Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs used in hereditary angioedema, ATC code: B06AC07
Mechanism of action
Garadacimab is a fully human IgG4/lambda recombinant monoclonal antibody which binds to the catalytic domain of activated Factor XII (FXIIa and βFXIIa) and inhibits its catalytic activity. The inhibition of FXIIa prevents HAE attacks by blocking the cascade of events in the kallikrein (contact) pathway, including the activation of prekallikrein to kallikrein and the generation of bradykinin, which is associated with inflammation and swelling in HAE attacks.
Clinical efficacy and safety
VANGUARD pivotal study
The efficacy and safety of garadacimab for the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks in patients 12 years of age and older with Type I or II HAE were evaluated in a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study.
The study included 58 adult and 6 adolescent patients (12 years of age and older) who experienced at least 2 attacks during the up to 2-month run-in period. Patients were randomized into 2 parallel treatment arms in a 3:2 ratio (garadacimab 200 mg monthly after an initial 400 mg loading dose or volume-match placebo) for a 6-month treatment period. Adult patients were required to discontinue other prophylactic HAE treatment prior to entering the study. Adolescent patients using long term prophylactic therapy prior to screening were excluded from the study. All patients were allowed to use on-demand medications for treatment of HAE attacks during the study.
Of the 6 adolescent patients included in the study, 4 received garadacimab and 2 received placebo.
Overall, 87.5% of patients had Type I HAE. A family history of HAE was reported for 89.1%, a history of laryngeal edema attacks for 59.4% of patients and 32.8% were on prior prophylactic HAE treatment. During the study run-in period, attack rates of ≥3 attacks/month were observed in 59.4% of patients overall. Baseline number of attacks per month was 3.07 in the garadacimab group compared to 2.52 in the placebo group.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the time-normalised number of HAE attacks from day 0 through the end of the 6-month treatment period. The key secondary endpoints were: the percent reduction in the mean time normalised number of HAE attacks, the number of subjects who were attack free from day 0 through the end of the first 3-months and the percentage of subjects with good or excellent responses to the SGART from day 0 through the end of the 6-month treatment period.
A statistically significant difference was observed when compared to placebo across the primary and key secondary endpoints included in the hierarchical testing procedure in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population as seen in Table 2.
Table 2: Results of the primary and secondary efficacy measures (ITT analysis set)
| | Garadacimab 200 mg (N = 39) | Placebo (N = 25) |
| Number of evaluable patients, n | 39 | 24a |
| Number of HAE Attacks during Treatment Period | 63 | 264 |
| Primary endpoint – Time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month during treatment period from Day 1 to 182 |
| Mean (SD) | 0.27 (0.683) | 2.01 (1.341) |
| 95% CI | 0.05, 0.49 | 1.44, 2.57 |
| Median (IQR) | 0.00 (0.0 to 0.31) | 1.35 (1.00 to 3.20) |
| p-value* | < 0.001 |
| Adjusted LS meanb (95% CI) | 0.22 (0.11 to 0.47) | 2.07 (1.49 to 2.87) |
| Secondary endpoint - Percent reduction in time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month relative to placebo |
| Mean (95% CI) | 86.5 (57.9, 95.7) | |
| Median | 100 | |
| p-value* | < 0.001 |
| Adjusted LS meanb (95% CI) | 89.2 (75.59, 95.23) | |
| Secondary endpoint – Number of attack free subjects through Day 91 | 71.79 (28) | 8.33 (2) |
| P-value* | < 0.001 |
| Secondary endpointc - Percentage of subjects rating therapy as 'good' or 'excellent' through the SGART at Day 182 | 82 (31) | 33 (8) |
| P-value* | < 0.001 |
CI = confidence interval; HAE = hereditary angioedema; ITT = intention-to-treat; N = number of patients in the ITT Analysis Set; IQR = Interquartile Range; SD = standard deviation; LS = least squares
a One patient had a Treatment Period of less than 30 Days and was therefore not included in the analysis
b After adjusting for baseline attack rate
c The overall response to treatment with the investigational product was self-assessed by the patient using the Subject's Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (SGART). Possible responses are 'none, 'poor', 'fair', 'good' or 'excellent'
* A hierarchical testing procedure controls for the overall alpha level of 5% (2-sided)
Descriptive results of the additional secondary endpoints; the number of HAE attacks requiring on-demand treatment and the number of moderate/severe HAE attacks are provided in Table 3.
Table 3: Results of Secondary efficacy measures (ITT analysis set)
| | Garadacimab 200 mg (N = 39) | Placebo (N = 25) |
| Number of evaluable patients, n | 39 | 24a |
| Number of HAE Attacks during Treatment Period | 63 | 264 |
| Secondary endpoint – Time-normalized number of HAE attacks requiring on-demand treatment per month from Day 1 to 182 |
| Mean (SD) | 0.23 (0.663) | 1.86 (1.412) |
| Median (Min, Max) | 0.00 (0.0, 3.8) | 1.35 (0.0, 4.4) |
| Secondary endpoint – Time-normalized number of moderateb or severec HAE attacks from Day 1 to 182 |
| Mean (SD) | 0.13 (0.296) | 1.35 (1.166) |
| Median (Min, Max) | 0.00 (0.0, 1.2) | 0.83 (0.0, 4.4) |
HAE = hereditary angioedema; ITT = intention-to-treat; N = number of patients in the ITT Analysis Set;
SD = standard deviation; Max = maximum; Min = minimum.
a One patient had a Treatment Period of less than 30 Days and was therefore not included in the analysis
b Causes daily activities to be limited, use of on-demand medication is probable
c Causes marked limitation of daily activities, on-demand medication is used
Health related quality of life
Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) total and domain (functioning, fatigue/mood, fear/shame, and nutrition) scores, compared to the placebo at day 182 was an exploratory endpoint (Table 4). A reduction of six points in the AE-QoL has been defined as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Changes from baseline greater than the MCID were observed in 88% of patients treated with garadacimab.
Table 4: AE-QoL total score and domains change from baseline to day 182 (ITT Analysis Set)a
| AE-QoL total score and domains change from baseline to day 182b, mean (SD) | ANDEMBRY 200mg (N=39) | Placebo (N=25) |
| Patients Included in the Analysis, n | 33 | 20 |
| Total Score | -26.5 (17.9) | -2.2 (19.1) |
| Functioning | -35.8 (23.2) | 1.9 (29.6) |
| Fatigue/Mood | -21.1 (22.9) | -5.8 (27.1) |
| Fears/Shame | -28.0 (24.1) | -2.5 (18.6) |
| Nutrition: | -16.7 (23.3) | -0.6 (16.5) |
CI = confidence interval; HAE = hereditary angioedema; ITT = intention-to-treat; Max = maximum; Min = minimum; N = number of patients in the ITT Analysis Set; SD = standard deviation.
a Angioedema Quality of Life is only answered by patients of age ≥ 18 years.
b A lower AE-QoL score represents greater improvement
The safety and efficacy profile in paediatric patients 12 years of age and older was consistent with that of the overall population.
VANGUARD Open Label Extension Study
Patients who completed VANGUARD (n=57) in addition to patients from a phase 2 study (n=35) rolled over into the VANGUARD open-label extension study which also enrolled 69 new patients. From the start of treatment through 21.1 months (median duration of exposure 13.8 months) 96/161 (59.6%) patients remained attack-free. The safety and efficacy profile in adolescent patients ages 12 years and older (n=10) was consistent with that of the overall population.
Normal C1-INH HAE population
Normal C1-INH HAE includes patients with known or unknown mutations. The safety and efficacy of garadacimab was evaluated in 6 patients with known mutations: HAE-FXII (n=3) or HAE-PLG (n=3) in the phase 2 study 2001.
Among the three genetically confirmed HAE-FXII patients enrolled, one withdrew during the second month of the treatment period due to lack of efficacy after showing a reduction in overall attack rate from 4.35 to 3.51 attacks per month and a reduction in severe attacks from 1.09 to 0.58 attacks per month. The remaining two patients completed the initial 12-week treatment period, with one demonstrating a reduction in attack rate from 3.24 to 0.36 attacks per month and the other becoming attack-free from an initial attack rate of 3.20 attacks per month. The response to garadacimab was maintained in both patients during the second treatment period and after rolling over from the phase 2 to the phase 3 Study for an additional 18 months.
The 3 patients with HAE-PLG completed the initial 12-week treatment period and did not continue into the treatment extension period. One patient reported a decrease in their monthly overall attack rate to 1.75 and a severe attack rate to 0.35 during the treatment period, compared to 3.20 and 1.60, respectively, during the run-in period. The remaining two patients reported an increase in their monthly attack rates to 6.8 and 3.17 during the treatment period compared to 2.28 and 1.45 during the run-in period respectively. None of the reported attacks was classified as severe attack.
Overall, the safety profile of garadacimab in patients with nC1-INH was similar to that observed in patients with HAE-C1-INH.
Immunogenicity
Treatment with ANDEMBRY has been associated with development of low-titer treatment emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in 2.9% of treated subjects. The development of ADA against ANDEMBRY did not affect pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety or clinical response.
Paediatric population
The licensing authority has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with ANDEMBRY in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).