| Pharmacotherapeutic group: Alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists, ATC code: G04CA52Dutasteride-tamsulosin is a combination of two drugs: dutasteride, a dual 5 α-reductase inhibitor (5 ARI) and tamsulosin hydrochloride, an antagonist of α1a and α1d adrenoreceptors. These drugs have complementary mechanisms of action that rapidly improve symptoms, urinary flow and reduce the risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) and the need for BPH related surgery. Dutasteride inhibits both type 1 and type 2, 5 alpha-reductase isoenzymes, which are responsible for the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). DHT is the androgen primarily responsible for prostate growth and BPH development. Tamsulosin inhibits α1a and α1d adrenergic receptors in the stromal prostatic smooth muscle and bladder neck. Approximately 75% of the α1-receptors in the prostate are of the α1a subtype.DUTASTERIDE CO-ADMINISTRATION WITH TAMSULOSINThere have been no clinical studies conducted with Combodart. The following statements reflect the information available on dutasteride and tamsulosin co-administration therapy.Dutasteride 0.5 mg/day (n = 1,623), tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day (n = 1,611) or the co-administration of Dutasteride 0.5 mg plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg (n = 1,610) were evaluated in male subjects with moderate to severe symptoms of BPH who had prostates ≥30ml and a PSA value within the range 1.5 - 10 ng/mL in a 4 year multicentre, multinational, randomized double-blind, parallel group study. Approximately 53% of subjects had previous exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitor or alpha-blocker treatment. The primary efficacy endpoints during the first 2 years of treatment was change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), an 8-item instrument based on AUA-SI with an additional question on quality of life. Secondary efficacy endpoints at 2 years included maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) and prostate volume. IPSS is The combination achieved significance for IPSS from Month 3 compared to dutasteride and from Month 9 compared to tamsulosin. For Qmax combination achieved significance from Month 6 compared to both dutasteride and tamsulosin.The combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin provides superior improvement in symptoms than either component alone. After 2 years of treatment, co-administration therapy showed a statistically significant adjusted mean improvement in symptom scores from baseline of -6.2 units. These improvements in flow rate and BII were statistically significant for co-administration therapy compared to both monotherapies.The reduction in total prostate volume and transition zone volume after 2 years of treatment was statistically significant for co-administration therapy compared to tamsulosin monotherapy alone.The primary efficacy endpoint at 4 years of treatment was time to first event of AUR or BPH-related surgery. After 4 years of treatment, combination therapy statistically significantly reduced the risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery (65.8% reduction in risk p<0.001 [95% CI 54.7% to 74.1%]) compared to tamsulosin monotherapy. The incidence of AUR or BPH-related surgery by Year 4 was 4.2% for combination therapy and 11.9% for tamsulosin (p<0.001). Compared to dutasteride monotherapy, combination therapy reduced the risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery by 19.6% (p=0.18 [95% CI -10.9% to 41.7%]). The incidence of AUR or BPH-related surgery by Year 4 was 4.2% for combination therapy and 5.2% for dutasteride.Secondary efficacy endpoints after 4 years of treatment included time to clinical progression (defined as a composite of: IPSS deterioration by ≥4 points, BPH-related events of AUR, incontinence, urinary tract infection (UTI), and renal insufficiency) change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) and prostate volume. IPSS is an 8-item instrument based on the AUA-SI with an additional question on quality of life. Results following 4 years of treatment are presented below:| Parameter
| Time-point
| Combination
| Dutasteride
| Tamsulosin
| | AUR or BPH related surgery (%)
| Incidence at Month 48
| 4.2
| 5.2
| 11.9a
| | Clinical progression* (%)
| Month 48
| 12.6
| 17.8b
| 21.5a
| | IPSS (units)
| [Baseline]
Month 48 (Change from Baseline)
| [16.6]
-6.3
| [16.4]
-5.3b
| [16.4]
-3.8a
| | Qmax (mL/sec)
| [Baseline]
Month 48 (Change from Baseline)
| [10.9]
2.4
| [10.6]
2.0
| [10.7]
0.7a
| | Prostate Volume (ml)
| [Baseline]
Month 48 (% Change from Baseline)
| [54.7]
-27.3
| [54.6]
-28.0
| [55.8]
+4.6a
| | Prostate Transition Zone Volume (ml)
| [Baseline]
Month 48 (% Change from Baseline)
| [27.7]
-17.9
| [30.3]
-26.5
| [30.5]
18.2a
| | BPH Impact Index (BII) (units)
| [Baseline]
Month 48 (Change from Baseline)
| [5.3]
-2.2
| [5.3]
-1.8b
| [5.3]
-1.2a
| | IPSS Question 8 (BPH-related Health Status) (units)
| [Baseline]
Month 48 (Change from Baseline)
| [3.6]
-1.5
| [3.6]
-1.3b
| [3.6]
-1.1a
| Baseline values are mean values and changes from baseline are adjusted mean changes.* Clinical progression was defined as a composite of: IPSS deterioration by ≥4 points, BPH-related events of AUR, incontinence, UTI, and renal insufficiency.a. Combination achieved significance (p<0.001) vs. tamsulosin at Month 48b. Combination achieved significance (p<0.001) vs. dutasteride at Month 48DUTASTERIDEDutasteride 0.5 mg/day or placebo was evaluated in 4325 male subjects with moderate to severe symptoms of BPH who had prostates ≥30ml and a PSA value within the range 1.5 - 10 ng/mL in three primary efficacy 2-year multicenter, multinational, placebo controlled, double-blind studies. The studies then continued with an open-label extension to 4 years with all patients remaining in the study receiving dutasteride at the same 0.5 mg dose. 37% of initially placebo-randomized patients and 40% of dutasteride-randomized patients remained in the study at 4 years. The majority (71%) of the 2,340 subjects in the open-label extensions completed the 2 additional years of open-label treatment.The most important clinical efficacy parameters were American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI), maximum urinary flow (Qmax) and the incidence of acute urinary retention and BPH-related surgery.AUA-SI is a seven-item questionnaire about BPH-related symptoms with a maximum score of 35. At baseline the average score was approx. 17. After six months, one and two years treatment the placebo group had an average improvement of 2.5, 2.5 and 2.3 points respectively while the Avodart group improved 3.2, 3.8 and 4.5 points respectively. The differences between the groups were statistically significant. The improvement in AUA-SI seen during the first 2 years of double-blind treatment was maintained during an additional 2 years of open-label extension studies.Qmax (maximum urine flow):Mean baseline Qmax for the studies was approx 10 ml/sec (normal Qmax ≥ 15 ml/sec). After one and two years treatment the flow in the placebo group had improved by 0.8 and 0.9 ml/sec respectively and 1.7 and 2.0 ml/sec respectively in the Avodart group. The difference between the groups was statistically significant from Month 1 to Month 24. The increase in maximum urine flow rate seen during the first 2 years of double-blind treatment was maintained during an additional 2 years of open-label extension studies.Acute Urinary Retention and Surgical InterventionAfter two years of treatment, the incidence of AUR was 4.2% in the placebo group against 1.8% in the Avodart group (57% risk reduction). This difference is statistically significant and means that 42 patients (95% CI 30-73) need to be treated for two years to avoid one case of AUR.The incidence of BPH-related surgery after two years was 4.1% in the placebo group and 2.2% in the Avodart group (48% risk reduction). This difference is statistically significant and means that 51 patients (95% CI 33-109) need to be treated for two years to avoid one surgical intervention.Hair distributionThe effect of dutasteride on hair distribution was not formally studied during the phase III programme, however, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors could reduce hair loss and may induce hair growth in subjects with male pattern hair loss (male androgenetic alopecia).Thyroid function:Thyroid function was evaluated in a one year study in healthy men. Free thyroxine levels were stable on dutasteride treatment but TSH levels were mildly increased (by 0.4 MCIU/mL) compared to placebo at the end of one year's treatment. However, as TSH levels were variable, median TSH ranges (1.4 - 1.9 MCIU/mL ) remained within normal limits (0.5 - 5/6 MCIU/mL), free thyroxine levels were stable within the normal range and similar for both placebo and dutasteride treatment, the changes in TSH were not considered clinically significant. In all the clinical studies, there has been no evidence that dutasteride adversely affects thyroid function. Breast neoplasia:In the 2 year clinical trials, providing 3374 patient years of exposure to dutasteride, and at the time of registration in the 2 year open label extension, there were 2 cases of breast cancer reported in dutasteride-treated patients and 1 case in a patient who received placebo. In the 4 year CombAT and REDUCE clinical trials providing 17489 patient years exposure to dutasteride and 5027 patient years exposure to dutasteride and tamsulosin combination there were no cases of breast cancer reported in any treatment groups.Currently it is not clear if there is a causal relationship between the occurrence of male breast cancer and long term use of dutasteride.Effects on male fertilityThe effects of dutasteride 0.5 mg/day on semen characteristics were evaluated in healthy volunteers aged 18 to 52 (n=27 dutasteride, n=23 placebo) throughout 52 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. At 52 weeks, the mean percent reduction from baseline in total sperm count, semen volume and sperm motility were 23%, 26% and 18%, respectively, in the dutasteride group when adjusted for changes from baseline in the placebo group. Sperm concentration and sperm morphology were unaffected. After 24 weeks of follow-up, the mean percent change in total sperm count in the dutasteride group remained 23% lower than baseline. While mean values for all parameters at all time points remained within the normal ranges and did not meet the predefined criteria for a clinically significant change (30%), two subjects in the dutasteride group had decreases in sperm count of greater than 90% from baseline at 52 weeks, with partial recovery at the 24 week follow-up. The possibility of reduced male fertility cannot be excluded.Cardiac failure:In a 4 year BPH study of dutasteride in combination with tamsulosin in 4844 men (the CombAT study) the incidence of the composite term cardiac failure in the combination group (14/1610, 0.9%) was higher than in either monotherapy group: dutasteride, (4/1623, 0.2%) and tamsulosin, (10/1611, 0.6%). In a separate 4-year study in 8231 men aged 50 to 75, with a prior negative biopsy for prostate cancer and baseline PSA between 2.5 ng/mL and 10.0 ng/mL in the case of men 50 to 60 years of age, or 3 ng/mL and 10.0 ng/mL in the case of men older than 60 years of age) (the REDUCE study), there was a higher incidence of the composite term cardiac failure in subjects taking dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily (30/4105, 0.7%) compared to subjects taking placebo (16/4126, 0.4%). A post-hoc analysis of this study showed a higher incidence of the composite term cardiac failure in subjects taking dutasteride and an alpha blocker concomitantly (12/1152, 1.0%), compared to subjects taking dutasteride and no alpha blocker (18/2953, 0.6%), placebo and an alpha blocker (1/1399, <0.1%), or placebo and no alpha blocker (15/2727, 0.6%). Prostate cancer and high grade tumoursIn a 4-year comparison of placebo and dutasteride in 8231 men aged 50 to 75, with a prior negative biopsy for prostate cancer and baseline PSA between 2.5 ng/mL and 10.0 ng/mL in the case of men 50 to 60 years of age, or 3 ng/mL and 10.0 ng/mL in the case of men older than 60 years of age) (the REDUCE study), 6,706 subjects had prostate needle biopsy (primarily protocol mandated) data available for analysis to determine Gleason Scores. There were 1517 subjects diagnosed with prostate cancer in the study. The majority of biopsy-detectable prostate cancers in both treatment groups were diagnosed as low grade (Gleason 5-6, 70%). There was a higher incidence of Gleason 8-10 prostate cancers in the dutasteride group (n=29, 0.9%) compared to the placebo group (n=19, 0.6%) (p=0.15). In Years 1-2, the number of subjects with Gleason 8-10 cancers was similar in the dutasteride group (n=17, 0.5%) and the placebo group (n=18, 0.5%). In Years 3-4, more Gleason 8-10 cancers were diagnosed in the dutasteride group (n=12, 0.5%) compared with the placebo group (n=1, <0.1%) (p=0.0035). There are no data available on the effect of dutasteride beyond 4 years in men at risk of prostate cancer. The percentage of subjects diagnosed with Gleason 8-10 cancers was consistent across study time periods (Years 1-2 and Years 3-4) in the dutasteride group (0.5% in each time period), while in the placebo group, the percentage of subjects diagnosed with Gleason 8-10 cancers was lower during Years 3-4 than in Years 1-2 (<0.1% versus 0.5%, respectively) (see section 4.4). There was no difference in the incidence of Gleason 7-10 cancers (p=0.81). In a 4 year BPH study (CombAT) where there were no protocol-mandated biopsies and all diagnoses of prostate cancer were based on for-cause biopsies, the rates of Gleason 8-10 cancer were (n=8, 0.5%) for dutasteride, (n=11, 0.7%) for tamsulosin and (n=5, 0.3%) for combination therapy. The relationship between dutasteride and high grade prostate cancer is not clear. TAMSULOSINTamsulosin increases maximum urinary flow rate. It relieves obstruction by relaxing smooth muscle in the prostate and urethra, thereby improving voiding symptoms. It also improves the storage symptoms in which bladder instability plays an important role. These effects on storage and voiding symptoms are maintained during long-term therapy. The need for surgery or catheterization is significantly delayed.Α1-adrenoreceptor antagonists can reduce blood pressure by lowering peripheral resistance. No reduction in blood pressure of any clinical significance was observed during studies with tamsulosin. | |