| | Pharmacotherapeutic Group:
| Adrenergics and other anti-asthmatics.
| | ATC Code:
| R03AK06
|
Seretide Asthma clinical trials A twelve month study (Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL, GOAL), in 3416 adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma, compared the safety and efficacy of Seretide versus inhaled corticosteroid (Fluticasone Propionate) alone to determine whether the goals of asthma management were achievable. Treatment was stepped up every 12 weeks until **Total control was achieved or the highest dose of study drug was reached. GOAL showed more patients treated with Seretide achieved asthma control than patients treated with ICS alone and this control was attained at a lower corticosteroid dose.Well Controlled asthma was achieved more rapidly with Seretide than with ICS alone. The time on treatment for 50% of subjects to achieve a first individual Well Controlled week was 16 days for Seretide compared to 37 days for the ICS group. In the subset of steroid naive asthmatics the time to an individual Well Controlled week was 16 days in the Seretide treatment compared to 23 days following treatment with ICS.The overall study results showed:| Percentage of Patients Attaining *Well Controlled (WC) and **Totally Controlled (TC) Asthma over 12 months | | Pre-Study Treatment | Salmeterol/FP | FP | | WC | TC | WC | TC | | No ICS (SABA alone)
| 78%
| 50%
| 70%
| 40%
| Low dose ICS ( 500mcg BDP or equivalent/day)
| 75%
| 44%
| 60%
| 28%
| | Medium dose ICS (>500-1000mcg BDP or equivalent/day)
| 62%
| 29%
| 47%
| 16%
| | Pooled results across the 3 treatment levels | 71%
| 41%
| 59%
| 28%
| *Well controlled asthma; occasional symptoms or SABA use or less than 80% predicted lung function plus no night-time awakenings, no exacerbations and no side effects enforcing a change in therapy **Total control of asthma; no symptoms, no SABA use, greater than or equal to 80% predicted lung function, no night-time awakenings, no exacerbations and no side effects enforcing a change in therapyThe results of this study suggest that Seretide 50/100mcg bd may be considered as initial maintenance therapy in patients with moderate persistent asthma for whom rapid control of asthma is deemed essential (see section 4.2).A double-blind, randomised, parallel group study in 318 patients with persistent asthma aged 18 years evaluated the safety and tolerability of administering two inhalations twice daily (double dose) of Seretide for two weeks. The study showed that doubling the inhalations of each strength of Seretide for up to 14 days resulted in a small increase in beta-agonist-related adverse events (tremor; 1 patient [1%] vs 0, palpitations; 6 [3%] vs 1 [<1%], muscle cramps; 6[3%] vs 1 [<1%]) and a similar incidence of inhaled corticosteroid related adverse events (e.g. oral candidiasis; 6 [6%] vs 16 [8%], hoarseness; 2 [2%] vs 4 [2%]) compared to one inhalation twice daily. The small increase in beta-agonist-related adverse events should be taken into account if doubling the dose of Seretide is considered by the physician in adult patients requiring additional short-term (up to 14 days) inhaled corticosteroid therapy.Seretide COPD clinical trials TORCH was a 3-year study to assess the effect of treatment with Seretide Accuhaler 50/500mcg bd, salmeterol Accuhaler 50mcg bd, fluticasone propionate (FP) Accuhaler 500mcg bd or placebo on all-cause mortality in patients with COPD. COPD patients with a baseline (pre-bronchodilator) FEV1 <60% of predicted normal were randomised to double-blind medication. During the study, patients were permitted usual COPD therapy with the exception of other inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators and long-term systemic corticosteroids. Survival status at 3 years was determined for all patients regardless of withdrawal from study medication. The primary endpoint was reduction in all cause mortality at 3 years for Seretide vs Placebo. | | PlaceboN = 1524 | Salmeterol 50N = 1521 | FP 500N = 1534 | Seretide 50/500N = 1533 | | All cause mortality at 3 years
| | Number of deaths (%)
| 231
(15.2%)
| 205
(13.5%)
| 246
(16.0%)
| 193
(12.6%)
| | Hazard Ratio vs Placebo (CIs) p value
| N/A
| 0.879 (0.73, 1.06) 0.180
| 1.060 (0.89, 1.27) 0.525
| 0.825 (0.68, 1.00 ) 0.0521 | | Hazard Ratio Seretide 50/500 vs components (CIs) p value
| N/A
| 0.932 (0.77, 1.13) 0.481
| 0.774 (0.64, 0.93) 0.007
| N/A
| | 1. Non significant P value after adjustment for 2 interim analyses on the primary efficacy comparison from a log-rank analysis stratified by smoking status
| There was a trend towards improved survival in subjects treated with Seretide compared with placebo over 3 years however this did not achieve the statistical significance level p 0.05.The percentage of patients who died within 3 years due to COPD-related causes was 6.0% for placebo, 6.1% for salmeterol, 6.9% for FP and 4.7% for Seretide.The mean number of moderate to severe exacerbations per year was significantly reduced with Seretide as compared with treatment with salmeterol, FP and placebo (mean rate in the Seretide group 0.85 compared with 0.97 in the salmeterol group, 0.93 in the FP group and 1.13 in the placebo). This translates to a reduction in the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations of 25% (95% CI: 19% to 31%; p<0.001) compared with placebo, 12% compared with salmeterol (95% CI: 5% to 19%, p=0.002) and 9% compared with FP (95% CI: 1% to 16%, p=0.024). Salmeterol and FP significantly reduced exacerbation rates compared with placebo by 15% (95% CI: 7% to 22%; p<0.001) and 18% (95% CI: 11% to 24%; p<0.001) respectively. Health Related Quality of Life, as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was improved by all active treatments in comparison with placebo. The average improvement over three years for Seretide compared with placebo was -3.1 units (95% CI: -4.1 to -2.1; p<0.001), compared with salmeterol was -2.2 units (p<0.001) and compared with FP was -1.2 units (p=0.017). A 4-unit decrease is considered clinically relevant.The estimated 3-year probability of having pneumonia reported as an adverse event was 12.3% for placebo, 13.3% for salmeterol, 18.3% for FP and 19.6% for Seretide (Hazard ratio for Seretide vs placebo: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.01, p<0.001). There was no increase in pneumonia related deaths; deaths while on treatment that were adjudicated as primarily due to pneumonia were 7 for placebo, 9 for salmeterol, 13 for FP and 8 for Seretide. There was no significant difference in probability of bone fracture (5.1% placebo, 5.1% salmeterol, 5.4% FP and 6.3% Seretide; Hazard ratio for Seretide vs placebo: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.72, p=0.248. Placebo-controlled clinical trials, over 6 and 12 months, have shown that regular use of Seretide 50/500 micrograms improves lung function and reduces breathlessness and the use of relief medication. Studies SCO40043 and SCO100250 were randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, replicate studies comparing the effect of Seretide 50/250 micrograms bd (a dose not licensed for COPD treatment in the European Union) with salmeterol 50 micrograms bd on the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations in subjects with COPD with FEV1 less than 50% predicted and a history of exacerbations. Moderate/ severe exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms that required treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics or in-patient hospitalisation.The trials had a 4 week run-in period during which all subjects received open-label salmeterol/ FP 50/250 to standardize COPD pharmacotherapy and stabilise disease prior to randomisation to blinded study medication for 52 weeks. Subjects were randomised 1:1 to salmeterol/ FP 50/250 (total ITT n=776) or salmeterol (total ITT n=778). Prior to run-in, subjects discontinued use of previous COPD medications except short-acting bronchodilators. The use of concurrent inhaled long-acting bronchodilators (beta2-agonist and anticholinergic), ipratropium/salbutamol combination products, oral beta2-agonists, and theophylline preparations were not allowed during the treatment period. Oral corticosteroids and antibiotics were allowed for the acute treatment of COPD exacerbations with specific guidelines for use. Subjects used salbutamol on an as-needed basis throughout the studies.The results of both studies showed that treatment with Seretide 50/250 resulted in a significantly lower annual rate of moderate/severe COPD exacerbations compared with salmeterol (SCO40043: 1.06 and 1.53 per subject per year, respectively, rate ratio of 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.83, p<0.001; SCO100250: 1.10 and 1.59 per subject per year, respectively, rate ratio of 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.83, p<0.001). Findings for the secondary efficacy measures (time to first moderate/severe exacerbation, the annual rate of exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids, and pre-dose morning (AM) FEV1) significantly favoured Seretide 50/250 micrograms bd over salmeterol. Adverse event profiles were similar with the exception of a higher incidence of pneumonias and known local side effects (candidiasis and dysphonia) in the Seretide 50/250 micrograms bd group compared with salmeterol. Pneumonia-related events were reported for 55 (7%) subjects in the Seretide 50/250 micrograms bd group and 25 (3%) in the salmeterol group. The increased incidence of reported pneumonia with Seretide 50/250 micrograms bd appears to be of similar magnitude to the incidence reported following treatment with Seretide 50/500 micrograms bd in TORCH. The Salmeterol Multi-center Asthma Research Trial (SMART) SMART was a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group 28-week study in the US which randomised 13,176 patients to salmeterol (50μg twice daily) and 13,179 patients to placebo in addition to the patients' usual asthma therapy. Patients were enrolled if 12 years of age, with asthma and if currently using asthma medication (but not a LABA). Baseline ICS use at study entry was recorded, but not required in the study. The primary endpoint in SMART was the combined number of respiratory-related deaths and respiratory-related life-threatening experiences. Key findings from SMART: primary endpoint| Patient group
| Number of primary endpoint events /number of patients
| Relative Risk
(95% confidence intervals)
| | salmeterol
| placebo
| | All patients
| 50/13,176
| 36/13,179
| 1.40 (0.91, 2.14)
| | Patients using inhaled steroids
| 23/6,127
| 19/6,138
| 1.21 (0.66, 2.23)
| | Patients not using inhaled steroids
| 27/7,049
| 17/7,041
| 1.60 (0.87, 2.93)
| | African-American patients | 20/2,366 | 5/2,319 | 4.10 (1.54, 10.90) | (Risk in bold is statistically significant at the 95% level.)Key findings from SMART by inhaled steroid use at baseline: secondary endpoints| | Number of secondary endpoint events /number of patients
| Relative Risk
(95% confidence intervals)
| | salmeterol
| placebo
| | Respiratory -related death
| | Patients using inhaled steroids
| 10/6127
| 5/6138
| 2.01 (0.69, 5.86)
| | Patients not using inhaled steroids
| 14/7049
| 6/7041
| 2.28 (0.88, 5.94)
| | Combined asthma-related death or life-threatening experience
| | Patients using inhaled steroids
| 16/6127
| 13/6138
| 1.24 (0.60, 2.58)
| | Patients not using inhaled steroids | 21/7049 | 9/7041 | 2.39 (1.10, 5.22) | | Asthma-related death
| | Patients using inhaled steroids
| 4/6127
| 3/6138
| 1.35 (0.30, 6.04)
| | Patients not using inhaled steroids
| 9/7049
| 0/7041
| *
| (*=could not be calculated because of no events in placebo group. Risk in bold figures is statistically significant at the 95% level. The secondary endpoints in the table above reached statistical significance in the whole population.) The secondary endpoints of combined all-cause death or life-threatening experience, all cause death, or all cause hospitalisation did not reach statistical significance in the whole population.Mechanism of action: Seretide contains salmeterol and fluticasone propionate which have differing modes of action. The respective mechanisms of action of both drugs are discussed below:Salmeterol: Salmeterol is a selective long-acting (12 hour) beta-2-adrenoceptor agonist with a long side chain which binds to the exo-site of the receptor.Salmeterol produces a longer duration of bronchodilation, lasting for at least 12 hours, than recommended doses of conventional short-acting beta-2-agonists.Fluticasone propionate: Fluticasone propionate given by inhalation at recommended doses has a glucocorticoid anti-inflammatory action within the lungs, resulting in reduced symptoms and exacerbations of asthma, without the adverse effects observed when corticosteroids are administered systemically. | |