ORAL ANTI-DIABETICS
(A10BA02: Gastrointestinal tract and metabolism)
Mechanism of action
Metformin is a biguanide with antihyperglycaemic effects, on both basal and postprandial hyperglycaemia. It does not stimulate insulin secretion and therefore does not cause hypoglycaemia.
Metformin reduces basal hyperinsulinemia, and in combination with insulin, reduces insulin requirement.
Metformin exerts its antihyperglycaemic effect via multiple mechanisms:
Metformin reduces hepatic glucose production.
Metformin facilitates peripheral glucose uptake and utilisation, in part by increasing insulin action.
Metformin alters glucose turnover in the gut: Uptake from circulation is increased and absorption from food is decreased. Additional mechanisms attributed to the gut include an increase in release of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and a decrease of bile acid resorption. Metformin alters the gut microbiome.
Metformin can improve the lipid profile in hyperlipidaemic individuals.
Metformin is an adenosine monophosphate-protein-kinase (AMPK) activator and increases the transport capacity of all types of membrane glucose transporters (GLUTs).
In clinical studies, use of metformin was associated with either a stable body weight or modest weight loss.
Metformin lowers PCOS-related hyperandrogenism.
Clinical Efficacy:
Reduction in the risk or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus
The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) was a multicenter randomised controlled clinical trial in adults assessing the efficacy of an intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin to prevent or delay the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Inclusion criteria were age ≥25 years, BMI ≥24 kg/m2 (≥22 kg/m2 for Asian-Americans), and impaired glucose tolerance plus a fasting plasma glucose of 95 – 125 mg/dl (or ≤125 mg/dl for American Indians). Patients were either treated with intensive lifestyle intervention, 2x850 mg metformin plus standard lifestyle change, or placebo plus standard lifestyle change.
The mean baseline values of the DPP participants (n=3,234 for 2.8 years) were age 50.6± 10.7 years, 106.5±8.3 mg/dl fasted plasma glucose, 164.6±17.0 mg/dl plasma glucose two hours after an oral glucose load, and 34.0±6.7 kg/m2 BMI. Intensive lifestyle intervention as well as metformin significantly reduced the risk of developing overt diabetes compared to placebo, 58% (95% CI 48-66%) and 31% (95% CI 17-43%), respectively.
The advantage of the lifestyle intervention over metformin was greater in older persons.
The patients who benefited most from the metformin treatment were aged below 45 years, with a BMI equal or above 35kg/m2, a baseline glucose 2 h value of 9.6-11.0 mmol/l, a baseline HbA1C equal or above 6.0% or with a history of gestational diabetes.
To prevent one case of overt diabetes during the three years in the whole population of the DPP, 6.9 patients had to participate in the intensive lifestyle group and 13.9 in the metformin group. The point of reaching a cumulative incidence of diabetes equal to 50% was delayed by about three years in the metformin group compared to placebo.
The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) is the long-term follow-up study of the DPP including more than 87% of the original DPP population for long-term follow up.
Among the DPPOS participants (n=2776), the cumulative incidence of diabetes at year 15 is 62% in the placebo group, 56% in the metformin group, and 55% in the intensive lifestyle intervention group. Crude rates of diabetes are 7.0, 5.7 and 5.2 cases per 100 person-years among the placebo, metformin, and intensive lifestyle participants, respectively. Reductions in the diabetes risk were of 18% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.93; p=0.001) for the metformin group and 27% (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.83; p<0.0001) for the intensive lifestyle intervention group, when compared with the placebo group. For an aggregate microvascular endpoint of nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy, the outcome was not significantly different between the treatment groups, but among the participants who had not developed diabetes during DPP/DPPOS, the prevalence of the aggregate microvascular outcome was 28% lower compared with those who had developed diabetes (Risk Ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.83; p<0.0001). No prospective comparative data for metformin on macrovascular outcomes in patients with IGT and/or IFG and/or increased HbA1C are available.
Published risk factors for type 2 diabetes include: Asian or black ethnic background, age above 40, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, obesity or being overweight, age, 1st degree family history of diabetes, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
Consideration must be given to current national guidance on the definition of prediabetes.
Patients at high risk should be identified by a validated risk-assessment tool.
Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus
The prospective randomised (UKPDS) study has established long-term benefit of intensive blood glucose control in overweight type 2 diabetes patients treated with immediate release metformin as first-line therapy after diet failure. Analysis of the results of the overweight patients treated with metformin after failure of diet alone showed:
• a significant reduction of the absolute risk of any diabetes-related complication in metformin group (29.8 events/1000 patients-years) versus diet alone (43.3 events/1000 patient-years), p= 0.0023, and versus the combined sulphonylurea and insulin monotherapy groups (40.1 events/1000 patients-years), p=0.0034.
• a significant reduction of the absolute risk of the diabetes-related mortality: metformin 7.5 events/1000 patient-years, diet alone 12.7 events/1000 patient-year, p=0.017;
• a significant reduction of the absolute risk of overall mortality: metformin 13.5 events/1000 patient-years versus diet alone 20.6 events/1000 patient-years (p=0.011), and versus the combined sulphonylurea and insulin monotherapy groups 18.9 events/1000 patient-years (p = 0.021);
• a significant reduction in the absolute risk of myocardial infarction: metformin 11 events/1000 patient years, diet alone 18 events/1000 patients-years (p=0.01)
For Metformin used as second line therapy, in combination with a sulfonylurea, benefit regarding clinical outcome has not been shown.
In type I diabetes, the combination of metformin and insulin has been used in selected patients, but the clinical benefit of this combination has not been formally established.