Pharmacotherapeutic group: Anaesthetics, amides, ATC code: N01BB20
Mechanism of action
Fortacin provides topical anaesthesia to the glans penis. The active substances lidocaine and prilocaine block the transmission of nerve impulses in the glans penis, reducing the sensitivity of the glans penis. This is translated into a delaying of the ejaculatory latency time without adversely affecting the sensation of ejaculation.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Clinical studies have shown Fortacin to increase the intra‑vaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), increase control over ejaculation and reduce the feelings of distress in patients with premature ejaculation as measured by the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE). The medicinal product has a rapid onset of action and is effective within 5 minutes of application. The effectiveness of the medicinal product has been demonstrated to persist on repeat use over time.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy of Fortacin was demonstrated in two multi‑centre, multinational, randomised, double‑blind, placebo controlled studies (PSD502 PE 002 and PSD502-PE-004), both followed by an open‑label phase. Men satisfying the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) criteria for premature ejaculation (PE) who had a baseline IELT ≤ 1 minutes in at least 2 of the first 3 sexual encounters during screening were eligible to enrol.
The ITT population for the two combined pivotal studies comprised 539 patients, with 358 and 181 patients in the Fortacin and placebo groups, respectively (2:1 ratio) for the initial, three month DB phase. The Per Protocol population comprised 430 patients (284 and 146 patients in the Fortacin and placebo groups, respectively).
Demographic characteristics for the ITT population of PSD502‑PE‑002 and PSD502-PE-004 individually are summarised in table below.
| Demographics: ITT population (PSD502-PE-002 and PSD502-PE-004 individual results) |
| Demographic | PSD502-PE-002 | PSD502-PE-004 |
| PSD502 N=167 | Placebo N=82 | Total N=249 | PSD502 N=191 | Placebo N=99 | Total N=290 |
| Age (years) | | | | | | |
| n | 167 | 82 | 249 | 191 | 99 | 290 |
| Mean | 39.1 | 37.9 | 38.7 | 34.6 | 35.2 | 34.8 |
| SD | 11.71 | 11.97 | 11.97 | 9.56 | 11.20 | 10.13 |
| Range | 18 - 67 | 18 - 68 | 18 - 68 | 19 - 65 | 20 - 60 | 19 - 65 |
| Median | 39.0 | 36.0 | 38.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 |
| Age group (years) | | | | | | |
| 18 to <25 | 14 (8.4%) | 12 (14.6%) | 26 (10.4) | 27 (14.1%) | 19 (19.2%) | 46 (15.9%) |
| 25 to <35 | 53 (31.7%) | 26 (31.7%) | 79 (31.7) | 82 (42.9%) | 36 (36.4%) | 118 (40.7%) |
| 35 to <45 | 44 (26.3%) | 18 (22.0%) | 62 (24.9) | 50 (26.2%) | 20 (20.2%) | 70 (24.1%) |
| 45 to <55 | 39 (23.4%) | 18 (22.0%) | 57 (22.9) | 24 (12.6%) | 19 (19.2%) | 43 (14.8%) |
| 55 to <65 | 13 (7.8%) | 7 (8.5%) | 20 ( 8.0) | 7 (3.7%) | 5 (5.1%) | 12 (4.1%) |
| ≥65 | 4 (2.4%) | 1 (1.2%) | 5 ( 2.0) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 | 1 (0.3%) |
| Race/ethnic origin | | | | | | |
| Caucasian | 133 (79.6%) | 74 (90.2%) | 207 (83.1%) | 188 (98.4%) | 99 (100%) | 287 (99.0%) |
| Afro-American/Caribbean | 17 (10.2%) | 4 (4.9%) | 21 (8.4%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 | 1 (0.3%) |
| Hispanic | 9 (5.4%) | 2 (2.4%) | 11 (4.4%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 5 (3.0%) | 2 (2.4%) | 7 (2.8%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 | 1 (0.3%) |
| Other | 3 (1.8%) | 0 | 3 (1.2%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 | 1 (0.3%) |
| Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; ITT = intention-to-treat; SD = standard deviation |
The effectiveness of Fortacin in treating PE was assessed by measuring IELT and the co primary endpoints of ejaculatory control, sexual satisfaction, and distress using the IPE. During the 3 months of the double‑blind treatment phase, the geometric mean IELT increased from 0.58 to 3.17 minutes in the Fortacin group and from 0.56 to 0.94 minutes in the placebo group.
85.2% of subjects in the Fortacin group achieved a mean IELT of > 1 minute over the course of 3 months of treatment with it, whereas 46.4% of the placebo subjects had a mean IELT of > 1 minute. 66.2% of Fortacin‑treated subjects and 18.8% of placebo‑treated subjects achieved a mean IELT > 2 minutes.
The clinically significant increases in IELT were paralleled by significant differences in the IPE scores (p <0.0001). Adjusted mean change scores (Fortacin vs. placebo) at Month 3 were 8.2 vs. 2.2 for the ejaculatory control score, 7.2 vs. 1.9 for the sexual satisfaction score, and 3.7 vs. 1.1 for the distress score.
In Fortacin‑treated subjects, IELT and IPE scores increased at the first measured timepoint. Both IELT and IPE scores continued to increase slightly more throughout the remainder of the double‑blind phase. The positive changes in IELT and IPE domain scores were maintained during the open‑label treatment phase.
At each of the three monthly assessments all subjects completed a Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) questionnaire relating to perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse, and interpersonal difficulty relating to ejaculation. The PEP scores followed a similar pattern of improvement to the IELT and IPE scores. For all of the three monthly assessments completed by the subjects, there was a significant difference between Fortacin and placebo (p < 0.0001). Partners completed the PEP questionnaire at month three. There was also a significant difference over placebo in all domains for the responses from the partners (p < 0.0001).
Elderly patients
Patients recruited into the clinical trials ranged from 18- 68 years of age. In the pivotal clinical studies, subgroup analysis of the efficacy response in different age groups showed that the efficacy and safety profiles were quite consistent between the different age groups.
There is a large safety database for lidocaine and prilocaine, due to their established use. This does not indicate a safety concern for elderly
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Fortacin in all subsets of the paediatric population in primary premature ejaculation (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).