Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, protein kinase inhibitors, other protein kinase inhibitors, ATC code: L01EX03
Mechanism of action
Pazopanib is an orally administered, potent multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) -1, -2, and -3, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFR) -α and –β, and stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT), with IC50 values of 10, 30, 47, 71, 84 and 74 nM, respectively. In preclinical experiments, pazopanib dose-dependently inhibited ligand-induced auto-phosphorylation of VEGFR-2, c-Kit and PDGFR-β receptors in cells. In vivo, pazopanib inhibited VEGF-induced VEGFR-2 phosphorylation in mouse lungs, angiogenesis in various animal models, and the growth of multiple human tumour xenografts in mice.
Pharmacogenomics
In a pharmacogenetic meta-analysis of data from 31 clinical studies of pazopanib administered either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, ALT >5 x ULN (NCI CTC Grade 3) occurred in 19% of HLA-B*57:01 allele carriers and in 10% of non-carriers. In this dataset, 133/2235 (6%) of the patients carried the HLA-B*57:01 allele (see section 4.4).
Clinical studies
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
The safety and efficacy of pazopanib in RCC were evaluated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study. Patients (N = 435) with locally advanced and/or metastatic RCC were randomised to receive pazopanib 800 mg once daily or placebo. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the two treatment arms for progression-free survival (PFS) and the principle secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The other objectives were to evaluate the overall response rate and duration of response.
From the total of 435 patients in this study, 233 patients were treatment-naïve and 202 were second-line patients who had received one prior IL-2 or INFα-based therapy. The performance status (ECOG) was similar between the pazopanib and placebo groups (ECOG 0: 42% vs. 41%, ECOG 1: 58% vs. 59%). The majority of patients had either favourable (39%) or intermediate (54%), MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre) / Motzer prognostic factors. All patients had clear cell histology or predominantly clear cell histology. Approximately half of all patients had 3 or more organs involved in their disease and most patients had the lung (74%), and/or lymph nodes (54%) as a metastatic location for disease at baseline.
A similar proportion of patients in each arm were treatment-naïve and cytokine pre-treated (53% and 47% in pazopanib arm, 54% and 46% in placebo arm). In the cytokine pre-treated subgroup, the majority (75%) had received interferon-based treatment.
Similar proportions of patients in each arm had prior nephrectomy (89% and 88% in the pazopanib and placebo arms, respectively) and/or prior radiotherapy (22% and 15% in the pazopanib and placebo arms, respectively.
The primary analysis of the primary endpoint PFS is based on disease assessment by independent radiological review in the entire study population (treatment-naïve and cytokine pre-treated).
Table 4 Overall efficacy results in RCC by independent assessment (VEG105192)
| Endpoints/Study population | Pazopanib | Placebo | HR (95% CI) | P value (one-sided) |
| PFS | | | | |
| Overall* ITT | N = 290 | N = 145 | | |
| Median (months) | 9.2 | 4.2 | 0.46 (0.34, 0.62) | <0.0000001 |
| Response rate | N = 290 | N = 145 | | |
| % (95% CI) | 30 (25.1,35.6) | 3 (0.5, 6.4) | – | <0.001 |
| HR = hazard ratio; ITT = intent to treat; PFS = progression-free survival. * - treatment-naïve and cytokine pre-treated populations |
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curve for progression-free survival by independent assessment for the overall population (treatment-naïve and cytokine pre-treated populations) (VEG105192)

x axis; Months, y axis; Proportion Progression Free, Pazopanib —―— (N = 290) Median 9.2 months; Placebo -------- (N = 145) Median 4.2 months; Hazard Ratio = 0.46, 95% CI (0.34, 0.62), P <0.0000001
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curve for progression-free survival by independent assessment for the treatment-naïve population (VEG105192)

x axis; Months, y axis; Proportion Progression Free, Pazopanib —―— (N = 155) Median 11.1 months; Placebo -------- (N = 78) Median 2.8 months; Hazard Ratio = 0.40, 95% CI (0.27, 0.60), P <0.0000001
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier Curve for progression-free survival by independent assessment for the cytokine pre-treated population (VEG105192)

x axis; Months, y axis; Proportion Progression Free, Pazopanib —―— (N = 135) Median 7.4 months; Placebo -------- (N = 67) Median 4.2 months; Hazard Ratio = 0.54, 95% CI (0.35, 0.84), P <0.001
For patients who responded to treatment, the median time to response was 11.9 weeks and the median duration of response was 58.7 weeks as per independent review (VEG105192).
The median overall survival (OS) data at the protocol-specified final survival analysis were 22.9 months and 20.5 months [HR = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.16; p = 0.224)] for patients randomised to the pazopanib and placebo arms, respectively. The OS results are subject to potential bias as 54% of patients in the placebo arm also received pazopanib in the extension part of this study following disease progression. Sixty-six per cent of placebo patients received post-study therapy compared to 30% of pazopanib patients.
No statistical differences were observed between treatment groups for Global Quality of Life using EORTC QLQ-C30 and EuroQoL EQ-5D.
In a Phase II study of 225 patients with locally recurrent or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma, objective response rate was 35% and median duration of response was 68 weeks, as per independent review. Median PFS was 11.9 months.
The safety, efficacy and quality of life of pazopanib versus sunitinib was evaluated in a randomised, open-label, parallel group Phase III non-inferiority study (VEG108844).
In VEG108844, patients (N = 1110) with locally advanced and/or metastatic RCC who had not received prior systemic therapy, were randomised to receive either pazopanib 800 mg once daily continuously or sunitinib 50 mg once daily in 6-week cycles of dosing with 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks without treatment.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare PFS in patients treated with pazopanib to those treated with sunitinib. Demographic characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. Disease characteristics at initial diagnosis and at screening were balanced between the treatment arms with the majority of patients having clear cell histology and Stage IV disease.
VEG108844 achieved its primary endpoint of PFS and demonstrated that pazopanib was non-inferior to sunitinib, as the upper bound of the 95% CI for the hazard ratio was less than the protocol-specified non-inferiority margin of 1.25. Overall efficacy results are summarised in Table 5.
Table 5 Overall efficacy results (VEG108844)
| Endpoint | Pazopanib N = 557 | Sunitinib N = 553 | HR (95% CI) |
| PFS | | | |
| Overall | | | |
| Median (months) (95% CI) | 8.4 (8.3, 10.9) | 9.5 (8.3, 11.0) | 1.047 (0.898, 1.220) |
| Overall Survival Median (months) (95% CI) | 28.3 (26.0, 35.5) | 29.1 (25.4, 33.1) | 0.915a (0.786, 1.065) |
| HR = hazard ratio; PFS = progression-free survival; a P value = 0.245 (2-sided) |
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier Curve for progression-free survival by independent assessment for the overall population (VEG108844)

Subgroup analyses of PFS were performed for 20 demographic and prognostic factors. The 95% confidence intervals for all subgroups include a hazard ratio of 1. In the three smallest of these 20 subgroups, the point estimate of the hazard ratio exceeded 1.25; i.e. in subjects with no prior nephrectomy (n=186, HR=1.403, 95% CI (0.955, 2.061)), baseline LDH >1.5 x ULN (n=68, HR=1.72, 95% CI (0.943, 3.139)), and MSKCC: poor risk (n=119, HR=1.472, 95% CI (0.937, 2.313)).
Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS)
The efficacy and safety of pazopanib in STS were evaluated in a pivotal Phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study (VEG110727). A total of 369 patients with advanced STS were randomised to receive pazopanib 800 mg once daily or placebo. Importantly, only patients with selective histological subtypes of STS were allowed to participate to the study, therefore efficacy and safety of pazopanib can only be considered established for those subgroups of STS and treatment with pazopanib should be restricted to such STS subtypes.
The following tumour types were eligible:
Fibroblastic (adult fibrosarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma, malignant solitary fibrous tumours), so-called fibrohistiocytic (pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma [MFH], giant cell MFH, inflammatory MFH), leiomyosarcoma, malignant glomus tumours, skeletal muscles (pleomorphic and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma), vascular (epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, angiosarcoma), uncertain differentiation (synovial, epithelioid, alveolar soft part, clear cell, desmoplastic small round cell, extra-renal rhabdoid, malignant mesenchymoma, PEComa, intimal sarcoma), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas not otherwise specified (NOS) and other types of sarcoma (not listed as ineligible).
The following tumour types were not eligible:
Adipocytic sarcoma (all subtypes), all rhabdomyosarcoma that were not alveolar or pleomorphic, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing tumours/primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET), GIST, dermofibromatosis sarcoma protuberans, inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma, malignant mesothelioma and mixed mesodermal tumours of the uterus.
Of note, patients with adipocytic sarcoma were excluded from the pivotal Phase III study as in a preliminary Phase II study (VEG20002) activity (PFS at week 12) observed with pazopanib in adipocytic did not meet the prerequisite rate to allow further clinical testing.
Other key eligibility criteria of the VEG110727 study were: histological evidence of high or intermediate grade malignant STS and disease progression within 6 months of therapy for metastatic disease, or recurrence within 12 months of (neo) -/adjuvant therapy.
Ninety-eight percent (98%) of subjects received prior doxorubicin, 70% prior ifosfamide, and 65% of subjects had received at least three or more chemotherapeutic agents prior to study enrolment.
Patients were stratified by the factors of WHO performance status (WHO PS) (0 or 1) at baseline and the number of lines of prior systemic therapy for advanced disease (0 or 1 vs. 2+). In each treatment group, there was a slightly greater percentage of subjects in the 2+ lines of prior systemic therapy for advanced disease (58% and 55%, respectively, for placebo and pazopanib treatment arms) compared with 0 or 1 lines of prior systemic therapy (42% and 45%, respectively, for placebo and pazopanib treatment arms). The median duration of follow-up of subjects (defined as date of randomisation to date of last contact or death) was similar for both treatment arms (9.36 months for placebo [range 0.69 to 23.0 months] and 10.04 months for pazopanib [range 0.2 to 24.3 months].
The primary objective of the study was progression-free survival (PFS assessed by independent radiological review); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate and duration of response.
Table 6 Overall efficacy results in STS by independent assessment (VEG110727)
| Endpoints / study population | Pazopanib | Placebo | HR (95% CI) | P value (two-sided) |
| PFS | | | | |
| Overall ITT | N = 246 | N = 123 | | |
| Median (weeks) | 20.0 | 7.0 | 0.35 (0.26, 0.48) | <0.001 |
| Leiomyosarcoma | N = 109 | N = 49 | | |
| Median (weeks) | 20.1 | 8.1 | 0.37 (0.23, 0.60) | <0.001 |
| Synovial sarcoma subgroups | N = 25 | N = 13 | | |
| Median (weeks) | 17.9 | 4.1 | 0.43 (0.19, 0.98) | 0.005 |
| 'Other STS' subgroups | N = 112 | N = 61 | | |
| Median (weeks) | 20.1 | 4.3 | 0.39 (0.25, 0.60) | <0.001 |
| OS | | | | |
| Overall ITT | N = 246 | N = 123 | | |
| Median (months) | 12.6 | 10.7 | 0.87 (0.67, 1.12) | 0.256 |
| Leiomyosarcoma* | N = 109 | N = 49 | | |
| Median (months) | 16.7 | 14.1 | 0.84 (0.56, 1.26) | 0.363 |
| Synovial sarcoma subgroups* | N = 25 | N = 13 | | |
| Median (months) | 8.7 | 21.6 | 1.62 (0.79, 3.33) | 0.115 |
| “Other STS” subgroups* | N = 112 | N = 61 | | |
| Median (months) | 10.3 | 9.5 | 0.84 (0.59, 1.21) | 0.325 |
| Response rate (CR+PR) | | | | |
| % (95% CI) | 4 (2.3, 7.9) | 0 (0.0, 3.0) | | |
| Duration of response | | | | |
| Median (weeks) (95% CI) | 38.9 (16.7, 40.0) | | | |
| HR = hazard ratio; ITT = intent to treat; PFS = progression-free survival; CR = complete response; PR = partial response. OS = overall survival * Overall survival for the respective STS histological subgroups (leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma and “Other” STS) should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of subjects and wide confidence intervals |
A similar improvement in PFS based on investigator assessments was observed in the pazopanib arm compared with the placebo arm (in the overall ITT population HR: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.52, p <0.001).
Figure 5 Kaplan-Meier Curve for Progression-Free Survival in STS by Independent Assessment for the Overall Population (VEG110727)

No significant difference in OS was observed between the two treatment arms at the final OS analysis performed after 76% (280/369) of the events had occurred (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67, 1.12 p=0.256).
Paediatric population
A Phase I study (ADVL0815) of pazopanib was conducted in 44 paediatric patients with various recurrent or refractory solid tumours. The primary objective was to investigate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the safety profile and the pharmacokinetic properties of pazopanib in children. The median duration of exposure in this study was 3 months (1-23 months).
A Phase II study (PZP034X2203) of pazopanib was conducted in 57 paediatric patients with refractory solid tumours including rhabdomyosarcoma (N=12), non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (N=11), Ewing sarcoma/pPNET (N=10), osteosarcoma (N=10), neuroblastoma (N=8) and hepatoblastoma (N=6). The study was a single-agent, non-controlled, open-label study to determine the therapeutic activity of pazopanib in children and adolescents aged 1 to <18 years of age. Pazopanib was administered daily as a tablet at a dose of 450 mg/m2/dose or as an oral suspension at 225 mg/m2/dose. The maximum daily dose permitted was 800 mg for the tablet and 400 mg for the oral suspension. The median duration of exposure was 1.8 months (1 day-29 months).
Results of this study did not show any meaningful anti-tumour activity in the respective paediatric population. Pazopanib is therefore not recommended for treatment of these tumours in the paediatric population (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Votrient in all subsets of the paediatric population in treatment of kidney and renal pelvis carcinoma (excluding nephroblastoma, nephroblastomatosis, clear cell sarcoma, mesoblastic nephroma, renal medullary carcinoma and rhabdoid tumour of the kidney) (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).