- 1. Name of the medicinal product
- 2. Qualitative and quantitative composition
- 3. Pharmaceutical form
- 4. Clinical particulars
- 4.1 Therapeutic indications
- 4.2 Posology and method of administration
- 4.3 Contraindications
- 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use
- 4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction
- 4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
- 4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines
- 4.8 Undesirable effects
- 4.9 Overdose
- 5. Pharmacological properties
- 5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties
- 5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties
- 5.3 Preclinical safety data
- 6. Pharmaceutical particulars
- 6.1 List of excipients
- 6.2 Incompatibilities
- 6.3 Shelf life
- 6.4 Special precautions for storage
- 6.5 Nature and contents of container
- 6.6 Special precautions for disposal and other handling
- 7. Marketing authorisation holder
- 8. Marketing authorisation number(s)
- 9. Date of first authorisation/renewal of the authorisation
- 10. Date of revision of the text
This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions.
Patients infected with HIV-1 without documented or clinically suspected resistance to the integrase classThe recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg (one tablet) orally once daily. Tivicay should be administered twice daily in this population when co-administered with some medicines (e.g. efavirenz, nevirapine, tipranavir/ritonavir, or rifampicin). Please refer to section 4.5.
Patients infected with HIV-1 with resistance to the integrase class (documented or clinically suspected)The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg (one tablet) twice daily. In the presence of documented resistance that includes Q148 + ≥2 secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, L74I, modelling suggests that an increased dose may be considered for patients with limited treatment options (less than 2 active agents) due to advanced multi class resistance (see section 5.2). The decision to use dolutegravir for such patients should be informed by the integrase resistance pattern (see section 5.1).Co-administration of Tivicay with some medicines should be avoided in this population (e.g. efavirenz, nevirapine, tipranavir/ritonavir, or rifampicin). Please refer to section 4.4 and 4.5.
Missed dosesIf the patient misses a dose of Tivicay, the patient should take Tivicay as soon as possible, providing the next dose is not due within 4 hours. If the next dose is due within 4 hours, the patient should not take the missed dose and simply resume the usual dosing schedule.
Adolescents aged 12 and aboveIn adolescents (aged from 12 to 17 years and weighing at least 40 kg) infected with HIV-1 without resistance to the integrase class, the recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg once daily.
ElderlyThere are limited data available on the use of dolutegravir in patients aged 65 years and over. There is no evidence that elderly patients require a different dose than younger adult patients (see section 5.2).
Renal impairmentNo dosage adjustment is required in patients with mild, moderate or severe (CrCl <30 mL/min, not on dialysis) renal impairment. No data are available in subjects receiving dialysis although differences in pharmacokinetics are not expected in this population (see section 5.2).
Hepatic impairmentNo dosage adjustment is required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh grade A or B). No data are available in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh grade C); therefore dolutegravir should be used with caution in these patients (see section 5.2).
Paediatric populationThe safety and efficacy of Tivicay in children aged less than 12 years or weighing less than 40 kg has not yet been established. In the presence of integrase inhibitor resistance, there are insufficient data to recommend a dose for Tivicay in children and adolescents. Currently available data are described in section 4.8, 5.1 and 5.2, but no recommendation on a posology can be made.
Method of administrationOral use.Tivicay can be taken with or without food (see section 5.2). In the presence of integrase class resistance, Tivicay should preferably be taken with food to enhance exposure (particularly in patients with Q148 mutations) (see section 5.2).
Integrase class resistance of particular concernThe decision to use dolutegravir in the presence of integrase class resistance should take into account that the activity of dolutegravir is considerably compromised for viral strains harbouring Q148+≥2 secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, L74I (see section 5.1). To what extent dolutegravir provides added efficacy in the presence of such integrase class resistance is uncertain (see section 5.2).
Hypersensitivity reactionsHypersensitivity reactions have been reported with dolutegravir, and were characterized by rash, constitutional findings, and sometimes, organ dysfunction, including severe liver reactions. Dolutegravir and other suspect agents should be discontinued immediately if signs or symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions develop (including, but not limited to, severe rash or rash accompanied by raised liver enzymes, fever, general malaise, fatigue, muscle or joint aches, blisters, oral lesions, conjunctivitis, facial oedema, eosinophilia, angioedema). Clinical status including liver aminotransferases and bilirubin should be monitored. Delay in stopping treatment with dolutegravir or other suspect active substances after the onset of hypersensitivity may result in a life-threatening allergic reaction.
Immune Reactivation SyndromeIn HIV-infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of institution of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic pathogens may arise and cause serious clinical conditions, or aggravation of symptoms. Typically, such reactions have been observed within the first few weeks or months of initiation of CART. Relevant examples are cytomegalovirus retinitis, generalised and/or focal mycobacterial infections, and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Any inflammatory symptoms should be evaluated and treatment instituted when necessary. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reconstitution, however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment. Liver biochemistry elevations consistent with immune reconstitution syndrome were observed in some hepatitis B and/or C co-infected patients at the start of dolutegravir therapy. Monitoring of liver biochemistries is recommended in patients with hepatitis B and/or C co-infection. Particular diligence should be applied in initiating or maintaining effective hepatitis B therapy (referring to treatment guidelines) when starting dolutegravir-based therapy in hepatitis B co-infected patients (see section 4.8).
Opportunistic infectionsPatients should be advised that dolutegravir or any other antiretroviral therapy does not cure HIV infection and that they may still develop opportunistic infections and other complications of HIV infection. Therefore, patients should remain under close clinical observation by physicians experienced in the treatment of these associated HIV diseases.
Drug interactionsFactors that decrease dolutegravir exposure should be avoided in the presence of integrase class resistance. This includes co-administration with medicinal products that reduce dolutegravir exposure (e.g. magnesium/ aluminium-containing antacid, iron and calcium supplements, multivitamins and inducing agents, etravirine (without boosted protease inhibitors), tipranavir/ritonavir, rifampicin, St. John's wort and certain anti-epileptic drugs) (see section 4.5).Dolutegravir increased metformin concentrations. A dose adjustment of metformin should be considered when starting and stopping coadministration of dolutegravir with metformin, to maintain glycaemic control (see section 4.5). Metformin is eliminated renally and therefore it is of importance to monitor renal function when co-treated with dolutegravir. This combination may increase the risk for lactic acidosis in patients with moderate renal impairment (stage 3a creatinine clearance [CrCl] 45 59 mL/min) and a cautious approach is recommended. Reduction of the metformin dose should be highly considered.
OsteonecrosisAlthough the aetiology is considered to be multifactorial (including corticosteroid use, biphosphonates, alcohol consumption, severe immunosuppression, higher body mass index), cases of osteonecrosis have been reported in patients with advanced HIV-disease and/or long-term exposure to CART. Patients should be advised to seek medical advice if they experience joint aches and pain, joint stiffness or difficulty in movement.
Effect of other agents on the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravirAll factors that decrease dolutegravir exposure should be avoided in the presence of integrase class resistance.Dolutegravir is eliminated mainly through metabolism by UGT1A1. Dolutegravir is also a substrate of UGT1A3, UGT1A9, CYP3A4, Pgp, and BCRP; therefore medicinal products that induce those enzymes may decrease dolutegravir plasma concentration and reduce the therapeutic effect of dolutegravir (see Table 1). Co-administration of dolutegravir and other medicinal products that inhibit these enzymes may increase dolutegravir plasma concentration (see Table 1).The absorption of dolutegravir is reduced by certain anti-acid agents (see Table 1).
Effect of dolutegravir on the pharmacokinetics of other agentsIn vivo, dolutegravir did not have an effect on midazolam, a CYP3A4 probe. Based on in vivo and/or in vitro data, dolutegravir is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products that are substrates of any major enzyme or transporter such as CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and P-gp (for more information see section 5.2). In vitro, dolutegravir inhibited the renal organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter (MATE) 1. In vivo, a 10-14% decrease of creatinine clearance (secretory fraction is dependent on OCT2 and MATE-1 transport) was observed in patients. In vivo, dolutegravir may increase plasma concentrations of medicinal products in which excretion is dependent upon OCT2 or MATE-1 (e.g. dofetilide, metformin) (see Table 1 and section 4.3).In vitro, dolutegravir inhibited the renal uptake transporters, organic anion transporters (OAT1) and OAT3. Based on the lack of effect on the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the OAT substrate tenofovir, in vivo inhibition of OAT1 is unlikely. Inhibition of OAT3 has not been studied in vivo. Dolutegravir may increase plasma concentrations of medical products in which excretion is dependent upon OAT3. Established and theoretical interactions with selected antiretrovirals and non-antiretroviral medicinal products are listed in Table 1.Interaction tableInteractions between dolutegravir and co-administered medicinal products are listed in Table 1 (increase is indicated as ↑, decrease as ↓, no change as ↔, area under the concentration versus time curve as AUC, maximum observed concentration as Cmax, concentration at end of dosing interval as C).
Table 1: Drug Interactions
|Medicinal products by therapeutic areas||Interaction Geometric mean change (%)||Recommendations concerning co-administration|
|HIV-1 Antiviral Agents|
|Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors|
|Etravirine without boosted protease inhibitors||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 71% Cmax ↓ 52% C ↓ 88% Etravirine ↔ (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||Etravirine without boosted protease inhibitors decreased plasma dolutegravir concentration. The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with etravirine without boosted protease inhibitors. Dolutegravir should not be used with etravirine without co-administration of atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir in INI-resistant patients (see further below in table).|
|Lopinavir/ritonavir + etravirine||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↑ 11% Cmax ↑ 7% C ↑ 28% LPV ↔ RTV ↔||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Darunavir/ritonavir + etravirine||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 25% Cmax ↓ 12% C ↓ 36% DRV ↔ RTV ↔||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Efavirenz||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 57% Cmax ↓ 39% C ↓ 75%Efavirenz ↔ (historical controls) (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with efavirenz. In the presence of integrase class resistance alternative combinations that do not include efavirenz should be considered (see section 4.4).|
|Nevirapine||Dolutegravir ↓ (Not studied, a similar reduction in exposure as observed with efavirenz is expected, due to induction)||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with nevirapine. In the presence of integrase class resistance alternative combinations that do not include nevirapine should be considered (see section 4.4).|
|Rilpivirine||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↑ 12% Cmax ↑ 13% C ↑ 22% Rilpivirine ↔||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors|
|Tenofovir||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↑ 1% Cmax ↓ 3% C ↓ 8% Tenofovir ↔||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Atazanavir||Dolutegravir ↑ AUC ↑ 91% Cmax ↑ 50% C ↑ 180% Atazanavir ↔ (historical controls) (inhibition of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||No dose adjustment is necessary. Tivicay should not be dosed higher than 50 mg twice daily in combination with atazanavir (see section 5.2) due to lack of data|
|Atazanavir/ritonavir||Dolutegravir ↑ AUC ↑ 62% Cmax ↑ 34% C ↑ 121% Atazanavir ↔ Ritonavir ↔(inhibition of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||No dose adjustment is necessary. Tivicay should not be dosed higher than 50 mg twice daily in combination with atazanavir (see section 5.2) due to lack of data.|
|Tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV+RTV)||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 59% Cmax ↓ 47% C ↓ 76% (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with tipranavir/ritonavir the absence of integrase class resistance. In the presence of integrase class resistance this combination should be avoided (see section 4.4).|
|Fosamprenavir/ ritonavir (FPV+RTV)||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 35% Cmax ↓ 24% C ↓ 49% (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||No dose adjustment is necessary in the absence of integrase class resistance. In the presence of integrase class resistance alternative combinations that do not include fosamprenavir/ritonavir should be considered.|
|Nelfinavir||Dolutegravir ↔ (Not studied)||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Darunavir/ritonavir||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 22% Cmax ↓ 11% C24 ↓ 38% (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Lopinavir/ritonavir||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↓ 4% Cmax ↔ 0% C24 ↓ 6%||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Other Antiviral agents|
|Telaprevir||Dolutegravir ↑ AUC ↑ 25% Cmax ↑ 19% C ↑ 37% Telaprevir ↔(historical controls) (inhibition of CYP3A enzyme)||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Boceprevir||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↑ 7% Cmax ↑ 5% C ↑ 8% Boceprevir ↔(historical controls)||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Daclatasvir||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↑ 33% Cmax ↑ 29% C ↑ 45% Daclatasvir ↔||Daclatasvir did not change dolutegravir plasma concentration to a clinically relevant extent. Dolutegravir did not change daclatasvir plasma concentration. No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Dofetilide||Dofetilide ↑(Not studied, potential increase via inhibition of OCT2 transporter)||Dolutegravir and dofetilide co-administration is contraindicated due to potential life-threatening toxicity caused by high dofetilide concentration (see section 4.3).|
|Carbamazepine||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 49% Cmax ↓ 33% C ↓ 73%||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with carbamazepine. Alternatives to carbamazepine should be used where possible for INI resistant patients.|
|Oxcarbazepine Phenytoin Phenobarbital||Dolutegravir ↓(Not studied, decrease expected due to induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes, a similar reduction in exposure as observed with carbamazepine is expected)||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with these metabolic inducers. Alternative combinations that do not include these metabolic inducers should be used where possible in INI-resistant patients.|
|Azole anti-fungal agents|
|Ketoconazole Fluconazole Itraconazole Posaconazole Voriconazole||Dolutegravir ↔(Not studied)||No dose adjustment is necessary. Based on data from other CYP3A4 inhibitors, a marked increase is not expected.|
|St. John's wort||Dolutegravir ↓(Not studied, decrease expected due to induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes, a similar reduction in exposure as observed with carbamazepine is expected)||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with St. John's wort. Alternative combinations that do not include St. John's wort should be used where possible in INI-resistant patients.|
|Antacids and supplements|
|Magnesium/ aluminium-containing antacid||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 74% Cmax ↓ 72% (Complex binding to polyvalent ions)||Magnesium/ aluminium-containing antacid should be taken well separated in time from the administration of dolutegravir (minimum 2 hours after or 6 hours before).|
|Calcium supplements||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 39% Cmax ↓ 37% C24 ↓ 39% (Complex binding to polyvalent ions)||Calcium supplements, iron supplements or multivitamins should be taken well separated in time from the administration of dolutegravir (minimum 2 hours after or 6 hours before).|
|Iron supplements||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 54% Cmax ↓ 57% C24 ↓ 56% (Complex binding to polyvalent ions)|
|Multivitamin||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 33% Cmax ↓ 35% C24 ↓ 32% (Complex binding to polyvalent ions)|
|Prednisone||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↑ 11% Cmax ↑ 6% C ↑ 17%||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Metformin||Metformin ↑When co-administered with dolutegravir 50mg once daily: Metformin AUC ↑ 79% Cmax ↑ 66% When co-administered with dolutegravir 50mg twice daily: Metformin AUC ↑ 145 % Cmax ↑ 111%||A dose adjustment of metformin should be considered when starting and stopping coadministration of dolutegravir with metformin, to maintain glycaemic control. In patients with moderate renal impairment a dose adjustment of metformin should be considered when coadministered with dolutegravir, because of the increased risk for lactic acidosis in patients with moderate renal impairment due to increased metformin concentration (section 4.4).|
|Rifampicin||Dolutegravir ↓ AUC ↓ 54% Cmax ↓ 43% C ↓72% (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||The recommended dose of dolutegravir is 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with rifampicin in the absence of integrase class resistance. In the presence of integrase class resistance this combination should be avoided (see section 4.4).|
|Rifabutin||Dolutegravir ↔ AUC ↓ 5% Cmax ↑ 16% C ↓ 30% (induction of UGT1A1 and CYP3A enzymes)||No dose adjustment is necessary.|
|Ethinyl estradiol (EE) and Norelgestromin (NGMN)||Dolutegravir ↔EE ↔ AUC ↑ 3% Cmax ↓ 1%NGMN ↔ AUC ↓ 2% Cmax ↓ 11%||Dolutegravir had no pharmacodynamic effect on Luteinizing Hormone (LH), Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and progesterone. No dose adjustment of oral contraceptives is necessary when co-administered with dolutegravir.|
|Methadone||Dolutegravir ↔Methadone ↔ AUC ↓ 2% Cmax ↔ 0% C ↓ 1%||No dose adjustment is necessary of either agent.|
Paediatric populationInteraction studies have only been performed in adults.
PregnancyThere are limited amount of data from the use of dolutegravir in pregnant women. The effect of dolutegravir on human pregnancy is unknown. In reproductive toxicity studies in animals, dolutegravir was shown to cross the placenta. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity (see section 5.3). Dolutegravir should be used during pregnancy only if the expected benefit justifies the potential risk to the foetus.
Breast-feedingIt is unknown whether dolutegravir is excreted in human milk. Available toxicological data in animals has shown excretion of dolutegravir in milk. In lactating rats that received a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg at 10 days postpartum, dolutegravir was detected in milk at concentrations typically higher than blood. It is recommended that HIV infected women do not breast-feed their infants under any circumstances in order to avoid transmission of HIV.
FertilityThere are no data on the effects of dolutegravir on human male or female fertility. Animal studies indicate no effects of dolutegravir on male or female fertility (see section 5.3).
Summary of the safety profileThe safety profile is based on pooled data from Phase IIb and Phase III clinical studies in 1222 previously untreated patients, 357 previously treated patients unexposed to integrase inhibitors and 264 patients with prior treatment failure that included an integrase inhibitor (including integrase class resistance). The most severe adverse reaction, seen in an individual patient, was a hypersensitivity reaction that included rash and severe liver effects (see section 4.4). The most commonly seen treatment emergent adverse reactions were nausea (13%), diarrhoea (18%) and headache (13%).The safety profile was similar across the different treatment populations mentioned above.
Tabulated list of adverse reactionsThe adverse reactions considered at least possibly related to dolutegravir are listed by body system, organ class and absolute frequency. Frequencies are defined as very common (≥1/10), common (≥1/100 to <1/10), uncommon (≥1/1,000 to <1/100), rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000), very rare (<1/10,000).
Table 2 Adverse Reactions
|Immune system disorders||Uncommon||Hypersensitivity (see section 4.4)|
|Uncommon||Immune Reconstitution Syndrome (see section 4.4)**|
|Uncommon||Suicidal ideation or suicide attempt (particularly in patients with a pre-existing history of depression or psychiatric illness)|
|Nervous system disorders||Very common||Headache|
|Gastrointestinal disorders||Very common||Nausea|
|Common||Upper abdominal pain|
|Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders||Common||Rash|
|General disorders and administration site conditions||Common||Fatigue|
|Investigations||Common||Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations|
|Common||Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations|
Description of selected adverse reactions
Changes in laboratory biochemistriesIncreases in serum creatinine occurred within the first week of treatment with dolutegravir and remained stable through 48 weeks. A mean change from baseline of 9.96 μmol/L was observed after 48 weeks of treatment. Creatinine increases were comparable by various background regimens. These changes are not considered to be clinically relevant since they do not reflect a change in glomerular filtration rate.
Co-infection with Hepatitis B or CIn Phase III studies patients with hepatitis B and/or C co-infection were permitted to enrol provided that baseline liver chemistry tests did not exceed 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Overall, the safety profile in patients co-infected with hepatitis B and/or C was similar to that observed in patients without hepatitis B or C co-infection, although the rates of AST and ALT abnormalities were higher in the subgroup with hepatitis B and/or C co-infection for all treatment groups. Liver chemistry elevations consistent with immune reconstitution syndrome were observed in some subjects with hepatitis B and/or C co-infection at the start of dolutegravir therapy, particularly in those whose anti-hepatitis B therapy was withdrawn (see section 4.4).
Immune response syndromeIn HIV-infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic infections may arise. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease) have also been reported; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment (see section 4.4).
Paediatric populationBased on limited available data in adolescents (12 to less than 18 years of age and weighing at least 40 kg), there were no additional types of adverse reactions beyond those observed in the adult population.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactionsReporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via:
United Kingdomthe Yellow Card Scheme at: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard
IrelandHPRA Pharmacovigilance, Earlsfort Terrace, IRL - Dublin 2; Tel: +353 1 6764971; Fax: +353 1 6762517. Website: www.hpra.ie; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mechanism of actionDolutegravir inhibits HIV integrase by binding to the integrase active site and blocking the strand transfer step of retroviral Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) integration which is essential for the HIV replication cycle.
Antiviral activity in cell cultureThe IC50 for dolutegravir in various labstrains using PBMC was 0.5 nM, and when using MT-4 cells it ranged from 0.7-2 nM. Similar IC50s were seen for clinical isolates without any major difference between subtypes; in a panel of 24 HIV-1 isolates of clades A, B, C, D, E, F and G and group O the mean IC50 value was 0.2 nM (range 0.02-2.14). The mean IC50 for 3 HIV-2 isolates was 0.18 nM (range 0.09-0.61).
Antiviral activity in combination with other antiviral agentsNo antagonistic effects in vitro were seen with dolutegravir and other antiretrovirals tested: stavudine, abacavir, efavirenz, nevirapine, lopinavir, amprenavir, enfuvirtide, maraviroc and raltegravir. In addition, no antagonistic effects were seen for dolutegravir and adefovir, and ribavirin had no apparent effect on dolutegravir activity.
Effect of human serumIn 100% human serum, the mean protein fold shift was 75 fold, resulting in protein adjusted IC90 of 0.064 ug/mL.
Resistance in vitroSerial passage is used to study resistance evolution in vitro. When using the lab-strain HIV-1 IIIB during passage over 112 days, mutations selected appeared slowly, with substitutions at positions S153Y and F, resulting in a maximal fold change in susceptibility of 4 (range 2-4). These mutations were not selected in patients treated with dolutegravir in the clinical studies. Using strain NL432, mutations E92Q (FC 3) and G193E (also FC 3) were selected. The E92Q mutation has been selected in patients with pre-existing raltegravir resistance who were then treated with dolutegravir (listed as a secondary mutation for dolutegravir). In further selection experiments using clinical isolates of subtype B, mutation R263K was seen in all five isolates (after 20 weeks and onwards). In subtype C (n=2) and A/G (n=2) isolates the integrase substitution R263K was selected in one isolate, and G118R in two isolates. R263K was reported from two ART experienced, INI naive individual patients with subtypes B and C in the clinical program, but without effects on dolutegravir susceptibility in vitro. G118R lowers the susceptibility to dolutegravir in site directed mutants (FC 10), but was not detected in patients receiving dolutegravir in the Phase III program. Primary mutations for raltegravir/elvitegravir (Q148H/R/K, N155H, Y143R/H/C, E92Q and T66I) do not affect the in vitro susceptibility of dolutegravir as single mutations. When mutations listed as secondary integrase inhibitor associated mutations (for raltegravir/elvitegravir) are added to these primary mutations in experiments with site directed mutants, dolutegravir susceptibility is still unchanged (FC <2 vs wild type virus), except in the case of Q148-mutations, where a FC of 5-10 or higher is seen with combinations of certain secondary mutations. The effect by the Q148-mutations (H/R/K) was also verified in passage experiments with site directed mutants. In serial passage with strain NL432, starting with site directed mutants harbouring N155H or E92Q, no further selection of resistance was seen (FC unchanged around 1). In contrast, starting with mutants harbouring mutation Q148H (FC 1), a variety of secondary mutations were seen with a consequent increase of FC to values >10. A clinically relevant phenotypic cut-off value (FC vs wild type virus) has not been determined; genotypic resistance was a better predictor for outcome.Seven hundred and five raltegravir resistant isolates from raltegravir experienced patients were analyzed for susceptibility to dolutegravir. Dolutegravir has a less than or equal to 10 FC against 94% of the 705 clinical isolates.
Resistance in vivoIn previously untreated patients receiving dolutegravir + 2 NRTIs in Phase IIb and Phase III, no development of resistance to the integrase class, or to the NRTI class was seen (n=1118 follow-up of 48-96 weeks). In patients with prior failed therapies, but naïve to the integrase class (SAILING study), integrase inhibitor substitutions were observed in 4/354 patients (follow-up 48 weeks) treated with dolutegravir, which was given in combination with an investigator selected background regimen (BR). Of these four, two subjects had a unique R263K integrase substitution, with a maximum FC of 1.93, one subject had a polymorphic V151V/I integrase substitution, with maximum FC of 0.92, and one subject had pre-existing integrase mutations and is assumed to have been integrase experienced or infected with integrase resistant virus by transmission. The R263K mutation was also selected in vitro (see above).In the presence of integrase class-resistance (VIKING-3 study) the following mutations were selected in 32 patients with protocol defined virological failure (PDVF) through Week 24 and with paired genotypes (all treated with dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily + optimized background agents): L74L/M (n=1), E92Q (n=2), T97A (n=9), E138K/A/T (n=8), G140S (n=2), Y143H (n=1), S147G (n=1), Q148H/K/R (n=4), and N155H (n=1) and E157E/Q (n=1). Treatment emergent integrase resistance typically appeared in patients with a history of the Q148-mutation (baseline or historic). Five further subjects experienced PDVF between weeks 24 and 48, and 2 of these 5 had treatment emergent mutations. Treatment-emergent mutations or mixtures of mutations observed were L74I (n=1), N155H (n=2).The VIKING-4 study examined dolutegravir (plus optimized background therapy) in subjects with primary genotypic resistance to INIs at Screening in 30 subjects. Treatment-emergent mutations observed were consistent with those observed in the VIKING-3 study.
Effects on electrocardiogramNo relevant effects were seen on the QTc interval, with doses exceeding the clinical dose by approximately three fold.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Previously untreated patientsThe efficacy of dolutegravir in HIV-infected, therapy naïve subjects is based on the analyses of 96-week data from two randomized, international, double-blind, active-controlled trials, SPRING-2 (ING113086) and SINGLE (ING114467). This is supported by 96 week data from an open-label, randomized and active-controlled study FLAMINGO (ING114915) and additional data from the open-label phase of SINGLE to 144 weeks.In SPRING-2, 822 adults were randomized and received at least one dose of either dolutegravir 50 mg once daily or raltegravir (RAL) 400 mg twice daily, both administered with either ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC. At baseline, median patient age was 36 years, 14% were female, 15% non-white, 11% had hepatitis B and/or C co-infection and 2% were CDC Class C, these characteristics were similar between treatment groups.In SINGLE, 833 subjects were randomized and received at least one dose of either dolutegravir 50 mg once daily with fixed-dose abacavir-lamivudine (DTG + ABC/3TC) or fixed-dose efavirenz-tenofovir-emtricitabine (EFV/TDF/FTC). At baseline, median patient age was 35 years, 16% were female, 32% non-white, 7% had hepatitis C co-infection and 4% were CDC Class C, these characteristics were similar between treatment groups. The primary endpoint and other week 48 outcomes (including outcomes by key baseline covariates) for SPRING-2 and SINGLE are shown in Table 3.Table 3 Response in SPRING-2 and SINGLE at 48 Weeks (Snapshot algorithm, <50 copies/mL)
|Dolutegravir 50 mg Once Daily + 2 NRTIN=411||RAL 400 mg Twice Daily + 2 NRTIN=411||Dolutegravir 50 mg + ABC/3TC Once DailyN=414||EFV/TDF/FTC Once DailyN=419|
|HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL||88%||85%||88%||81%|
|Treatment Difference*||2.5% (95% CI: -2.2%, 7.1%)||7.4% (95% CI: 2.5%, 12.3%)|
|HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by baseline covariates|
|Baseline Viral Load (cps/mL)|
|≤100,000||267 / 297 (90%)||264 / 295 (89%)||253 / 280 (90%)||238 / 288 (83%)|
|>100,000||94 / 114 (82%)||87 / 116 (75%)||111 / 134 (83%)||100 / 131 (76%)|
|Baseline CD4+ (cells/ mm3)|
|<200||43 / 55 (78%)||34 / 50 (68%)||45 / 57 (79%)||48 / 62 (77%)|
|200 to <350||128 / 144 (89%)||118 / 139 (85%)||143 / 163 (88%)||126 / 159 (79%)|
|≥350||190 / 212 (90%)||199 / 222 (90%)||176 / 194 (91%)||164 / 198 (83%)|
|ABC/3TC||145 / 169 (86%)||142 / 164 (87%)||N/A||N/A|
|TDF/FTC||216 / 242 (89%)||209 / 247 (85%)||N/A||N/A|
|Male||308 / 348 (89%)||305 / 355 (86%)||307 / 347 (88%)||291 / 356 (82%)|
|Female||53 / 63 (84%)||46 / 56 (82%)||57 / 67 (85%)||47 / 63 (75%)|
|White||306 / 346 (88%)||301 / 352 (86%)||255 / 284 (90%)||238 /285 (84%)|
|African-America/African Heritage/Other||55 / 65 (85%)||50 / 59 (85%)||109 / 130 (84%)||99 / 133 (74%)|
|<50||324/370 (88%)||312/365 (85%)||319/361 (88%)||302/375 (81%)|
|≥50||37/41 (90%)||39/46 (85%)||45/53 (85%)||36/44 (82%)|
|Median CD4 change from baseline||230||230||246||187|
|* Adjusted for baseline stratification factors. Includes subjects who changed BR to new class or changed BR not permitted per protocol or due to lack of efficacy prior to Week 48 (for SPRING-2 only), subjects who discontinued prior to Week 48 for lack or loss of efficacy and subjects who are ≥50 copies in the 48 week window. Adjusted mean treatment difference was statistically significant (p<0.001)|
Treatment emergent resistance in previously untreated patients failing therapyThrough 96 weeks in SPRING-2 and FLAMINGO and 144 weeks in SINGLE, no cases of treatment emergent primary resistance to the integrase- or NRTI-class were seen in the dolutegravir-containing arms. For the comparator arms, the same lack of treatment emergent resistance was also the case for patients treated with darunavir/r in FLAMINGO. In SPRING-2, four patients in the RAL-arm failed with major NRTI mutations and one with raltegravir resistance; in SINGLE, six patients in the EFV/TDF/FTC-arm failed with mutations associated with NNRTI resistance, and one developed a major NRTI mutation.
Patients with prior treatment failure, but not exposed to the integrase classIn the international multicentre, double-blind SAILING study (ING111762), 719 HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced adults were randomized and received either dolutegravir 50 mg once daily or raltegravir 400 mg twice daily with investigator selected background regimen consisting of up to 2 agents (including at least one fully active agent). At baseline, median patient age was 43 years, 32% were female, 50% non-white, 16% had hepatitis B and/or C co-infection, and 46% were CDC Class C. All patients had at least two class ART resistance, and 49% of subjects had at least 3-class ART resistance at baseline. Week 48 outcomes (including outcomes by key baseline covariates) for SAILING are shown in Table 4.Table 4 Response in SAILING at 48 Weeks (Snapshot algorithm, <50 copies/mL)
|Dolutegravir 50 mg Once Daily + BRN=354§||RAL 400 mg Twice Daily + BRN=361§|
|HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL||71%||64%|
|Adjusted treatment difference||7.4% (95% CI: 0.7%, 14.2%)|
|HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by baseline covariates|
|Baseline Viral Load (copies/mL)|
|≤50,000 copies/mL||186 / 249 (75%)||180 / 254 (71%)|
|>50,000 copies/mL||65 / 105 (62%)||50 / 107 (47%)|
|Baseline CD4+ (cells/ mm3)|
|<50||33 / 62 (53%)||30 / 59 (51%)|
|50 to <200||77 / 111 (69%)||76 / 125 (61%)|
|200 to <350||64 / 82 (78%)||53 / 79 (67%)|
|≥350||77 / 99 (78%)||71 / 98 (72%)|
|Genotypic Susceptibility Score* <2||155 / 216 (72%)||129 / 192 (67%)|
|Genotypic Susceptibility Score* =2||96 / 138 (70%)||101 / 169 (60%)|
|Use of DRV in background regimen|
|No DRV use||143 / 214 (67%)||126 / 209 (60%)|
|DRV use with primary PI mutations||58 / 68 (85%)||50 / 75 (67%)|
|DRV use without primary PI mutations||50 / 72 (69%)||54 / 77 (70%)|
|Male||172 / 247 (70%)||156 / 238 (66%)|
|Female||79 / 107 (74%)||74 / 123 (60%)|
|White||133 / 178 (75%)||125 / 175 (71%)|
|African-America/African Heritage/Other||118 / 175 (67%)||105 / 185 (57%)|
|<50||196 / 269 (73%)||172 / 277 (62%)|
|≥50||55 / 85 (65%)||58 / 84 (69%)|
|HIV sub type|
|Clade B||173 / 241 (72%)||159 / 246 (65%)|
|Clade C||34 / 55 (62%)||29 / 48 (60%)|
|Other||43 / 57 (75%)||42 / 67 (63%)|
|Mean increase in CD4+ T cell (cells/mm3)||162||153|
| Adjusted for baseline stratification factors. § 4 subjects were excluded from the efficacy analysis due to data integrity at one study site *The Genotypic Susceptibility Score (GSS) was defined as the total number of ARTs in BR to which a subject's viral isolate showed susceptibility at baseline based upon genotypic resistance tests. Other clades included: Complex (43), F1 (32), A1 (18), BF (14), all others <10.|
Patients with prior treatment failure that included an integrase inhibitor (and integrase class resistance)In the multicentre, open-label, single arm VIKING-3 study (ING112574), HIV-1 infected, ART-experienced adults with virological failure and current or historical evidence of raltegravir and/or elvitegravir resistance received Tivicay 50 mg twice daily with the current failing background regimen for 7 days but with optimised background ART from Day 8. The study enrolled 183 patients, 133 with INI-resistance at Screening and 50 with only historical evidence of resistance (and not at Screening). Raltegravir/elvitegravir was part of the current failing regimen in 98/183 patients (part of prior failing therapies in the others). At baseline, median patient age was 48 years, 23% were female, 29% non-white, and 20% had hepatitis B and/or C co-infection. Median baseline CD4+ was 140 cells/mm3, median duration of prior ART was 14 years, and 56% were CDC Class C. Subjects showed multiple class ART resistance at baseline: 79% had ≥2 NRTI, 75% ≥1 NNRTI, and 71% ≥2 PI major mutations; 62% had non-R5 virus. Mean change from baseline in HIV RNA at day 8 (primary endpoint) was -1.4log10 copies/mL (95% CI -1.3 -1.5log10, p<0.001). Response was associated with baseline INI mutation pathway, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5 Virologic response (day 8) after 7 days of functional monotherapy, in patients with RAL/EVG as part of current failing regimen, VIKING 3
|Baseline parameters||DTG 50 mg BIDN=88*|
|n||Mean (SD) Plasma HIV-1 RNA log10 c/mL||Median|
|Derived IN mutation group at Baseline with ongoing RAL/EVG|
|Primary mutation other than Q148H/K/Ra||48||-1.59 (0.47)||-1.64|
|Q148+1 secondary mutationb||26||-1.14 (0.61)||-1.08|
|Q148+≥2 secondary mutationsb||14||-0.75 (0.84)||-0.45|
|*Of 98 on RAL/EVG as part of current failing regimen, 88 had detectable primary INI mutations at Baseline and a Day 8 Plasma HIV-1 RNA outcome for evaluation a Included primary IN resistance mutations N155H, Y143C/H/R, T66A, E92Q b Secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, L74I.|
Table 6 Response by baseline Resistance, VIKING-3. VO Population (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL, Snapshot algorithm)
|Week 24 (N=161)||Week 48 (N=160)|
|Derived IN Mutation Group||OSS=0||OSS=1||OSS=2||OSS>2||Total||Total|
|No primary IN mutation1||2/2 (100%)||15/20 (75%)||19/21 (90%)||9/12 (75%)||45/55 (82%)||38/55 (69%)|
|Primary mutation other than Q148H/K/R2||2/2 (100%)||20/20 (100%)||21/27 (78%)||8/10 (80%)||51/59 (86%)||50/58 (86%)|
|Q148 + 1 secondary mutation3||2/2 (100%)||8/12 (67%)||10/17 (59%)||-||20/31 (65%)||19/31 (61%)|
|Q148 +≥2 secondary mutations 3||1/2 (50%)||2/11 (18%)||1/3 (33%)||-||4/16 (25%)||4/16 (25%)|
|1 Historical or phenotypic evidence of INI resistance only. 2 N155H, Y143C/H/R, T66A, E92Q 3 G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, L74I OSS: combined genotypic and phenotypic resistance (Monogram Biosciences Net Assessment)|
Paediatric populationIn a Phase I/II 48 week multicentre, open-label study (P1093/ING112578), the pharmacokinetic parameters, safety, tolerability and efficacy of Tivicay will be evaluated in combination regimens in HIV-1 infected adolescents.At 24 weeks, 16 of 23 (70%) adolescents (12 to less than 18 years of age) treated with Tivicay once daily (35 mg n=4, 50 mg n=19) plus OBR achieved viral load <50 copies/mL. Four subjects had virologic failure none of which had INI resistance at the time of virologic failure.The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Tivicay in paediatric patients aged 4 weeks to below 12 years with HIV infection (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
AbsorptionDolutegravir is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, with median Tmax at 2 to 3 hours post dose for tablet formulation. Food increased the extent and slowed the rate of absorption of dolutegravir. Bioavailability of dolutegravir depends on meal content: low, moderate, and high fat meals increased dolutegravir AUC(0-∞) by 33%, 41%, and 66%, increased Cmax by 46%, 52%, and 67%, prolonged Tmax to 3, 4, and 5 hours from 2 hours under fasted conditions, respectively. These increases may be clinically relevant in the presence of certain integrase class resistance. Therefore, Tivicay is recommended to be taken with food by patients infected with HIV with integrase class resistance (see section 4.2).The absolute bioavailability of dolutegravir has not been established.
DistributionDolutegravir is highly bound (>99%) to human plasma proteins based on in vitro data. The apparent volume of distribution is 17 L to 20 L in HIV-infected patients, based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Binding of dolutegravir to plasma proteins is independent of dolutegravir concentration. Total blood and plasma drug-related radioactivity concentration ratios averaged between 0.441 to 0.535, indicating minimal association of radioactivity with blood cellular components. The unbound fraction of dolutegravir in plasma is increased at low levels of serum albumin (<35 g/L) as seen in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Dolutegravir is present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In 13 treatment-naïve subjects on a stable dolutegravir plus abacavir/lamivudine regimen, dolutegravir concentration in CSF averaged 18 ng/mL (comparable to unbound plasma concentration, and above the IC50). Dolutegravir is present in the female and male genital tract. AUC in cervicovaginal fluid, cervical tissue and vaginal tissue were 6-10% of those in corresponding plasma at steady state. AUC in semen was 7% and 17% in rectal tissue of those in corresponding plasma at steady state.
BiotransformationDolutegravir is primarily metabolized through glucuronidation via UGT1A1 with a minor CYP3A component. Dolutegravir is the predominant circulating compound in plasma; renal elimination of unchanged active substance is low (< 1% of the dose). Fifty-three percent of total oral dose is excreted unchanged in the faeces. It is unknown if all or part of this is due to unabsorbed active substance or biliary excretion of the glucuronidate conjugate, which can be further degraded to form the parent compound in the gut lumen. Thirty-two percent of the total oral dose is excreted in the urine, represented by ether glucuronide of dolutegravir (18.9% of total dose), N-dealkylation metabolite (3.6% of total dose), and a metabolite formed by oxidation at the benzylic carbon (3.0% of total dose).
Drug interactionsIn vitro, dolutegravir demonstrated no direct, or weak inhibition (IC50>50 μM) of the enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 CYP3A, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT)1A1 or UGT2B7, or the transporters Pgp, BCRP, BSEP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, MATE2-K, MRP2 or MRP4. In vitro, dolutegravir did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6 or CYP3A4. Based on this data, dolutegravir is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products that are substrates of major enzymes or transporters (see section 4.5). In vitro, dolutegravir was not a substrate of human OATP 1B1, OATP 1B3 or OCT 1.
EliminationDolutegravir has a terminal half-life of ~14 hours. The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) is approximately 1L/hr in HIV-infected patients based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Linearity/non-linearityThe linearity of dolutegravir pharmacokinetics is dependent on dose and formulation. Following oral administration of tablet formulations, in general, dolutegravir exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics with less than dose-proportional increases in plasma exposure from 2 to 100 mg; however increase in dolutegravir exposure appears dose proportional from 25 mg to 50 mg for the tablet formulation. With 50 mg twice daily, the exposure over 24 hours was approximately doubled compared to 50 mg once daily.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship(s)In a randomized, dose-ranging trial, HIV-1infected subjects treated with dolutegravir monotherapy (ING111521) demonstrated rapid and dose-dependent antiviral activity, with mean decline in HIV-1 RNA of 2.5 log10 at day 11 for 50 mg dose. This antiviral response was maintained for 3 to 4 days after the last dose in the 50 mg group. PK/PD modelling using pooled data from clinical studies in integrase resistant patients suggest that increasing the dose from 50 mg twice daily to 100 mg twice daily may increase the effectiveness of dolutegravir in patients with integrase resistance and limited treatment options due to advanced multi class resistance. The proportion of responders (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) at week 24 was predicted to increase around 4-18% in the subjects with Q148 + ≥2 secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, L74I. Although these simulated results have not been confirmed in clinical trials, this high dose may be considered in the presence of the Q148 + ≥2 secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, L74I in patients with overall limited treatment options due to advanced multi class resistance. There is no clinical data on the safety or efficacy of the 100 mg twice daily dose. Co-treatment with atazanavir increases the exposure of dolutegravir markedly, and should not be used in combination with this high dose, since safety with the resulting dolutegravir exposure has not been established.
Special patient populations
ChildrenThe pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in 10 antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected adolescents (12 to <18 years of age) showed that Tivicay 50 mg once daily oral dosage resulted in dolutegravir exposure comparable to that observed in adults who received Tivicay 50 mg orally once daily.
ElderlyPopulation pharmacokinetic analysis of dolutegravir using data in HIV-1 infected adults showed that there was no clinically relevant effect of age on dolutegravir exposure.Pharmacokinetic data for dolutegravir in subjects >65 years of age are limited.
Renal impairmentRenal clearance of unchanged active substance is a minor pathway of elimination for dolutegravir. A study of the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir was performed in subjects with severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min) and matched healthy controls. The exposure to dolutegravir was decreased by approximately 40% in subjects with severe renal impairment. The mechanism for the decrease is unknown. No dosage adjustment is considered necessary for patients with renal impairment. Tivicay has not been studied in patients on dialysis.
Hepatic impairmentDolutegravir is primarily metabolized and eliminated by the liver. A single dose of 50 mg of dolutegravir was administered to 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) and to 8 matched healthy adult controls. While the total dolutegravir concentration in plasma was similar, a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in unbound exposure to dolutegravir was observed in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy controls. No dosage adjustment is considered necessary for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of Tivicay has not been studied.
Polymorphisms in drug metabolising enzymesThere is no evidence that common polymorphisms in drug metabolising enzymes alter dolutegravir pharmacokinetics to a clinically meaningful extent. In a meta-analysis using pharmacogenomics samples collected in clinical studies in healthy subjects, subjects with UGT1A1 (n=7) genotypes conferring poor dolutegravir metabolism had a 32% lower clearance of dolutegravir and 46% higher AUC compared with subjects with genotypes associated with normal metabolism via UGT1A1 (n=41).
GenderPopulation PK analyses using pooled pharmacokinetic data from Phase IIb and Phase III adult trials revealed no clinically relevant effect of gender on the exposure of dolutegravir.
RacePopulation PK analyses using pooled pharmacokinetic data from Phase IIb and Phase III adult trials revealed no clinically relevant effect of race on the exposure of dolutegravir. The pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir following single dose oral administration to Japanese subjects appear similar to observed parameters in Western (US) subjects.
Co-infection with Hepatitis B or CPopulation pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that hepatitis C virus co-infection had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure to dolutegravir. There are limited data on subjects with hepatitis B co-infection.
Tablet coreMannitol (E421)Microcrystalline cellulosePovidone K29/32Sodium starch glycolateSodium stearyl fumarate
Tablet coatingPolyvinyl alcohol-partially hydrolyzedTitanium dioxide (E171)MacrogolTalc Iron oxide yellow (E172)
ViiV Healthcare UK Ltd
Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex,, UB11 1BT, UK
+44 (0)208 990 4328
+44 (0)800 221 441