Pharmacotherapeutic group: Influenza vaccine, ATC code: J07BB02.
Annual influenza vaccination is recommended because immunity during the year after vaccination declines and because circulating strains of influenza virus change from year to year.
Clinical Efficacy
FIM12 was a multi-centre, double-blind efficacy trial conducted in the US and Canada in which adults 65 years of age and older were randomised (1:1) to receive Efluelda TIV-HD or a standard dose vaccine. The study was conducted over two influenza seasons (2011-2012 and 2012-2013) to assess the occurrence of laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by any influenza viral type/subtype, in association with influenza-like illness (ILI) as the primary endpoint.
Participants were monitored for the occurrence of a respiratory illness by both active and passive surveillance, starting 2 weeks post-vaccination for approximately 7 months. After an episode of respiratory illness, nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected for analysis; attack rates and vaccine efficacy were calculated. The pre-specified statistical superiority criterion for the primary endpoint (lower limit of the 2-sided 95% CI of the vaccine efficacy for Efluelda TIV-HD relative to standard dose vaccine >9.1%) was met.
Table 3: Relative vaccine efficacy to prevent influenza-like illnessa in adults ≥ 65 years
| | High Dose vaccine Nb=15892 nc (%) | Standard dose vaccine Nb=15911 nc (%) | Relative Efficacy % (95% CI) |
| Laboratory-confirmed influenzad caused by: |
| - Any type/subtypee | 227 (1.43) | 300 (1.89) | 24.2 (9.7; 36.5) |
| - Viral strains similar to those contained in the vaccine | 73 (0.46) | 113 (0.71) | 35.3 (12.4; 52.5) |
a Occurrence of at least one of the following respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing; concurrent with at least one of the following systemic signs or symptoms: temperature >37.2 °C, chills, tiredness, headaches or myalgia
b N is the number of vaccinated participants in the per-protocol analysis set for efficacy assessments
c n is the number of participants with protocol-defined influenza-like illness with laboratory confirmation
d Laboratory-confirmed: culture- or polymerase-chain-reaction-confirmed
e Primary endpoint
Immunogenicity
Immunogenicity study comparing Efluelda TIV-HD with a standard dose vaccine in adults 65 years and older: FIM05
A phase 3 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multi-centre trial was conducted in US in adults aged 65 years and older to demonstrate the superiority of Efluelda TIV-HD versus a standard dose vaccine, as assessed by seroconversion rates and GMT ratios. A total of 3,876 adults were randomised to receive either one dose of Efluelda TIV-HD or standard dose vaccine.
Efluelda TIV-HD induced superior immune response against A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains and a non-inferior immune response against B strain, both in terms of GMT ratios and seroconversion rates 28 days after vaccination, compared to standard dose vaccine.
Immunogenicity study comparing Efluelda TIV-HD with QIV-HD in adults 65 years and older: QHD00013
A randomised, active-controlled, modified double-blind Phase III clinical trial was conducted in the U.S. in adults 65 years and older to demonstrate the noninferiority of QIV-HD over Efluelda TIV-HD as assessed by HAI (haemagglutinin inhibition) Geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) at Day 28 and seroconversion rates.
A total of 2670 adults were randomised to receive either one dose of QIV-HD or one dose of Efluelda TIV-HD (one of two formulations of comparator vaccine, containing either a B strain of the Yamagata lineage or a B strain of the Victoria lineage).
QIV-HD was as immunogenic as Efluelda TIV-HD for HAI GMTs and seroconversion rates for the common influenza strains. These data allow extrapolating the immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness results of QIV-HD to Efluelda TIV-HD.
Immunogenicity study comparing High dose Influenza vaccine with Standard dose influenza vaccine in adults 60 years and older: QHD00011
A randomised, active-controlled, modified double-blind, Phase III clinical trial was conducted in Europe in adults 60 years and older to demonstrate the superiority of QIV-HD over Standard dose influenza vaccine for all strains, as assessed by HAI (haemagglutinin inhibition) geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) at Day 28 in adults 60 to 64 years of age and in adults 65 years of age and older.
A total of 1539 adults (760 adults 60 to 64 years of age and 779 adults 65 years of age and older) were randomised to receive either one dose of QIV-HD or one dose of Standard dose influenza vaccine.
QIV-HD induced a superior immune response to Standard dose influenza vaccine for all 4 virus strains 28 days post-vaccination in adults 60 to 64 years of age, and this response was at least similar to the immune response in adults 65 years and above. The efficacy and effectiveness data from 65 years of age and above can thus be inferred to adults from 60 years of age and above.
Effectiveness Studies
The effectiveness of High-dose influenza vaccine compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine has been evaluated for the prevention of influenza-related complications in adults 65 years and older across multiple study designs, settings and populations.
Meta-analysis of observational studies among adults 65 years and older:
Several retrospective studies, over 11 influenza seasons and in more than 45 million individuals 65 years of age and older, confirmed the superior protection offered by High-Dose influenza vaccine compared to standard-dose influenza vaccines against complications of influenza such as pneumonia and influenza hospitalisation (13.4% (95%CI: 7.3% to 19.2%, p<0.001)), cardio-respiratory hospitalisation 17.9% (95%CI :14.7% to 21.0%, p<0.001) and all–cause hospitalisation 7.8% (95%CI: 5.3% to 10.3%, p<0.001); although the impact may vary per season.
Individually randomised adults 65 years and older (FLUNITY-HD study):
The benefit of High-Dose influenza vaccine compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine was confirmed in the FLUNITY-HD study, a prespecified pooled analysis of two methodologically harmonised, individually randomised, pragmatic registry-based trials conducted in Denmark and Spain during the 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 influenza seasons enrolling 466 320 participants (mean age 73.3±5.4 years) of whom 49% had at least one chronic condition (e.g. history of cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes). For the primary objective, high-dose influenza vaccine reduced influenza or pneumonia hospitalisation by 8.8% (95% CI: 1.7- 15.5%, p=0.0082), although there was heterogeneity between the trials for the primary outcome: the reduction was 5.9% (95% CI: -2.1 to 13.3%) in Denmark versus 23.7% (95% CI: 6.6 to 37.7%) in Spain. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was also demonstrated against cardio-respiratory hospitalisation (rVE= 6.3%, 95% CI:2.5-10.0%, p=0.0006), all-cause hospitalisation (rVE=2.2%, 95% CI: 0.3-4.1%, p=0.012). and laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalisation (rVE=31.9%, 95% CI: 19.7-42.2%, p<0.0001).
Cluster-randomised trial in adults 65 years and older in nursing homes:
A US cluster- randomised trial in 53 008 nursing home residents during the 2013-2014 season, demonstrated that Efluelda significantly reduced respiratory-related hospital admissions by 12.7% (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 0.873, 95% CI 0.776 to 0.982, p=0.023), pneumonia admissions by 20.9% (ARR 0.791, 95% CI: 0.267 to 0.953, p=0.013), and all-cause admissions by 8.0% (ARR 0.915, 95% CI: 0.863 to 0.970, p=0.0028) compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine in nursing home populations.
Concomitant Administration of QIV-HD with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified)
In a descriptive open-label clinical study (NCT04969276), healthy adults aged 65 years and older were divided in three groups: Group 1 received QIV-HD alone (N=92), Group 2 (N=100) received QIV-HD concomitantly with an investigational booster 100 mcg dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (nucleoside modified) at least 5 months after the second dose of the primary series, Group 3 (N=104) received only the investigational booster 100 mcg dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (nucleoside modified).
Co-administration resulted in no change to influenza vaccine immune responses as measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. Co-administration resulted in similar responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, as assessed by an anti-spike IgG assay (see section 4.5 and 4.8).