Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, other antineoplastic agents, ATC code: L01XG03.
Mechanism of action
Ixazomib citrate, a prodrug, is a substance that rapidly hydrolyses under physiological conditions to its biologically active form, ixazomib.
Ixazomib is an oral, highly selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor. Ixazomib preferentially binds and inhibits the chymotrypsin‑like activity of the beta 5 subunit of the 20S proteasome.
Ixazomib induced apoptosis of several tumour cell types in vitro. Ixazomib demonstrated in vitro cytotoxicity against myeloma cells from patients who had relapsed after multiple prior therapies, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. The combination of ixazomib and lenalidomide demonstrated synergistic cytotoxic effects in multiple myeloma cell lines. In vivo, ixazomib demonstrated antitumour activity in various tumour xenograft models, including models of multiple myeloma. In vitro, ixazomib affected cell types found in the bone marrow microenvironment including vascular endothelial cells, osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
Cardiac electrophysiology
Ixazomib did not prolong the QTc interval at clinically relevant exposures based on the results of a pharmacokinetic‑pharmacodynamic analysis of data from 245 patients. At the 4 mg dose, mean change from baseline in QTcF was estimated to be 0.07 msec (90% CI; ‑0.22, 0.36) from the model based analysis. There was no discernible relationship between ixazomib concentration and the RR interval suggesting no clinically meaningful effect of ixazomib on heart rate.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The efficacy and safety of ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone was evaluated in an international randomised, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled, multicenter Phase 3 superiority study (C16010) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy. A total of 722 patients (intent‑to-treat [ITT] population) were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (N = 360; ixazomib regimen) or placebo, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (N = 362; placebo regimen) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled in the trial had multiple myeloma that was refractory, including primary refractory, had relapsed after prior therapy, or had relapsed and was refractory to any prior therapy. Patients that changed therapies prior to disease progression were eligible for enrolment, as well as those with controlled cardiovascular conditions. The Phase 3 study excluded patients who were refractory to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitors and patients who received more than three prior therapies. For the purposes of this study, refractory disease was defined as disease progression on treatment or progression within 60 days after the last dose of lenalidomide or a proteasome inhibitor. As data are limited in these patients, a careful risk‑benefit assessment is recommended before initiating the ixazomib regimen.
Thromboprophylaxis was recommended for all patients in both treatment groups according to the lenalidomide SmPC. Concomitant medicinal products, such as antiemetic, antiviral, and antihistamine medicinal products were given to patients at the physician's discretion as prophylaxis and/or management of symptoms.
Patients received ixazomib 4 mg or placebo on Days 1, 8, and 15 plus lenalidomide (25 mg) on Days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone (40 mg) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28‑day cycle. Patients with renal impairment received a starting dose of lenalidomide according to its SmPC. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.
The baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced and comparable between the study regimens. The median age was 66 years, range 38‑91 years; 58% of patients were older than 65 years. Fifty seven percent of patients were male. Eighty five percent of the population was White, 9% Asian and 2% Black. Ninety three percent of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0‑1 and 12% had baseline ISS stage III disease (N = 90). Twenty five percent of patients had a creatinine clearance of < 60 mL/min. Twenty three percent of patients had light chain disease and 12% of patients had measurable disease by free light chain assay only. Nineteen percent had high‑risk cytogenetic abnormalities (del[17], t[4;14], t[14;16]) (N = 137), 10% had del(17) (N = 69) and 34% had 1q amplification (1q21) (N = 247). Patients received one to three prior therapies (median of 1) including prior treatment with bortezomib (69%), carfilzomib (< 1%), thalidomide (45%), lenalidomide (12%), melphalan (81%). Fifty seven percent of patients had undergone prior stem cell transplantation. Seventy seven percent of patients relapsed after prior therapies and 11% were refractory to prior therapies. Primary refractory, defined as best response of stable disease or disease progression on all prior therapies, was documented in 6% of patients.
The primary endpoint was progression‑free survival (PFS) according to the 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Consensus Uniform Response Criteria as assessed by a blinded independent review committee (IRC) based on central laboratory results. Response was assessed every 4 weeks until disease progression. At the primary analysis (median follow up of 14.7 months and a median of 13 cycles), PFS was statistically significantly different between the treatment arms. PFS results are summarised in Table 4 and Figure 1. The improvement in PFS in the ixazomib regimen was supported by improvements in overall response rate.
Table 4: Progression free survival and response Results in multiple myeloma patients treated with ixazomib or placebo in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (intent‑to-treat population, primary analysis)
| | Ixazomib + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (N = 360) | Placebo + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (N = 362) |
| Progression‑Free Survival |
| Events, n (%) | 129 (36) | 157 (43) |
| Median (months) | 20.6 | 14.7 |
| p‑value* | 0.012 |
| Hazard Ratio† (95% CI) | 0.74 (0.59, 0.94) |
| Overall Response Rate‡, n (%) | 282 (78.3) | 259 (71.5) |
| Response Category, n (%) |
| Complete Response | 42 (11.7) | 24 (6.6) |
| Very Good Partial Response | 131 (36.4) | 117 (32.3) |
| Partial Response | 109 (30.3) | 118 (32.6) |
| Time to Response, months |
| Median | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| Duration of Response§, months |
| Median | 20.5 | 15.0 |
*P‑value is based on the stratified log‑rank test.
†Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox's proportional hazard regression model. A hazard ratio less than 1 indicates an advantage for the ixazomib regimen.
‡ORR = CR+VGPR+PR
§Based on responders in the response‑evaluable population
Figure 1: Kaplan‑Meier plot of progression‑free survival in the intent‑to-treat population (primary analysis)
A second, non‑inferential, PFS analysis was conducted with a median follow up of 23 months. At this analysis, estimated median PFS was 20 months in the ixazomib regimen and 15.9 months in the placebo regimen (HR = 0.82 [95% CI (0.67, 1.0)]) in the ITT population. For patients with one prior therapy, the median PFS was 18.7 months in the ixazomib regimen and 17.6 months in the placebo regimen (HR = 0.99). For patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, PFS was 22.0 months in the ixazomib regimen and 13.0 months in the placebo regimen (HR = 0.62).
At the final analysis for OS at a median duration of follow up of approximately 85 months, median OS in the ITT population was 53.6 months for patients in the ixazomib regimen and 51.6 months for patients in the placebo regimen (HR = 0.94 [95% CI: 0.78, 1.13; p = 0.495]). For patients with one prior therapy, the median OS was 54.3 months in the ixazomib regimen and 58.3 months in the placebo regimen (HR = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.80, 1.29]). For patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, the median OS was 53.0 months in the ixazomib regimen and 43.0 months in the placebo regimen (HR = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.64, 1.11]).
A randomised, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled Phase 3 study was conducted in China (N = 115) with a similar study design and eligibility criteria. Many of the patients enrolled in the study had advanced disease with Durie‑Salmon Stage III (69%) at initial diagnosis and a treatment history of receiving at least 2 prior therapies (60%) and being thalidomide refractory (63%). At the primary analysis (median follow up of 8 months and a median of 6 cycles), the median PFS was 6.7 months in the ixazomib regimen compared to 4 months in the placebo regimen (p‑value = 0.035, HR = 0.60). At the final analysis for OS at a median follow up of 19.8 months, OS was improved for patients treated in the ixazomib regimen compared with placebo [p‑value = 0.0014, HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.242, 0.726 ]).
As multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous disease, benefit may vary across subgroups in the Phase 3 study (C16010) (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Forest plot of progression‑free survival in subgroups
In the Phase 3 study (C16010), 10 patients (5 in each treatment regimen) had severe renal impairment at baseline. Of the 5 patients in the ixazomib regimen, one patient had a confirmed partial response and 3 confirmed stable disease (however 2 were unconfirmed partial response and 1 was an unconfirmed very good partial response). Of the 5 patients in the placebo regimen, 2 had a confirmed very good partial response.
Quality of life as assessed by global health scores (EORTC QLQ‑C30 and MY‑20) was maintained during treatment and was similar in both treatment regimens in the Phase 3 study (C16010).
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with ixazomib in all subsets of the paediatric population in multiple myeloma (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).