Pharmacotherapeutic group: Immunosuppressants, monoclonal antiboides, ATC code: L04AG13
Mechanism of action
Teprotumumabs mechanism of action in patients with Thyroid Eye Disease (TED) has not been fully characterised. Teprotumumab binds to the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and blocks its activation and signalling. No formal pharmacodynamic studies have been conducted with teprotumumab.
Pharmacodynamic effects
No formal pharmacodynamic studies have been conducted with teprotumumab.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of teprotumumab was assessed in 287 patients with thyroid eye disease in four randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical studies. The classification of severity of thyroid eye disease used in these studies were consistent with the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) criteria.
TED01RV was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study in patients with acute TED. Patients were randomized to receive TEPEZZA or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were given intravenous infusions (10 mg/kg for first infusion and 20 mg/kg for the remaining 7 infusions) every 3 weeks for a total of 8 infusions. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of TED with symptoms and were euthyroid or had thyroxine and free triiodothyronine levels less than 50% above or below normal limits. Prior surgical treatment for TED was not permitted. Median proptosis was 23 mm and ranged from 16 to 33 mm and 69 patients (79.3%) had diplopia at baseline. The median clinical activity score (CAS) on the study eye at baseline was 5 (range 2 to 7) and the median time since the diagnosis of TED was 5.76 months (range 1.2 to 11.0).
A total of 43 patients were randomized to TEPEZZA and 45 patients were randomized to placebo. The median age was 52.9 years (range 20.4 to 77.0), 73.6% were female and 66.7% were non-smokers. 86.2% were white, 9.2% were black, 3.4% were Asian, and 1.1% were native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.
TEPEZZA demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint, overall responder rate at week 24 (defined as the proportion of patients with a decrease in CAS of ≥ 2 points and a reduction of proptosis ≥ 2 mm in the study eye without deterioration in the fellow eye) (See Table 2).
Table 2. Overall Responder Rate at Week 24 in TED01RV (ITT Analysis Set)
| Primary Endpoint | Placebo (N = 45) | TEPEZZA (N = 42) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) TEPEZZA vs Placebo | p-value |
| Overall Responder, n (%) | 9 (20.0) | 29 (69.0) | 8.86 (3.293, 23.825) | < 0.001 |
| CI= Confidence Interval; ITT = intent-to-treat Odds ratio, 95% CI, and p-value were obtained from a logistic regression model with treatment a smoking status as covariates. |
OPTIC was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study in patients with acute TED. Patients were randomized to receive either TEPEZZA or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were given intravenous infusions (10 mg/kg for the first infusion and 20 mg/kg for the remaining 7 infusions) every 3 weeks for a total of 8 infusions. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of TED within 9 months of enrolment in the study with symptoms and were euthyroid or had thyroxine and free triiodothyronine levels less than 50% above or below normal limits. Prior surgical treatment for TED was not permitted. Median proptosis was 23 mm and ranged from 16 to 33 mm and 56 patients (67.5%) had diplopia at baseline. The median clinical activity score (CAS) on the study eye at baseline was 5 (range 4 to 7) and the median time since the diagnosis of TED was 6.78 months (range 0.9 to 10.3).
A total of 41 patients were randomized to TEPEZZA and 42 were randomized to placebo. The median age was 52.0 years (range 20 to 79), 72.3% were female and 79.5% were non-smokers. 86.7% were white, 7.2% were black, 3.6% were Asian, and 2.4% were categorized as other.
TEPEZZA demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint, proptosis responder rate at week 24 (defined as the proportion of patients with a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, without deterioration (≥ 2 mm increase) in proptosis in the fellow eye (see Table 3).
Table 3. Proptosis Responder Rate at Week 24 in OPTIC (ITT Analysis Set)
| Primary Endpoint | Placebo (N = 42) | TEPEZZA (N = 41) | Treatment Difference (95% CI) | p-value |
| Proptosis Responder Rate, n (%) | 4 (9.5) | 34 (82.9) | 73.45 (58.89, 88.01) | < 0.001a |
| CI = confidence interval; ITT = intent-to-treat a Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by tobacco use status (smoker vs non-smoker). |
OPTIC-J was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with acute TED. Patients were randomized to receive either TEPEZZA or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were given intravenous infusions (10 mg/kg for the first infusion and 20 mg/kg for the remaining 7 infusions) every 3 weeks for a total of 8 infusions. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of TED within 9 months of enrolment in the study with symptoms and a CAS ≥ 3 (on the 7‑item scale) for the most severely affected eye and were euthyroid or had thyroxine and free triiodothyronine levels < 50% above or below normal limits. Prior orbital irradiation or surgical therapy for TED was not permitted. Median proptosis was 20.0 mm and ranged from 14.5 to 27.0 mm and 42 patients (77.8%) had diplopia at baseline. The median clinical activity score (CAS) in the study eye at baseline was 4.0 (range 3 to 7) and the median time since the diagnosis of TED was 4.72 months (range 0.53 to 8.9).
A total of 27 patients were randomized to TEPEZZA and 27 were randomized to placebo. The median age was 49.0 years (range 20 to 74), 70.4% were female, and 85.2% were non-smokers and 100.0% were Asian.
TEPEZZA demonstrated a statistically significant improvement for the primary efficacy endpoint (proptosis responder rate at week 24 defined as a ≥ 2-mm reduction from baseline in proptosis in the study eye without deterioration [≥ 2-mm increase] of proptosis in the fellow eye). (See Table 4).
Table 4. Proptosis Responder Rate at Week 24 in OPTIC-J (ITT Analysis Set)
| Primary Endpoint | Placebo (N = 27) | TEPEZZA (N = 27) | Treatment Difference (95% CI) | p-value |
| Proptosis responder rate at Week 24, n (%) | 3 (11.1) | 24 (88.9) | 77.78 (60.7, 94.8) | < 0.0001a |
| CI = confidence interval; ITT = intent-to-treat Note: Results shown are those for the study eye, if applicable. a p-value was estimated from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for the randomization stratification factor (tobacco use status). |
HZNP-TEP-403 was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic (inactive) TED. Patients were randomized to receive TEPEZZA or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Patients were given intravenous infusions (10 mg/kg for first infusion and 20 mg/kg for the remaining 7 infusions) every 3 weeks for a total of 8 infusions.
Patients had an initial diagnosis of TED ≥ 2 years but < 10 years prior to screening and clinical diagnosis of stable TED defined as a CAS ≤ 1 in both eyes prior to screening for at least 1 year or all of the following for at least 1 year before screening: no proptosis progression, no diplopia progression in patients with history of diplopia, and no new inflammatory TED symptoms. Patients also had proptosis ≥ 3-mm increase from the participant's baseline (prior to diagnosis of TED) and/or proptosis ≥ 3 mm above normal for race and gender. Patients were euthyroid or had mild hypo- or hyperthyroidism. Previous orbital irradiation, orbital decompression or strabismus surgery or planned orbital irradiation or surgery for TED during this trial were not permitted. The median baseline proptosis was 25.0 mm and ranged from18.5 to 31.0 mm and 18 patients (29%) had diplopia at baseline. The median clinical activity score (CAS) on the study eye at baseline was 0 (range 0 to 1) and the median time since the diagnosis of TED was 5.39 years (range 2.24 to 8.74).
A total of 42 patients were randomized to TEPEZZA and 20 patients were randomized to placebo. The median age was 49.0 years (range 18 to 75), 80.6% were female, and 87.1% were non-smokers. 54.8% were white, 24.2% were black, 12.9% were Asian, and 8.1% were classified as other.
TEPEZZA demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint, change from baseline in proptosis at week 24 in the study eye. (see Table 5).
Table 5. Change from baseline in proptosis at week 24 (study eye) in HZNP-TEP-403 (ITT Analysis Set)
| Primary Endpoint | Placebo (N = 20) | TEPEZZA (N = 42) | Treatment Difference (95% CI) | p-value |
| Change from baseline in proptosis at Week 24 in the study eye, LS mean (SE) | -0.92 (0.323) | -2.41 (0.228) | -1.48 (-2.28, -0.69) | 0.0004a |
| CI = confidence interval; ITT = intent-to-treat; LS = least squares; SE = standard error. Note: Results shown are those for the study eye, if applicable. a p-value is from mixed effect repeated measurement analysis with an unstructured variance-covariance matrix including change from baseline value as the dependent variable and the following covariates: baseline value, treatment group, visit, visit‑by‑treatment and visit-by-baseline value interactions. A change from baseline value of 0 was imputed at the first post-baseline visit for any participant without post-baseline values. |
Paediatric population
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with TEPEZZA in all subsets of the paediatric population with thyroid eye disease (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
Immunogenicity
As with all therapeutic proteins, there is potential for immunogenicity. The detection of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Additionally, the observed incidence of antibody (including neutralizing antibody) positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors including assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease.
Following 8 intravenous (IV) infusions of teprotumumab in study HZNP-TEP-301 4.9% (2/41) had detectable levels of anti-drug antibodies. The presence of ADAs did not impact pharmacokinetics, efficacy or safety.