Pharmacotherapeutic group: Immunostimulants, other immunostimulants, ATC code: L03AX22
Mechanism of action
Leniolisib inhibits PI3K‑delta by blocking the active binding site of PI3K‑delta. In cell‑free isolated enzyme assays, leniolisib was selective for PI3K‑delta over PI3K‑alpha (28‑fold), PI3K-beta (43‑fold), and PI3K‑gamma (257‑fold), as well as the broader kinome. In cell-based assays, leniolisib reduced pAkt pathway activity and inhibited proliferation and activation of B and T cell subsets. Gain‑of‑function variants in the gene encoding the p110-delta catalytic subunit or loss of function variants in the gene encoding the p85-alpha regulatory subunit each cause hyperactivity of PI3K-delta. Leniolisib inhibits the signalling pathways that lead to increased production of PIP3, hyperactivity of the downstream mTOR/Akt pathway, and to the dysregulation of B and T cells.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Ex vivo pharmacodynamics of leniolisib [proportion of phosphorylated Akt (pAkt)-positive B cells] were assessed intra-individually at 10, 30, and 70 mg twice daily for 4 weeks at each dose level in patients with APDS (N=6; mean age 22 years). Within the explored dose range, higher leniolisib plasma concentrations were generally associated with higher reduction of pAkt-positive B cells and higher doses were associated with a slightly higher peak reduction as well as more sustained reduction. Treatment with Joenja 70 mg twice a day at steady state is estimated to produce time-averaged reduction of pAkt-positive B cells by approximately 80%.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy of leniolisib was evaluated in the placebo-controlled portion of Study 2201, a 12‑week blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study in adult and paediatric patients 12 years of age and older with confirmed APDS-associated genetic PI3Kδ mutation with a documented variant in either PIK3CD or PIK3R1. Baseline patient demographics are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 Baseline demographic and disease characteristics in patients with APDS (Study 2201)
| Demographics and disease characteristics | Joenja (N=21) | Placebo (N=10) |
| Demographics | | |
| Age1 (Years) Mean (SD) | 22.2 (10.00) | 26.7 (13.43) |
| Age categories < 18, n (%) (Min, Max) ≥ 18, n (%) (Min, Max) | 8 (38) (12, 17) 13 (62) (18, 54) | 4 (40) (15, 17) 6 (60) (18, 48) |
| Sex, n (%) Male Female | 11 (52) 10 (48) | 4 (40) 6 (60) |
| Race, n (%) Asian Black White Other | 1 (5) 1 (5) 18 (86) 1 (5) | 1 (10) 1 (10) 7 (70) 1 (10) |
| Ethnicity, n (%) Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino Not reported | 0 14 (67) 7 (33) | 1 (10) 7 (70) 2 (20) |
| Disease characteristics | | |
| APDS 1 (PIK3CD variant), n (%) | 16 (76) | 9 (90) |
| APDS 2 (PIK3R1 variant), n (%) | 5 (24) | 1 (10) |
| Concomitant glucocorticoids, n (%) | 12 (57) | 6 (60) |
| Concomitant immunoglobulin G (IgG), n (%) | 14 (67) | 7 (70) |
| Previous rapamycin/sirolimus use, n (%) | 4 (19) | 3 (30) |
1Patient age from study Day -4 up to initial leniolisib dosing
Patients had nodal and/or extranodal lymphoproliferation, as measured by index nodal lesion selected by the Cheson methodology on CT or MRI and clinical findings and manifestations compatible with APDS (e.g., history of repeated oto‑sino‑pulmonary infections, organ dysfunction). Immunosuppressive medications or PI3Kδ inhibitors (selective or non-selective) were prohibited within 6 weeks of baseline (Day -1 and the visit prior to first study drug administration) and throughout the study. In addition, patients who had previous or concurrent B cell depleters (e.g., rituximab) within 6 months of baseline were excluded from the study, unless absolute B lymphocytes in the blood were normal. B cell depleters were prohibited throughout the study.
Thirty-one patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either leniolisib 70 mg (N=21) or placebo (N=10) twice a day for 12 weeks. The co‑primary efficacy endpoints were improvement in lymphoproliferation as measured by a change from baseline in lymphadenopathy measured by the log10‑transformed sum of product diameters and the normalization of immunophenotype as measured by the percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells. Both co‑primary efficacy endpoints were statistically significant (Table 4).
Table 4 Co-primary endpoints in placebo-controlled portion of Study 2201 at Week 12 (Day 85)
| | Joenja (N=21) | Placebo (N=10) |
| Log10‑transformed SPD of index lesions (excluding patients with 0 lesions at Baseline)a |
| nb | 18 | 8 |
| Baseline Mean (SD) | 3.03 (0.42) | 3.05 (0.39) |
| Change from Baseline, LS Mean (SE) | -0.27 (0.04) | -0.02 (0.05) |
| Difference vs. Placebo (95% CI) | | -0.25 (-0.38, -0.12) |
| p-value | | 0.0006 |
| Percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells (patients with < 48% of naïve B cells at Baseline)c |
| nd | 8 | 5 |
| Baselinee Mean (SD) | 27.16 (13.16) | 30.51 (7.97) |
| Change from Baseline, LS Mean (SE) | 37.39 (5.34) | 0.09 (6.66) |
| Difference vs. Placebo (95% CI) | | 37.30 (24.06, 50.54) |
| p-value | | 0.0002 |
CI=confidence interval; SD= Standard deviation; SE=standard error; SPD=sum of product diameters; vs=versus; LS Mean: Least-squares mean
Note: The LS mean change from baseline, difference in LS mean change from baseline between Joenja and placebo and its p-value were obtained from an Analysis of Covariance model with treatment, glucocorticoids use and immunoglobulin replacement therapy at baseline, and baseline measurement as covariates.
aChange in index lesion size was measured using the log10 transformed sum of the product of diameters (SPD) of the largest lymph nodes (maximum of 6) identified as per the Cheson criteria on CT/MRI.
bThe analysis excluded 2 patients from each treatment group due to protocol deviations and 1 Joenja patient having complete resolution of the index lesion identified at baseline.
cCell surface markers used to distinguish naïve B cells on flow cytometry were CD19+CD27-CD10-.
dThe analysis excluded 2 patients from each treatment group due to protocol deviations, 5 Joenja patients and 3 placebo patients with more than or equal to 48% naïve B cells at baseline, 5 Joenja patients with no Day 85 measurement, and 1 Joenja patient with no baseline measurement.
eBaseline is defined as the arithmetic mean of the Baseline and Day 1 values when both were available, and if either value was missing, the existing value was used.
Figure 1 represents the co-primary endpoints grouped by age (12 to < 18 years of age vs ≥ 18 years of age) in Study 2201.
Figure 1 Difference from baseline in log10 transformed SPD of index lesions and percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells (patients with < 48% of naïve B cells at Baseline) by age group (Study 2201)

Long-term extension study
Study 2201E1 was a long-term extension study and included patients from Study 2201. Thirty-seven patients continued treatment with leniolisib 70 mg twice daily for 60 weeks or longer and 84% were exposed for 108 weeks or longer. Median duration of leniolisib treatment was approximately 4 years, and 10 patients had more than 5 years of leniolisib exposure.
Paediatric population
For adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, please see above.
Study LE 3301 was a 2-part, open-label, single arm study to evaluate leniolisib in 21 paediatric patients 4 to 11 years of age. Most patients were male (62%), white (43%), older than 6 years of age (76%), and 81% of subjects had APDS 1 (PIK3CD variant). Patient selection and diagnostic criteria for study participation in LE 3301 were similar to Study 2201.
Patients received 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, or 50 mg leniolisib twice daily based on their body weight at baseline and remained on the same dose throughout the Part 1, 12-week treatment period. In the Part 2 long-term safety extension phase, doses could be adjusted for changes in body weight up to a maximum daily dose of 70 mg twice a day.
The primary objectives of Part 1 were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of leniolisib. Efficacy was based on the reduction in lymphoproliferation as measured by MRI or low-dose CT and immunophenotype normalization assessed by changes from baseline in the proportion of naive B cells among all B cells at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. A reduction in lymphoproliferation and immunophenotype normalization were observed in Part 1 across all dosing groups and these observations remained stable in Part 2.
Efficacy findings follow similar trends to those seen in adults and paediatric patients 12 years of age and older in Study 2201.
Twenty paediatric patients continued treatment in Part 2 with a median duration of leniolisib exposure of approximately 50 weeks and 95% of subjects received leniolisib for at least 6 months.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with leniolisib in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in APDS (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).