=183 | Placebo N=91 |
| LS Mean change in DLQI from baselinea,b |
| At Week 4 | -7.8 | -3.0 | -8.0 | -1.9 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -4.8* (-6.3, -3.3) | -6.1* (-7.8, -4.3) |
| At Week 16 | -8.6 | -2.2 | -8.9 | -0.8 |
| LS mean difference (95%CI) | -6.4* (-8.4, -4.4) | -8.2* (-10.2, -6.1) |
| % of subjects with improvement of DLQI ≥4 from baselineb,c |
| At Week 4 | 70.0 | 42.7 | 68.9 | 39.6 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 26.5* (14.0, 39.0) | 29.9* (17.3, 42.5) |
| At Week 16 | 70.5 | 42.7 | 74.9 | 39.6 |
| Strata-adjusted proportion difference (95%CI) | 27.5* (15.8, 39.2) | 37.4* (25.7, 49.0) |
a If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value. Missing data is imputed by multiple imputation, assuming missing at random. Least square (LS) means and LS mean differences are strata-adjusted using ANCOVA MI-MAR, based on the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and baseline body weight (<90 kg, ≥90 kg).
b Not adjusted for multiplicity
c If a subject received any rescue therapy, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.
*nominal p-value <0.0001 Strata-adjusted using the randomized stratification variables.