- 1. Name of the medicinal product
- 2. Qualitative and quantitative composition
- 3. Pharmaceutical form
- 4. Clinical particulars
- 4.1 Therapeutic indications
- 4.2 Posology and method of administration
- 4.3 Contraindications
- 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use
- 4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction
- 4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
- 4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines
- 4.8 Undesirable effects
- 4.9 Overdose
- 5. Pharmacological properties
- 5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties
- 5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties
- 5.3 Preclinical safety data
- 6. Pharmaceutical particulars
- 6.1 List of excipients
- 6.2 Incompatibilities
- 6.3 Shelf life
- 6.4 Special precautions for storage
- 6.5 Nature and contents of container
- 6.6 Special precautions for disposal and other handling
- 7. Marketing authorisation holder
- 8. Marketing authorisation number(s)
- 9. Date of first authorisation/renewal of the authorisation
- 10. Date of revision of the text
|Aptivus must always be given with low dose ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer, and in combination with other antiretroviral medicinal products. The Summary of Product Characteristics of ritonavir must therefore be consulted prior to initiation of therapy with Aptivus (especially as regards the contraindications, warnings and undesirable effects sections).|
PosologyPatients should be advised of the need to take Aptivus and ritonavir every day as prescribed. If a dose is missed by more than 5 hours, the patient should be instructed to wait and then to take the next dose of tipranavir and ritonavir at the regularly scheduled time. If a dose is missed by less than 5 hours, the patient should be instructed to take the missed dose immediately, and then to take the next dose of tipranavir and ritonavir at the regularly scheduled time.
Paediatric populationThe recommended dose for children (age 2 to 12 years) is 375 mg/m2 Aptivus co-administered with 150 mg/m2 ritonavir, twice daily. The paediatric dose should not exceed the 500 mg/200 mg dose.
|Aptivus/ritonavir dose (375 mg/m2 Aptivus + 150 mg/m2 ritonavir)|
|BSA Range (m2)||Dose Aptivus (mg)||Volume Aptivus (ml)||Dose ritonavir (mg)||Volume ritonavir (ml)|
|0.69 - 0.74||260||2.6||103||1.3|
|1.01 - 1.06||380||3.8||151||1.9|
Patients with liver impairmentTipranavir is metabolised by the hepatic system. Liver impairment could therefore result in an increase of tipranavir exposure and a worsening of its safety profile. Therefore, Aptivus should be used with caution, and with increased monitoring frequency, in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A). Aptivus is contraindicated in patients with moderate or severe (Child-Pugh Class B or C) hepatic impairment (see sections 4.3, 4.4 and 5.2).
Patients with renal impairmentNo dosage adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
Method of administrationAptivus oral solution co-administered with low dose oral solution ritonavir should be taken with food (see section 5.2).
Liver monitoringMonitoring of hepatic tests should be done prior to initiation of therapy, after two, four and then every four weeks until 24 weeks, and then every eight to twelve weeks thereafter. Increased monitoring (i.e. prior to initiation of therapy, every two weeks during the first three months of treatment, then monthly until 48 weeks, and then every eight to twelve weeks thereafter) is warranted when Aptivus and low dose ritonavir are administered to patients with elevated ASAT and ALAT levels, mild hepatic impairment, chronic hepatitis B or C, or other underlying liver disease.
Treatment-naïve patientsIn a study performed in antiretroviral naïve adult patients, tipranavir 500 mg with ritonavir 200 mg twice daily, as compared to lopinavir/ritonavir, was associated with an excess in the occurrence of significant (grade 3 and 4) transaminase elevations without any advantage in terms of efficacy (trend towards a lower efficacy). The study was prematurely stopped after 60 weeks.Therefore, tipranavir with ritonavir should not be used in treatment-naïve patients.
Renal impairmentSince the renal clearance of tipranavir is negligible, increased plasma concentrations are not expected in patients with renal impairment.
HaemophiliaThere have been reports of increased bleeding, including spontaneous skin haematomas and haemarthrosis in patients with haemophilia type A and B treated with protease inhibitors. In some patients additional Factor VIII was given. In more than half of the reported cases, treatment with protease inhibitors was continued or reintroduced if treatment had been discontinued. A causal relationship has been evoked, although the mechanism of action had not been elucidated. Haemophiliac patients should therefore be made aware of the possibility of increased bleeding.
BleedingRESIST participants receiving Aptivus with ritonavir tended to have an increased risk of bleeding; at 24 weeks the relative risk was 1.98 (95% CI=1.03, 3.80). At 48-weeks the relative risk decreased to 1.27 (95% CI=0.76, 2.12). There was no pattern for the bleeding events and no difference between treatment groups in coagulation parameters. The significance of this finding is being further studied.Fatal and non-fatal intracranial haemorrhages (ICH) have been reported in patients receiving Aptivus, many of whom had other medical conditions or were receiving concomitant medicinal products that may have caused or contributed to these events. However, in some cases the role of Aptivus cannot be excluded. No pattern of abnormal haematological or coagulation parameters has been observed in patients in general, or preceding the development of ICH. Therefore, routine measurement of coagulation parameters is not currently indicated in the management of patients on Aptivus.An increased risk of ICH has previously been observed in patients with advanced HIV disease/AIDS such as those treated in the Aptivus clinical trials.In in vitro experiments, tipranavir was observed to inhibit human platelet aggregation at levels consistent with exposures observed in patients receiving Aptivus with ritonavir.In rats, co-administration with vitamin E increased the bleeding effects of tipranavir (see section 5.3).Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, should be used with caution in patients who may be at risk of increased bleeding from trauma, surgery or other medical conditions, or who are receiving medicinal products known to increase the risk of bleeding such as antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants or who are taking supplemental vitamin E. Patients taking Aptivus oral solution should be advised not to take any supplemental vitamin E.
Diabetes mellitus/hyperglycaemiaNew onset of diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia or exacerbations of existing diabetes mellitus has been reported in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, including protease inhibitors. In some of these the hyperglycaemia was severe and in some cases also associated with ketoacidosis. Many of the patients had confounding medical conditions, some of which required therapy with agents that have been associated with the development of diabetes mellitus or hyperglycaemia.
Lipid elevationsTreatment with Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir and other antiretroviral agents has resulted in increased plasma total triglycerides and cholesterol. Triglyceride and cholesterol testing should be performed prior to initiating tipranavir therapy and during therapy. Treatment-related lipid elevations should be managed as clinically appropriate.
Fat redistributionCombination antiretroviral therapy has been associated with the redistribution of body fat (lipodystrophy) in HIV infected patients. The long-term consequences of these events are currently unknown. Knowledge about the mechanism is incomplete. A connection between visceral lipomatosis and protease inhibitors, and lipoatrophy and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, has been hypothesised. A higher risk of lipodystrophy has been associated with individual factors such as older age, and with factors related to the active substance such as longer duration of antiretroviral treatment and associated metabolic disturbances. Clinical examination should include evaluation for physical signs of fat redistribution. Consideration should be given to the measurement of fasting serum lipids and blood glucose. Lipid disorders should be managed as clinically appropriate (see section 4.8).
Immune reactivation syndromeIn HIV-infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of institution of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic pathogens may arise and cause serious clinical conditions, or aggravation of symptoms. Typically, such reactions have been observed within the first few weeks or months of initiation of CART. Relevant examples are cytomegalovirus retinitis, generalised and/or focal mycobacterial infections and pneumocystis pneumonia. Any inflammatory symptoms should be evaluated and treatment instituted when necessary. In addition, reactivation of herpes simplex and herpes zoster has been observed in clinical studies with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reactivation; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment.
RashMild to moderate rashes including urticarial rash, maculopapular rash, and photosensitivity have been reported in subjects receiving Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. At 48-weeks in Phase III trials, rash of various types was observed in 15.5% males and 20.5% females receiving Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Additionally, in one interaction trial, in healthy female volunteers administered a single dose of ethinyl oestradiol followed by Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir, 33% of subjects developed a rash. Rash accompanied by joint pain or stiffness, throat tightness, or generalized pruritus has been reported in both men and women receiving Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir. In the paediatric clinical trial, the frequency of rash (all grades, all causality) through 48 weeks of treatment was higher than in adult patients.
OsteonecrosisAlthough the aetiology is considered to be multifactorial (including corticosteroid use, alcohol consumption, severe immunosuppression, higher body mass index), cases of osteonecrosis have been reported particularly in patients with advanced HIV-disease and/or long-term exposure to combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). Patients should be advised to seek medical advice if they experience joint aches and pain, joint stiffness or difficulty in movement.
InteractionsThe interaction profile of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is complex. The mechanisms and potential mechanisms contributing to the interaction profile of tipranavir are described (see section 4.5).Abacavir and zidovudine: The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with zidovudine or abacavir, results in a significant decrease in plasma concentration of these nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Therefore, the concomitant use of zidovudine or abacavir with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not-recommended unless there are no other available NRTIs suitable for patient management (see section 4.5).Protease inhibitors: Concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with the protease inhibitors amprenavir, lopinavir or saquinavir (each co-administered with low dose ritonavir) in a dual-boosted regimen, results in significant decreases in plasma concentrations of these protease inhibitors. A significant decrease in plasma concentrations of atazanavir and a marked increase of tipranavir and ritonavir concentrations was observed when Aptivus, associated with low dose ritonavir, was co-administered with atazanavir (see section 4.5). No data are currently available on interactions of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with protease inhibitors other than those listed above. Therefore, the co-administration of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with protease inhibitors is not recommended.Oral contraceptives and oestrogens: Since levels of ethinyl oestradiol are decreased, the co-administration of Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir is not recommended. Alternative or additional contraceptive measures are to be used when oestrogen based oral contraceptives are co-administered with Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir (see section 4.5). Patients using oestrogens as hormone replacement therapy should be clinically monitored for signs of oestrogen deficiency. Women using oestrogens may have an increased risk of non serious rash.Anticonvulsants: Caution should be used when prescribing carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin. Aptivus may be less effective due to decreased tipranavir plasma concentrations in patients taking these agents concomitantly.Halofantrine, lumefantrine: Due to their metabolic profile and inherent risk of inducing torsades de pointes, administration of halofantrine and lumefantrine with Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended.Fluticasone: Concomitant use of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and fluticasone or other glucocorticoids that are metabolised by CYP3A4 is not recommended unless the potential benefit of treatment outweighs the risk of systemic corticosteroid effects, including Cushing's syndrome and adrenal suppression (see section 4.5).Atorvastatin: Tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, increases the plasma concentrations of atorvastatin (see section 4.5). The combination is not recommended. Other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors should be considered such as pravastatin, fluvastatin or rosuvastatin (see section 4.5). However, if atorvastatin is specifically required for patient management, it should be started with the lowest dose and careful monitoring is necessary.Omeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors: The combined use of Aptivus with ritonavir with either omeprazole, esomeprazole or with other proton pump inhibitors is not recommended (see section 4.5).
Colchicine:In patients with normal renal and hepatic function, a reduction in colchicine dosage or an interruption of colchicine treatment is recommended in co-administration (see section 4.5).
Salmeterol:Concomitant use of salmeterol and Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended (see section 4.5).Bosentan: Due to the marked hepatotoxicity of bosentan and the potential for increasing the liver toxicity associated with Aptivus,co-administered with low dose ritonavir, this combination is not recommended.
|The interaction profile of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is complex and requires special attention in particular in combination with other antiretroviral agents.|
Metabolic profile of tipranavir:Tipranavir is a substrate, an inducer and an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 CYP3A. When co-administered with ritonavir at the recommended dosage (see section 4.2) there is a net inhibition of P450 CYP3A. Co-administration of Aptivus and low dose ritonavir with agents primarily metabolised by CYP3A may result in changed plasma concentrations of tipranavir or the other agents, which could alter their therapeutic and undesirable effects (see list and details of considered agents, below). Agents that are contraindicated specifically due to the expected magnitude of interaction and potential for serious adverse reactions are detailed in this section, and listed in section 4.3.A cocktail study was conducted in 16 healthy volunteers with twice-daily tipranavir 500 mg with ritonavir 200 mg capsule administration for 10 days to assess the net effect on the activity of hepatic CYP 1A2 (caffeine), 2C9 (warfarin), 2D6 (dextromethorphan), both intestinal/hepatic CYP 3A4 (midazolam) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (digoxin). At steady state, there was a significant induction of CYP 1A2 and a slight induction on CYP 2C9. Potent inhibition of CYP 2D6 and both hepatic and intestinal CYP 3A4 activities were observed. P-gp activity is significantly inhibited after the first dose, but there was a slight induction at steady state. Practical recommendations deriving from this study are displayed below. This study was also conducted with Aptivus oral solution 500 mg with ritonavir 200 mg and showed the same CYP P450 and P-gp interactions as the Aptivus capsule 500 mg with ritonavir 200 mg. Based on the results from this study, Aptivus oral solution might be expected to have a similar interaction profile as the capsules.Studies in human liver microsomes indicated tipranavir is an inhibitor of CYP 1A2, CYP 2C9, CYP 2C19 and CYP 2D6. The potential net effect of tipranavir with ritonavir on CYP 2D6 is inhibition, because ritonavir is also a CYP 2D6 inhibitor. The in vivo net effect of tipranavir with ritonavir on CYP 1A2, CYP 2C9 and CYP 2C19, indicates, through a preliminary study, an inducing potential of tipranavir with ritonavir on CYP1A2 and, to a lesser extent, on CYP2C9 and P-gp after several days of treatment. Data are not available to indicate whether tipranavir inhibits or induces glucuronosyl transferases. In vitro studies show that tipranavir is a substrate and also an inhibitor of P-gp. It is difficult to predict the net effect of Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir on oral bioavailability and plasma concentrations of agents that are dual substrates of CYP3A and P-gp. The net effect will vary depending on the relative affinity of the co-administered substance for CYP3A and P-gp, and the extent of intestinal first-pass metabolism/efflux.Co-administration of Aptivus and agents that induce CYP3A and/or P-gp may decrease tipranavir concentrations and reduce its therapeutic effect (see list and details of considered agents, below). Co-administration of Aptivus and medicinal products that inhibit P-gp may increase tipranavir plasma concentrations.Known and theoretical interactions with selected antiretrovirals and non-antiretroviral medicinal products are listed in the table below.
Interaction tableInteractions between Aptivus and co-administered medicinal products are listed in the table below (increase is indicated as ↑, decrease as ↓, no change as ↔,once daily as QD, twice daily as BID).Unless otherwise stated, studies detailed below have been performed with the recommended dosage of Aptivus/r (i.e. 500/200 mg BID). However, some PK interaction studies were not performed with this recommended dosage. Nevertheless, the results of many of these interaction studies can be extrapolated to the recommended dosage since the doses used (eg. TPV/r 500/100 mg, TPV/r 750/200 mg) represented extremes of hepatic enzyme induction and inhibition and bracketed the recommended dosage of Aptivus/r.
|Drugs by Therapeutic Area||InteractionGeometric mean change (%)||Recommendations concerning co-administration|
|Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)|
|Since there is no significant impact of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues on the P450 enzyme system no dosage adjustment of Aptivus is required when co-administered with these agents.|
|Abacavir 300 mg BID (TPV/r 750/100 mg BID)||Abacavir Cmax ↓ 46% Abacavir AUC ↓ 36% The clinical relevance of this reduction has not been established, but may decrease the efficacy of abacavir. Mechanism unknown.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with abacavir is not recommended unless there are no other available NRTIs suitable for patient management. In such cases no dosage adjustment of abacavir can be recommended (see section 4.4).|
|Didanosine 200 mg BID, ≥ 60 kg - 125 mg BID, < 60 kg (TPV/r 250/200 mg BID) (TPV/r 750/100 mg BID)||Didanosine Cmax ↓ 43% Didanosine AUC ↓ 33% Didanosine Cmax ↓ 24% Didanosine AUC ↔The clinical relevance of this reduction in didanosine concentrations has not been established. Mechanism unknown.||Dosing of enteric-coated didanosine and Aptivus soft capsules, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, should be separated by at least 2 hours to avoid formulation incompatibility.|
|EmtricitabineNo interaction study performed||Potential interactions with renal transporters cannot be fully excluded.||No dosage adjustment necessary in patients with normal renal function. In case of concomitant administration of emtricitabine and Aptivus/ritonavir, renal function should be evaluated before initiating the co-administration.|
|Lamivudine 150 mg BID (TPV/r 750/100 mg BID)||No clinically significant interaction is observed.||No dosage adjustment necessary.|
|Stavudine40 mg BID > 60 kg 30 mg BID < 60 kg (TPV/r 750/100 mg BID)||No clinically significant interaction is observed.||No dosage adjustment necessary.|
|Zidovudine 300 mg BID (TPV/r 750/100 mg BID)||Zidovudine Cmax ↓ 49% Zidovudine AUC ↓ 36% The clinical relevance of this reduction has not been established, but may decrease the efficacy of zidovudine. Mechanism unknown.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir with zidovudine is not recommended unless there are no other available NRTIs suitable for patient management. In such cases no dosage adjustment of zidovudine can be recommended (see section 4.4).|
|Tenofovir 300 mg QD (TPV/r 750/200 mg BID)||No clinically significant interaction is observed.||No dosage adjustment necessary.|
|Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)|
|Efavirenz 600 mg QD||No clinically significant interaction is observed.||No dosage adjustment necessary.|
|Etravirine||Etravirine Cmax ↓ 71% Etravirine AUC ↓ 76% Etravirine Cmin ↓ 82% Concomitant use of Aptivus/ritonavir caused a decrease of etravirine exposure that could significantly impair the virologic response to etravirine.||Co-administration of etravirine and Aptivus/ritonavir is not recommended.|
|NevirapineNo interaction study performed||The limited data available from a phase IIa study in HIV-infected patients suggest that no significant interaction is expected between nevirapine and TPV/r. Moreover a study with TPV/r and another NNRTI (efavirenz) did not show any clinically relevant interaction (see above).||No dosage adjustment necessary.|
|RilpivirineNo interaction study performed||Concomitant use of rilpivirine with some ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors has demonstrated an increase in the plasma concentrations of rilpivirine.||Close monitoring for signs of rilpivirine toxicity and possibly also dose adjustment of rilpivirine is recommended when co-administered with Aptivus/ritonavir.|
|Protease inhibitors (PIs)|
|According to current treatment guidelines, dual therapy with protease inhibitors is generally not recommended|
|Amprenavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg BID||Amprenavir Cmax ↓ 39% Amprenavir AUC ↓ 44% Amprenavir Cmin ↓ 55% The clinical relevance of this reduction in amprenavir concentrations has not been established. Mechanism unknown.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with amprenavir/ritonavir is not recommended. If the combination is nevertheless considered necessary, a monitoring of the plasma levels of amprenavir is strongly encouraged (see section 4.4).|
|Atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg QD (TPV/r 500/100 mg BID)||Atazanavir Cmax ↓ 57% Atazanavir AUC ↓ 68% Atazanavir Cmin ↓ 81% Mechanism unknown. Tipranavir Cmax ↑ 8% Tipranavir AUC ↑ 20% Tipranavir Cmin ↑ 75% Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by atazanavir/ritonavir and induction by tipranavir/r.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with atazanavir/ritonavir is not recommended. If the co-administration is nevertheless considered necessary, a close monitoring of the safety of tipranavir and a monitoring of plasma concentrations of atazanavir are strongly encouraged (see section 4.4).|
|Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg BID||Lopinavir Cmax ↓ 47% Lopinavir AUC ↓ 55% Lopinavir Cmin ↓ 70% The clinical relevance of this reduction in lopinavir concentrations has not been established. Mechanism unknown.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with lopinavir/ritonavir is not recommended. If the combination is nevertheless considered necessary, a monitoring of the plasma levels of lopinavir is strongly encouraged (see section 4.4).|
|Saquinavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg QD||Saquinavir Cmax ↓ 70% Saquinavir AUC ↓ 76% Saquinavir Cmin ↓ 82% The clinical relevance of this reduction in saquinavir concentrations has not been established. Mechanism unknown.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with saquinavir/ritonavir is not recommended. If the combination is nevertheless considered necessary, a monitoring of the plasma levels of saquinavir is strongly encouraged (see section 4.4).|
|Protease inhibitors other than those listed above||No data are currently available on interactions of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with protease inhibitors other than those listed above.||Combination with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended (see section 4.4)|
|Enfuvirtide No interaction study performed||In studies where tipranavir co-administered with low-dose ritonavir was used with or without enfuvirtide, it has been observed that the steady-state plasma tipranavir trough concentration of patients receiving enfuvirtide were 45% higher as compared to patients not receiving enfuvirtide. No information is available for the parameters AUC and Cmax. A pharmacokinetic interaction is mechanistically unexpected and the interaction has not been confirmed in a controlled interaction study.||The clinical impact of the observed data, especially regarding the tipranavir with ritonavir safety profile, remains unknown. Nevertheless, the clinical data available from the RESIST trials did not suggest any significant alteration of the tipranavir with ritonavir safety profile when combined with enfuvirtide as compared to patients treated with tipranavir with ritonavir without enfuvirtide.|
|Integrase strand transfer inhibitors|
|Raltegravir 400 mg BID||Raltegravir Cmax ↔Raltegravir AUC 0-12↔Raltegravir C12: ↓ 45% Despite an almost half reduction of C12, previous clinical studies with this combination did not evidence an impaired outcome. The mechanism of action is thought to be induction of glucuronosyltransferase by tipranavir/r.||No particular dose adjustment is recommended.|
|Cobicistat and cobicistat-containing products||When co-administered, tipranavir and cobicistat exposures are markedly lower compared to that of tipranavir when boosted with low dose ritonavir.||Aptivus/ritonavir should not be administered concomitantly with cobicistat or cobicistat-containing products.|
|BoceprevirNo interaction study performed||In a pharmacokinetic study of healthy volunteers, boceprevir decreased the exposure of ritonavir, and some ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. Boceprevir exposure was reduced when co-administered with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir or ritonavir-boosted darunavir. These drug-drug interactions may reduce the effectiveness of HIV protease inhibitors and/or boceprevir when co-administered.||Co-administration of boceprevir with Aptivus/ritonavir is not recommended.|
|TelaprevirNo interaction study performed||Telaprevir is metabolized in the liver by CYP3A and is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, but other enzymes may be involved in the metabolism. When Aptivus/ritonavir is co-administered with telaprevir, a decrease or an increase of telaprevir exposure could be expected. There is a heterogeneous effect of telaprevir on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor drug plasma levels, depending on the protease inhibitors. Therefore, a modification of Aptivus exposure cannot be ruled out.||Co-administration of telaprevir with Aptivus/ritonavir is not recommended.|
|Fluconazole 200 mg QD (Day 1) then 100 mg QD||Fluconazole ↔Tipranavir Cmax ↑ 32% Tipranavir AUC ↑ 50% Tipranavir Cmin ↑ 69% Mechanism unknown||No dosage adjustments are recommended. Fluconazole doses >200 mg/day are not recommended.|
|ItraconazoleKetoconazoleNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase itraconazole or ketoconazole concentrations. Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir or ritonavir concentrations might increase upon co-administration with itraconazole or ketoconazole.||Itraconazole or ketoconazole should be used with caution (doses >200 mg/day are not recommended).|
|VoriconazoleNo interaction study performed||Due to multiple CYP isoenzyme systems involved in voriconazole metabolism, it is difficult to predict the interaction with tipranavir, co-administered with low-dose ritonavir.||Based on the known interaction of voriconazole with low dose ritonavir (see voriconazole SmPC) the co-administration of tipranavir/r and voriconazole should be avoided, unless an assessment of the benefit/risk to the patient justifies the use of voriconazole.|
|ColchicineNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, colchicine concentrations may increase upon co-administration with tipranavir and low dose ritonavir, due to tipranavir/ ritonavir CYP3A and P-gp inhibition. However a decrease of colchicine concentrations cannot be excluded since both tipranavir and ritonavir exhibit inducing potential towards CYP3A and P-gp. Colchicine is a substrate of CYP3A4 and P-gp (an intestinal efflux transporter).||A reduction in colchicine dosage or an interruption of colchicine treatment is recommended in patients with normal renal or hepatic function if treatment with Aptivus/ritonavir is required (see section 4.4). In patients with renal or hepatic impairment, co-administration of colchicine in patients on Aptivus/ritonavir is contraindicated (see section 4.3).|
|Clarithromycin 500 mg BID||Clarithromycin Cmax ↔Clarithromycin AUC ↑ 19% Clarithromycin Cmin ↑ 68% 14-OH-clarithromycin Cmax ↓ 97% 14-OH-clarithromycin AUC ↓ 97% 14-OH-clarithromycin Cmin ↓ 95% Tipranavir Cmax ↑ 40% Tipranavir AUC ↑ 66% Tipranavir Cmin ↑ 100% CYP 3A4 inhibition by tipranavir/r and P-gp (an intestinal efflux transporter) inhibition by clarithromycin.||Whilst the changes in clarithromycin parameters are not considered clinically relevant, the reduction in the 14-OH metabolite AUC should be considered for the treatment of infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae in which the 14-OH metabolite is most active. The increase of tipranavir Cmin may be clinically relevant. Patients using clarithromycin at doses higher than 500 mg twice daily should be carefully monitored for signs of toxicity of clarithromycin and tipranavir. For patients with renal impairment dose reduction of clarithromycin should be considered (see clarithromycin and ritonavir product information).|
|Rifabutin 150 mg QD||Rifabutin Cmax ↑ 70% Rifabutin AUC ↑ 190% Rifabutin Cmin ↑ 114% 25-O-desacetylrifabutin Cmax ↑ 3.2 fold 25-O-desacetylrifabutin AUC ↑ 21 fold 25-O-desacetylrifabutin Cmin ↑ 7.8 fold Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r No clinically significant change is observed in tipranavir PK parameters.||Dosage reductions of rifabutin by at least 75% of the usual 300 mg/day are recommended (ie 150 mg on alternate days, or three times per week). Patients receiving rifabutin with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, should be closely monitored for emergence of adverse events associated with rifabutin therapy. Further dosage reduction may be necessary.|
|Rifampicin||Co-administration of protease inhibitors with rifampicin substantially decreases protease inhibitor concentrations. In the case of tipranavir co-administered with low dose ritonavir, concomitant use with rifampicin is expected to result in sub-optimal levels of tipranavir which may lead to loss of virologic response and possible resistance to tipranavir.||Concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and rifampicin is contraindicated (see section 4.3). Alternate antimycobacterial agents such as rifabutin should be considered.|
|HalofantrineLumefantrine No interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase halofantrine and lumefantrine concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||Due to their metabolic profile and inherent risk of inducing torsades de pointes, administration of halofantrine and lumefantrine with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended (see section 4.4).|
|Carbamazepine 200 mg BID||Carbamazepine total* Cmax ↑ 13% Carbamazepine total* AUC ↑ 16% Carbamazepine total* Cmin ↑ 23% *Carbamazepine total = total of carbamazepine and epoxy-carbamazepine (both are pharmacologically active moieties). The increase in carbamazepine total PK parameters is not expected to have clinical consequences. Tipranavir Cmin ↓ 61% (compared to historical data) The decrease in tipranavir concentrations may result in decreased effectiveness. Carbamazepine induces CYP3A4.||Carbamazepine should be used with caution in combination with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Higher doses of carbamazepine (> 200 mg) may result in even larger decreases in tipranavir plasma concentrations (see section 4.4).|
|PhenobarbitalPhenytoinNo interaction study performed||Phenobarbital and phenytoin induce CYP3A4.||Phenobarbital and phenytoin should be used with caution in combination with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir (see section 4.4).|
|TolterodineNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase tolterodine concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 and CYP 2D6 by tipranavir/r||Co-administration is not recommended.|
|Endothelin receptor antagonists|
|Bosentan||Based on theoretical considerations, bosentan concentrations may increase upon co-administration with tipranavir and low dose ritonavir. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||Co-administration of bosentan and Aptivus with low dose ritonavir is not recommended (see section 4.4).|
|HMG CoA reductase inhibitors|
|Atorvastatin 10 mg QD||Atorvastatin Cmax ↑ 8.6 fold Atorvastatin AUC ↑ 9.4 fold Atorvastatin Cmin ↑ 5.2 fold Tipranavir ↔Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||Co-administration of atorvastatin and Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended. Other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors should be considered such as pravastatin, fluvastatin or rosuvastatin (See also section 4.4 and rosuvastatin and pravastatin recommendations). In cases where co-administration is necessary, the dose of 10 mg atorvastatin daily should not be exceeded. It is recommended to start with the lowest dose and careful clinical monitoring is necessary (see section 4.4).|
|Rosuvastatin 10 mg QD||Rosuvastatin Cmax ↑ 123% Rosuvastatin AUC ↑ 37% Rosuvastatin Cmin ↑ 6% Tipranavir ↔Mechanism unknown.||Co-administration of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and rosuvastatin should be initiated with the lowest dose (5 mg/day) of rosuvastatin, titrated to treatment response, and accompanied with careful clinical monitoring for rosuvastatin associated symptoms as described in the label of rosuvastatin.|
|PravastatinNo interaction study performed||Based on similarities in the elimination between pravastatin and rosuvastatin, TPV/r could increase the plasma levels of pravastatin. Mechanism unknown.||Co-administration of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and pravastatin should be initiated with the lowest dose (10 mg/day) of pravastatin, titrated to treatment response, and accompanied with careful clinical monitoring for pravastatin associated symptoms as described in the label of pravastatin.|
|SimvastatinLovastatinNo interaction study performed||The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors simvastatin and lovastatin are highly dependent on CYP3A for metabolism.||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with simvastatin or lovastatin are contra-indicated due to an increased risk of myopathy, including rhabdomyolysis (see section 4.3).|
|St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum)No interaction study performed||Plasma concentrations of tipranavir can be reduced by concomitant use of the herbal preparation St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum). This is due to induction of drug metabolising enzymes by St John's wort.||Herbal preparations containing St. John's wort must not be combined with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Co-administration of Aptivus with ritonavir, with St. John's wort is expected to substantially decrease tipranavir and ritonavir concentrations and may result in sub-optimal levels of tipranavir and lead to loss of virologic response and possible resistance to tipranavir.|
|Inhaled beta agonists|
|Salmeterol||The concurrent administration of tipranavir and low dose ritonavir may result in increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events associated with salmeterol, including QT prolongation, palpitations and sinus tachycardia. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r.||Concurrent administration of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended.|
|Oral contraceptives / Oestrogens|
|Ethinyl oestradiol 0.035 mg / Norethindrone 1.0 mg QD (TPV/r 750/200 mg BID)||Ethinyl oestradiol Cmax ↓ 52% Ethinyl oestradiol AUC ↓ 43% Mechanism unknown Norethindrone Cmax ↔Norethindrone AUC ↑ 27% Tipranavir ↔||The concomitant administration with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended. Alternative or additional contraceptive measures are to be used when oestrogen based oral contraceptives are co-administered with Aptivus and low dose ritonavir. Patients using oestrogens as hormone replacement therapy should be clinically monitored for signs of oestrogen deficiency (see sections 4.4 and 4.6).|
|Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors|
|SildenafilVardenafilNo interaction study performed||Co-administration of tipranavir and low dose ritonavir with PDE5 inhibitors is expected to substantially increase PDE5 concentrations and may result in an increase in PDE5 inhibitor-associated adverse events including hypotension, visual changes and priapism. CYP 3A4 inhibition by tipranavir/ r||Particular caution should be used when prescribing the phosphodiesterase (PDE5) inhibitors sildenafil or vardenafil in patients receiving Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. A safe and effective dose has not been established when used with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. There is increased potential for PDE5 inhibitor-associated adverse events (which include visual disturbances, hypotension, prolonged erection, and syncope). Co-administration of Aptivus/ ritonavir with sildenafil, when used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension, is contraindicated.|
|Tadalafil 10 mg QD||Tadalafil first-dose Cmax ↓ 22% Tadalafil first-dose AUC ↑ 133% CYP 3A4 inhibition and induction by tipranavir/r Tadalafil steady-state Cmax ↓ 30% Tadalafil steady-state AUC ↔No clinically significant change is observed in tipranavir PK parameters.||It is recommended to prescribe tadalafil after at least 7 days of Aptivus with ritonavir dosing. A safe and effective dose has not been established when used with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. There is increased potential for PDE5 inhibitor-associated adverse events (which include visual disturbances, hypotension, prolonged erection, and syncope).|
|Methadone 5 mg QD||Methadone Cmax ↓ 55% Methadone AUC ↓ 53% Methadone Cmin ↓ 50% R-methadone Cmax ↓ 46% R-methadone AUC ↓ 48% S-methadone Cmax ↓ 62% S-methadone AUC ↓ 63% Mechanism unknown||Patients should be monitored for opiate withdrawal syndrome. Dosage of methadone may need to be increased.|
|MeperidineNo interaction study performed||Tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to decrease meperidine concentrations and increase normeperidine metabolite concentrations.||Dosage increase and long-term use of meperidine with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, are not recommended due to the increased concentrations of the metabolite normeperidine which has both analgesic activity and CNS stimulant activity (e.g. seizures).|
|Buprenorphine/ Naloxone||Buprenorphine ↔Norbuprenorphine AUC ↓ 79% Norbuprenorphine Cmax ↓ 80% Norbuprenorphine Cmin ↓ 80%||Due to reduction in the levels of the active metabolite norbuprenorphine, co-administration of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and buprenorphine/naloxone may result in decreased clinical efficacy of buprenorphine. Therefore, patients should be monitored for opiate withdrawal syndrome.|
|CyclosporinTacrolimusSirolimusNo interaction study performed||Concentrations of cyclosporin, tacrolimus, or sirolimus cannot be predicted when co-administered with tipranavir co-administered with low dose ritonavir, due to conflicting effect of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, on CYP 3A and P-gp.||More frequent concentration monitoring of these medicinal products is recommended until blood levels have been stabilised.|
|Warfarin 10 mg QD||First-dose tipranavir /r: S-warfarin Cmax ↔S-warfarin AUC ↑ 18% Steady-state tipranavir/r: S-warfarin Cmax ↓ 17% S-warfarin AUC ↓ 12% Inhibition of CYP 2C9 with first-dose tipranavir /r, then induction of CYP 2C9 with steady-state tipranavir/r||Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, when combined with warfarin may be associated with changes in INR (International Normalised Ratio) values, and may affect anticoagulation (thrombogenic effect) or increase the risk of bleeding. Close clinical and biological (INR measurement) monitoring is recommended when warfarin and tipranavir are combined.|
|aluminium- and magnesium-based antacid QD||Tipranavir Cmax ↓ 25% Tipranavir AUC ↓ 27% Mechanism unknown||Dosing of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with antacids should be separated by at least a two hours time interval.|
|Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)|
|Omeprazole 40 mg QD||Omeprazole Cmax ↓ 73% Omeprazole AUC ↓ 70% Similar effects were observed for the S-enantiomer, esomeprazole. Induction of CYP 2C19 by tipranavir/r Tipranavir ↔||The combined use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with either omeprazole or esomeprazole is not recommended (see section 4.4). If unavoidable, upward dose adjustments for either omeprazole or esomeprazole may be considered based on clinical response to therapy. There are no data available indicating that omeprazole or esomeprazole dose adjustments will overcome the observed pharmacokinetic interaction. Recommendations for maximal doses of omeprazole or esomeprazole are found in the corresponding product information. No tipranavir with ritonavir dose adjustment is required.|
|LansoprazolePantoprazoleRabeprazoleNo interaction study performed||Based on the metabolic profiles of tipranavir/r and the proton pump inhibitors, an interaction can be expected. As a result of CYP3A4 inhibition and CYP2C19 induction by tipranavir/r, lansoprazole and pantoprazole plasma concentrations are difficult to predict. Rabeprazole plasma concentrations might decrease as a result of induction of CYP2C19 by tipranavir/r.||The combined use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with proton pump inhibitors is not recommended (see section 4.4). If the co-administration is judged unavoidable, this should be done under close clinical monitoring.|
|No interaction study performed||No data are available for H2-receptor antagonists in combination with tipranavir and low dose ritonavir.||An increase in gastric pH that may result from H2-receptor antagonist therapy is not expected to have an impact on tipranavir plasma concentrations.|
|AmiodaroneBepridilQuinidineNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase amiodarone, bepridil and quinidine concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with amiodarone, bepridil or quinidine is contraindicated due to potential serious and/or life threatening events (see section 4.3)|
|FlecainidePropafenone Metoprolol (given in heart failure) No interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase flecainide, propafenone and metoprolol concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 2D6 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with flecainide, propafenone or metoprolol is contraindicated (see section 4.3)|
|AstemizoleTerfenadineNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase astemizole and terfenadine concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with astemizole or terfenadine is contraindicated due to potential serious and/or life threatening events (see section 4.3)|
|DihydroergotamineErgonovineErgotamine MethylergonovineNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine and methylergonovine concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine or methylergonovine is contraindicated due to potential serious and/or life threatening events (see section 4.3)|
|Gastrointestinal motility agents|
|CisaprideNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase cisapride concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with cisapride is contraindicated due to potential serious and/or life threatening events (see section 4.3)|
|PimozideSertindoleQuetiapineNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase pimozide, sertindole and quetiapine concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with pimozide, sertindole, or quetiapine is contraindicated due to potential serious and/or life threatening events, including coma (see section 4.3)|
|Midazolam 2 mg QD (iv) Midazolam 5 mg QD (po)||First-dose tipranavir/r: Midazolam Cmax ↔Midazolam AUC ↑ 5.1 fold Steady-state tipranavir/r: Midazolam Cmax ↓ 13% Midazolam AUC ↑ 181% First-dose tipranavir/r Midazolam Cmax ↑ 5.0 fold Midazolam AUC ↑ 27 fold Steady-state tipranavir/r Midazolam Cmax ↑ 3.7 fold Midazolam AUC ↑ 9.8 fold Ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4 and therefore affect drugs metabolised by this enzyme.||Concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and oral midazolam is contra-indicated (see section 4.3). If Aptivus with ritonavir is administered with parenteral midazolam, close clinical monitoring for respiratory depression and/or prolonged sedation should be instituted and dosage adjustment should be considered.|
|TriazolamNo interaction study performed||Based on theoretical considerations, tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase triazolam concentrations. Inhibition of CYP 3A4 by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with triazolam is contraindicated due to potential serious and/or life threatening events (see section 4.3)|
|Nucleoside analogue DNA polymerase inhibitors|
|Valaciclovir 500 mg single dose||Co-administration of valaciclovir, tipranavir and low dose ritonavir was not associated with clinically relevant pharmacokinetic effects. Tipranavir: ↔Valaciclovir: ↔||Valaciclovir and Aptivus with low dose of ritonavir may be co-administered without dose adjustment.|
|Alpha 1-adrenoreceptor antagonists|
|Alfuzosin||Based on theoretical considerations, co-administration of tipranavir with low dose ritonavir and alfuzosin results in increased alfuzosin concentrations and may result in hypotension. CYP 3A4 inhibition by tipranavir/r||The concomitant use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with alfuzosin is contraindicated.|
|TheophyllineNo interaction study performed||Based on data from the cocktail study where caffeine (CYP1A2 substrate) AUC was reduced by 43%, tipranavir with ritonavir is expected to decrease theophylline concentrations. Induction of CYP 1A2 by tipranavir/r||Theophylline plasma concentrations should be monitored during the first two weeks of co-administration with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and the theophylline dose should be increased as needed.|
|DesipramineNo interaction study performed||Tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is expected to increase desipramine concentrations Inhibition of CYP 2D6 by tipranavir/r||Dosage reduction and concentration monitoring of desipramine is recommended.|
|Digoxin 0.25 mg QD iv Digoxin 0.25 mg QD po||First-dose tipranavir/r Digoxin Cmax ↔Digoxin AUC ↔Steady-state tipranavir/r Digoxin Cmax ↓ 20% Digoxin AUC ↔First-dose tipranavir/r Digoxin Cmax ↑ 93% Digoxin AUC ↑ 91% Transient inhibition of P-gp by tipranavir/r, followed by induction of P-gp by tipranavir/r at steady-state Steady-state tipranavir/r Digoxin Cmax ↓ 38% Digoxin AUC ↔||Monitoring of digoxin serum concentrations is recommended until steady state has been obtained.|
|TrazodoneInteraction study performed only with ritonavir||In a pharmacokinetic study performed in healthy volunteers, concomitant use of low dose ritonavir (200 mg twice daily) with a single dose of trazodone led to an increased plasma concentration of trazodone (AUC increased by 2.4 fold). Adverse events of nausea, dizziness, hypotension and syncope have been observed following co-administration of trazodone and ritonavir in this study. However, it is unknown whether the combination of tipranavir with ritonavir might cause a larger increase in trazodone exposure.||The combination should be used with caution and a lower dose of trazodone should be considered.|
|Bupropion 150 mg BID||Bupropion Cmax ↓ 51% Bupropion AUC ↓ 56% Tipranavir ↔The reduction of bupropion plasma levels is likely due to induction of CYP2B6 and UGT activity by RTV||If the co-administration with bupropion is judged unavoidable, this should be done under close clinical monitoring for bupropion efficacy, without exceeding the recommended dosage, despite the observed induction.|
|Loperamide 16 mg QD||Loperamide Cmax ↓ 61% Loperamide AUC ↓ 51% Mechanism unknown Tipranavir Cmax ↔Tipranavir AUC ↔Tipranavir Cmin ↓ 26%||A pharmacodynamic interaction study in healthy volunteers demonstrated that administration of loperamide and Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, does not cause any clinically relevant change in the respiratory response to carbon dioxide. The clinical relevance of the reduced loperamide plasma concentration is unknown.|
|Fluticasone propionateInteraction study performed only with ritonavir||In a clinical study where ritonavir 100 mg capsules bid were co-administered with 50 µg intranasal fluticasone propionate (4 times daily) for 7 days in healthy subjects, the fluticasone propionate plasma levels increased significantly, whereas the intrinsic cortisol levels decreased by approximately 86% (90% confidence interval 82-89%). Greater effects may be expected when fluticasone propionate is inhaled. Systemic corticosteroid effects including Cushing's syndrome and adrenal suppression have been reported in patients receiving ritonavir and inhaled or intranasally administered fluticasone propionate; this could also occur with other corticosteroids metabolised via the P450 3A pathway e.g. budesonide. It is unknown whether the combination of tipranavir with ritonavir might cause a larger increase in fluticasone exposure.||Concomitant administration of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and these glucocorticoids is not recommended unless the potential benefit of treatment outweighs the risk of systemic corticosteroid effects (see section 4.4). A dose reduction of the glucocorticoid should be considered with close monitoring of local and systemic effects or a switch to a glucocorticoid, which is not a substrate for CYP3A4 (e.g. beclomethasone). Moreover, in case of withdrawal of glucocorticoids progressive dose reduction may have to be performed over a longer period. The effects of high fluticasone systemic exposure on ritonavir plasma levels are as yet unknown.|
PregnancyThere are no adequate data from the use of tipranavir in pregnant women. Studies in animals have shown reproductive toxicity (see section 5.3). The potential risk for humans is unknown. Tipranavir should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the foetus.
Contraception in males and femalesTipranavir adversely interacts with oral contraceptives. Therefore, an alternative, effective, safe method of contraception should be used during treatment (see section 4.5).
BreastfeedingConsistent with the recommendation that HIV-infected mothers should not breast-feed their infants under any circumstances to avoid risking postnatal transmission of HIV, mothers should discontinue breast-feeding if they are receiving Aptivus.
FertilityClinical data on fertility are not available for tipranavir. Preclinical studies performed with tipranavir showed no adverse effect on fertility (see section 5.3).
Summary of the safety profileAmongst the most common adverse reactions reported for Aptivus were gastrointestinal complaints such as diarrhoea and nausea as well as hyperlipidaemia. The most serious adverse events include hepatic impairment and liver toxicity. Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) was only observed in post marketing experience (see section 4.4).
|Aptivus co-administered with low dose ritonavir, has been associated with reports of significant liver toxicity. In Phase III RESIST trials, the frequency of transaminase elevations was significantly increased in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm compared to the comparator arm. Close monitoring is therefore needed in patients treated with Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir (see section 4.4).Limited data are currently available for the use of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, in patients co-infected with hepatitis B or C. Aptivus should therefore be used with caution in patients co-infected with hepatitis B or C. Aptivus should be used in this patient population only if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk, and with increased clinical and laboratory monitoring.|
Tabulated summary of adverse reactionsAssessment of adverse reactions from HIV-1 clinical study data is based on experience in all Phase II and III trials in adults treated with the 500 mg tipranavir with 200 mg ritonavir dose twice daily (n=1397) and are listed below by system organ class and frequency according to the following categories:Very common (≥ 1/10), common (≥ 1/100 to <1/10), uncommon (≥1/1,000 to <1/100), rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000) Tabulated summary of adverse reactions associated with Aptivus based on clinical studies and post-marketing experience:
|Blood and lymphatic system disorders|
|uncommon||neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia|
|Immune system disorders|
|Metabolism and nutrition disorders|
|uncommon||anorexia, decreased appetite, weight decreased, hyperamylasaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia|
|rare||dehydration, facial wasting|
|uncommon||insomnia, sleep disorder|
|Nervous system disorders|
|uncommon||dizziness, neuropathy peripheral, somnolence|
|Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders|
|very common||diarrhoea, nausea|
|common||vomiting, flatulence, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, dyspepsia|
|uncommon||gastrooesophageal reflux disease, pancreatitis|
|uncommon||hepatic enzyme increased (ALAT, ASAT), cytolytic hepatitis, liver function test abnormal (ALAT, ASAT), hepatitis toxic|
|rare||hepatic failure (including fatal outcome), hepatitis, hepatic steatosis, hyperbilirubinaemia|
|Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders|
|uncommon||pruritus, lipohypertrophy, exanthem, lipoatrophy, lipodystrophy acquired|
|Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders|
|uncommon||myalgia, muscle spasms|
|Renal and urinary disorders|
|General disorders and administration site conditions|
|uncommon||pyrexia, influenza like illness, malaise|
Description of selected adverse reactionsThe following clinical safety features (hepatotoxicity, hyperlipidaemia, bleeding events, rash) were seen at higher frequency among tipranavir with ritonavir treated patients when compared with the comparator arm treated patients in the RESIST trials, or have been observed with tipranavir with ritonavir administration. The clinical significance of these observations has not been fully explored. Hepatotoxicity: After 48 weeks of follow-up, the frequency of Grade 3 or 4 ALAT and/or ASAT abnormalities was higher in tipranavir with ritonavir patients compared with comparator arm patients (10% and 3.4%, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that baseline ALAT or ASAT above DAIDS Grade 1 and co-infection with hepatitis B or C were risk factors for these elevations. Most patients were able to continue treatment with tipranavir with ritonavir. Hyperlipidaemia: Grade 3 or 4 elevations of triglycerides occurred more frequently in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm compared with the comparator arm. At 48 weeks these rates were 25.2% of patients in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm and 15.6% in the comparator arm. Bleeding: RESIST participants receiving tipranavir with ritonavir tended to have an increased risk of bleeding; at 24 weeks the relative risk was 1.98 (95% CI=1.03, 3.80). At 48-weeks the relative risk decreased to 1.27 (95% CI=0.76, 2.12). There was no pattern for the bleeding events and no difference between treatment groups in coagulation parameters. The significance of this finding is being further studied.Fatal and non-fatal intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) have been reported in patients receiving tipranavir, many of whom had other medical conditions or were receiving concomitant medicinal products that may have caused or contributed to these events. However, in some cases the role of tipranavir cannot be excluded. No pattern of abnormal haematological or coagulation parameters has been observed in patients in general, or preceding the development of ICH. Therefore, routine measurement of coagulation parameters is not currently indicated in the management of patients on Aptivus.An increased risk of ICH has previously been observed in patients with advanced HIV disease/AIDS such as those treated in the Aptivus clinical trials.Rash: An interaction study in women between tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and ethinyl oestradiol/norethindrone demonstrated a high frequency of non-serious rash. In the RESIST trials, the risk of rash was similar between tipranavir with ritonavir and comparator arms (16.3% vs. 12.5%, respectively; see section 4.4). No cases of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis have been reported in the clinical development programme of tipranavir.
Laboratory abnormalitiesFrequencies of marked clinical laboratory abnormalities (Grade 3 or 4) reported in at least 2% of patients in the tipranavir with ritonavir arms in the phase III clinical studies (RESIST-1 and RESIST-2) after 48-weeks were increased ASAT (6.1%), increased ALAT (9.7%), increased amylase (6.0%), increased cholesterol (4.2%), increased triglycerides (24.9%), and decreased white blood cell count (5.7%).Combination antiretroviral therapy, including regimens containing a protease inhibitor, is associated with redistribution of body fat in some patients, including loss of peripheral subcutaneous fat, increased intra-abdominal fat, breast hypertrophy and dorsocervical fat accumulation (buffalo hump). Protease inhibitors are also associated with metabolic abnormalities such as hypertriglyceridaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia.Increased CPK, myalgia, myositis and, rarely, rhabdomyolysis, have been reported with protease inhibitors, particularly in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In HIV-infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic infections may arise. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease) have also been reported; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment (see section 4.4). Reactivation of herpes simplex and herpes zoster virus infections were observed in the RESIST trials. Cases of osteonecrosis have been reported, particularly in patients with generally acknowledged risk factors, advanced HIV disease or long-term exposure to combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). The frequency of this is unknown (see section 4.4).
Paediatric populationIn an open-label, dose-finding study of tipranavir plus ritonavir (Trial 1182.14), 62 children aged 2 to 12 years received Aptivus oral solution. In general, adverse reactions were similar to those seen in adults, with the exception of vomiting, rash and pyrexia which were reported more frequently in children than in adults. The most frequently reported moderate or severe adverse reactions in the 48 week analyses are noted below. Most frequently reported moderate or severe adverse reactions in paediatric patients age 2 to < 12 years (reported in 2 or more children, Trial 1182.14, 48 weeks analyses, Full Analysis Set).
|Total patients treated (N)||62|
|Abdominal pain1||3 (4.8)|
|gamma GT increased||4 (6.5)|
|ALAT increased||2 (3.2)|
Mechanism of actionThe human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) encodes an aspartyl protease that is essential for the cleavage and maturation of viral protein precursors. Tipranavir is a non-peptidic inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease that inhibits viral replication by preventing the maturation of viral particles.Antiviral activity in vitroTipranavir inhibits the replication of laboratory strains of HIV-1 and clinical isolates in acute models of T-cell infection, with 50% and 90% effective concentrations (EC50 and EC90) ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 µM (18-42 ng/ml) and 0.07 to 0.18 µM (42-108 ng/ml), respectively. Tipranavir demonstrates antiviral activity in vitro against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M non-clade B isolates (A, C, D, F, G, H, CRF01 AE, CRF02 AG, CRF12 BF). Group O and HIV-2 isolates have reduced susceptibility in vitro to tipranavir with EC50 values ranging from 0.164-1 µM and 0.233-0.522 µM, respectively. Protein binding studies have shown that the antiviral activity of tipranavir decreases on average 3.75-fold in conditions where human serum is present.
ResistanceThe development of resistance to tipranavir in vitro is slow and complex. In one particular in vitro resistance experiment, an HIV-1 isolate that was 87-fold resistant to tipranavir was selected after 9 months, and contained 10 mutations in the protease: L10F, I13V, V32I, L33F, M36I, K45I, I54V/T, A71V, V82L, I84V as well as a mutation in the gag polyprotein CA/P2 cleavage site. Reverse genetic experiments showed that the presence of 6 mutations in the protease (I13V, V32I, L33F, K45I, V82L, I84V) was required to confer > 10-fold resistance to tipranavir while the full 10-mutation genotype conferred 69-fold resistance to tipranavir. In vitro, there is an inverse correlation between the degree of resistance to tipranavir and the capacity of viruses to replicate. Recombinant viruses showing ≥ 3-fold resistance to tipranavir grow at less than 1% of the rate detected for wild type HIV-1 in the same conditions. Tipranavir resistant viruses which emerge in vitro from wild-type HIV-1 show decreased susceptibility to the protease inhibitors amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir and ritonavir but remain sensitive to saquinavir. Through a series of multiple stepwise regression analyses of baseline and on-treatment genotypes from all clinical studies, 16 amino acids have been associated with reduced tipranavir susceptibility and/or reduced 48-week viral load response: 10V, 13V, 20M/R/V, 33F, 35G, 36I, 43T, 46L, 47V, 54A/M/V, 58E, 69K, 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 84V. Clinical isolates that exhibited a ≥ 10-fold decrease in tipranavir susceptibility harboured 8 or more tipranavir-associated mutations. In Phase II and III clinical trials, 276 patients with on-treatment genotypes have demonstrated that the predominant emerging mutations with tipranavir treatment are L33F/I/V, V82T/L and I84V. Combination of all three of these is usually required for reduced susceptibility. Mutations at position 82 occur via two pathways: one from pre-existing mutation 82A selecting to 82T, the other from wild type 82V selecting to 82L.
Cross-resistanceTipranavir maintains significant antiviral activity (< 4-fold resistance) against the majority of HIV-1 clinical isolates showing post-treatment decreased susceptibility to the currently approved protease inhibitors: amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir. Greater than 10-fold resistance to tipranavir is uncommon (< 2.5% of tested isolates) in viruses obtained from highly treatment experienced patients who have received multiple peptidic protease inhibitors.
ECG evaluationThe effect of tipranavir with low dose of ritonavir on the QTcF interval was measured in a study in which 81 healthy subjects received the following treatments twice daily for 2.5 days: tipranavir/ritonavir (500/200 mg), tipranavir/ritonavir at a supra-therapeutic dose (750/200 mg), and placebo/ritonavir (-/200 mg). After baseline and placebo adjustment, the maximum mean QTcF change was 3.2 ms (1-sided 95% Upper CI: 5.6 ms) for the 500/200 mg dose and 8.3 ms (1-sided 95% Upper CI: 10.8 ms) for the supra-therapeutic 750/200 mg dose. Hence tipranavir at therapeutic dose with low dose of ritonavir did not prolong the QTc interval but may do so at supratherapeutic dose.
Clinical pharmacodynamic dataThe following clinical data is derived from analyses of 48-week data from ongoing studies (RESIST-1 and RESIST-2) measuring effects on plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 are ongoing, randomised, open-label, multicentre studies in HIV-positive, triple-class experienced patients, evaluating treatment with tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with low dose ritonavir 200 mg (twice daily) plus an optimised background regimen (OBR) individually defined for each patient based on genotypic resistance testing and patient history. The comparator regimen included a ritonavir-boosted PI (also individually defined) plus an OBR. The ritonavir-boosted PI was chosen from among saquinavir, amprenavir, indinavir or lopinavir/ritonavir. All patients had received at least two PI-based antiretroviral regimens and were failing a PI-based regimen at the time of study entry. At least one primary protease gene mutation from among 30N, 46I, 46L, 48V, 50V, 82A, 82F, 82L, 82T, 84V or 90M had to be present at baseline, with not more than two mutations on codons 33, 82, 84 or 90.After Week 8, patients in the comparator arm who met the protocol defined criteria of initial lack of virologic response had the option of discontinuing treatment and switching over to tipranavir with ritonavir in a separate roll-over study. The 1483 patients included in the primary analysis had a median age of 43 years (range 17-80), were 86% male, 75% white, 13% black and 1% Asian. In the tipranavir and comparator arms median baseline CD4 cell counts were 158 and 166 cells/mm3, respectively, (ranges 1-1893 and 1-1184 cells/mm3); median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.79 and 4.80 log10 copies/ml, respectively (ranges 2.34-6.52 and 2.01-6.76 log10 copies/ml). Patients had prior exposure to a median of 6 NRTIs, 1 NNRTI, and 4 PIs. In both studies, a total of 67% patient viruses were resistant and 22% were possibly resistant to the pre-selected comparator PIs. A total of 10% of patients had previously used enfuvirtide. Patients had baseline HIV-1 isolates with a median of 16 HIV-1 protease gene mutations, including a median of 3 primary protease gene mutations D30N, L33F/I, V46I/L, G48V, I50V, V82A/F/T/L, I84V, and L90M. With respect to mutations on codons 33, 82, 84 and 90 approximately 4% had no mutations, 24% had mutations at codons 82 (less than 1% of patients had the mutation V82L) and 90, 18% had mutations at codons 84 and 90 and 53% had at least one key mutation at codon 90. One patient in the tipranavir arm had four mutations. In addition the majority of participants had mutations associated with both NRTI and NNRTI resistance. Baseline phenotypic susceptibility was evaluated in 454 baseline patient samples. There was an average decrease in susceptibility of 2-fold wild type (WT) for tipranavir, 12-fold WT for amprenavir, 55-fold WT for atazanavir, 41-fold WT for indinavir, 87-fold WT for lopinavir, 41-fold WT for nelfinavir, 195-fold WT for ritonavir, and 20-fold WT for saquinavir.Combined 48-week treatment response (composite endpoint defined as patients with a confirmed ≥1 log RNA drop from baseline and without evidence of treatment failure) for both studies was 34% in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm and 15% in the comparator arm. Treatment response is presented for the overall population (displayed by enfuvirtide use), and detailed by PI strata for the subgroup of patients with genotypically resistant strains in the Table below.
Treatment response* at week 48 (pooled studies RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 in treatment-experienced patients)
|RESIST study||Tipranavir /RTV||CPI/RTV**||p-value|
|n (%)||N||n (%)||N|
|Overall populationFASPP||255 (34.2) 171 (37.7)||746 454||114 (15.5)74 (17.1)||737 432||<0.0001 <0.0001|
|- with ENF (FAS)||85 (50.0)||170||28 (20.7)||135||<0.0001|
|- without ENF (FAS)||170 (29.5)||576||86 (14.3)||602||<0.0001|
|LPV/rtv FAS PP||66 (28.9) 47 (32.2)||228 146||23 (9.5) 13 (9.1)||242 143||<0.0001 <0.0001|
|APV/rtv FASPP||50 (33.3)38 (39.2)||15097||22 (14.9)17 (18.3)||14893||<0.00010.0010|
|SQV/rtvFASPP||22 (30.6)11 (28.2)||7239||5 (7.0)2 (5.7)||7135||<0.00010.0650|
|IDV/rtvFASPP||6 (46.2)3 (50.0)||136||1 (5.3)1 (7.1)||1914||0.00260.0650|
Paediatric populationHIV-positive, paediatric patients, aged 2 through 18 years, were studied in a randomized, open-label, multicenter study (trial 1182.14). Patients were required to have a baseline HIV-1 RNA concentration of at least 1500 copies/ml, were stratified by age (2 to < 6 years, 6 to < 12 years and 12 to 18 years) and randomized to receive one of two tipranavir with ritonavir dose regimens: 375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 dose, compared to the 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2 dose, plus background therapy of at least two non-protease inhibitor antiretroviral medicinal products, optimized using baseline genotypic resistance testing. All patients initially received Aptivus oral solution. Paediatric patients who were 12 years or older and received the maximum dose of 500 mg/200 mg twice daily could change to Aptivus capsules from study day 28. The trial evaluated pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, as well as virologic and immunologic responses through 48 weeks. The available clinical data do not support the use of Aptivus oral solution in adolescents or adults. Compared to the capsules, tipranavir exposure is higher when administering the same dose as oral solution (see section 5.2). Due to this and to the high vitamin E content of the oral solution, the risk of adverse reactions (type, frequency and/or severity) may be higher than with the capsule formulation. In patients less than 12 years of age, however, the oral solution is the only available option for treatment with tipranavir, as no data are available on the efficacy and safety of Aptivus capsules in children less than 12 years of age. Since Aptivus capsules and oral solution are not bioequivalent, results obtained with the oral solution cannot be extrapolated to the capsules (see also section 5.2). Moreover, in patients with a body surface area of less than 1.33 m2 appropriate dose adjustments cannot be achieved with the capsule formulation. These factors lead to the conclusion that the benefits outweigh the risks of Aptivus oral solution only in children between 2 and 12 years of age without any other therapeutic option (see section 4.1).The baseline characteristics and the key efficacy results at 48 weeks for the paediatric patients receiving Aptivus oral solution are displayed in the tables below.Baseline characteristics for patients 2 - <12 years treated with Aptivus oral solution
|Number of Patients||62|
|Baseline HIV-1 RNA (log10 copies/ml)||Median (Min Max)||4.8 (3.3 6.0)|
|% with VL > 100,000 copies/ml||37.1%|
|Baseline CD4+ (cells/mm3)||Median (Min Max)||600 (24 2578)|
|% ≤ 200||15.5%|
|Baseline % CD4+ cells||Median (Min Max)||21.9% (1.5% 44.0%)|
|Previous ADI*||% with Category C||48.4%|
|Treatment history||% with any ARV||96.8%|
|Median # previous NRTIs||4|
|Median # previous NNRTIs||1|
|Median # previous PIs||1|
Key efficacy results at 48 weeks for patients 2 - <12 years treated with Aptivus oral solution
|Number of patients||62|
|Primary efficacy endpoint: % with VL < 400||50.0%|
|Median change from baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA (copies/ml)||-2.06|
|Median change from baseline in CD4+ cell count (cells/mm3)||167|
|Median change from baseline in % CD4+ cells||5%|
Analyses of tipranavir resistance in treatment experienced patientsTipranavir with ritonavir response rates in the RESIST studies were assessed by baseline tipranavir genotype and phenotype. Relationships between baseline phenotypic susceptibility to tipranavir, primary PI mutations, protease mutations at codons 33, 82, 84 and 90, tipranavir resistance-associated mutations, and response to tipranavir with ritonavir therapy were assessed.Of note, patients in the RESIST studies had a specific mutational pattern at baseline of at least one primary protease gene mutation among codons 30N, 46I, 46L, 48V, 50V, 82A, 82F, 82L, 82T, 84V or 90M, and no more than two mutations on codons 33, 82, 84 or 90.The following observations were made:− Primary PI mutations:Analyses were conducted to assess virological outcome by the number of primary PI mutations (any change at protease codons 30, 32, 36, 46, 47, 48, 50, 53, 54, 82, 84, 88 and 90) present at baseline. Response rates were higher in tipranavir with ritonavir patients than comparator PI boosted with ritonavir in new enfuvirtide patients, or patients without new enfuvirtide. However, without new enfuvirtide some patients began to lose antiviral activity between weeks 4 and 8.− Mutations at protease codons 33, 82, 84 and 90:A reduced virological response was observed in patients with viral strains harbouring two or more mutations at HIV protease codons 33, 82, 84 or 90, and not receiving new enfuvirtide.− Tipranavir resistance-associated mutations:Virological response to tipranavir with ritonavir therapy has been evaluated using a tipranavir-associated mutation score based on baseline genotype in RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 patients. This score (counting the 16 amino acids that have been associated with reduced tipranavir susceptibility and/or reduced viral load response: 10V, 13V, 20M/R/V, 33F, 35G, 36I, 43T, 46L, 47V, 54A/M/V, 58E, 69K, 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 84V) was applied to baseline viral protease sequences. A correlation between the tipranavir mutation score and response to tipranavir with ritonavir therapy at week 48 has been established. This score has been determined from the selected RESIST patient population having specific mutation inclusion criteria and therefore extrapolation to a wider population mandates caution.At 48-weeks, a higher proportion of patients receiving tipranavir with ritonavir achieved a treatment response in comparison to the comparator protease inhibitor/ritonavir for nearly all of the possible combinations of genotypic resistance mutations (see table below).Proportion of patients achieving treatment response at Week 48 (confirmed ≥ 1 log10 copies/ml decrease in viral load compared to baseline), according to tipranavir baseline mutation score and enfuvirtide use in RESIST patients
|New ENF||No New ENF*|
|Number of TPV Score Mutations**||TPV/r||TPV/r|
Mean decrease in viral load from baseline to week 48, according to tipranavir baseline mutation score and enfuvirtide use in RESIST patients
|New ENF||No New ENF*|
|Number of TPV Score Mutations**||TPV/r||TPV/r|
AbsorptionAbsorption of tipranavir in humans is limited, though no absolute quantification of absorption is available. Tipranavir is a P-gp substrate, a weak P-gp inhibitor and appears to be a potent P-gp inducer as well. Data suggest that, although ritonavir is a P-gp inhibitor, the net effect of Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, at the proposed dose regimen at steady-state, is P-gp induction. Peak plasma concentrations are reached within 1 to 5 hours after dose administration depending upon the dosage used. With repeated dosing, tipranavir plasma concentrations are lower than predicted from single dose data, presumably due to hepatic enzyme induction. Steady-state is attained in most subjects after 7 days of dosing. Tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, exhibits linear pharmacokinetics at steady state.Dosing with Aptivus capsules 500 mg twice daily concomitant with 200 mg ritonavir twice daily for 2 to 4 weeks and without meal restriction produced a mean tipranavir peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 94.8 ± 22.8 µM for female patients (n=14) and 77.6 ± 16.6 µM for male patients (n=106), occurring approximately 3 hours after administration. The mean steady-state trough concentration prior to the morning dose was 41.6 ± 24.3 µM for female patients and 35.6 ± 16.7 µM for male patients. Tipranavir AUC over a 12 hour dosing interval averaged 851 ± 309 µMh (CL=1.15 l/h) for female patients and 710 ± 207 µMh (CL=1.27 l/h) for male patients. The mean half-life was 5.5 (females) or 6.0 hours (males).
Effects of food on oral absorptionFood improves the tolerability of tipranavir with ritonavir. Therefore Aptivus, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, should be given with food. Absorption of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is reduced in the presence of antacids (see section 4.5).
DistributionTipranavir is extensively bound to plasma proteins (>99.9%). From clinical samples of healthy volunteers and HIV-1 positive subjects who received tipranavir without ritonavir the mean fraction of tipranavir unbound in plasma was similar in both populations (healthy volunteers 0.015% ± 0.006%; HIV-positive subjects 0.019% ± 0.076%). Total plasma tipranavir concentrations for these samples ranged from 9 to 82 μM. The unbound fraction of tipranavir appeared to be independent of total concentration over this concentration range. No studies have been conducted to determine the distribution of tipranavir into human cerebrospinal fluid or semen.
BiotransformationIn vitro metabolism studies with human liver microsomes indicated that CYP3A4 is the predominant CYP isoform involved in tipranavir metabolism. The oral clearance of tipranavir decreased after the addition of ritonavir which may represent diminished first-pass clearance of the substance at the gastrointestinal tract as well as the liver. The metabolism of tipranavir in the presence of low dose ritonavir is minimal. In a 14C-tipranavir human study (500 mg 14C-tipranavir with 200 mg ritonavir, twice daily), unchanged tipranavir was predominant and accounted for 98.4% or greater of the total plasma radioactivity circulating at 3, 8, or 12 hours after dosing. Only a few metabolites were found in plasma, and all were at trace levels (0.2% or less of the plasma radioactivity). In faeces, unchanged tipranavir represented the majority of faecal radioactivity (79.9% of faecal radioactivity). The most abundant faecal metabolite, at 4.9% of faecal radioactivity (3.2% of dose), was a hydroxyl metabolite of tipranavir. In urine, unchanged tipranavir was found in trace amounts (0.5% of urine radioactivity). The most abundant urinary metabolite, at 11.0% of urine radioactivity (0.5% of dose) was a glucuronide conjugate of tipranavir.
EliminationAdministration of 14C-tipranavir to subjects (n = 8) that received 500 mg tipranavir with 200 mg ritonavir twice daily dosed to steady-state demonstrated that most radioactivity (median 82.3%) was excreted in faeces, while only a median of 4.4% of the radioactive dose administered was recovered in urine. In addition, most radioactivity (56%) was excreted between 24 and 96 hours after dosing. The effective mean elimination half-life of tipranavir with ritonavir in healthy volunteers (n = 67) and HIV-infected adult patients (n = 120) was approximately 4.8 and 6.0 hours, respectively, at steady state following a dose of 500 mg/200 mg twice daily with a light meal.
Special populationsAlthough data available at this stage are currently limited to allow a definitive analysis, they suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile is unchanged in older people and comparable between races. By contrast, evaluation of the steady-state plasma tipranavir trough concentrations at 10-14 h after dosing from the RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 studies demonstrate that females generally had higher tipranavir concentrations than males. After four weeks of Aptivus 500 mg with 200 mg ritonavir (twice daily) the median plasma trough concentration of tipranavir was 43.9 µM for females and 31.1 µM for males. This difference in concentrations does not warrant a dose adjustment.Renal impairment: Tipranavir pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients with renal impairment. However, since the renal clearance of tipranavir is negligible, a decrease in total body clearance is not expected in patients with renal impairment.Hepatic impairment: In a study comparing 9 patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) hepatic impairment to 9 controls, the single and multiple dose exposure of tipranavir and ritonavir were increased in patients with hepatic impairment but still within the range observed in clinical studies. No dosing adjustment is required in patients with mild hepatic impairment but patients should be closely monitored (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).The influence of moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment on the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of either tipranavir or ritonavir has so far not been investigated. Tipranavir is contraindicated in moderate or severe hepatic impairment (see sections 4.2 and 4.3).Paediatric population: The oral solution has been shown to have greater bioavailability than the soft capsule formulation.
Boehringer Ingelheim Limited
Ellesfield Avenue, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8YS
+44 (0)1344 741 298
+44 (0)1344 424 600
+44 (0)1344 742579