| Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other antineoplastic agents, ATC code: L01XX19 Experimental data Irinotecan is a semi-synthetic derivative of camptothecin. It is an antineoplastic agent which acts as a specific inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I. It is metabolised by carboxylesterase in most tissues to SN-38, which was found to be more active than irinotecan in purified topoisomerase I and more cytotoxic than irinotecan against several murine and human tumour cell lines. The inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I by irinotecan or SN-38 induces single-strand DNA lesions which block the DNA replication fork and are responsible for the cytotoxicity. This cytotoxic activity was found to be time-dependent and was specific to the S phase.In vitro, irinotecan and SN-38 were not found to be significantly recognised by the P-glycoprotein MDR, and display cytotoxic activities against doxorubicin- and vinblastine-resistant cell lines.Furthermore, irinotecan has a broad antitumour activity in vivo against murine tumour models (P03 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, MA16/C mammary adenocarcinoma, C38 and C51 colon adenocarcinomas) and against human xenografts (Co-4 colon adenocarcinoma, Mx-1 mammary adenocarcinoma, ST-15 and SC-16 gastric adenocarcinomas). Irinotecan is also active against tumours expressing the P-glycoprotein MDR (vincristine- and doxorubicin-resistant P388 leukaemias).Beside its antitumour activity, the most relevant pharmacological effect of irinotecan is the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase.Clinical data In monotherapy Clinical phase II/III studies were performed in more than 980 patients in the every-3-week-dosage schedule with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed a previous 5-FU regimen. The efficacy of irinotecan was evaluated in 765 patients with documented progression on 5-FU at study entry.Phase III trials | Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) | Irinotecan versus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) | | | Irinotecan | BSC | p value | Irinotecan | 5-FU | p value | Number of patients | 183 | 90 | | 127 | 129 | | PFS at 6 months [%] | NA | NA | | 33.5 | 26.7 | 0.03 | Survival at 12 months [%] | 36.2 | 13.8 | 0.0001 | 44.8 | 32.4 | 0.0351 | Median survival [months] | 9.2 | 6.5 | 0.0001 | 10.8 | 8.5 | 0.0351 | PFS = progression-free survival; NA = not applicable | In phase II studies, performed on 455 patients in the every-3-week-dosage schedule, the progression-free survival at 6 months was 30 % and the median survival was 9 months. The median time to progression was 18 weeks.Additionally, non-comparative phase II studies were performed in 304 patients treated with a weekly schedule regimen, at a dose of 125 mg/m² administered as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks rest. In these studies, the median time to progression was 17 weeks and median survival was 10 months. A similar safety profile has been observed in the weekly-dosage schedule in 193 patients at the starting dose of 125 mg/m², compared to the every-3-week-dosage schedule. The median time of onset of the first liquid stool was on day 11.In combination therapy A phase III study was performed in 385 previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with either every-2-weeks schedule (see section 4.2) or weekly schedule regimens. In the every-2-weeks schedule, on day 1, the administration of irinotecan at 180 mg/m² once every 2 weeks is followed by infusion with folinic acid (200 mg/m² over a 2-hour intravenous infusion) and 5 fluorouracil (400 mg/m² as an intravenous bolus, followed by 600 mg/m² over a 22-hour intravenous infusion). On day 2, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil are administered at the same doses and schedules. In the weekly schedule, the administration of irinotecan at 80 mg/m² is followed by infusion with folinic acid (500 mg/m² over a 2-hour intravenous infusion) and then by 5 fluorouracil (2,300 mg/m² over a 24-hour intravenous infusion) over 6 weeks.In the combination therapy trial with the two regimens described above, the efficacy of irinotecan was evaluated in 198 treated patients.| | Combined regimens (n = 198) | Weekly schedule (n = 50) | Every-2-weeks schedule (n = 148) | | | Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA | 5-FU/FA | Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA | 5-FU/FA | Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA | 5-FU/FA | Response rate [%] | 40.8* | 23.1* | 51.2* | 28.6* | 37.5* | 21.6* | p value | < 0.001 | 0.045 | 0.005 | Median time to progression [months] | 6.7 | 4.4 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 3.7 | p value | < 0.001 | NS | 0.001 | Median response duration [months] | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 6.7 | 9.3 | 9.5 | p value | NS | 0.043 | NS | Median duration of response and stabi-lisation [months] | 8.6 | 6.2 | 8.3 | 6.7 | 8.5 | 5.6 | p value | < 0.001 | NS | 0.003 | Median time to treatment failure [months] | 5.3 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 3.0 | p value | 0.0014 | NS | < 0.001 | Median survival [months] | 16.8 | 14.0 | 19.2 | 14.1 | 15.6 | 13.0 | p value | 0.028 | NS | 0.041 | * as per protocol population; 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; FA = folinic acid; NS = not significant | In the weekly schedule, the incidence of severe diarrhoea was 44.4 % in patients treated with irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA and 25.6 % in patients treated by 5-FU/FA alone. The incidence of severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 500 cells/mm³) was 5.8 % in patients treated with irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA and 2.4 % in patients treated by 5-FU/FA alone.Additionally, median time to definitive performance status deterioration was significantly longer in irinotecan combination group than in 5-FU/FA alone group (p = 0.046).Quality of life was assessed in this phase III study using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Time to definitive deterioration constantly occurred later in the irinotecan groups. The evolution of the Global Health Status/quality of life was slightly better in irinotecan combination group although not significant, showing that efficacy of irinotecan in combination could be reached without affecting the quality of life.In combination with cetuximab The efficacy of the combination of cetuximab with irinotecan was investigated in two clinical studies. A total of 356 patients with EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer who had recently failed irinotecan-including cytotoxic therapy and who had a minimum Karnofsky performance status of 60 %, but the majority of whom had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 % received the combination treatment.EMR 62 202-007: This randomised study compared the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan (218 patients) with cetuximab monotherapy (111 patients).IMCL CP02-9923: This single arm open-label study investigated the combination therapy in 138 patients.The efficacy data from these studies are summarised in the table below.Study | n | ORR | DCR | PFS (months) | OS (months) | | | | n [%] | 95% CI | n [%] | 95% CI | Median | 95% CI | Median | 95% CI | Cetuximab + irinotecan | EMR 62 202-007 | 218 | 50 (22.9) | 17.5, 29.1 | 121 (55.5) | 48.6, 62.2 | 4.1 | 2.8, 4.3 | 8.6 | 7.6, 9.6 | IMCL CP02-9923 | 138 | 21 (15.2) | 9.7, 22.3 | 84 (60.9) | 52.2, 69.1 | 2.9 | 2.6, 4.1 | 8.4 | 7.2, 10.3 | Cetuximab | EMR 62 202-007 | 111 | 12 (10.8) | 5.7, 18.1 | 36 (32.4) | 23.9, 42.0 | 1.5 | 1.4, 2.0 | 6.9 | 5.6, 9.1 | CI = confidence interval; DCR = disease control rate (patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease for at least 6 weeks); ORR = objective response rate (patients with complete response or partial response); OS = overall survival time; PFS = progression-free survival | The efficacy of the combination of cetuximab with irinotecan was superior to that of cetuximab monotherapy, in terms of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). In the randomised trial, no effects on overall survival were demonstrated (hazard ratio 0.91, p = 0.48).In combination with bevacizumab A phase III randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial evaluated bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan/5-FU/FA as first-line treatment for metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum (study AVF2107g). The addition of bevacizumab to the combination of irinotecan/5-FU/FA resulted in a statistically significant increase in overall survival. The clinical benefit, as measured by overall survival, was seen in all pre-specified patient subgroups, including those defined by age, sex, performance status, location of primary tumour, number of organs involved and duration of metastatic disease. Refer also to the bevacizumab summary of product characteristics. The efficacy results of study AVF2107g are summarised in the table below.| | Arm 1 Irinotecan/5-FU/FA/placebo | Arm 2 Irinotecan/5-FU/FA/bevacizumab a | Number of patients | 411 | 402 | Overall survival | | | Median time [months] | 15.6 | 20.3 | 95% Confidence interval | 14.29 16.99 | 18.46 24.18 | Hazard ratio b | | 0.660 | p value | | 0.00004 | Progression-free survival | | | Median time [months] | 6.2 | 10.6 | Hazard ratio b | | 0.54 | p value | | < 0.0001 | Overall response rate | | | Rate [%] | 34.8 | 44.8 | 95% Confidence interval | 30.2 39.6 | 39.9 49.8 | p value | | 0.0036 | Duration of response | | | Median time [months] | 7.1 | 10.4 | 25 75 Percentile [months] | 4.7 11.8 | 6.7 15.0 | a
5 mg/kg every 2 weeks; b
Relative to control arm. |
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic data The intensity of the major toxicities encountered with irinotecan (e.g., neutropenia and diarrhoea) is related to the exposure (AUC) to parent drug and metabolite SN-38. Significant correlations were observed between haematological toxicity (decrease in white blood cells and neutrophils at nadir) or diarrhoea intensity and both irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 AUC values in monotherapy. | |