| Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, monoclonal antibodies, ATC code: L01XC03Trastuzumab is a recombinant humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Overexpression of HER2 is observed in 20 %-30 % of primary breast cancers. Studies of HER2-positivity rates in gastric cancer (GC) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) have shown that there is a broad variation of HER2-positivity ranging from 6.8 % to 34.0 % for IHC and 7.1 % to 42.6 % for FISH. Studies indicate that breast cancer patients whose tumours overexpress HER2 have a shortened disease-free survival compared to patients whose tumours do not overexpress HER2. The extracellular domain of the receptor (ECD, p105) can be shed into the blood stream and measured in serum samples. Mechanism of action Trastuzumab binds with high affinity and specificity to sub-domain IV, a juxta-membrane region of HER2's extracellular domain. Binding of trastuzumab to HER2 inhibits ligand-independent HER2 signalling and prevents the proteolytic cleavage of its extracellular domain, an activation mechanism of HER2. As a result, trastuzumab has been shown, in both in vitro assays and in animals, to inhibit the proliferation of human tumour cells that overexpress HER2. Additionally, trastuzumab is a potent mediator of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). In vitro, trastuzumab-mediated ADCC has been shown to be preferentially exerted on HER2 overexpressing cancer cells compared with cancer cells that do not overexpress HER2.Detection of HER2 overexpression or HER2 gene amplification Detection of HER2 overexpression or HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer Herceptin should only be used in patients whose tumours have HER2 overexpression or HER2 gene amplification as determined by an accurate and validated assay. HER2 overexpression should be detected using an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assessment of fixed tumour blocks (see section 4.4). HER2 gene amplification should be detected using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) of fixed tumour blocks. Patients are eligible for Herceptin treatment if they show strong HER2 overexpression as described by a 3+ score by IHC or a positive FISH or CISH result. To ensure accurate and reproducible results, the testing must be performed in a specialised laboratory, which can ensure validation of the testing procedures.The recommended scoring system to evaluate the IHC staining patterns is as follows:| Score | Staining pattern | HER2 overexpression assessment | | 0
| No staining is observed or membrane staining is observed in < 10 % of the tumour cells
| Negative
| | 1+
| A faint/barely perceptible membrane staining is detected in > 10 % of the tumour cells. The cells are only stained in part of their membrane.
| Negative
| | 2+
| A weak to moderate complete membrane staining is detected in > 10 % of the tumour cells.
| Equivocal
| | 3+
| Strong complete membrane staining is detected in > 10 % of the tumour cells.
| Positive
| In general, FISH is considered positive if the ratio of the HER2 gene copy number per tumour cell to the chromosome 17 copy number is greater than or equal to 2, or if there are more than 4 copies of the HER2 gene per tumour cell if no chromosome 17 control is used.In general, CISH is considered positive if there are more than 5 copies of the HER2 gene per nucleus in greater than 50 % of tumour cells.For full instructions on assay performance and interpretation please refer to the package inserts of validated FISH and CISH assays. Official recommendations on HER2 testing may also apply.For any other method that may be used for the assessment of HER2 protein or gene expression, the analyses should only be performed by laboratories that provide adequate state-of-the-art performance of validated methods. Such methods must clearly be precise and accurate enough to demonstrate overexpression of HER2 and must be able to distinguish between moderate (congruent with 2+) and strong (congruent with 3+) overexpression of HER2.Detection of HER2 over expression or HER2 gene amplification in gastric cancer Only an accurate and validated assay should be used to detect HER2 over expression or HER2 gene amplification. IHC is recommended as the first testing modality and in cases where HER2 gene amplification status is also required, either a silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) or a FISH technique must be applied. SISH technology is however, recommended to allow for the parallel evaluation of tumor histology and morphology. To ensure validation of testing procedures and the generation of accurate and reproducible results, HER2 testing must be performed in a laboratory staffed by trained personnel. Full instructions on assay performance and results interpretation should be taken from the product information leaflet provided with the HER2 testing assays used.In the ToGA (BO18255) trial, patients whose tumours were either IHC3+ or FISH positive were defined as HER2 positive and thus included in the trial. Based on the clinical trial results, the beneficial effects were limited to patients with the highest level of HER2 protein overexpression, defined by a 3+ score by IHC, or a 2+ score by IHC and a positive FISH result. In a method comparison study (study D008548) a high degree of concordance (>95%) was observed for SISH and FISH techniques for the detection of HER2 gene amplification in gastric cancer patients.HER2 over expression should be detected using an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assessment of fixed tumour blocks; HER2 gene amplification should be detected using in situ hybridisation using either SISH or FISH on fixed tumour blocks. The recommended scoring system to evaluate the IHC staining patterns is as follows:| Score | Surgical specimen - staining pattern | Biopsy specimen - staining pattern | HER2 overexpression assessment | | 0
| No reactivity or membranous reactivity in < 10 % of tumour cells
| No reactivity or membranous reactivity in any tumour cell
| Negative
| | 1+
| Faint ⁄ barely perceptible membranous reactivity in 10 % of tumour cells; cells are reactive only in part of their membrane
| Tumour cell cluster with a faint ⁄ barely perceptible membranous reactivity irrespective of percentage of tumour cells stained
| Negative
|
2+
| Weak to moderate complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity in 10 % of tumour cells
| Tumour cell cluster with a weak to moderate complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity irrespective of percentage of tumour cells stained
|
Equivocal
|
3+
| Strong complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity in 10 % of tumour cells
| Tumour cell cluster with a strong complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity irrespective of percentage of tumour cells stained
|
Positive
| In general, SISH or FISH is considered positive if the ratio of the HER2 gene copy number per tumour cell to the chromosome 17 copy number is greater than or equal to 2. Clinical efficacy and safety MBC Herceptin has been used in clinical trials as monotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have tumours that overexpress HER2 and who have failed one or more chemotherapy regimens for their metastatic disease (Herceptin alone).Herceptin has also been used in combination with paclitaxel or docetaxel for the treatment of patients who have not received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Patients who had previously received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 infused over 3 hours) with or without Herceptin. In the pivotal trial of docetaxel (100 mg/m2 infused over 1 hour) with or without Herceptin, 60 % of the patients had received prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were treated with Herceptin until progression of disease.The efficacy of Herceptin in combination with paclitaxel in patients who did not receive prior adjuvant anthracyclines has not been studied. However, Herceptin plus docetaxel was efficacious in patients whether or not they had received prior adjuvant anthracyclines.The test method for HER2 overexpression used to determine eligibility of patients in the pivotal Herceptin monotherapy and Herceptin plus paclitaxel clinical trials employed immunohistochemical staining for HER2 of fixed material from breast tumours using the murine monoclonal antibodies CB11 and 4D5. These tissues were fixed in formalin or Bouin's fixative. This investigative clinical trial assay performed in a central laboratory utilised a 0 to 3+ scale. Patients classified as staining 2+ or 3+ were included, while those staining 0 or 1+ were excluded. Greater than 70 % of patients enrolled exhibited 3+ overexpression. The data suggest that beneficial effects were greater among those patients with higher levels of overexpression of HER2 (3+).The main test method used to determine HER2 positivity in the pivotal trial of docetaxel, with or without Herceptin, was immunohistochemistry. A minority of patients was tested using fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH). In this trial, 87 % of patients entered had disease that was IHC3+, and 95 % of patients entered had disease that was IHC3+ and/or FISH-positive.Weekly dosing in MBC The efficacy results from the monotherapy and combination therapy studies are summarised in the following table:| Parameter | Monotherapy | Combination Therapy | | | Herceptin1
N=172 | Herceptin plus paclitaxel2N=68 | Paclitaxel2
N=77 | Herceptin plus docetaxel3N=92 | Docetaxel3
N=94 | Response rate (95 %CI) | 18 % (13 - 25)
| 49 % (36 - 61)
| 17 % (9 - 27)
| 61 % (50-71)
| 34 % (25-45)
| Median duration of response (months) (95 %CI) | 9.1
(5.6-10.3)
| 8.3
(7.3-8.8)
| 4.6
(3.7-7.4)
| 11.7
(9.3 15.0)
| 5.7
(4.6-7.6)
| Median TTP (months) (95 %CI) | 3.2 (2.6-3.5)
| 7.1 (6.2-12.0)
| 3.0 (2.0-4.4)
| 11.7 (9.2-13.5)
| 6.1 (5.4-7.2)
| Median Survival (months) (95 %CI) | 16.4 (12.3-ne)
| 24.8 (18.6-33.7)
| 17.9 (11.2-23.8)
| 31.2 (27.3-40.8)
| 22.74 (19.1-30.8)
| TTP = time to progression; "ne" indicates that it could not be estimated or it was not yet reached.1. Study H0649g: IHC3+ patient subset2. Study H0648g: IHC3+ patient subset3. Study M77001: Full analysis set (intent-to-treat), 24 months resultsCombination treatment with Herceptin and anastrozole Herceptin has been studied in combination with anastrozole for first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in HER2 overexpressing, hormone-receptor (i.e. estrogen-receptor (ER) and/or progesterone-receptor (PR)) positive postmenopausal patients. Progression free survival was doubled in the Herceptin plus anastrozole arm compared to anastrozole (4.8 months versus 2.4 months). For the other parameters the improvements seen for the combination were for overall response (16.5 % versus 6.7 %); clinical benefit rate (42.7 % versus 27.9 %); time to progression (4.8 months versus 2.4 months). For time to response and duration of response no difference could be recorded between the arms. The median overall survival was extended by 4.6 months for patients in the combination arm. The difference was not statistically significant, however more than half of the patients in the anastrozole alone arm crossed over to a Herceptin containing regimen after progression of disease.Three -weekly dosing in MBC The efficacy results from the non-comparative monotherapy and combination therapy studies are summarised in the following table:| Parameter | Monotherapy | Combination Therapy | | | Herceptin1
N=105 | Herceptin2
N=72 | Herceptin plus paclitaxel3N=32 | Herceptin plus docetaxel4N=110 | Response rate (95 %CI) | 24 %
(15 - 35)
| 27 %
(14 - 43)
| 59 %
(41-76)
| 73 %
(63-81)
| Median duration of response (months) (range) | 10.1
(2.8-35.6)
| 7.9
(2.1-18.8)
| 10.5
(1.8-21)
| 13.4
(2.1-55.1)
| Median TTP (months) (95 %CI) | 3.4 (2.8-4.1)
| 7.7 (4.2-8.3)
| 12.2 (6.2-ne)
| 13.6 (11-16)
| Median Survival (months) (95 %CI) | ne
| ne
| ne
| 47.3
(32-ne)
| TTP = time to progression; "ne" indicates that it could not be estimated or it was not yet reached.1. Study WO16229: loading dose 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg 3 weekly schedule2. Study MO16982: loading dose 6 mg/kg weekly x 3; followed by 6 mg/kg 3-weekly schedule3. Study BO159354. Study MO16419Sites of progression The frequency of progression in the liver was significantly reduced in patients treated with the combination of Herceptin and paclitaxel, compared to paclitaxel alone (21.8 % vs. 45.7 %; p=0.004). More patients treated with Herceptin and paclitaxel progressed in the central nervous system than those treated with paclitaxel alone (12.6 % vs. 6.5 %; p=0.377).EBC Early breast cancer is defined as non-metastatic primary invasive carcinoma of the breast.In the adjuvant setting, Herceptin was investigated in 4 large multicentre, randomised, trials. - The HERA study was designed to compare one year of three-weekly Herceptin treatment versus observation in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer following surgery, established chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if applicable). Patients assigned to receive Herceptin were given an initial loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg every three weeks for one year.- The NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 studies that comprise the joint analysis were designed to investigate the clinical utility of combining Herceptin treatment with paclitaxel following AC chemotherapy, additionally the NCCTG N9831 study also investigated adding Herceptin sequentially to AC P chemotherapy in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer following surgery.- The BCIRG 006 study was designed to investigate combining Herceptin treatment with docetaxel either following AC chemotherapy or in combination with docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer following surgery.Early breast cancer in the HERA trial was limited to operable, primary, invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, with axillary nodes positive or axillary nodes negative if tumors at least 1 cm in diameter. In the joint analysis of the NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 studies, early breast cancer was limited to women with operable breast cancer at high risk, defined as HER2-positive and axillary lymph node positive or HER2 positive and lymph node negative with high risk features (tumor size > 1 cm and ER negative or tumor size > 2 cm, regardless of hormonal status).In the BCIRG 006 study HER2 positive, early breast cancer was defined as either lymph node positive or high risk node negative patients with no (pN0) lymph node involvement, and at least 1 of the following factors: tumour size greater than 2 cm, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative, histological and/or nuclear grade 2-3, or age < 35 years).The efficacy results from the HERA trial are summarized in the following table:| Parameter
| Observation N=1693
| Herceptin 1 Year N = 1693
| P-value vs Observation
| Hazard Ratio vs Observation
| | Disease-free survival
| | | | | | - No. patients with event
| 219 (12.9 %)
| 127 (7.5 %)
| < 0.0001
| 0.54
| | - No. patients without event
| 1474 (87.1 %)
| 1566 (92.5 %)
| | Recurrence-free survival
| | | | | | - No. patients with event
| 208 (12.3 %)
| 113 (6.7 %)
| < 0.0001
| 0.51
| | - No. patients without event
| 1485 (87.7 %)
| 1580 (93.3 %)
| | Distant disease-free survival
| | | | | | - No. patients with event
| 184 (10.9 %)
| 99 (5.8 %)
| < 0.0001
| 0.50
| | - No. patients without event
| 1508 (89.1 %)
| 1594 (94.2 %)
| Study BO16348 (HERA): 12 months follow-upFor the primary endpoint, DFS, the hazard ratio translates into an absolute benefit, in terms of a 2-year disease-free survival rate, of 7.6 percentage points (85.8 % vs 78.2 %) in favour of the Herceptin arm.In the NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 studies Herceptin was administered in combination with paclitaxel, following AC chemotherapy. Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were administered concurrently as follows:- intravenous push doxorubicin, at 60 mg/ m2, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. - intravenous cyclophosphamide, at 600 mg/ m2 over 30 minutes, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.Paclitaxel, in combination with Herceptin, was administered as follows:- intravenous paclitaxel - 80 mg/m2 as a continuous i.v. infusion, given every week for 12 weeks. or - intravenous paclitaxel - 175 mg/m2 as a continuous i.v. infusion, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (day 1 of each cycle).The efficacy results from the joint analysis of the NCCTG 9831 and NSABP B-31 trials are summarized in the table below. The median duration of follow up was 1.8 years for the patients in the AC P arm and 2.0 years for patients in the AC PH arm. | Parameter
| AC P
(n=1697)
| AC PH
(n=1672)
| Hazard Ratio vs AC P
(95% CI)
p-value
| | Disease-free survival
No. patients with event (%)
| 261 (15.4)
| 133 (7.9)
| 0.48 (0.39, 0.59)
p<0.0001
| | Distant Recurrence
No. patients with event
| 174
| 90
| 0.47 (0.37, 0.60)
p<0.0001
| | Death (OS event):
No. patients with event
| 92
| 62
| 0.67 (0.48, 0.92)
p=0.014
| A: doxorubicin; C: cyclophosphamide; P: paclitaxel; H: trastuzumabFor the primary endpoint, DFS, the addition of Herceptin to paclitaxel chemotherapy resulted in a 52% decrease in the risk of disease recurrence. The hazard ratio translates into an absolute benefit, in terms of 3-year disease-free survival rate estimates of 11.8 percentage points (87.2 % vs 75.4 %) in favour of the AC PH (Herceptin) arm.At the time of a safety update after a median of 3.5-3.8 years follow up, an analysis of DFS reconfirms the magnitude of the benefit shown in the definitive analysis of DFS. Despite the cross-over to Herceptin in the control arm, the addition of Herceptin to paclitaxel chemotherapy resulted in a 52% decrease in the risk of disease recurrence. The addition of Herceptin to paclitaxel chemotherapy also resulted in a 37% decrease in the risk of death.In the BCIRG 006 study Herceptin was administered either in combination with docetaxel, following AC chemotherapy (AC DH) or in combination with docetaxel and carboplatin (DCarbH). Docetaxel was administered as follows:- intravenous docetaxel - 100 mg/m2 as an i.v. infusion over 1 hour, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (day 2 of first docetaxel cycle, then day 1 of each subsequent cycle) or - intravenous docetaxel - 75 mg/m2 as an i.v. infusion over 1 hour, given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (day 2 of cycle 1, then day 1 of each subsequent cycle) which was followed by:- carboplatin at target AUC = 6 mg/mL/min administered by IV infusion over 30-60 minutes repeated every 3 weeks for a total of six cyclesHerceptin was administered weekly with chemotherapy and 3 weekly thereafter for a total of 52 weeks.The efficacy results from the BCIRG 006 are summarized in the tables below. The median duration of follow up was 2.9 years in the AC D arm and 3.0 years in each of the AC DH and DCarbH arms.Overview of Efficacy Analyses BCIRG 006 AC D versus AC DH| Parameter
| AC D
(n=1073)
| AC DH
(n=1074)
| Hazard Ratio vs AC D
(95% CI)
p-value
| | Disease-free survival
No. patients with event
| 195
| 134
| 0.61 (0.49, 0.77)
p<0.0001
| | Distant recurrence
No. patients with event
| 144
| 95
| 0.59 (0.46, 0.77)
p<0.0001
| | Death (OS event)
No. patients with event
| 80
| 49
| 0.58 (0.40, 0.83)
p=0.0024
| AC D = doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, followed by docetaxel; AC DH = doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab; CI = confidence intervalOverview of Efficacy Analyses BCIRG 006 AC D versus DCarbH| Parameter
| AC D
(n=1073)
| DCarbH
(n=1074)
| Hazard Ratio vs AC D
(95% CI)
| | Disease-free survival
No. patients with event
| 195
| 145
| 0.67 (0.54, 0.83)
p=0.0003
| | Distant recurrence
No. patients with event
| 144
| 103
| 0.65 (0.50, 0.84)
p=0.0008
| | Death (OS event)
No. patients with event
| 80
| 56
| 0.66 (0.47, 0.93)
p=0.0182
| AC D = doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, followed by docetaxel; DCarbH = docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab; CI = confidence intervalIn the BCIRG 006 study for the primary endpoint, DFS, the hazard ratio translates into an absolute benefit, in terms of 3-year disease-free survival rate estimates of 5.8 percentage points (86.7 % vs 80.9 %) in favour of the AC DH (Herceptin) arm and 4.6 percentage points (85.5 % vs 80.9 %) in favour of the DCarbH (Herceptin) arm compared to AC D.In study BCIRG 006, 213/1075 patients in the DCarbH (TCH) arm, 221/1074 patients in the AC DH (AC TH) arm, and 217/1073 in the AC D (AC T) arm had a Karnofsky performance status 90 (either 80 or 90). No disease-free survival (DFS) benefit was noticed in this subgroup of patients (hazard ratio = 1.16, 95% CI [0.73, 1.83] for DCarbH (TCH) vs AC D (AC T); hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI [0.60, 1.55] for AC DH (AC TH) vs AC D).In addition a post-hoc exploratory analysis was performed on the data sets from the joint analysis (JA) NSABP B-31/NCCTG N9831 and BCIRG006 clinical studies combining DFS events and symptomatic cardiac events and summarised in the following table: | | AC PH
(vs. AC P)
(NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831)
| AC DH
(vs. AC D)
(BCIRG 006)
| DCarbH
(vs. AC D)
(BCIRG 006)
| | Primary efficacy analysis
DFS Hazard ratios
(95% CI)
p-value
| 0.48
(0.39, 0.59)
p<0.0001
| 0.61
(0.49, 0.77)
p< 0.0001
| 0.67
(0.54, 0.83)
p=0.0003
| | Post-hoc exploratory analysis with DFS and symptomatic cardiac events
Hazard ratios
(95% CI)
|
0.64
(0.53, 0.77)
|
0.70
(0.57, 0.87)
|
0.71
(0.57, 0.87)
| A: doxorubicin; C: cyclophosphamide; P: paclitaxel; D: docetaxel; Carb: carboplatin; H: trastuzumabCI = confidence intervalNeoadjuvant-adjuvant treatment So far, no results are available which compare the efficacy of Herceptin administered with chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting with that obtained in the neo-adjuvant/adjuvant setting. In the neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting, study MO16432, a multicentre randomised trial, was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of concurrent administration of Herceptin with neoadjuvant chemotherapy including both an anthracycline and a taxane, followed by adjuvant Herceptin, up to a total treatment duration of 1 year. The study recruited patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced (Stage III) or inflammatory early breast cancer. Patients with HER2+ tumours were randomised to receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy concurrently with neoadjuvant-adjuvant Herceptin, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone.In study MO16432, Herceptin (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance every 3 weeks) was administered concurrently with 10 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapyas follows:• Doxorubicin 60mg/m2 and paclitaxel 150 mg/m2, administered 3-weekly for 3 cycles,which was followed by• Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 administered 3-weekly for 4 cycles,which was followed by• CMF on day 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for 3 cycleswhich was followed after surgery by• additional cycles of adjuvant Herceptin (to complete 1 year of treatment)The efficacy results from MO16432 are summarized in the table below. The median duration of follow-up in the Herceptin arm was 3.8 years.| Parameter
| Chemo + Herceptin
(n=115)
| Chemo only
(n=116)
| | | Event-free survival
| | | Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
| | No. patients with event
| 46
| 59
| 0.65 (0.44, 0.96) p=0.0275
| | Total pathological complete response* (95% CI)
| 40%
(31.0, 49.6)
| 20.7%
(13.7, 29.2)
| P=0.0014
| | Overall survival
| | | Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
| | No. patients with event
| 22
| 33
| 0.59 (0.35, 1.02) p=0.0555
| * defined as absence of any invasive cancer both in the breast and axillary nodesAn absolute benefit of 13 percentage points in favour of the Herceptin arm was estimated in terms of 3-year event-free survival rate (65 % vs. 52 %).MGC Herceptin has been investigated in one randomised, open-label phase III trial ToGA (BO18255) in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Chemotherapy was administered as follows:- capecitabine - 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (evening of day 1 to morning of day 15 of each cycle) or - intravenous 5-fluorouracil - 800 mg/m2/day as a continuous i.v. infusion over 5 days, given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (days 1 to 5 of each cycle) Either of which was administered with:- cisplatin - 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles on day 1 of each cycle.The efficacy results from study BO18225 are summarized in the following table: | Parameter | FPN = 290 | FP +HN = 294 | HR (95 % CI) | p-value | | Overall Survival, Median months
| 11.1
| 13.8
| 0.74 (0.60-0.91)
| 0.0046
| | Progression-Free Survival, Median months
| 5.5
| 6.7
| 0.71 (0.59-0.85)
| 0.0002
| | Time to Disease Progression, Median months
| 5.6
| 7.1
| 0.70 (0.58-0.85)
| 0.0003
| | Overall Response Rate, %
| 34.5 %
| 47.3 %
| 1.70a
(1.22, 2.38)
| 0.0017
| | Duration of Response, Median months
| 4.8
| 6.9
| 0.54 (0.40-0.73)
| < 0.0001
| FP + H: Fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin + Herceptin FP: Fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin a Odds ratioPatients were recruited to the trial who were previously untreated for HER2-positive inoperable locally advanced or recurrent and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction not amenable to curative therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival which was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. At the time of the analysis a total of 349 randomized patients had died: 182 patients (62.8 %) in the control arm and 167 patients (56.8 %) in the treatment arm. The majority of the deaths were due to events related to the underlying cancer.Post-hoc subgroup analyses indicate that positive treatment effects are limited to targeting tumours with higher levels of HER2 protein (IHC 2+/FISH+ or IHC 3+). The median overall survival for the high HER2 expressing group was 11.8 months versus 16 months, HR 0.65 (95 % CI 0.51-0.83) and the median progression free survival was 5.5 months versus 7.6 months, HR 0.64 (95 % CI 0.51-0.79) for FP versus FP + H, respectively. For overall survival, the HR was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.51-1.11) in the IHC 2+/FISH+ group and the HR was 0.58 (95 % CI 0.41-0.81) in the IHC 3+/FISH+ group.In an exploratory subgroup analysis performed in the TOGA (BO18255) trial there was no apparent benefit on overall survival with the addition of Herceptin in patients with ECOG PS 2 at baseline [HR 0.96 (95 % CI 0.51-1.79)], non measurable [HR 1.78 (95 % CI 0.87-3.66)] and locally advanced disease [HR 1.20 (95 % CI 0.29-4.97)]. Immunogenicity 903 breast cancer patients treated with Herceptin, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have been evaluated for antibody production. Human anti-trastuzumab antibodies were detected in one patient, who had no allergic manifestations.There are no immunogenicity data available for Herceptin in gastric cancer.Paediatric population The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Herceptin in all subsets of the paediatric population in Breast and Gastric cancer. See section 4.2 for information on paediatric use. | |