Pharmacotherapeutic group: Ophthalmologicals, antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, ATC code: S01EE51
Mechanism of action
Roclanda contains two active substances: latanoprost and netarsudil. These two components lower IOP by increasing the outflow of aqueous humor. Although both latanoprost and netarsudil lower IOP by increasing aqueous humor outflow, their mechanisms of action are different.
Studies in animal and man suggest that the main mechanism of action for netarsudil, a Rho kinase inhibitor, is increased trabecular outflow. These studies also suggest that netarsudil lowers IOP by reducing episcleral venous pressure.
Studies in animal and man indicate that the main mechanism of action for latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2α analoque, is increased uveoscleral outflow, although some increase in outflow facility (decrease in outflow resistance) has been reported in man.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Roclanda was evaluated in 3 randomized, double-blind, multicentre Phase 3 clinical studies in 1 686 patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Studies 301 and 302 enrolled subjects with IOP < 36 mmHg and compared IOP lowering effect of latanoprost + netarsudil dosed once daily to individually administered netarsudil 0.02% once daily and latanoprost 0.005% once daily. The treatment duration was 12 months for Study 301 and 3 months for Study 302. The median age of study participants was 66 years (range 18 to 99 years). Study 303 assessed the ocular hypotensive efficacy of latanoprost + netarsudil relative to bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5%. The treatment duration was 6 months.
Studies 301 and 302 were designed to show superiority of latanoprost + netarsudil when dosed once daily in the evening over its individual components netarsudil 0.02% once daily and latanoprost 0.005% once daily. The primary efficacy outcome measure was least squares (LS) mean IOP at each of 9 timepoints measured at 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 on day 15, day 43 and day 90. The average IOP lowering effect of latanoprost + netarsudil was 1 to 3 mmHg greater than monotherapy with either netarsudil 0.02% or latanoprost 0.005% throughout 3 months (Figures 1 and 2). In Study 301 IOP reductions were maintained, showing statistical superiority of latanoprost + netarsudil throughout the 12-month treatment period. In all cases, the differences in the LS mean IOP were clinically relevant and statistically significant (p < 0.0001) through month 3. Approximately 30% of subjects included in the Phase 3 studies had a baseline IOP of ≥ 27 mmHg (132, 136 and 143 in the latanoprost + netarsudil, latanoprost and netarsudil treatment groups, respectively). In these subjects, latanoprost + netarsudil showed statistically significantly superior IOP-lowering efficacy to each of its components at all time points. Across both studies, compared to latanoprost alone, the combination product reduced IOP by a further 1.7 mmHg to 3.7 mmHg, and compared to netarsudil alone by a further 3.4 mmHg to 5.9 mmHg.
Figure 1: Study 301 mean IOP (mmHg) by treatment group and treatment difference in mean IOP
| |
| latanoprost + netarsudil vs. netarsudil 95% CI | 3.0 (2.5, 3.6) | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | 2.4 (1.9, 3.0) | 3.2 (2.6, 3.8) | 2.9 (2.3, 3.5) | 2.3 (1.7, 2.8) | 3.1 (2.5, 3.8) | 3.2 (2.5, 3.8) | 2.0 (1.4, 2.6) |
| latanoprost + netarsudil vs. latanoprost 95% CI | 2.3 (1.7, 2.8) | 2.6 (2.0, 3.2) | 2.3 (1.8, 2.9) | 1.7 (1.1, 2.4) | 1.9 (1.3, 2.5) | 1.7 (1.1, 2.2) | 1.5 (0.9, 2.1) | 1.7 (1.1, 2.3) | 1.3 (0.7, 1.9) |
The LS mean IOP at each post-baseline time point was derived using an analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline IOP and based on observed data for all randomized subjects (238 in latanoprost + netarsudil group, 244 in netarsudil group, 236 in latanoprost group).
Figure 2: Study 302 mean IOP (mmHg) by treatment group and treatment difference in mean IOP
| |
| latanoprost + netarsudil vs. netarsudil 95% CI | 3.4 (2.8, 3.9) | 2.7 (2.2, 3.2) | 2.2 (1.7, 2.8) | 3.2 (2.6, 3.8) | 2.9 (2.3, 3.4) | 2.3 (1.8, 2.9) | 3.6 (3.0, 4.2) | 2.8 (2.3, 3.4) | 2.4 (1.9, 2.9) |
| latanoprost + netarsudil vs. latanoprost 95% CI | 2.0 (1.5, 2.6) | 2.4 (1.9, 2.9) | 1.9 (1.3, 2.4) | 1.5 (0.9, 2.1) | 1.9 (1.3, 2.4) | 1.6 (1.0, 2.1) | 1.5 (0.9, 2.2) | 2.0 (1.4, 2.5) | 1.5 (1.0, 2.1) |
The LS mean IOP at each post-baseline time point was derived using an analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline IOP and based on observed data for all randomized subjects (245 in latanoprost + netarsudil group, 255 in netarsudil group, 250 in latanoprost group).
Approximately 67% of subjects included in the latanoprost + netarsudil treatment groups of Phase 3 studies were caucasian and 30% black or african american. Over half were aged ≥ 65 years. With the exception of the incidence of cornea verticillata (section 4.8); no other difference in safety profile was observed between races or age groups.
Completion rates in studies 301 and 302 were lower in the latanoprost + netarsudil treatment groups when compared with the latanoprost group. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events at month 3 were 8.7% for the pooled latanoprost + netarsudil treatment group versus 7.6% for the pooled netarsudil group and 1.0% for the pooled latanoprost group. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events at month 12 in Study 301 were 19.7% for the latanoprost + netarsudil treatment group versus 21.7% for the netarsudil group and 1.7% for the latanoprost group. The majority of discontinuations were associated with ocular events. The most frequently reported adverse event associated with discontinuation in the latanoprost + netarsudil group was conjunctival hyperemia (7.6% at month 12). The majority of ocular adverse events reported with netarsudil + latanoprost were mild in intensity.
Study 303 was a prospective, double-masked, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group, 6-month study assessing the safety and ocular hypotensive efficacy of latanoprost + netarsudil compared to bimatoprost + timolol in 430 subjects with elevated intraocular pressure. Subjects were randomly assigned to a planned fixed-dose treatment regimen with latanoprost + netarsudil one drop (218 subjects), once daily (QD) each evening in both eyes (OU) or comparator bimatoprost + timolol (212 subjects) one drop QD each evening OU for approximately 180 days following a washout period.
The primary efficacy outcome was the comparison of latanoprost + netarsudil to bimatoprost + timolol for Mean IOP at specified timepoints at Week 2, Week 6, and Month 3. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT population with imputation by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. This analysis demonstrated clinical non-inferiority of latanoprost + netarsudil ophthalmic solution relative to bimatoprost + timolol dosed QD in the ITT population with the upper limit of the 95% CIs around the difference (latanoprost + netarsudil - bimatoprost + timolol) ≤ 1.5 mmHg at all 9 time points and ≤ 1.0 mmHg at the majority (6 out of 9) of time points from Week 2 through Month 3, meeting the criteria for success. The threshold for clinical non-inferiority of latanoprost + netarsudil QD relative to bimatoprost + timolol QD (the between-group difference ≤ 1.5 mmHg) was demonstrated in the PP population at 8 out of 9 time points (08:00, 10.00, and 16:00) at week 2, through month 3 using the MCMC method. However, clinical non inferiority was not met overall since at the week 6 08:00 time point, the upper bound 95% CI was 1.55. Overall, there was a similar mean IOP reduction throughout the day of approximately 9.5 mmHg between both the latanoprost + netarsudil and bimatoprost + timolol treatment group.
The overall rate of discontinuation from the study treatment due to a TEAE was 11.2%. More subjects in the latanoprost + netarsudil QD treatment group discontinued from the study treatment due to a TEAE (20.2%) compared to the bimatoprost + timolol QD group (1.9%), and the majority of TEAEs leading to discontinuation were ocular TEAEs. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in any treatment group, and the safety profile remains consistent with the known profile for latanoprost + netarsudil, and/or latanoprost or netarsudil alone.
The efficacy and safety of latanoprost + netarsudil in subjects with compromised corneal epithelium or co-existing ocular pathologies e.g. pseudoexfoliation and dispersion pigment syndrome has not been established.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Roclanda in all subsets of the paediatric population for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).