Pharmacotherapeutic group: Analgesics, other analgesics and antipyretics, ATC code: N02BG08
Mechanism of action
Ziconotide is a synthetic analogue of a ω-conopeptide, MVIIA, found in the venom of the Conus magus marine snail. It is an N-type calcium channel blocker (NCCB). NCCs regulate neurotransmitter release in specific neuronal populations responsible for the spinal processing of pain. In binding to these neuronal NCCs ziconotide inhibits the voltage sensitive calcium current into primary nociceptive afferents terminating in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. In turn, this inhibits their release of neurotransmitters (including Substance P) and therefore, the spinal signalling of pain.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Though statistically significant relationships and reasonable correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure (AUC, Cmax) and clinical response measures have been observed following 1 hour IT administration, no well-defined dose-concentration-response relationships have yet been identified. Many responsive patients obtain near-maximal analgesia within a few hours of delivery of an appropriate dose. However, maximal effects may be delayed in some patients. Given the occurrence of analgesia and adverse reactions at similar doses, the recommended minimum interval between dose increases is 24 hours; the recommended interval, for safety reasons, is 48 hours or more. If necessary the dose can be decreased by any amount (including stopping the infusion) for the management of adverse reactions.
Nervous system adverse reactions, particularly dizziness, nausea and abnormal gait appear to be correlated with CSF exposure, though a definitive relationship has not been established.
Low plasma exposure occurs during IT infusion due to the low recommended IT infusion rates and relatively rapid plasma clearance (see section 5.2). Therefore, pharmacological effects related to systemic exposure should be minimal.
The median dose at response is approximately 6.0 μg/day and approximately 75% of responsive patients required ≤ 9.6 μg/day in placebo-controlled clinical trials. However, to limit the occurrence of serious adverse reactions, reports from clinical practice indicate that responsive patients may require a smaller daily dose of approximately 3.0 - 4.5 µg/ay or lower.
To limit the occurrence of serious adverse reactions, a low starting dose and slow titration interval is recommended, always considering the narrow therapeutic window. A maximum dose of 21.6 μg/day is recommended.
However, in clinical trials it has been observed that patients who tolerate doses of 21.6 μg/day following slow titration over a 3 to 4-week period, generally tolerate higher doses up to 48.0 μg/day.
There is no evidence of the development of pharmacological tolerance to ziconotide in patients. However, in view of limited data, the development of tolerance cannot be excluded. Examination of the patency of the intrathecal catheter should be considered if the required ziconotide dose continually increases and there is no benefit or increase in adverse reactions.
Alternative dosing regimens including initiation of dosing with lower doses of ziconotide and bolus administration have been explored in a limited number of studies available in the literature.
Bolus administration studies suggest that bolus dosing may be useful in identifying patients who may benefit from long term use of ziconotide, however, bolus administration may result in more adverse reactions than administration by continuous infusion.
These studies suggest that alternative methods of administration of ziconotide may be possible however, due to the limited numbers of patients, the results are inconclusive and there is currently insufficient evidence to make definitive recommendations for such alternative dosing regimens.
Clinical efficacy and safety
There were three placebo-controlled clinical trials of IT ziconotide.
Two short-term studies, 95-001 (malignant pain) and 96-002 (non-malignant pain), involving 366 patients, demonstrated the efficacy of IT ziconotide in severe chronic pain using the percent change in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) as the primary efficacy measure. These studies were of short duration, 5 and 6 days respectively, and used a more rapid dose escalation and higher doses than recommended in Section 4.2.
Efficacy results from study 95-001 (malignant pain and non-malignant pain, Staats et al. 2004)
| | Initial treatment assignment | |
| Parameter | Ziconotide (n = 71) | Placebo (n = 40) | p-value |
| Mean VASPI score at baseline in mm (SD) | 74.1 (± 13.82) | 77.9 (± 13.60) | _ |
| Mean VASPI score at end of initial titration in mm (SD) | 35.7 (± 33.27) | 61.0 (± 22.91) | _ |
| % improvement in VASPI score at end of initial titration (SD) | 51.4 (± 43.63) | 18.1 (± 28.28) | < 0.001 |
| Respondera n (%) | 34 (47.9%) | 7 (17.5%) | 0.001 |
| Starting dose of ziconotide | 9.6 µg/d (0.4 µg/h) | | |
| Titration frequency | every 12 h | | |
| Amendedb starting dose | 2.4 µg/d (0.1 µg/h) or less | | |
| Amendedb titration frequency | every 24 h to max dose or analgesia | | |
| Dose at end of titration (μg/hr) Mean Median Range | 0.91 0.60 0.074 - 9.36 | | |
aResponders were defined as those patients who 1) experienced a ≥ 30% drop in VASPI score compared to baseline; 2) had stable or decreased concomitant opioid analgesics; and 3) had opiate type unchanged from preinfusion if receiving opiates.
bProtocol amendments for better tolerance were necessary after high number of neurological adverse effects occurred coming with a high rate of discontinuation. Adverse effects were reversible and their incidence decreased with decreased initial dose and decreased frequency of titration.
Study Duration: Five days
SD – Standard Deviation.
Efficacy results from study 96-002 (non-malignant pain; Wallace et al. 2006)
| | Initial treatment assignment | |
| Parameter | Ziconotide (n = 169)b | Placebo (n = 86) | p-value |
| Mean VASPI score at baseline in mm (SD) | 80.1 (± 15.10) | 76.9 (± 14.58) | _ |
| Mean VASPI score at end of initial titration in mm (SD) | 54.4 (± 29.30) | 71.9 (± 30.93) | _ |
| % improvement in VASPI score at end of initial titration (SD) | 31.2 (± 38.69) | 6.0 (± 42.84) | < 0.001 |
| Respondera n (%) | 57 (33.7%) | 11 (12.8%) | < 0.001 |
| Starting dose of ziconotide | 9.6 µg/d (0.4 µg/h) | | |
| Titration frequency | every 24 h until analgesia, max dose or AE | | |
| Titration time (h) and dose (µg/h) | 0-24 0.4 24-48 0.9 48-72 1.8 72-96 3.4 96-120 5.3 120-144 7.0 | | |
| Revisedc starting dose | 2.4 µg/d (0.1 µg/h) | | |
| Revisedc titration frequency | every 24 h to max dose or analgesia | | |
| Revisedc titration time (h) and dose (µg/h) | 0-24 0.1 24-48 0.2 48-72 0.3 72-96 0.6 96-120 1.2 120-144 2.4 | | |
| Dose at end of titration (μg/hr) Mean Median Range | 1.02 0.50 0.019 - 9.60 | | |
aResponders were defined as those patients who 1) experienced a ≥ 30% drop in VASPI score compared to baseline; 2) had stable or decreased concomitant opioid analgesics; and 3) had opiate type unchanged from preinfusion if receiving opiates.
b164 patients provided VASPI scores for ziconotide at the end of titration.
cProtocol amendments for better tolerance were necessary due to onset of adverse events at high doses.
Study duration: Six days, with further 5-day maintenance as outpatient in ziconotide responders
SD – Standard Deviation.
The aetiologies of pain in studies 95-001 (malignant pain) and 96-002 (non-malignant pain) were varied and included bone pain (n = 38) mostly due to bone metastases (n = 34), myelopathy (n = 38), half of whom had spinal cord injury with paralysis (n = 19), neuropathy (n = 79), radiculopathy (n = 24), spinal pain (n = 91) mostly due to failed back surgery (n = 82), and other aetiologies (n = 82). Some patients had more than one cause of pain. The efficacy of IT ziconotide was apparent in all groups.
Study 301 (n = 220) was of longer duration (21 days), involved more cautious up-titration and lower doses of IT ziconotide, and enrolled the most refractory population of patients studied in the three studies. All patients in the 301 study had failed IT therapy with combinations of analgesics and their physicians considered that 97% of the patients were refractory to currently available treatments. The majority had spinal pain (n = 134), especially failed back surgery (n = 110); a lower proportion had neuropathy (n = 36). Only five had malignant pain. The primary endpoint was the percent change in VASPI score. The efficacy of IT ziconotide in study 301 was lower than in the previous two, short-term studies. The frequency and severity of adverse reactions were also lower, mainly as a result of lower starting dose at 2.4 µg/d (0.1 µg/h). Titration was allowed after a minimum of 24 hours and dose increments were limited to 1.2-2.4 µg/d.
Efficacy results from study 301 (refractory pain; Rauck et al. 2006)
| | Initial treatment assignment | |
| Parameter | Ziconotide (n = 112) | Placebo (n = 108) | p-value |
| Mean VASPI score at baseline in mm (SD) | 80.7 (± 14.98) | 80.7 (± 14.91) | - |
| Mean VASPI score at end of initial titration in mm (SD) | 67.9 (± 22.89) | 74.1 (± 21.28) | _ |
| % improvement in VASPI score at end of initial titration (SD) | 14.7 (± 27.71) | 7.2 (± 24.98) | 0.0360 |
| Respondera n (%) | 18 (16.1%) | 13 (12.0%) | 0.390 |
| Starting dose of ziconotide | 2.4 µg/d (0.1 µg/h) | | |
| Titration frequency | minimum of 24 h | | |
| Titration dose | limited to 1.2-2.4 µg/d (0.05-0.10 µg/h) | | |
| Dose at end of titration (μg/hr) Mean Median Range | 0.29 0.25 0.0 - 0.80 | | |
aResponders were defined as those who experienced a ≥ 30% drop in VASPI score compared to baseline.Study duration: 21 days
SD – Standard Deviation.
Post-marketing experience
Since market authorization approval, real-world data were published for long-time pain management with ziconotide monotherapy in <100 patients. In patients responding to initial trialing (about 50% of patients), safe and effective utilization of ziconotide with low starting dose, low titration dose and less frequent titration intervals resulted in pain relief with improved safety profile compared to high initial dose and rapid titration.
Combination studies with IT Morphine
Clinical studies 201 and 202 indicate that the combination of IT ziconotide and IT morphine may effectively reduce pain and decrease systemic opioid use over a sustained period of time for patients whose pain was inadequately controlled with their maximum tolerated dose of IT ziconotide (median 8.7 μg/day, mean 25.7 μg/day – study 201) or with IT morphine (study 202) alone. When adding IT ziconotide to stable doses of IT morphine, as with the initiation of IT ziconotide monotherapy, the appearance of psychotic adverse reactions. (e.g., hallucinations, paranoid reactions) or discontinuation due to increased adverse reactions may occur. (see section 4.5).