Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs for treatment of bone diseases, bisphosphonates, ATC code: M05BA08
Mechanism of action
Zoledronic acid belongs to the class of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates and acts primarily on bone. It is an inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption.
Pharmacodynamic effects
The selective action of bisphosphonates on bone is based on their high affinity for mineralised bone.
The main molecular target of zoledronic acid in the osteoclast is the enzyme farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase. The long duration of action of zoledronic acid is attributable to its high binding affinity for the active site of farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) synthase and its strong binding affinity to bone mineral.
Aclasta treatment rapidly reduced the rate of bone turnover from elevated post-menopausal levels with the nadir for resorption markers observed at 7 days, and for formation markers at 12 weeks. Thereafter bone markers stabilised within the pre-menopausal range. There was no progressive reduction of bone turnover markers with repeated annual dosing.
Clinical efficacy in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis (PFT)
The efficacy and safety of Aclasta 5 mg once a year for 3 consecutive years were demonstrated in post-menopausal women (7,736 women aged 65–89 years) with either: a femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) with a T-score ≤ –1.5 and at least two mild or one moderate existing vertebral fracture(s); or a femoral neck BMD T-score ≤ –2.5 with or without evidence of existing vertebral fracture(s). 85% of patients were bisphosphonate-naïve. Women who were evaluated for the incidence of vertebral fractures did not receive concomitant osteoporosis therapy, which was allowed for women contributing to the hip and all clinical fracture evaluations. Concomitant osteoporosis therapy included: calcitonin, raloxifene, tamoxifen, hormone replacement therapy, tibolone; but excluded other bisphosphonates. All women received 1,000 to 1,500 mg elemental calcium and 400 to 1,200 IU of vitamin D supplements daily.
Effect on morphometric vertebral fractures
Aclasta significantly decreased the incidence of one or more new vertebral fractures over three years and as early as the one year timepoint (see Table 2).
Table 2 Summary of vertebral fracture efficacy at 12, 24 and 36 months
| Outcome | Aclasta (%) | Placebo (%) | Absolute reduction in fracture incidence % (CI) | Relative reduction in fracture incidence % (CI) |
| At least one new vertebral fracture (0–1 year) | 1.5 | 3.7 | 2.2 (1.4, 3.1) | 60 (43, 72)** |
| At least one new vertebral fracture (0–2 year) | 2.2 | 7.7 | 5.5 (4.4, 6.6) | 71 (62, 78)** |
| At least one new vertebral fracture (0–3 year) | 3.3 | 10.9 | 7.6 (6.3, 9.0) | 70 (62, 76)** |
| ** p <0.0001 |
Aclasta-treated patients aged 75 years and older exhibited a 60% reduction in the risk of vertebral fractures compared to placebo patients (p<0.0001).
Effect on hip fractures
Aclasta demonstrated a consistent effect over 3 years, resulting in a 41% reduction in the risk of hip fractures (95% CI, 17% to 58%). The hip fracture event rate was 1.44% for Aclasta-treated patients compared to 2.49% for placebo-treated patients. The risk reduction was 51% in bisphosphonate-naïve patients and 42% in patients allowed to take concomitant osteoporosis therapy.
Effect on all clinical fractures
All clinical fractures were verified based on the radiographic and/or clinical evidence. A summary of results is presented in Table 3.
Table 3 Between treatment comparisons of the incidence of key clinical fracture variables over 3 years
| Outcome | Aclasta (N=3,875) event rate (%) | Placebo (N=3,861) event rate (%) | Absolute reduction in fracture event rate % (CI) | Relative risk reduction in fracture incidence % (CI) |
| Any clinical fracture (1) | 8.4 | 12.8 | 4.4 (3.0, 5.8) | 33 (23, 42)** |
| Clinical vertebral fracture (2) | 0.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 (1.5, 2.7) | 77 (63, 86)** |
| Non-vertebral fracture (1) | 8.0 | 10.7 | 2.7 (1.4, 4.0) | 25 (13, 36)* |
| *p-value <0.001, **p-value <0.0001 (1) Excluding finger, toe and facial fractures (2) Including clinical thoracic and clinical lumbar vertebral fractures |
Effect on bone mineral density (BMD)
Aclasta significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine, hip, and distal radius relative to treatment with placebo at all timepoints (6, 12, 24 and 36 months). Treatment with Aclasta resulted in a 6.7% increase in BMD at the lumbar spine, 6.0% at the total hip, 5.1% at the femoral neck, and 3.2% at the distal radius over 3 years as compared to placebo.
Bone histology
Bone biopsies were obtained from the iliac crest 1 year after the third annual dose in 152 post-menopausal patients with osteoporosis treated with Aclasta (N=82) or placebo (N=70). Histomorphometric analysis showed a 63% reduction in bone turnover. In patients treated with Aclasta, no osteomalacia, marrow fibrosis or woven bone formation was detected. Tetracycline label was detectable in all but one of 82 biopsies obtained from patients on Aclasta. Microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis demonstrated increased trabecular bone volume and preservation of trabecular bone architecture in patients treated with Aclasta compared to placebo.
Bone turnover markers
Bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), serum N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) and serum beta-C-telopeptides (b-CTx) were evaluated in subsets ranging from 517 to 1,246 patients at periodic intervals throughout the study. Treatment with a 5 mg annual dose of Aclasta significantly reduced BSAP by 30% relative to baseline at 12 months which was sustained at 28% below baseline levels at 36 months. P1NP was significantly reduced by 61% below baseline levels at 12 months and was sustained at 52% below baseline levels at 36 months. B-CTx was significantly reduced by 61% below baseline levels at 12 months and was sustained at 55% below baseline levels at 36 months. During this entire time period bone turnover markers were within the pre-menopausal range at the end of each year. Repeat dosing did not lead to further reduction of bone turnover markers.
Effect on height
In the three-year osteoporosis study standing height was measured annually using a stadiometer. The Aclasta group revealed approximately 2.5 mm less height loss compared to placebo (95% CI: 1.6 mm, 3.5 mm) [p<0.0001].
Days of disability
Aclasta significantly reduced the mean days of limited activity and the days of bed rest due to back pain by 17.9 days and 11.3 days respectively compared to placebo and significantly reduced the mean days of limited activity and the days of bed rest due to fractures by 2.9 days and 0.5 days respectively compared to placebo (all p<0.01).
Clinical efficacy in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients at increased risk of fracture after a recent hip fracture (RFT)
The incidence of clinical fractures, including vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, was evaluated in 2,127 men and women aged 50-95 years (mean age 74.5 years) with a recent (within 90 days) low-trauma hip fracture who were followed for an average of 2 years on study treatment (Aclasta). Approximately 42% of patients had a femoral neck BMD T-score below -2.5 and approximately 45% of the patients had a femoral neck BMD T-score above -2.5. Aclasta was administered once a year, until at least 211 patients in the study population had confirmed clinical fractures. Vitamin D levels were not routinely measured but a loading dose of vitamin D (50,000 to 125,000 IU orally or by intramuscular route) was given to the majority of patients 2 weeks prior to infusion. All participants received 1,000 to 1,500 mg of elemental calcium plus 800 to 1,200 IU of vitamin D supplementation per day. Ninety-five percent of the patients received their infusion two or more weeks after the hip fracture repair and the median timing of infusion was approximately six weeks after the hip fracture repair. The primary efficacy variable was the incidence of clinical fractures over the duration of the study.
Effect on all clinical fractures
The incidence rates of key clinical fracture variables are presented in Table 4.
Table 4 Between treatment comparisons of the incidence of key clinical fracture variables
| Outcome | Aclasta (N=1,065) event rate (%) | Placebo (N=1,062) event rate (%) | Absolute reduction in fracture event rate % (CI) | Relative risk reduction in fracture incidence % (CI) |
| Any clinical fracture (1) | 8.6 | 13.9 | 5.3 (2.3, 8.3) | 35 (16, 50)** |
| Clinical vertebral fracture (2) | 1.7 | 3.8 | 2.1 (0.5, 3.7) | 46 (8, 68)* |
| Non-vertebral fracture (1) | 7.6 | 10.7 | 3.1 (0.3, 5.9) | 27 (2, 45)* |
| *p-value <0.05, **p-value <0.01 (1) Excluding finger, toe and facial fractures (2) Including clinical thoracic and clinical lumbar vertebral fractures |
The study was not designed to measure significant differences in hip fracture, but a trend was seen towards reduction in new hip fractures.
All cause mortality was 10% (101 patients) in the Aclasta-treated group compared to 13% (141 patients) in the placebo group. This corresponds to a 28% reduction in the risk of all cause mortality (p=0.01).
The incidence of delayed hip fracture healing was comparable between Aclasta (34 [3.2%]) and placebo (29 [2.7%]).
Effect on bone mineral density (BMD)
In the HORIZON-RFT study Aclasta treatment significantly increased BMD at the total hip and femoral neck relative to treatment with placebo at all timepoints. Treatment with Aclasta resulted in an increase in BMD of 5.4% at the total hip and 4.3% at the femoral neck over 24 months as compared to placebo.
Clinical efficacy in men
In the HORIZON-RFT study 508 men were randomised into the study and 185 patients had BMD assessed at 24 months. At 24 months a similar significant increase of 3.6% in total hip BMD was observed for patients treated with Aclasta as compared to the effects observed in post-menopausal women in the HORIZON-PFT study. The study was not powered to show a reduction in clinical fractures in men; the incidence of clinical fractures was 7.5% in men treated with Aclasta versus 8.7% for placebo.
In another study in men (study CZOL446M2308) an annual infusion of Aclasta was non-inferior to weekly alendronate for the percentage change in lumbar spine BMD at month 24 relative to baseline.
Clinical efficacy in osteoporosis associated with long-term systemic glucocorticoid therapy
The efficacy and safety of Aclasta in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis associated with long-term systemic glucocorticoid therapy were assessed in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, stratified, active-controlled study of 833 men and women aged 18-85 years (mean age for men 56.4 years; for women 53.5 years) treated with > 7.5 mg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent). Patients were stratified with respect to duration of glucocorticoid use prior to randomisation (≤ 3 months versus > 3 months). The duration of the trial was one year. Patients were randomised to either Aclasta 5 mg single infusion or to oral risedronate 5 mg daily for one year. All participants received 1,000 mg elemental calcium plus 400 to 1,000 IU vitamin D supplementation per day. Efficacy was demonstrated if non-inferiority to risedronate was shown sequentially with respect to the percentage change in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months relative to baseline in the treatment and prevention subpopulations, respectively. The majority of patients continued to receive glucocorticoids for the one year duration of the trial.
Effect on bone mineral density (BMD)
The increases in BMD were significantly greater in the Aclasta-treated group at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at 12 months compared to risedronate (all p<0.03). In the subpopulation of patients receiving glucocorticoids for more than 3 months prior to randomisation, Aclasta increased lumbar spine BMD by 4.06% versus 2.71% for risedronate (mean difference: 1.36% ; p<0.001). In the subpopulation of patients that had received glucocorticoids for 3 months or less prior to randomisation, Aclasta increased lumbar spine BMD by 2.60% versus 0.64% for risedronate (mean difference: 1.96% ; p<0.001). The study was not powered to show a reduction in clinical fractures compared to risedronate. The incidence of fractures was 8 for Aclasta-treated patients versus 7 for risedronate-treated patients (p=0.8055).
Clinical efficacy in the treatment of Paget's disease of the bone
Aclasta was studied in male and female patients aged above 30 years with primarily mild to moderate Paget's disease of the bone (median serum alkaline phosphatase level 2.6–3.0 times the upper limit of the age-specific normal reference range at the time of study entry) confirmed by radiographic evidence.
The efficacy of one infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid versus daily doses of 30 mg risedronate for 2 months was demonstrated in two 6-month comparative trials. After 6 months, Aclasta showed 96% (169/176) and 89% (156/176) response and serum alkaline phosphatase (SAP) normalisation rates compared to 74% (127/171) and 58% (99/171) for risedronate (all p<0.001).
In the pooled results, a similar decrease in pain severity and pain interference scores relative to baseline were observed over 6 months for Aclasta and risedronate.
Patients who were classified as responders at the end of the 6 month core study were eligible to enter an extended follow-up period. Of the 153 Aclasta-treated patients and 115 risedronate-treated patients who entered an extended observation study, after a mean duration of follow-up of 3.8 years from time of dosing, the proportion of patients ending the Extended Observation Period due to the need for re-treatment (clinical judgment) was higher for risedronate (48 patients, or 41.7%) compared with zoledronic acid (11 patients, or 7.2%). The mean time of ending the Extended Observation Period due to the need for Paget's re-treatment from the initial dose was longer for zoledronic acid (7.7 years) than for risedronate (5.1 years).
Six patients who achieved therapeutic response 6 months after treatment with Aclasta and later experienced disease relapse during the extended follow-up period were re-treated with Aclasta after a mean time of 6.5 years from initial treatment to re-treatment. Five of the 6 patients had SAP within the normal range at month 6 (Last Observation Carried Forward, LOCF).
Bone histology was evaluated in 7 patients with Paget's disease 6 months after treatment with 5 mg zoledronic acid. Bone biopsy results showed bone of normal quality with no evidence of impaired bone remodelling and no evidence of mineralisation defects. These results were consistent with biochemical marker evidence of normalisation of bone turnover.
Paediatric population
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in paediatric patients aged 5 to 17 years treated with glucocorticoids who had decreased bone mineral density (lumbar spine BMD Z-score of -0.5 or less) and a low impact/fragility fracture. The patient population randomised in this study (ITT population) included patients with several sub-types of rheumatic conditions, inflammatory bowel disease, or Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The study was planned to include 92 patients, however only 34 patients were enrolled and randomised to receive either a twice-yearly 0.05 mg/kg (max. 5 mg) intravenous zoledronic acid infusion or placebo for one year. All patients were required to receive background therapy of vitamin D and calcium.
Zoledronic acid infusion resulted in an increase in the lumbar spine BMD Z-score least square (LS) mean difference of 0.41 at month 12 relative to baseline compared to placebo (95% CI: 0.02, 0.81; 18 and 16 patients, respectively). No effect on lumbar spine BMD Z-score was evident after 6 months of treatment. At month 12, a statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction in three bone turnover markers (P1NP, BSAP, NTX) was observed in the zoledronic acid group as compared to the placebo group. No statistically significant differences in total body bone mineral content were observed between patients treated with zoledronic acid versus placebo at 6 or 12 months. There is no clear evidence establishing a link between BMD changes and fracture prevention in children with growing skeletons.
No new vertebral fractures were observed in the zoledronic acid group as compared to two new fractures in the placebo group.
The most commonly reported adverse reactions after infusion of zoledronic acid were arthralgia (28%), pyrexia (22%), vomiting (22%), headache (22%), nausea (17%), myalgia (17%), pain (17%), diarrhoea (11%) and hypocalcaemia (11%).
More patients reported serious adverse events in the zoledronic acid group than in the placebo group (5 [27.8%] patients versus 1 [6.3%] patient).
In the 12-month open-label extension of the above-mentioned core study, no new clinical fractures were observed. However 2 patients, one in each of the core study treatment groups (zoledronic acid group: 1/9, 11.1% and placebo group: 1/14, 7.1%), had new morphometric vertebral fractures. There were no new safety findings.
Long-term safety data in this population cannot be established from these studies.
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Aclasta in all subsets of the paediatric population in Paget's disease of the bone, osteoporosis in post-menopausal women at an increased risk of fracture, osteoporosis in men at increased risk of fracture and prevention of clinical fractures after a hip fracture in men and women (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).