Pharmacotherapeutic group: Immunosuppressants, interleukin inhibitors, ATC code: L04AC18
Mechanism of action
Risankizumab is a humanised immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that selectively binds with high affinity to the p19 subunit of human interleukin 23 (IL-23) cytokine without binding to IL-12 and inhibits its interaction with the IL-23 receptor complex. IL-23 is a cytokine that is involved in inflammatory and immune responses. By blocking IL-23 from binding to its receptor, risankizumab inhibits IL-23-dependent cell signalling and release of proinflammatory cytokines.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In a study of subjects with psoriasis, expression of genes associated with the IL-23/IL-17 axis was decreased in the skin after single doses of risankizumab. Reductions in epidermal thickness, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and expression of psoriatic disease markers were also observed in psoriatic lesions.
In a Phase 2 study of subjects with Crohn's disease, expression of genes associated with the IL-23/Th17 axis were decreased in gut tissue after multiple doses of risankizumab. Reductions in faecal calprotectin (FCP), serum C reactive protein (CRP) and IL-22 were also observed after multiple doses in Phase 3 induction studies in Crohn's patients. Decreases in FCP, CRP and serum IL-22 were maintained out to Week 52 of the maintenance study.
In a Phase 2b/3 study of subjects with ulcerative colitis, statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction from baseline was observed in the inflammatory biomarkers, FCP and CRP, and in the IL-23 pathway-associated biomarker, serum IL-22, at week 12 of the induction study. Decreases in FCP, CRP and serum IL-22 were maintained out to Week 52 of the maintenance study.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Crohn's disease
Skyrizi has been shown to improve signs and symptoms and health related quality of life, as well as decrease mucosal inflammation as measured by endoscopy.
The efficacy and safety of risankizumab were assessed in 1 419 subjects with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease in three multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo‑controlled clinical studies. Enrolled subjects were 16 years of age or older with a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) of 220 to 450, an average daily stool frequency (SF) ≥4 and/or average daily abdominal pain score (APS) ≥2, and a Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) of ≥6, or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease, excluding the narrowing component and confirmed by a central reviewer.
There were two 12‑week intravenous induction studies (ADVANCE and MOTIVATE), which included a 12‑week extension period for subjects who did not achieve SF/APS clinical response at Week 12 (≥ 30% decrease in SF and/or ≥ 30% decrease in APS and both not worse than baseline) at Week 12. ADVANCE and MOTIVATE were followed by a 52‑week randomized withdrawal study of subcutaneous maintenance treatment (FORTIFY) that enrolled subjects with SF/APS clinical response to IV induction treatment, representing at least 64 weeks of therapy.
ADVANCE and MOTIVATE
In studies ADVANCE and MOTIVATE, subjects were randomized to receive risankizumab at either 600 mg (recommended dose), 1 200 mg, or placebo, at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8.
In ADVANCE, 58% (491/850) subjects had failed or were intolerant to treatment with one or more biologic therapies (prior biologic failure), and 42% (359/850) had failed or were intolerant to therapy with conventional therapies but not biologic therapies (without prior biologic failure). In ADVANCE, among the subjects without prior biologic failure, (87%) 314/359 were naïve to biologic therapy and the remaining 13% had received a biologic but never failed or demonstrated intolerance. All patients in MOTIVATE had prior biologic failure.
The co-primary endpoints were clinical remission based on SF and APS (average daily SF ≤2.8 and not worse than baseline and average daily AP score ≤1 and not worse than baseline) at Week 12, and endoscopic response (greater than 50% decrease in SES‑CD from baseline, or a decrease of at least 2 points for subjects with a baseline score of 4 and isolated ileal disease) at Week 12. In both studies, a greater proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved clinical remission at Week 12 and endoscopic response at Week 12 compared to placebo (Table 2). Enhanced SF/APS clinical response and clinical remission were significant as early as Week 4 in subjects treated with Skyrizi and continued to improve through Week 12.
Additional secondary endpoints measured at Week 12 included the proportion of subjects with enhanced SF/APS clinical response (with ≥60% decrease in average daily SF and/or ≥35% decrease in average daily AP score and both not worse than Baseline, and/or clinical remission), endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤4 and at least a 2 point reduction versus Baseline and no subscore greater than 1 in any individual variable), mucosal healing (SES-CD ulcerated surface subscore of 0 in subjects with a subscore of >1 at Baseline), a decrease of least 100 points in baseline CDAI, and a CDAI <150 at Week 12.
Table 2. Efficacy results in ADVANCE and MOTIVATE
| | ADVANCE | MOTIVATE |
| | Placebo IV (N=175) % | Skyrizi 600 mg IV (N=336) % | Treatment differencee (95% CI) | Placebo IV (N=187) % | Skyrizi 600 mg IV (N=191) % | Treatment differencee (95% CI) |
| Clinical remission at Week 12a | 22% | 43% | 22% [14%, 30%]b | 19% | 35% | 15% [6%, 24%]c |
| Endoscopic response at Week 12a | 12% | 40% | 28% [21%, 35%]b | 11% | 29% | 18% [10%, 25%]b |
| Enhanced SF/APS clinical response at Week 4 | 31% | 46% | 15% [6%, 23%]c | 32% | 45% | 14% [4%, 23%]d |
| Enhanced SF/APS clinical response at Week 12 | 42% | 63% | 21% [12%, 30%]b | 39% | 62% | 23% [13%, 33%]b |
| Mucosal healing at Week 12 | 8% | 21% | 14% [8%, 19%]b | 4% | 14% | 9% [4%, 15%]c |
| Endoscopic remission at Week 12 | 9% | 24% | 15% [9%, 21%]b | 4% | 19% | 15% [9%, 21%]b |
| a Co-primary endpoints. b Statistically significant under multiplicity-control for Skyrizi vs placebo comparison (p<0.001). c Statistically significant under multiplicity-control for Skyrizi vs placebo (p≤0.01). d Nominal p ≤ 0.01 SKYRIZI vs placebo comparison. e Adjusted treatment difference. |
At Week 4, a higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved a CDAI <150 compared to placebo (ADVANCE, Skyrizi=18%, placebo=10%, p≤0.05; MOTIVATE, Skyrizi=21%, placebo=11%, p≤0.01).
At Week 12, a higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved a CDAI<150 compared to placebo (ADVANCE, Skyrizi=45%, placebo=25%, p<0.001; MOTIVATE, Skyrizi=42%, placebo=20%, p<0.001).
At Week 12, a higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved a decrease of at least 100 points in baseline CDAI compared to placebo (ADVANCE, Skyrizi=60%, placebo=37%, p<0.001; MOTIVATE, Skyrizi=60%, placebo=30%, p<0.001).
At Week 12, a higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved both enhanced SF/APS clinical response and endoscopic response at Week 12 compared to placebo (ADVANCE, Skyrizi=31%, placebo=8%, p<0.001; MOTIVATE, Skyrizi=21%, placebo=7%, p<0.001).
The results for the co-primary endpoints for subjects with and without prior biologic failure are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Efficacy results at Week 12 in subjects with prior biologic treatment failure and subjects without prior biologic failure in ADVANCE
| | ADVANCE |
| Placebo IV | Skyrizi 600 mg |
| Clinical remission per SF/AP Score |
| Prior biologic failure | 23% (N=97) | 41% (N=195) |
| Without prior biologic failure | 21% (N=78) | 48% (N=141) |
| Endoscopic response |
| Prior biologic failure | 11% (N=97) | 33% (N=195) |
| Without prior biologic failure | 13% (N=78) | 50% (N=141) |
In ADVANCE, a higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi with and without prior biologic failure achieved CDAI<150 compared to placebo (With prior biologic failure, Skyrizi=42%, placebo=26%; Without prior biologic failure, Skyrizi=49%, placebo=23%).
CD-related hospitalisations
Rates of CD-related hospitalisations through Week 12 were lower in subjects treated with Skyrizi compared to placebo (ADVANCE, Skyrizi=3%, placebo=12%, p<0.001; MOTIVATE, Skyrizi=3%, placebo=11%, p≤0.01).
FORTIFY
The maintenance study FORTIFY evaluated 462 subjects with SF/APS clinical response to 12 weeks of Skyrizi IV induction treatment in studies ADVANCE and MOTIVIATE. Subjects were randomized to continue to receive a maintenance regimen of Skyrizi 360 mg SC (recommended dose), or Skyrizi 180 mg SC every 8 weeks, or to withdraw from Skyrizi induction and receive placebo SC every 8 weeks for up to 52 weeks.
The co-primary endpoints were clinical remission at Week 52 and, endoscopic response at Week 52. Co-primary endpoints were also measured in subjects with and without prior biologic failure (see Table 4).
Secondary endpoints measured at Week 52 included enhanced SF/APS clinical response, maintenance of clinical remission (clinical remission at Week 52 in subjects with clinical remission at Week 0), mucosal healing, endoscopic remission, deep remission (clinical remission and endoscopic remission), and CDAI <150.
Table 4. Efficacy results in FORTIFY at Week 52 (64 weeks from initiation of induction dose)
| | FORTIFY |
| | Skyrizi IV induction/ Placebo SCg (N=164) % | Skyrizi IV induction/ Skyrizi 360 mg SC (N=141) % | Treatment difference (95% CI) |
| Clinical remissiona | 40% | 52% | 15% [5%, 25%]b,h |
| Prior biologic failure | 34% (N=123) | 48% (N=102) | 14% [1%,27%] |
| Without prior biologic failure | 56% (N=41) | 62% (N=39) | 5% [-16%,27%] |
| Endoscopic responsea | 22% | 47% | 28% [19%, 37%]c,h |
| Prior biologic failure | 20% (N=123) | 44% (N=102) | 23% [11%, 35%] |
| Without biologic failure | 27% (N=41) | 54% (N=39) | 27% [6%, 48%] |
| Enhanced SF/APS clinical response | 49% | 59% | 13% [2%, 23%]f,h |
| Maintenance of clinical remission | (N = 91) 51% | (N = 72) 69% | 21% [6%, 35%]e,h |
| Endoscopic remission | 13% | 39% | 28% [20%, 37%]d,h |
| Mucosal healing | (N = 162) 10% | (N = 141) 31% | 22% [14%, 30%]d,h |
| a Co-primary endpoints b Statistically significant under multiplicity-control for Skyrizi vs placebo comparison (p≤0.01). c Statistically significant under multiplicity-control for Skyrizi vs placebo comparison (p≤0.001). d Nominal p<0.001 Skyrizi vs placebo comparison. e Nominal p≤0.01 Skyrizi vs placebo comparison. f Nominal p≤0.05 Skyrizi vs placebo comparison. g The induction-only group consisted of subjects who achieved clinical response to Skyrizi induction therapy and were randomized to receive placebo in the maintenance study (FORTIFY). h Adjusted treatment difference. |
Deep remission at Week 52 was observed at higher rates in subjects treated with Skyrizi IV/Skyrizi SC compared to subjects who received Skyrizi IV/placebo SC (28% vs. 10%, respectively, p<0.001).
At Week 52, a higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi IV/Skyrizi SC achieved CDAI < 150 compared to Skyrizi IV/placebo SC (52% vs. 41%, respectively, p≤0.01). A higher proportion of subjects treated with Skyrizi IV/Skyrizi SC achieved a decrease of at least 100 points in baseline CDAI score compared to subjects treated with Skyrizi IV/placebo SC (62% vs. 48%, respectively, p≤ 0.01).
91 subjects who did not demonstrate SF/APS clinical response 12 weeks after Skyrizi induction in studies ADVANCE and MOTIVATE received subcutaneous 360 mg dose of Skyrizi at Week 12 and Week 20. Of these subjects, 64% (58/91) achieved SF/APS clinical response at Week 24; 33 of the subjects achieving SF/APS clinical response enrolled in FORTIFY and continued receiving Skyrizi 360 mg SC every 8 weeks for up to 52 weeks. Among these subjects, 55% (18/33) achieved clinical remission and 45% (15/33) achieved endoscopic response at Week 52.
During FORTIFY, 30 subjects had loss of response to Skyrizi 360 mg SC treatment and received rescue treatment with Skyrizi (1 200 mg IV single dose, followed by 360 mg SC every 8 weeks). Of these subjects, 57% (17/30) achieved SF/APS clinical response at Week 52. In addition, 20% (6/30) and 34% (10/29) of subjects achieved clinical remission and endoscopic response at Week 52, respectively.
Health-related and quality of life outcomes
Health-related quality of life was assessed by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Improvement in fatigue was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale.
At Week 12 of ADVANCE and MOTIVATE, subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in IBDQ total score, all IBDQ domain scores (bowel symptoms, systemic function, emotional function, and social function), SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Score, EQ-5D VAS, and FACIT-Fatigue compared to placebo.
Subjects treated with Skyrizi experienced more improvements in work productivity compared to placebo, as assessed by the WPAI-CD questionnaire at Week 12. Specifically, greater reductions in impairment while working, overall work impairment, and activity impairment was demonstrated in ADVANCE; and greater reduction in activity impairment was demonstrated in MOTIVATE.
Compared to placebo, subjects treated with Skyrizi achieved clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in Crohn's-related symptoms and sleep impact as assessed by Crohn's Symptom Severity (CSS) questionnaire at Week 12. These improvements were maintained in subjects treated with Skyrizi IV/Skyrizi SC in FORTIFY through Week 52.
Ulcerative colitis
The efficacy and safety of risankizumab was assessed in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies. Enrolled subjects were ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age with adapted Mayo Score (aMS) of 5 to 9 (using the Mayo scoring system, excluding Physician's Global Assessment) with an endoscopic subscore (ES) of 2 or 3 on screening endoscopy, confirmed by central review.
The 12-week intravenous induction study (INSPIRE) included a 12-week extension period for subjects who did not achieve clinical response [defined as a decrease from baseline in the aMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from baseline, and a decrease in rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1] at Week 12. INSPIRE was followed by a 52-week randomised withdrawal study of subcutaneous maintenance treatment (COMMAND) that enrolled subjects with clinical response to 12 weeks of risankizumab intravenous induction treatment, representing at least 64 weeks of therapy.
INSPIRE
In study INSPIRE, 975 subjects were randomised and received either risankizumab 1200 mg or placebo, at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8.
In INSPIRE, 52% (503/975) of subjects had failed (inadequate response or intolerance) one or more biologics therapies, JAK inhibitors, and/or S1P receptor modulators. Of these 503 subjects, 488 (97%) failed biologics and 90 (18%) failed JAK inhibitors.
Enrolled subjects were permitted to use a stable dose of oral corticosteroids (up to 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), immunomodulators, and aminosalicylates. At baseline in INSPIRE, 36% of subjects received corticosteroids, 17% of subjects received immunomodulators and 73% of subjects received aminosalicylates. Patient disease activity was moderate (aMS ≤7) in 58% of subjects and severe (aMS >7) in 42% of subjects.
In INSPIRE, a significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of clinical remission per aMS [defined as stool frequency subscore (SFS) ≤ 1, and not greater than baseline, RBS = 0, and ES ≤ 1 without evidence of friability] at Week 12 compared to placebo (Table 5). Results of the primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints are listed in Table 5.
Table 5. Efficacy results in INSPIRE at Week 12
| Endpoint | Placebo IV (N=325) % | Risankizumab 1 200 mg IV (N=650) % | Treatment difference (95% CI) |
| Disease activity and UC symptoms |
| Clinical remissionab | 6% | 20% | 14%f [10%, 18%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 4% (N=170) | 11% (N=333) | 7% [3%, 12%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 8% (N=155) | 30% (N=317) | 21% [15%, 28%] |
| Clinical responsec | 36% | 64% | 29%f [22%, 35%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 31% (N=170) | 55% (N=333) | 24% [15%, 33%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 41% (N=155) | 74% (N=317) | 33% [24%, 42%] |
| Endoscopic and histologic assessment |
| Mucosal healingd | 12% | 37% | 24%f [19%, 29%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 10% (N=170) | 26% (N=333) | 16% [9%, 22%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 14% (N=155) | 48% (N=317) | 33% [26%, 41%] |
| Histologic-endoscopic mucosal healinge | 8% | 24% | 17%f [12%, 21%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 7% (N=170) | 16% (N=333) | 9% [3%, 14%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 8% (N=155) | 33% (N=317) | 25% [18%, 32%] |
| a Primary endpoint b Clinical remission per aMS: SFS ≤ 1, and not greater than baseline, RBS = 0, and ES ≤ 1 without evidence of friability c Clinical response per aMS: decrease from Baseline ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30%, and a decrease in RBS ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1 d ES ≤ 1 without the evidence of friability e ES ≤ 1 without the evidence of friability and Geboes score ≤ 3.1 (indicating neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction and no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue) f p < 0.00001, adjusted treatment difference (95% CI) |
Clinical disease activity and symptoms
The partial adapted Mayo score (paMS) is composed of SFS and RBS. Clinical response per paMS is defined as a decrease of ≥1 point and ≥30% from Baseline and a decrease in RBS ≥1 or an absolute RBS ≤1. The results of clinical response per paMS over time in INSPIRE are shown in Figure 1. Onset of efficacy was rapid with a greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab achieving clinical response as early as Week 4 compared to placebo (52% vs 31%, respectively, p < 0.00001).
Figure 1. Proportion of subjects achieving clinical response per paMS over time in induction study INSPIRE

A significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo had no abdominal pain (36% vs 26%, respectively, p < 0.01) and no bowel urgency (44% vs 28%, respectively, p < 0.00001) at week 12.
Other UC symptoms
Number of faecal incontinence episodes per week was reduced in a significantly greater amount in subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo at Week 12 (change from baseline in risankizumab = -3.8, placebo = -2.2, p = 0.00003).
The proportion of subjects who had no nocturnal bowel movements was significantly greater in subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo at week 12 (67% vs 43%, respectively, p < 0.00001).
The proportion of subjects who had no tenesmus was significantly greater in subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo at Week 12 (49% vs 30%, respectively, p < 0.00001).
Number of days with sleep interruption due to UC symptoms per week were reduced in a significantly greater amount in subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo at Week 12 (change from baseline in risankizumab = -2.5, placebo = -1.5, p < 0.00001).
UC-related hospitalisations
Rates of UC-related hospitalisations through Week 12 were significantly lower in subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo (1% vs 6%, respectively, p < 0.00001).
Extended treatment in week 12 non-responders
A total of 141 subjects who did not demonstrate clinical response at Week 12 of risankizumab induction in INSPIRE received either subcutaneous 180 mg or 360 mg dose of risankizumab at Week 12 and Week 20. Of the 71 subjects who received risankizumab 180 mg SC and 70 subjects who received risankizumab 360 mg SC, 56% and 57% achieved clinical response at Week 24, respectively.
COMMAND
The maintenance study COMMAND evaluated 548 subjects with clinical response after 12 weeks of risankizumab IV induction treatment in study INSPIRE. Subjects were randomised to receive a maintenance regimen of risankizumab 180 mg SC or 360 mg SC every 8 weeks, or to withdraw from risankizumab induction and receive placebo SC every 8 weeks for up to 52 weeks.
In COMMAND, 75% (411/548) of subjects had failed (inadequate response or intolerance) one or more biologics therapies, JAK inhibitors, and/or S1P receptor modulators prior to induction baseline. Of these 411 subjects, 407 (99%) failed biologics and 78 (19%) failed JAK inhibitors.
In COMMAND, a significantly greater proportion of the above 548 subjects treated with risankizumab 180 mg SC or risankizumab 360 mg SC achieved the primary endpoint of clinical remission per aMS at Week 52 compared to placebo (see Table 6). Results of the primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints are listed in Table 6.
Table 6. Efficacy results in COMMAND at week 52 (64 weeks from initiation of induction dose)
| Endpoint | Risankizumab IV induction/ Placebo SC+ (N=183) % | Risankizumab IV induction/ Risankizumab 180 mg SC (N=179) % | Risankizumab IV induction/ Risankizumab 360 mg SC (N=186) % | Treatment difference (97.5% CI)++ |
| Risankizumab IV induction/ Risankizumab 180 mg SC | Risankizumab IV induction/ Risankizumab 360 mg SC |
| Disease activity and UC symptoms |
| Clinical remissionab | 25% | 40% | 38% | 16%h [6%, 27%] | 14%h [4%, 24%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 23% (N=138) | 37% (N=134) | 29% (N=139) | 13% [1%, 26%] | 6% [-6%, 18%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 31% (N=45) | 51% (N=45) | 62% (N=47) | 20% [-3%, 43%] | 31% [8%, 53%] |
| Maintenance of clinical remissionc | 40% (N=53) | 70% (N=44) | 50% (N=40) | 29%h [7%, 51%] | 13%k [-11%, 36%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 37% (N=35) | 65% (N=26) | 44% (N=25) | 28% [0%, 56%] | 7% [-22%, 36%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 44% (N=18) | 77% (N=18) | 60% (N=15) | 33% [-2%, 67%] | 16% [-23%, 54%] |
| Corticosteroid-free clinical remissiond | 25% | 40% | 37% | 16% h [6%, 26%] | 14% h [3%, 24%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 23% (N=138) | 36% (N=134) | 29% (N=139) | 13% [0%, 25%] | 6% [-6%, 18%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 31% (N=45) | 51% (N=45) | 60% (N=47) | 20% [-3%, 43%] | 28% [6%, 51%] |
| Clinical responsee | 52% | 68% | 62% | 17%i [6%, 28%] | 11%j [0%, 23%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 46% (N=138) | 63% (N=134) | 57% (N=139) | 18% [4%, 31%] | 11% [-2%, 25%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 71% (N=45) | 82% (N=45) | 79% (N=47) | 11% [-9%, 31%] | 8% [-13%, 28%] |
| Endoscopic and histologic assessment |
| Mucosal healingf | 32% | 51% | 48% | 20% h [9%, 31%] | 17% h [7%, 28%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 30% (N=138) | 48% (N=134) | 39% (N=139) | 17% [4%, 30%] | 8% [-4%, 21%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 36% (N=45) | 60% (N=45) | 76% (N=47) | 24% [1%, 47%] | 41% [19%, 62%] |
| Histologic-endoscopic mucosal healingg | 23% | 43% | 42% | 20%h [10%, 31%] | 20% h [10%, 30%] |
| With biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 22% (N=138) | 39% (N=134) | 33% (N=139) | 17% [5%, 29%] | 11% [-1%, 23%] |
| Without biologic and/or JAK inhibitor failure | 29% (N=45) | 55% (N=45) | 69% (N=47) | 26% [3%, 49%] | 40% [19%, 62%] |
| + The induction-only group consisted of subjects who achieved clinical response to risankizumab induction therapy and were randomised to receive placebo in the maintenance study (COMMAND). ++ Adjusted difference for the overall treatment difference. a Primary endpoint b Clinical remission per aMS: SFS ≤ 1, and not greater than baseline, RBS = 0, and ES ≤ 1 without evidence of friability c Clinical remission per aMS at Week 52 among subjects who achieved clinical remission at the end of induction treatment d Clinical remission per aMS at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for ≥90 days e Clinical response per aMS: decrease from Baseline ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30%, and a decrease in RBS ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1 f ES of ≤ 1 without the evidence of friability g ES ≤ 1 without the evidence of friability and Geboes score ≤ 3.1 (indicating neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction and no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue) h Statistically significant under multiplicity-control for risankizumab vs placebo comparison (p ≤ 0.01). i Nominal p ≤ 0.01 risankizumab vs placebo comparison j Nominal p ≤ 0.05 risankizumab vs placebo comparison k p = 0.2234 |
Clinical disease activity and symptoms
A significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo had no abdominal pain (47% vs 30%, respectively, p < 0.001) and no bowel urgency (54% vs 31%, respectively, p < 0.00001) at Week 52. A greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo had no bowel urgency (49% vs 31%, respectively, p < 0.001) at Week 52, and a numerically higher proportion of subjects had no abdominal pain compared to risankizumab IV/placebo (38% vs 30%, respectively, p = 0.0895) at Week 52.
Other UC symptoms
The proportion of subjects who had no nocturnal bowel movements was greater in subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo at Week 52 (42% and 43% vs 30%, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively).
The proportion of subjects who had no tenesmus was greater in subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo at Week 52 (37% and 37% vs 23%, respectively, p < 0.01).
UC-related hospitalisations
Occurrence of UC-related hospitalisations through Week 52 were numerically lower in subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo (0.6 per 100 subject-years and 1.2 per 100 subject-years vs 3.1 per 100 subject-years, p = 0.0949 and p = 0.2531, respectively).
Endoscopic and histologic assessment
Endoscopic remission (normalisation of the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa) was defined as ES of 0. At Week 12 of INSPIRE, a significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo achieved endoscopic remission (11% vs 3%, respectively, p < 0.00001). At Week 52 of COMMAND, a significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo achieved endoscopic remission (23% and 24% vs 15%, respectively, p < 0.05).
Deep mucosal healing was defined as ES of 0 and Geboes score < 2.0 (indicating no neutrophil in crypts or lamina propria and no increase in eosinophil, no crypt destruction, and no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue). At Week 12 of INSPIRE, a significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab compared to placebo achieved deep mucosal healing (6% vs 1%, respectively, p < 0.00001). At Week 52 of COMMAND, a numerically higher proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo achieved deep mucosal healing (13% and 16% vs 10%, p = 0.2062 and p = 0.0618, respectively).
In COMMAND, maintenance of mucosal healing at Week 52 (ES ≤1 without friability) was seen in a greater proportion of subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC compared to risankizumab IV/placebo among subjects who achieved mucosal healing at the end of induction (74% and 54% vs 47%, p < 0.01 and p = 0.5629, respectively).
Rescue treatment
During COMMAND, subjects who had loss of response to risankizumab SC treatment received rescue treatment with risankizumab (a single IV induction dose, followed by 360 mg SC every 8 weeks). Among these subjects, in the risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab 360 mg SC treatment group, 85% (17/20) and 74% (26/35) achieved clinical response at Week 52, respectively. In addition, 24% (6/25) and 35% (13/37) of subjects achieved clinical remission per aMS, and 38% (10/26) and 45% (17/38) of subjects achieved endoscopic improvement at Week 52 in the risankizumab 180 mg SC and risankizumab 360 mg SC treatment group, respectively.
Week 24 responders
A total of 100 subjects did not demonstrate clinical response after 12 weeks of induction treatment, received either subcutaneous 180 mg (N=56) or 360 mg (N=44) dose of risankizumab at Week 12 and Week 20, demonstrated clinical response at week 24, and continued receiving risankizumab 180 mg or 360 mg SC every 8 weeks for up to 52 weeks in COMMAND. Among these subjects, 46% and 45% achieved clinical response per aMS at Week 52, and 18% and 23% achieved clinical remission per aMS at Week 52, for risankizumab 180 mg and 360 mg SC respectively.
Health-related and quality of life outcomes
Subjects treated with risankizumab achieved clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (bowel symptoms, systemic function, emotional function, and social function) compared to placebo. Changes from baseline in IBDQ total score at Week 12 with risankizumab compared to placebo were 42.6 and 24.3, respectively. Changes from baseline in IBDQ total score at Week 52 were 52.6, 50.3 and 35.0 in subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC, risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC and risankizumab IV/placebo, respectively.
Subjects receiving risankizumab experienced significantly greater improvement from baseline in fatigue, as measured by FACIT-F score at Week 12 compared to placebo. Changes from baseline in FACIT-F score at Week 12 with risankizumab compared to placebo were 7.9 and 3.3, respectively. Changes from baseline in FACIT-F score at Week 52 were 10.9, 10.3 and 7.0 in subjects treated with risankizumab IV/risankizumab 180 mg SC, risankizumab IV/risankizumab 360 mg SC and risankizumab IV/placebo, respectively.
Paediatric population
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Skyrizi in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).