| Pharmacotherapeutic Group: other antineoplastic agentsATC Code: L01XX19 Experimental data Irinotecan is a semi-synthetic derivative of camptothecin. It is an antineoplastic agent which acts as a specific inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I. It is metabolised by carboxylesterase in most tissues to SN-38, which has been found to be more active than irinotecan in purified topoisomerase I and more cytotoxic than irinotecan against several murine and human tumour cell lines. The inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I by irinotecan or SN-38 induces single-strand DNA lesions which block the DNA replication fork and are responsible for the cytotoxicity. This cytotoxic effect has been found to be time-dependent and specific to the S-phase.In vitro, irinotecan and SN-38 are not significantly recognised by the P-glycoprotein (MDR), and irinotecan displays cytotoxic activity against doxorubicin- and vinblastine-resistant cell lines.Furthermore, irinotecan has a broad antitumour activity in vivo against murine tumour models (P03 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, MA16/C mammary adenocarcinoma, C38 and C51 colon adenocarcinomas) and against human xenografts (Co-4 colon adenocarcinoma, MX-1 mammary adenocarcinoma, ST-15 and SC-16 gastric adenocarcinomas). Irinotecan is active against tumours expressing the P-glycoprotein (MDR) (vincristine- and doxorubicin-resistant P388 leukaemias).In addition to the antitumour effect of irinotecan, the most relevant pharmacological effect of irinotecan is the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase.Clinical data In monotherapy for the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma:More than 980 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who had failed a previous 5-FU treatment, were enrolled in clinical phase II/III studies, in the every 3 week dosage schedule. The efficacy of irinotecan was evaluated in 765 patients with disease progression during 5-FU treatment at study entry.
Progression Free Survival at 6 months (%) Survival at 12 months (%) Median Survival (months) | Phase III | Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) | Irinotecan versus 5-FU | Irinotecan | Supportive care | p values | Irinotecan | 5-FU | p values | n = 183 | n = 90 | n = 127 | n = 129 | NA 36.2 9.2 | NA 13.8 6.5 | p=0.0001 p=0.0001 | 33.5 44.8 10.8 | 26.7 32.4 8.5 | p=0.03 p=0.0351 p=0.0351 | NA: Not Applicable In phase II studies, carried out on 455 patients with the 3 weekly dosage schedule, the disease free survival at 6 months was 30% and the median survival time was 9 months. The median time to progression was 18 weeks.In addition, non-comparative phase II studies were carried out on 304 patients by administering weekly a dose of 125 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over a 90 minute period for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. In these studies, the median time to the start of progression was 17 weeks and median survival time was 10 months. A similar safety profile has been observed in the weekly dosage schedule in 193 patients at the starting dose of 125 mg/m2, compared to the 3 weekly dosage schedule. The median time of onset of the liquid stool was on day 11.In combination therapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma In combination therapy with Folinic Acid and 5-FluorouracilA phase III study was carried out on 385 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first line treatment, either by administering the treatment every 2 weeks (see section 4.2) or every week. In the 2 weekly schedule, on the first day, the administration of irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks was followed by infusion of FA (200 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus, followed by 600 mg/m2 as a 22-hour intravenous infusion). On day 2, FA and 5-FU were administered using the same doses and schedules. In the weekly schedule, the administration of irinotecan at 80 mg/m2 was followed by infusion with FA (500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion) and then by 5-FU (2,300 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous infusion) over 6 weeks.In the combination treatment trial with the 2 regimens described above, the efficacy of irinotecan was evaluated in 198 patients: | Combined regimens (n=198) | Weekly schedule (n=50) | Every 2 weeks schedule (n=148) | Irin. +5-FU/FA | 5-FU/FA | Irin. +5-FU/FA | 5-FU/FA | Irin. +5-FU/FA | 5-FU/FA | Response rate (%) p value | 40.8 * | 23.1 * | 51.2 * | 28.6 * | 37.5 * | 21.6 * | p < 0.001 | p = 0.045 | p = 0.005 | Median time to progression (months) p value | 6.7 | 4.4 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 3.7 | p < 0.001 | NS | p = 0.001 | Median duration of response (months) p value | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 6.7 | 9.3 | 9.5 | NS | p = 0.043 | NS | Median duration of response and stabilisation (months) p value | 8.6 | 6.2 | 8.3 | 6.7 | 8.5 | 5.6 | p < 0.001 | NS | p = 0.003 | Median time to treatment failure (months) p value | 5.3 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 3.0 | p = 0.0014 | NS | p < 0.001 | Median survival (months) p value | 16.8 | 14.0 | 19.2 | 14.1 | 15.6 | 13.0 | p = 0.028 | NS | p = 0.041 | Irin: irinotecan 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil, FA: folinic acid, NS: nonsignificant, *: as per protocol population analysisIn the weekly schedule, the incidence of severe diarrhoea was 44.4% in the patients treated with irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA and 25.6% in the patients treated with 5-FU/FA alone. The incidence of severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 500 cells/mm3) was 5.8% in the patients treated with irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA and 2.4% in the patients treated with 5-FU/FA alone.Additionally, the median time to definitive performance status deterioration was significantly longer in the group that received irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA than in the 5-FU/FA alone group (p = 0.046).Quality of life was assessed in this phase III study by using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Time to definitive deterioration constantly occurred later in the irinotecan groups. The global health status/quality of life was slightly better in the irinotecan combination group although not significantly, showing that efficacy of irinotecan in combination treatment could be reached without affecting the quality of life.In combination therapy with cetuximab EMR 62 202-013: This randomised study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not received prior treatment for metastatic disease compared the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) (599 patients) to the same chemotherapy alone (599 patients). The proportion of patients with KRAS wild-type tumours from the patient population evaluable for KRAS status comprised 64%. The efficacy data generated in this study are summarised in the table below:
| Overall population | KRAS wild-type population | Variable/statistic | Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI (N=599) | FOLFIRI (N=599) | Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI (N=172) | FOLFIRI (N=176) | ORR | | | | | % (95%CI) | 46.9 (42.9, 51.0) | 38.7 (34.8, 42.8) | 59.3 (51.6, 66.7) | 43.2 (35.8, 50.9) | p-value | 0.0038 | 0.0025 | PFS | | | | | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.726, 0.998) | 0.68 (0.501, 0.934) | p-value | 0.0479 | 0.0167 | CI = confidence interval, FOLFIRI = irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU/FA, ORR = objective response rate (patients with complete response or partial response), PFS = progression-free survival time In combination with cetuximab after failure of irinotecan-including cytotoxic therapy The efficacy of the combination of cetuximab with irinotecan was investigated in two clinical studies. A total of 356 patients with EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer who had recently failed irinotecan-including cytotoxic therapy and who had a minimum Karnofsky performance status of 60%, but the majority of whom had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 % received the combination treatment.EMR 62 202-007: This randomised study compared the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan (218 patients) with cetuximab monotherapy (111 patients).IMCL CP02-9923: This single arm open-label study investigated the combination therapy in 138 patients.The efficacy data from these studies are summarised in the table below.Study | n | ORR | DCR | PFS (months) | OS (months) | | | n[%] | 95% CI | n[%] | 95% CI | Median | 95% CI | Median | 95% CI | Cetuximab + irinotecan | EMR 62 202-007 | 218 | 50 (22.9) | 17.5, 29.1 | 121 (55.5) | 48.6, 62.2 | 4.1 | 2.8, 4.3 | 8.6 | 7.6, 9.6 | IMCL CP02-9923 | 138 | 21 (15.2) | 9.7, 22.3 | 84 (60.9) | 52.2, 69.1 | 2.9 | 2.6, 4.1 | 8.4 | 7.2, 10.3 | Cetuximab | EMR 62 202-007 | 111 | 12 (10.8) | 5.7, 18.1 | 36 (32.4) | 23.9, 42.0 | 1.5 | 1.4, 2.0 | 6.9 | 5.6, 9.1 | CI = confidence interval; DCR = disease control rate (patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease for at least 6 weeks); ORR = objective response rate (patients with complete response or partial response); OS = overall survival time; PFS = progression-free survival | The efficacy of the combination of cetuximab with irinotecan was superior to that of cetuximab monotherapy, in terms of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). In the randomised trial, no effects on overall survival were demonstrated (hazard ratio 0.91, p = 0.48).In combination therapy with bevacizumab A phase III randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial evaluated bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan/5-FU/FA as first-line treatment for metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum (study AVF2107g). The addition of bevacizumab to the combination of irinotecan/5-FU/FA resulted in a statistically significant increase in overall survival. The clinical benefit, as measured by overall survival, was seen in all pre-specified patient subgroups, including those defined by age, sex, performance status, location of primary tumour, number of organs involved and duration of metastatic disease. Refer also to the bevacizumab summary of product characteristics. The efficacy results of study AVF2107g are summarised in the table below. | Arm 1 Irinotecan/5-FU/FA/placebo | Arm 2 Irinotecan/5-FU/FA/bevacizumab a | Number of patients | 411 | 402 | Overall survival | | | Median time [months] | 15.6 | 20.3 | 95% Confidence interval | 14.29 16.99 | 18.46 24.18 | Hazard ratio b | | 0.660 | p value | | 0.00004 | Progression-free survival | | | Median time [months] | 6.2 | 10.6 | Hazard ratio b | | 0.54 | p value | | < 0.0001 | Overall response rate | | | Rate [%] | 34.8 | 44.8 | 95% Confidence interval | 30.2 39.6 | 39.9 49.8 | p value | | 0.0036 | Duration of response | | | Median time [months] | 7.1 | 10.4 | 25 75 Percentile [months] | 4.7 11.8 | 6.7 15.0 | a
5 mg/kg every 2 weeks; b
Relative to control arm. |
In combination therapy with capecitabine Data from a randomised, controlled phase III study (CAIRO) support the use of capecitabine at a starting dose of 1000 mg/m2 for 2 weeks every 3 weeks in combination with irinotecan for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. 820 Patients were randomized to receive either sequential treatment (n=410) or combination treatment (n=410). Sequential treatment consisted of first-line treatment with capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days), second-line irinotecan (350 mg/m2 on day 1), and third-line combination of capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1). Combination treatment consisted of first-line treatment of capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) combined with irinotecan (250 mg /m2 on day 1) (XELIRI) and second-line capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) plus oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1). All treatment cycles were administered at intervals of 3 weeks. In first-line treatment the median progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 5.8 months (95%CI, 5.1 -6.2 months) for capecitabine monotherapy and 7.8 months (95%CI, 7.0-8.3 months) for XELIRI (p=0.0002). Data from an interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase II study (AIO KRK 0604) support the use of capecitabine at a starting dose of 800 mg/m2 for 2 weeks every 3 weeks in combination with irinotecan and bevacizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. 115 patients were randomised to treatment with capecitabine combined with irinotecan (XELIRI) and bevacizumab: capecitabine (800 mg/m2 twice daily for two weeks followed by a 7-day rest period), irinotecan (200 mg/m2 as a 30 minute infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks), and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg as a 30 to 90 minute infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks); a total of 118 patients were randomised to treatment with capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab: capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for two weeks followed by a 7-day rest period), oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 as a 2 hour infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks), and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg as a 30 to 90 minute infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks). Progression-free survival at 6 months in the intent-to-treat population was 80% (XELIRI plus bevacizumab) versus 74 % (XELOX plus bevacizumab). Overall response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 45 % (XELOX plus bevacizumab) versus 47 % (XELIRI plus bevacizumab). Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic data The intensity of the major toxic effects encountered with irinotecan (e.g., neutropenia and diarrhoea) is related to the exposure (AUC) to the parent drug and the metabolite SN-38. In monotherapy, a significant correlation was noted between the intensity of haematological toxicity (decrease in white blood cells and neutrophils at nadir) or diarrhoea intensity, and the AUC values of both irinotecan and the SN-38 metabolite. | |