| The safety of Evorel® Sequi was evaluated in 165 subjects who participated in 2 clinical trials. Based on safety data from these clinical trials, the most commonly reported ( 5% incidence) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were (with % incidence): application site reaction (14.6%), headache (7.9%), breast pain (6.1%), and depression (5.5%). Including the above-mentioned ADRs, the following table displays ADRs that have been reported with the use of Evorel® Sequi from either clinical trial or post-marketing experiences, and additional ADRs that have been reported with the use of Evorel® (estradiol alone) from clinical trial data. The displayed frequency categories use the following convention:Very common (>1/10); common (>1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (>1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (>1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000); and not known (cannot be estimated from the available clinical trial data).Adverse Drug Reactions| Infections and Infestations | | Uncommon
| Candidiasis
| | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps) | | Uncommon
| Breast cancer, fibroadenoma of breast
| | Frequency not known
| Endometrial cancer
| | Immune System Disorders | | Uncommon | Hypersensitivity
| | Psychiatric disorders | | Common | Depression, Insomnia, Affect lability, Nervousness
| | Uncommon
| Libido decreased, Libido increased
| | Frequency not known
| Mood swings
| | Nervous system disorders | | Common | Migraine, Headache
| | Uncommon
| Dizziness, Paraesthesia, Disturbance in attention
| | Frequency not known | Cerebrovascular accident, Epilepsy*
| | Cardiac disorders | | Uncommon
| Palpitations
| | Vascular disorders | | Common
| Hypertension
| | Frequency not known
| Deep vein thrombosis, Thrombosis*
| | Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders | | Frequency not known
| Pulmonary embolism
| | Gastrointestinal disorders | | Common
| Abdominal pain, Gastrointestinal disorder, Diarrhoea*, Flatulence*, Nausea
| | Frequency not known | Abdominal distension | | Hepato-biliary disorders | | Frequency not known | Cholelithiasis
| | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | | Common | Pruritus, Rash erythematous
| | Frequency not known | Rash*, Stevens-Johnson syndrome | | Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders | | Common
| Arthralgia, Back pain, Myalgia*
| | Reproductive system and breast disorders | | Common
| Breast pain, Dysmenorrhoea, Menorrhagia, Menstrual disorder
| | Uncommon
| Breast enlargement, Endometrial hyperplasia, Metrorrhagia
| | Frequency not known
| Uterine fibroids
| | General disorders and administration site conditions | | Very Common | Application site erythema, Application site pruritus, Application site rash, Application site reaction
| | Common
| Pain*, Oedema, Malaise
| | Uncommon
| Generalised oedema*, Fatigue
| | Frequency not known
| Oedema peripheral*, Application site oedema*
| | Investigations | | Common
| Weight increased
| * Additional adverse drug reactions reported in clinical trials of Evorel®® (estradiol only).Breast Cancer According to evidence from a large number of epidemiological studies and one randomised placebo-controlled trial, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), the overall risk of breast cancer increases with increasing duration of HRT use in current or recent HRT users. For oestrogen-only HRT, estimates of relative risk (RR) from a reanalysis of original data from 51 epidemiological studies (in which >80% of HRT use was oestrogen-only HRT) and from the epidemiological Million Women Study (MWS) are similar at 1.35 (95% CI 1.21-1.49) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.21-1.40), respectively.For oestrogen plus progestogen combined HRT, several epidemiological studies have reported an overall higher risk for breast cancer than with oestrogens alone. The MWS reported that, compared to never users, the use of various types of oestrogen-progestogen combined HRT was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 2.00, 95%CI: 1.88-2.12) than use oestrogens alone (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21-1.40) or use of tibolone (RR =1.45; 95% CI 1.25-1.68). The WHI trial reported a risk estimate of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.01-1.54) after 5.6 years of use of oestrogen-progestogen combined HRT (CEE +MPA) in all users compared with placebo. The absolute risks calculated from the MWS and the WHI trial are presented below: The MWS has estimated, from the known average incidence of breast cancer in developed countries, that:For women not using HRT, about 32 in every 1000 are expected to have breast cancer diagnosed between the ages of 50 and 64 years. For 1000 current or recent users of HRT, the number of additional cases during the corresponding period will be| | For users of oestrogen-only replacement therapy | | | | between 0 and 3 (best estimate = 1.5) for 5 year's usebetween 3 and 7 (best estimate = 5) for 10 year's use. | | | For users of oestrogen plus progestogen combined HRT, | | | | between 5 and 7 (best estimate = 6) for 5 year's usebetween 18 and 20 (best estimate = 19) for 10 years' use. | The WHI trial estimated that after 5.6 years of follow-up of women between the ages of 50 and 79 years, an additional 8 cases of invasive breast cancer would be due to oestrogen-progestogen combined HRT (CEE + MPA) per 10 000 women years. According to calculations from the trial data, it is estimated that: | For 1000 women in the placebo group, | | | about 16 cases of invasive breast cancer would be diagnosed in 5 years. | | For 1000 women who used oestrogen + progestogen combined HRT (CEE + MPA) the number of additional cases would be | | | between 0 and 9 (best estimate = 4) for 5 year's use. | The number of additional cases of breast cancer in women who use HRT is broadly similar for women who start HRT irrespective of age at start of use (between the ages of 45-65) (see section 4.4). Endometrial Cancer In women with an intact uterus, the risk of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer increases with increasing duration of use of unopposed oestrogens. According to data from epidemiological studies, the best estimate of the risk is that for women not using HRT, about 5 in every 1000 are expected to have endometrial cancer diagnosed between the ages of 50 and 65. Depending on the duration of treatment and oestrogen dose, the reported increase in endometrial cancer risk among unopposed oestrogen users varies from 2- to 12-fold greater compared with non-users. Adding a progestogen to oestrogen-only therapy greatly reduces this increased risk.Other adverse events have been reported in association with oestrogen/progestogen treatment:Venous thrombo-embolism, ie deep leg or pelvic venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is more frequent among hormone HRT users than among non-users. For further information see Sections 4.3 Contraindications and 4.4 Special Warnings and Special Precautions for use.
| |