Pharmacotherapeutic group: Iron parenteral preparation, ATC code: B03AC
Monofer solution for injection is a colloid with strongly bound iron in spheroidal iron-carbohydrate particles.
The Monofer formulation contains iron in a complex that enables a controlled and slow release of bioavailable iron to iron-binding proteins with little risk of free iron.
Each particle consists of a matrix of iron(III) atoms and derisomaltose with an average molecular weight of 1000 Da and a narrow molecular weight distribution that is almost devoid of mono- and disaccharides.
INN name: Ferric derisomaltose (also known as iron(III) isomaltoside 1000).
The chelation of iron(III) with carbohydrate confers to the particles a structure resembling ferritin that is suggested to protect against the toxicity of unbound inorganic iron(III).
The iron is available in a non-ionic water-soluble form in an aqueous solution with pH between 5.0 and 7.0.
Evidence of a therapeutic response can be seen within a few days of administration of Monofer as an increase in the reticulocyte count. Due to the slow release of bioavailable iron serum ferritin peaks within days after an intravenous dose of Monofer and slowly returns to baseline after weeks.
Clinical efficacy
The efficacy of Monofer has been studied in the different therapeutic areas necessitating IV iron to correct iron deficiency. The main trials are described in more detail below.
Iron deficiency anaemia outside CKD
The P-Monofer-IDA-01 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority trial conducted in 511 patients with IDA randomised 2:1 to either Monofer or iron sucrose. 90 % of recruited patients were females. The dosing of Monofer was performed according to the Simplified Table as described in section 4.2 above and dosing of iron sucrose was calculated according to Ganzoni and administered as 200 mg infusions. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an Hb increase ≥2 g/dl from baseline at any time between weeks 1 to 5. A higher proportion of patients treated with Monofer compared to iron sucrose reached the primary endpoint, 68.5% vs 51.6%, respectively (FAS, p < 0.0001).
The P-Monofer-IDA-03 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre trial conducted in 1512 patients with IDA randomised 2:1 to either Monofer 1000 mg infused over 20 min (1009 subjects) or iron sucrose administered as 200 mg IV injections repeated up to a cumulative dose of 1000 mg (503 subjects). For the co-primary efficacy endpoint the change from baseline to week 8 in Hb was 2.49 g/dL in the Monofer fer group and 2.49 g/dL in the iron sucrose group. The estimated treatment difference [95 % CI] of Monofer - iron sucrose was 0.00 g/dL [-0.13;0.13]. Since the lower bound of the 95 % CI for the treatment difference was above -0.5 g/dL, non-inferiority was concluded. For the co-primary safety endpoint, a total of 3 treatment emergent serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions in 989 subjects (0.3 %) were adjudicated and confirmed by the adjudication committee in the Monofer group. The 95 % CI was [0.06 %;0.88 %] and as the upper bound was <3 %, the primary safety objective was considered met. In the iron sucrose group 2 treatment emergent serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions in 494 subjects (0.4 %) were adjudicated and confirmed by the adjudication committee. The risk difference between Monofer and iron sucrose was estimated to -0.10 % [95% CI: -0.91;0.71].
Nephrology
Non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease
The P-Monofer-CKD-02 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority trial conducted in 351 iron deficient non-dialysis dependent (NDD) chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, randomised 2:1 to either Monofer or oral iron sulphate administered as 100 mg elemental oral iron twice daily (200 mg daily) for 8 weeks. The patients in the Monofer group were randomised to infusion of 1000 mg single dose or bolus injections of 500 mg. Monofer was non-inferior to oral iron at week 4 (p<0.001) and also sustained a superior increase in Hb compared to oral iron from week 3 until the end of trial at week 8 (p=0.009 at week 3).
The P-Monofer-CKD-04 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre trial conducted in 1538 NDD-CKD patients with IDA randomised 2:1 to either Monofer 1000 mg infused over 20 min (1027 subjects) or iron sucrose administered as 200 mg IV injections repeated up to a cumulative dose of 1000 mg (511 subjects). For the co-primary efficacy endpoint, the change from baseline to week 8 in Hb was 1.22 g/dL in the Monofer group and 1.14 g/dL in the iron sucrose group. The estimated treatment difference was 0.08 g/dL [95% CI: -0.06;0.23]. Since the lower bound of the 95 % CI was above -0.5 g/dL, non-inferiority was concluded. For the co-primary safety endpoint, a total of 3 treatment emergent serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions in 1019 subjects (0.3 %) were adjudicated and confirmed by the adjudication committee in the Monofer group. The 95 % CI was [0.06 %;0.86 %] and as the upper bound was <3 %, the primary safety objective was considered met. No treatment emergent serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions were adjudicated and confirmed by the adjudication committee in the iron sucrose group. The risk difference between Monofer and iron sucrose was estimated to 0.29 % [95% CI: -0.19;0.77].
Haemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease
The P-Monofer-CKD-03 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority trial conducted in 351 haemodialysis patients randomised 2:1 to either Monofer or iron sucrose. Patients were randomised to either a single injection of 500 mg or 500 mg in split doses of Monofer or 500 mg iron sucrose in split doses. Both treatments showed similar efficacy with more than 82% of patients with Hb in the target range (non-inferiority, p=0.01).
Oncology
Cancer related anaemia
The P-Monofer-CIA-01 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority trial conducted in 350 cancer patients with anaemia randomised 2:1 to either Monofer or oral iron sulphate administered as 100 mg elemental oral iron twice daily (200 mg daily) for 12 weeks. The patients in the Monofer group were randomised to either an infusion of max 1000 mg single doses over 15 min or bolus injections of 500 mg over 2 min. The primary endpoint was change in Hb concentrations from baseline to week 4. Monofer was non-inferior to oral iron at week 4 (p<0.001) and a faster onset of the Hb response was observed with infusion of Monofer.
Gastroenterology
Inflammatory bowel disease
The P-Monofer-IBD-01 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority trial conducted in 338 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients randomised 2:1 to receive Monofer or oral iron sulphate administered as 100 mg elemental oral iron twice daily for 8 weeks (200 mg daily). The patients in the Monofer group were randomised to either an infusion of max 1000 mg single doses over 15 min or bolus injections of 500 mg over 2 min. A modified Ganzoni formula was used to calculate the IV iron need with a target Hb of only 13 g/dl resulting in an average iron dose of 884 mg elemental iron compared to oral iron administered as 200 mg oral iron sulfate once daily for 8 weeks (11,200 mg elemental oral iron in total). The primary endpoint was change in Hb concentrations from baseline to week 8. The patients had mild to moderate disease activity. Non-inferiority in change of Hb to week 8 could not be demonstrated. The dose-response relationship observed with Monofer suggests that the true iron demand of IV iron was underestimated by the modified Ganzoni formula. The Hb response (Hb increase ≥2 g/dl) rate was 93% for patients receiving > 1000 mg Monofer.
Women's health
Postpartum
The P-Monofer-PP-01 trial was an open-label, comparative, randomised, single-centre trial conducted in 200 healthy women with postpartum haemorrhage exceeding 700 mL and ≤1000 ml or PPH >1000 ml and Hb >6.5 g/dl measured >12 hours after delivery. The women were randomised 1:1 to receive either a single dose of 1200 mg Monofer or standard medical care. The primary endpoint was the aggregated change in physical fatigue within 12 weeks postpartum. The difference in aggregated change in physical fatigue score within 12 weeks postpartum was -0.97 (p=0.006), in favour of Monofer.