Pharmacotherapeutic group: Muscle relaxants, other muscle relaxants, peripherally acting agents.
ATC code: M03AX01
Mechanism of action
Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin type A blocks the peripheral release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine at presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminals of neuromuscular junctions by cleaving SNAP-25, a protein integral to the successful docking and release of acetylcholine from vesicles situated within the nerve endings, thereby leading to denervation of the muscle and a flaccid paralysis.
After injection, there is an initial rapid high-affinity binding of toxin to specific cell surface receptors. This is followed by transfer of the toxin across the plasma membrane by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Finally, the toxin is released into the cytosol with progressive inhibition of acetylcholine release. Clinical signs manifest within 2-3 days, with peak effect seen within 4 weeks of injection. Recovery occurs usually within 3-4 months after injection when nerve terminals sprout again and reconnect with the endplate.
Clinical data
The safety and efficacy of Letybo was investigated in 3 pivotal, double-blind Phase 3 studies (BLESS I, BLESS II, and BLESS III) in which a total of 955 patients were treated with Letybo and 317 patients were treated with placebo for 1 treatment. In addition, data are available for 854 patients treated with Letybo in an unblinded extension part of Studies BLESS I and II for a further 1 to 3 treatments. Supportive data in glabellar lines comes from the clinical development program in Korea, comprising a Phase 3 study (HG-11-01) in 137 patients and a post-marketing study (HG-13-02) in 815 patients.
Efficacy
In studies BLESS I, BLESS II and BLESS III, all patients had moderate (27% of patients) or severe (73% of patients) glabellar lines at maximum frown at baseline. Letybo at the dose of 20 units significantly reduced the severity of glabellar lines seen at maximum frown, as measured by the investigator's and patient's assessment of glabellar line severity on a 4-point facial wrinkle scale (FWS). Statistically significant response rates in favour of Letybo were seen when using an endpoint requiring 2-point improvement in FWS. High response rates in favour of Letybo were also seen when applying the clinically meaningful response definition of achieving a FWS score of 0 or 1 (no or mild lines) according to the investigator's rating at Week 4 (see Table 2).
Table 2 Response rate from baseline to week 4 at maximum frown based on facial wrinkle scale (FWS) in BLESS I, BLESS II, and BLESS III studies – Full analysis set
| | BLESS I | BLESS II | BLESS III |
| Assessed by: | Letybo (N = 529) | Placebo (N = 175) | Letybo (N = 160) | Placebo (N = 53) | Letybo (N = 266) | Placebo (N = 89) |
| Response rate (n [%]): Reduction in FWS score from moderate or severe to none or mild (≥ 2-point improvement required)a |
| Investigator AND Patient | 246 (46.5%)* | 0 (0%) | 78 (48.8%)* | 1 (1.9%) | 172 (64.7%)* | 0 (0.0%) |
| Investigator | 348 (65.8%)* | 1 (0.6%) | 120 (75.0%)* | 1 (1.9%) | 209 (78.6%)* | 1 (1.1%) |
| Patient | 290 (54.8%)* | 0 (0%) | 83 (51.9%)* | 1 (1.9%) | 183 (68.8%)* | 0 (0.0%) |
| Response rate (%): Reduction in FWS score from moderate or severe to none or mildb |
| Investigator | 393 (74.3%)* | 3 (1.7%) | 136 (85.0%)* | 2 (3.8%) | 218 (82.0%)* | 1 (1.1%) |
| *p-value of <0.001 for Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test for difference between Letybo and placebo; N: number of patients randomized, n: number of responders a Primary efficacy endpoint b Post-hoc analysis |
A total of 38.3% of Letybo-treated subjects showed a 3-point improvement in line severity from a baseline value of severe lines (FWS grade 3) to no lines (FWS grade 0) at Week 4 according to investigator's assessment
The improvement in glabellar lines (based on an improvement of ≥ 2 point reduction in FWS score at maximum frown based on both subject and investigator assessment) started within one week after the injection and reached a maximal effect during the second week following the injection. The duration of the effect can be considered to be between 12 and 16 weeks (see Figure 1).
Figure 1 Time course of responder rate (≥ 2-point improvement in FWS required both according to subject and investigator assessment) during cycle 1 for active versus placebo treatment in pivotal BLESS studies
It could be demonstrated that the responder rate of ≥ 1 point reduction in FWS score at rest was statistically significantly higher in the Letybo group compared with the placebo group: Four weeks after injection, investigators judged 63.1%, 59.4%, and 61.3% of Letybo treated patients and 15.4%, 5.7%, and 9.0% of placebo treated patients to have experienced a ≥ 1-point improvement on FWS at rest in studies BLESS I, BLESS II, and BLESS III, respectively (p-value for between treatment differences was <0.001 for all studies).
Long-term repeat dose open-label data confirmed that response rates after the second, third, and fourth treatments with Letybo over the one-year study period remained high even though, based on study design, the re-treatment cycles included some bias towards non-response.
According to the newly developed Modified Skindex-16 Glabellar Line Quality of Life Scale, more than 85% of the patients entering the studies experienced a moderate or severe negative psychological impact from their glabellar lines at baseline, while about 15% of patients reported a mild impact.
A distinct improvement in psychological impact was observed in patients with Letybo compared to placebo treatment as measured by the Modified Skindex-16 Glabellar Line Quality of Life Scale.
Broadly favourable patient reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded as well as high rates of satisfaction with outcome.
Safety
During double-blind treatment in BLESS I, BLESS II, and BLESS III, 33 (3.5%) patients experienced TEAEs considered to be at least possibly related to Letybo and 8 (2.5%) patients experienced TEAEs considered to be at least possibly related to placebo treatment. During open-label treatment, 46 (5.4%) patients experienced TEAEs considered to be at least possibly related to Letybo treatment (including up to 3 treatment cycles). None of these related AEs were considered serious. The results were consistent with the supportive Phase 3 study HG-11-01 in glabellar lines.
In BLESS I, BLESS II, and BLESS III, antibody formation was evaluated before each treatment, at 4 weeks after each treatment, and at the final study visit. No neutralizing antibodies were detected in any patient after administration of Letybo.
Post-marketing data
The post-marketing data, including data from a post-marketing study in glabellar lines (HG-13-02) in 815 patients, are consistent with those observed in clinical studies.
Elderly population
In studies BLESS I, BLESS II and BLESS III, overall, 152/1272 (11.91%) of patients were ≥ 65 years old at screening. No patient was > 75 years of age. The composite responder rate at week 4 (primary endpoint) for patients receiving Letybo was lower in patients ≥ 65 years at 46/118 (39.0%) than in patients < 65 years at 450/839 (53.6%) for studies BLESS I, BLESS II, and BLESS III combined. There were no large differences in the overall rates of patients with TEAEs considered related to double-blind Letybo treatment in the 3 studies combined (3.7% and 1.7% in patients aged < 65 years and ≥ 65 years, respectively, when medication-related and/or injection procedure-related TEAEs were considered).
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Letybo<Invented name> in all subsets of the paediatric population for treatment of muscle induced wrinkles (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).