| Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antiviral for systemic use; antivirals for treatment of HIV infections, combinations. ATC code: J05AR08. Mechanism of action and pharmacodynamic effects Emtricitabine is a nucleoside analogue of cytidine. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is converted in vivo to tenofovir, a nucleoside monophosphate (nucleotide) analogue of adenosine monophosphate. Both emtricitabine and tenofovir have activity that is specific to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1 and HIV-2) and hepatitis B virus.Rilpivirine is a diarylpyrimidine NNRTI of HIV-1. Rilpivirine activity is mediated by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT).Emtricitabine and tenofovir are phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine triphosphate and tenofovir diphosphate, respectively. In vitro studies have shown that both emtricitabine and tenofovir can be fully phosphorylated when combined together in cells. Emtricitabine triphosphate and tenofovir diphosphate competitively inhibit HIV-1 RT, resulting in DNA chain termination.Both emtricitabine triphosphate and tenofovir diphosphate are weak inhibitors of mammalian DNA polymerases and there was no evidence of toxicity to mitochondria in vitro and in vivo. Rilpivirine does not inhibit the human cellular DNA polymerases α, β and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.Antiviral activity in vitroThe triple combination of emtricitabine, rilpivirine, and tenofovir demonstrated synergistic antiviral activity in cell culture.The antiviral activity of emtricitabine against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for emtricitabine were in the range of 0.0013 to 0.64 µM.Emtricitabine displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 subtype A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from 0.007 to 0.075 µM) and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 0.007 to 1.5 µM).In drug combination studies of emtricitabine with NRTIs (abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zidovudine), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz, nevirapine, and rilpivirine), and PIs (amprenavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir), additive to synergistic effects were observed.Rilpivirine exhibited activity against laboratory strains of wild-type HIV-1 in an acutely infected T-cell line with a median EC50 value for HIV-1/IIIB of 0.73 nM (0.27 ng/ml). Although rilpivirine demonstrated limited in vitro activity against HIV-2 with EC50 values ranging from 2,510 to 10,830 nM (920 to 3,970 ng/ml), treatment of HIV-2 infection with rilpivirine hydrochloride is not recommended in the absence of clinical data.Rilpivirine also demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M (subtype A, B, C, D, F, G, H) primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 0.07 to 1.01 nM (0.03 to 0.37 ng/ml) and group O primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 2.88 to 8.45 nM (1.06 to 3.10 ng/ml).The antiviral activity of tenofovir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes. The EC50 values for tenofovir were in the range of 0.04 to 8.5 µM.Tenofovir displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 subtype A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and O (EC50 values ranged from 0.5 to 2.2 µM) and strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 1.6 µM to 5.5 µM).In drug combination studies of tenofovir with NRTIs (abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, and zidovudine), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz, nevirapine, and rilpivirine), and PIs (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir), additive to synergistic effects were observed.Resistance In cell culture Resistance to emtricitabine or tenofovir has been seen in vitro and in some HIV-1 infected patients due to the development of the M184V or M184I substitution in RT with emtricitabine, or the K65R substitution in RT with tenofovir. No other pathways of resistance to emtricitabine or tenofovir have been identified. Emtricitabine-resistant viruses with the M184V/I mutation were cross-resistant to lamivudine, but retained sensitivity to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, zalcitabine and zidovudine. The K65R mutation can also be selected by abacavir or didanosine and results in reduced susceptibility to these agents plus to lamivudine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate should be avoided in patients with HIV-1 harbouring the K65R mutation. The K65R, M184V, and K65R+M184V mutants of HIV-1 remain fully susceptible to rilpivirine.Rilpivirine-resistant strains were selected in cell culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes as well as NNRTI resistant HIV-1. The most commonly observed resistance-associated mutations that emerged included L100I, K101E, V108I, E138K, V179F, Y181C, H221Y, F227C and M230I.In treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients In a pooled analysis for patients receiving emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + rilpivirine hydrochloride in the Phase III clinical studies C209 and C215, there were 62 virologic failure patients with resistance information available for 54 of those patients. The NNRTI resistance-associated mutations that developed most commonly in these patients were: V90I, K101E, E138K/Q, Y181C, V189I, and H221Y. However, in the studies, the presence of the mutations V90I and V189I at baseline did not affect the response. The mutations associated with NRTI resistance that developed in 3 or more patients were: K65R, K70E, M184V/I and K219E during the treatment period.Considering all of the available in vitro and in vivo data in treatment naïve subjects, the following resistance-associated mutations, when present at baseline, may affect the activity of Eviplera: K65R, K101E, K101P, E138A, E138G, E138K, E138Q, E138R, V179L, Y181C, Y181I, Y181V, M184I, M184V, H221Y, F227C, M230I and M230L. These resistance-associated mutations should only guide the use of Eviplera in the treatment-naïve population.These resistance-associated mutations were derived from in vivo data involving treatment-naïve subjects only and therefore cannot be used to predict the activity of Eviplera in subjects who have virologically failed an antiretroviral-containing regimen.As with other antiretroviral medicinal products resistance testing should guide the use of Eviplera (see section 4.4).Cross-resistance No significant cross-resistance has been demonstrated between rilpivirine-resistant HIV-1 variants and emtricitabine or tenofovir, or between emtricitabine- or tenofovir-resistant variants and rilpivirine.In cell culture Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine-resistant viruses with the M184V/I substitution were cross-resistant to lamivudine, but retained sensitivity to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zidovudine.Viruses harbouring substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to stavudine and zidovudine-thymidine analogue-associated mutations-TAMs (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, K219Q/E), or didanosine (L74V) remained sensitive to emtricitabine. HIV-1 containing the K103N substitution or other substitutions associated with resistance to rilpivirine and other NNRTIs was susceptible to emtricitabine.Rilpivirine hydrochloride: In a panel of 67 HIV-1 recombinant laboratory strains with one resistance-associated mutation at RT positions associated with NNRTI resistance, including the most commonly found K103N and Y181C, rilpivirine showed antiviral activity against 64 (96%) of these strains. The single resistance-associated mutations associated with a loss of susceptibility to rilpivirine were: K101P and Y181V/I.In the pooled analysis of all subjects in the Phase III clinical studies C209 and C215, 31 of the 62 patients with virologic failure on rilpivirine hydrochloride with phenotypic resistance data lost susceptibility to rilpivirine. Of these, 28 were resistant to etravirine, 27 to efavirenz, and 14 to nevirapine.Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: The K65R substitution can also be selected by abacavir or didanosine and results in reduced susceptibility to these agents plus lamivudine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir, but retains sensitivity to zidovudine.Patients with HIV-1 expressing three or more TAMs that included either the M41L or L210W reverse transcriptase substitution showed reduced response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.Virologic response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was not reduced in patients with HIV-1 that expressed the abacavir/emtricitabine/lamivudine resistance-associated M184V substitution.HIV-1 containing the K103N, Y181C, or rilpivirine-associated substitutions with resistance to NNRTIs were susceptible to tenofovir.In treatment-naïve patients In a pooled analysis for patients receiving emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + rilpivirine hydrochloride in the Phase III clinical studies C209 and C215, 54 patients with virologic failure had available phenotypic resistance data at virologic failure, 37 lost susceptibility to emtricitabine, 29 lost susceptibility to rilpivirine hydrochloride, and 2 lost susceptibility to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Among these subjects, 37 were resistant to lamivudine, 28 to etravirine, 26 to efavirenz, and 12 to nevirapine. Reduced susceptibility was observed to abacavir and/or didanosine in some cases.Effects on electrocardiogram The effect of rilpivirine hydrochloride at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily on the QTcF interval was evaluated in a randomised, placebo and active (moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily) controlled crossover study in 60 healthy adults, with 13 measurements over 24 hours at steady-state. Rilpivirine hydrochloride at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily is not associated with a clinically relevant effect on QTc.When supratherapeutic doses of 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily of rilpivirine hydrochloride were studied in healthy adults, the maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction were 10.7 (15.3) and 23.3 (28.4) ms, respectively. Steady-state administration of rilpivirine hydrochloride 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily resulted in a mean Cmax approximately 2.6-fold and 6.7-fold, respectively, higher than the mean steady-state Cmax observed with the recommended 25 mg once daily dose of rilpivirine hydrochloride.Clinical experience Treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients The efficacy of Eviplera is based on the analyses of 48 week data from two ongoing, randomised, double-blind, controlled studies C209 and C215. Antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients were enrolled (n = 1,368) who had a plasma HIV-1 RNA 5,000 copies/ml and were screened for susceptibility to N(t)RTI and for absence of specific NNRTI resistance-associated mutations. The studies are identical in design with the exception of the background regimen (BR). Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either rilpivirine hydrochloride 25 mg (n = 686) once daily or efavirenz 600 mg (n = 682) once daily in addition to a BR. In study C209 (n = 690), the BR was emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. In study C215 (n = 678), the BR consisted of 2 investigator selected N(t)RTIs: emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (60%, n = 406) or lamivudine/zidovudine (30%, n = 204) or abacavir plus lamivudine (10%, n = 68).In the pooled analysis for C209 and C215 of patients who received a background regimen of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between the rilpivirine and efavirenz arm. Table 3 displays selected demographic and baseline disease characteristics. Median plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5.0 and 5.0 log10 copies/ml and median CD4 count was 247 x 106 cells/l and 261 x 106 cells/l for patients randomised to rilpivirine and efavirenz arm, respectively.Table 3: Demographic and baseline characteristics of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adult subjects in studies C209 and C215 (pooled data for patients receiving rilpivirine hydrochloride or efavirenz in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) at week 48| | Rilpivirine + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumaraten = 550 | Efavirenz + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumaraten = 546 | | Demographic Characteristics | | Median age, years (min-max)
| 36.0
(18-78)
| 36.0
(19-69)
| | Sex
| | | | Male
| 78%
| 79%
| | Female
| 22%
| 21%
| | Ethnicity
| | | | White
| 64%
| 61%
| | Black/African American
| 25%
| 23%
| | Asian
| 10%
| 13%
| | Other
| 1%
| 1%
| | Not allowed to ask per local regulations
| 1%
| 1%
| | Baseline disease characteristics | | Median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (range) log10
copies/ml
| 5.0
(2-7)
| 5.0
(3-7)
| | Median baseline CD4+ cell count (range), x 106
cells/l
| 247
(1-888)
| 261
(1-857)
| | Percentage of subjects with hepatitis B/C virus co-infection
| 7.7%
| 8.1%
| A subgroup analysis of the virologic response (< 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml) at 48 weeks and virologic failure by baseline viral load (pooled data from the two Phase III clinical studies, C209 and C215, for patients receiving the emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate background regimen) is presented in Table 4.Table 4: Virologic outcomes of randomised treatment of studies C209 and C215 (pooled data for patients receiving rilpivirine hydrochloride or efavirenz in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) at week 48| | Rilpivirine + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate n = 550 | Efavirenz + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate n = 546 | | Overall Response
(HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml (TLOVRa))b | 83.5% (459/550)
(80.4, 86.6)
| 82.4% (450/546)
(79.2, 85.6)
| | By baseline viral load (copies/ml) | 100,000 | 89.6% (258/288)(86.1, 93.1) | 84.8% (217/256)(80.4, 89.2) | | > 100,000 | 76.7% (201/262)
(71.6, 81.8) | 80.3% (233/290)
(75.8, 84.9) | | By baseline CD4 count (cells/µl) | | < 50
| 51.7% (15/29)
(33.5, 69.9)
| 79.3% (23/29)
(64.6, 94.1)
| 50-200
| 80.9% (123/152)
(74.7, 87.2)
| 80.7% (109/135)
(74.1, 87.4)
| 200-350
| 86.3% (215/249)
(82.1, 90.6)
| 82.3% (205/249)
(77.6, 87.1)
| 350
| 89.1% (106/119)
(83.5, 94.7)
| 85.0% (113/133)
(78.9, 91.0)
| | Non-response | | Virologic Failure (all subjects)
| 9.5% (52/550)
| 4.2% (23/546)
| | By baseline viral load (copies/ml) | 100,000 | 4.2% (12/288) | 2.3% (6/256) | | > 100,000
| 15.3% (40/262)
| 5.9% (17/290)
| | Death
| 0
| 0.2% (1/546)
| | Discontinued due to adverse event (AE)
| 2.2% (12/550)
| 7.1% (39/546)
| | Discontinued for non-AE reason c | 4.9% (27/550)
| 6.0% (33/546)
| n = total number of subjects per treatment group.a ITT TLOVR = Intention to Treat Time to loss of virologic response.b The difference of response rate is 1% (95% confidence interval -3% to 6%) using normal approximation.c e.g. lost to follow up, non-compliance, withdrew consent.Emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + rilpivirine hydrochloride has been shown to be non-inferior in achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml compared to emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + efavirenz.The mean changes in CD4 cell count from baseline were +193 x 106 cells/l and + 182 x 106 cells/l for the rilpivirine and efavirenz treatment arms, respectively, of patients receiving the emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate background regimen.The resistance outcome for patients with protocol defined virological failure and phenotypic resistance are shown in Table 5:Table 5: Resistance outcomes from studies C209 and C215 (pooled data for patients receiving rilpivirine hydrochloride or efavirenz in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) at week 48| | Rilpivirine + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate n = 550 | Efavirenz + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate n = 546 | | Resistance to emtricitabine/lamivudine
| 6.7% (37/550)
| 0.7% (4/546)
| | Resistance to rilpivirine
| 5.3% (29/550)
| 0
| | Resistance to efavirenz
| 4.7% (26/550)
| 1.8% (10/546)
| For those patients failing therapy with Eviplera and who developed resistance to Eviplera cross resistance to other approved NNRTIs (etravirine, efavirenz, nevirapine) was generally seen.Paediatric population The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Eviplera in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of HIV-1 (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use). | |