Pharmacotherapeutic group: Butyrophenone derivates. ATC code: N05AD08.Droperidol is a butyrophenone neuroleptic. Its pharmacologic profile is characterised mainly by dopamine-blocking and weak α1-adrenolytic effects. Droperidol is devoid of anticholinergic and antihistaminic activity.
Droperidol's inhibitory action on dopaminergic receptors in the chemotrigger zone in the area postrema, gives it a potent antiemetic effect, especially useful for the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting and/or induced by opioid analgesics.
At a dose of 0.15 mg/kg, droperidol induces a fall in mean blood pressure (MBP), due to a decrease in cardiac output in a first phase, and then subsequently due to a decrease in pre-load. These changes occur independently of any alteration in myocardial contractility or vascular resistance. Droperidol does not affect myocardial contractility or heart rate, therefore has no negative inotropic effect. Its weak α1-adrenergic blockade can cause a modest hypotension and decreased peripheral vascular resistance and may decrease pulmonary arterial pressure (particularly if it is abnormally high). It may also reduce the incidence of epinephrine-induced arrhythmia, but it does not prevent other forms of cardiac arrhythmia.
Droperidol has a specific antiarrhythmic effect at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg by an effect on myocardial contractility (prolongation of the refractory period) and a decrease in blood pressure.
Two studies (one placebo-controlled and one comparative active treatment-controlled) performed in the general anaesthesia setting and designed to better identify the QTc changes associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting treatment by small dose of droperidol (0.625 and 1.25 mg intravenous, and 0.75 mg intravenous, respectively) identified a QT interval prolongation at 3-6 min after administration of 0.625 and 1.25 mg droperidol (respectively 15 ±40 and 22 ±41 ms), but these changes did not differ significantly from that seen with saline (12 ±35 ms). There were no statistically significant differences amongst the droperidol and saline groups in the number of patients with greater than 10% prolongation in QTc versus baseline.
There was no evidence of droperidol-induced QTc prolongation after surgery.
No ectopic heartbeats were reported from the electrocardiographic records or 12-lead recordings during the perioperative period. The comparative active-treatment study with 0.75 mg intravenous droperidol identified a significant QTc interval prolongation(maximal of 17±9ms at the second minute after droperidol injection when compared with pre-treatment QTc measurement), with the QTc interval significantly lower after the 90th minute."
PONV
In a systematic review of 222 studies on prevention of PONV, the risk of PONV was decreased compared to placebo by RR (95% confidence interval) 0.65 (0.60-0.71) for nausea, 0.65 (0.61-0.70) for vomiting and by 0.62 (0.58-0.67) for nausea and vomiting combined.
In a combined analysis of 2061 high risk PONV patients, 1.25mg droperidol was more effective than 4 mg ondansetron or 0.625 mg droperidol in preventing nausea (p<0.05; absence of nausea 43%, 29%, 29% respectively), in preventing vomiting (complete response 0-24h 56%, 53%, 48%) and in reducing the need for rescue medication (26%, 34%, 32%).
Monotherapy
A meta-analysis study examined data from 74 clinical trials involving 5351 patients who received 24 different regimens of droperidol and 3372 patients who received placebo or no treatment. The incidence of early (0-6 hours) and late PONV (0-24 hours) in adults and children was analysed (see table).
Early and late outcomes after droperidol compared to placebo or no treatment. Percentages shown refer to incidence of nausea or vomiting.
| Parameter | Droperidol Average (range) in % | Placebo/no treatment Average (range) in % |
| Early outcome (0-6 hours) | Nausea | 16 (3-41) | 33 (15-80) |
| Vomiting | 14 (0-56) | 29 (6-86) |
| Late outcome (0-24 hours) | Nausea | 45 (1-86) | 58 (11–96) |
| Vomiting | 28 (4-83) | 46 (12-97) |
Droperidol was more efficacious than placebo or no treatment in preventing PONV in adults and in children.
Combination therapy
A randomised study in 4123 patients assessed the effectiveness of single and combined antiemetic interventions in patients at high risk of PONV. Treatment included 1.25 mg of droperidol or no droperidol; 4 mg of ondansetron or no ondansetron; 4 mg of dexamethasone or no dexamethasone. The addition of further antiemetics reduced the incidence of PONV, corresponding to an approximate 26% reduction in relative risk of nausea and vomiting for each additional antiemetic. All antiemetics tested were equally effective.
PCA
A systematic review of 14 studies involving 1117 patients receiving PCA was performed. Droperidol was used in 6 with a dose range of 0.017-0.17 mg/mg of morphine; 0.017-0.33 mg/bolus. The incidence of any emetic event in patients receiving placebo was 66% compared to 30% for patients receiving droperidol.
QTc
In a placebo-controlled study, treatment with droperidol identified a QT interval prolongation at 3-6 min after administration of 0.625 and 1.25 mg droperidol (respectively 15 ± 40 and 22 ± 41 ms), but these changes did not differ significantly from that seen with placebo (12 ± 35 ms). There were no statistically significant differences compared to placebo in the number of patients with greater than 10% QTc prolongation. A second study with 0.75 mg intravenous droperidol and 4 mg ondansetron identified significant QTc interval prolongation (17 ± 9 ms droperidol, 20 ± 13ms ondansetron), with the QTc interval significantly lower after the 90th minute.
A study looking at the combination of ondansetron (4 mg) and droperidol (1 mg) showed that both drugs increased QTc interval separately (17 ± 10 ms ondansetron, 25 ± 8 ms droperidol) but there was no additive effect when given together (28 ± 10 ms).