| Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antiviral for systemic use, Other Antivirals, ATC code: J05AX08. Mechanism of action Raltegravir is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor active against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1). Raltegravir inhibits the catalytic activity of integrase, an HIV-encoded enzyme that is required for viral replication. Inhibition of integrase prevents the covalent insertion, or integration, of the HIV genome into the host cell genome. HIV genomes that fail to integrate cannot direct the production of new infectious viral particles, so inhibiting integration prevents propagation of the viral infection. Antiviral activity in vitroRaltegravir at concentrations of 31 ± 20 nM resulted in 95% inhibition (IC95) of HIV-1 replication (relative to an untreated virus-infected culture) in human T-lymphoid cell cultures infected with the cell-line adapted HIV-1 variant H9IIIB. In addition, raltegravir inhibited viral replication in cultures of mitogen-activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells infected with diverse, primary clinical isolates of HIV-1, including isolates from 5 non-B subtypes, and isolates resistant to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. In a single-cycle infection assay, raltegravir inhibited infection of 23 HIV isolates representing 5 non-B subtypes and 5 circulating recombinant forms with IC50 values ranging from 5 to 12 nM. Resistance Most viruses isolated from patients failing raltegravir had high-level raltegravir resistance resulting from the appearance of two or more mutations. Most had a signature mutation at amino acid 155 (N155 changed to H), amino acid 148 (Q148 changed to H, K, or R), or amino acid 143 (Y143 changed to H, C, or R), along with one or more additional integrase mutations (e.g., L74M, E92Q, T97A, E138A/K, G140A/S, V151I, G163R, S230R). The signature mutations decrease viral susceptibility to raltegravir and addition of other mutations results in a further decrease in raltegravir susceptibility. Factors that reduced the likelihood of developing resistance included lower baseline viral load and use of other active anti-retroviral agents. Preliminary data indicate that there is potential for at least some degree of cross-resistance to occur between raltegravir and other integrase inhibitors. Clinical experience The evidence of efficacy of ISENTRESS is based on the analyses of 96-week data from two ongoing, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, (BENCHMRK 1 and BENCHMRK 2, Protocols 018 and 019) in antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected adult patients and the analysis of 156 week data from an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, active-control trial, (STARTMRK, Protocol 021) in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adult patients.EfficacyTreatment-experienced patients BENCHMRK 1 and BENCHMRK 2 (ongoing multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials) evaluate the safety and anti-retroviral activity of ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily vs. placebo in a combination with optimised background therapy (OBT), in HIV-infected patients, 16 years or older, with documented resistance to at least 1 drug in each of 3 classes (NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs) of anti-retroviral therapies. Prior to randomisation, OBT were selected by the investigator based on the patient's prior treatment history, as well as baseline genotypic and phenotypic viral resistance testing. Patient demographics (gender, age and race) and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups receiving ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily and placebo. Patients had prior exposure to a median of 12 anti-retrovirals for a median of 10 years. A median of 4 ARTs was used in OBT.Results 48 week and 96 week analyses Durable outcomes (Week 48 and Week 96) for patients on the recommended dose ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily from the pooled studies BENCHMRK 1 and BENCHMRK 2 are shown in Table 2.Table 2 Efficacy Outcome at Weeks 48 and 96 | BENCHMRK 1 and 2 PooledParameter | 48 Weeks | 96 Weeks | | ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily + OBT(N = 462) | Placebo + OBT (N = 237) | ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily + OBT(N = 462) | Placebo + OBT (N = 237) | | Percent HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml (95% CI) | | | | | | All patients | 72 (68, 76)
| 37 (31, 44)
| 62 (57, 66)
| 28 (23, 34)
| | Baseline Characteristic | | | | | | HIV-RNA > 100,000 copies/ml
| 62 (53, 69)
| 17 (9, 27)
| 53 (45, 61)
| 15 (8, 25)
| 100,000 copies/ml
| 82 (77, 86)
| 49 (41, 58)
| 74 (69, 79)
| 39 (31, 47)
| CD4-count 50 cells/mm3 | 61 (53, 69)
| 21 (13, 32)
| 51 (42, 60)
| 14 (7, 24)
| > 50 and 200
cells/mm3 | 80 (73, 85)
| 44 (33, 55)
| 70 (62, 77)
| 36 (25, 48)
| | > 200 cells/mm3 | 83 (76, 89)
| 51 (39, 63)
| 78 (70, 85)
| 42 (30, 55)
| | Sensitivity score (GSS) § | | | | | | 0
| 52 (42, 61)
| 8 (3, 17)
| 46 (36, 56)
| 5 (1, 13)
| | 1
| 81 (75, 87)
| 40 (30, 51)
| 76 (69, 83)
| 31 (22, 42)
| | 2 and above
| 84 (77, 89)
| 65 (52, 76)
| 71 (63, 78)
| 56 (43, 69)
| | Percent HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml (95% CI) | | | | | | All patients | 62 (57, 67)
| 33 (27, 39)
| 57 (52, 62)
| 26 (21, 32)
| | Baseline Characteristic | | | | | | HIV-RNA > 100,000 copies/ml
| 48 (40, 56)
| 16 (8, 26)
| 47 (39, 55)
| 13 (7, 23)
| 100,000 copies/ml
| 73 (68, 78)
| 43 (35, 52)
| 70 (64, 75)
| 36 (28, 45)
| CD4-count 50 cells/mm3 | 50 (41, 58)
| 20 (12, 31)
| 50 (41, 58)
| 13 (6, 22)
| > 50 and 200 cells/mm3 | 67 (59, 74)
| 39 (28, 50)
| 65 (57, 72)
| 32 (22, 44)
| | > 200 cells/mm3 | 76 (68, 83)
| 44 (32, 56)
| 71 (62, 78)
| 41 (29, 53)
| | Sensitivity score (GSS) § | | | | | | 0
| 45 (35, 54)
| 3 (0, 11)
| 41 (32, 51)
| 5 (1, 13)
| | 1
| 67 (59, 74)
| 37 (27, 48)
| 72 (64, 79)
| 28 (19, 39)
| | 2 and above
| 75 (68, 82)
| 59 (46, 71)
| 65 (56, 72)
| 53 (40, 66)
| | Mean CD4 Cell Change (95% CI), cells/mm3 | | | | | | All patients | 109 ( 98, 121)
| 45 (32, 57)
| 123 (110, 137)
| 49 (35, 63)
| | Baseline Characteristic | | | | | | HIV-RNA > 100,000 copies/ml
| 126 (107, 144)
| 36 (17, 55)
| 140 (115, 165)
| 40 (16, 65)
| 100,000 copies/ml
| 100 (86, 115)
| 49 (33, 65)
| 114 (98, 131)
| 53 (36, 70)
| CD4-count 50 cells/mm3 | 121 (100, 142)
| 33 (18, 48)
| 130 (104, 156)
| 42 (17, 67)
| > 50 and 200
cells/mm3 | 104 (88, 119)
| 47 (28, 66)
| 123 (103, 144)
| 56 (34, 79)
| | > 200 cells/mm3 | 104 (80, 129)
| 54 (24, 84)
| 117 (90, 143)
| 48 (23, 73)
| | Sensitivity score (GSS) § | | | | | | 0
| 81 (55, 106)
| 11 (4, 26)
| 97 (70, 124)
| 15 (-0, 31)
| | 1
| 113 (96, 130)
| 44 (24, 63)
| 132 (111, 154)
| 45 (24, 66)
| | 2 and above
| 125 (105, 144)
| 76 (48, 103)
| 134 (108, 159)
| 90 (57, 123)
| |
Non-completer is failure imputation: patients who discontinued prematurely are imputed as failure thereafter. Percent of patients with response and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported.
For analysis by prognostic factors, virologic failures were carried forward for percent < 400 and 50 copies/ml. For mean CD4 changes, baseline-carry-forward was used for virologic failures.
§
The Genotypic Sensitivity Score (GSS) was defined as the total oral ARTs in the optimised background therapy (OBT) to which a patient's viral isolate showed genotypic sensitivity based upon genotypic resistance test. Enfuvirtide use in OBT in enfuvirtide-naïve patients was counted as one active drug in OBT. Similarly, darunavir use in OBT in darunavir-naïve patients was counted as one active drug in OBT. | Raltegravir achieved virologic responses (using Not Completer=Failure approach) of HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml in 61.7 % of patients at Week 16, in 62.1 % at Week 48 and in 57.0 % at Week 96. Some patients experienced viral rebound between Week 16 and Week 96. Factors associated with failure include high baseline viral load and OBT that did not include at least one potent active agent. Switch to raltegravir The SWITCHMRK 1 & 2 (Protocols 032 & 033) studies evaluated HIV-infected patients receiving suppressive (screening HIV RNA <50 copies/ml; stable regimen >3 months) therapy with lopinavir 200 mg (+) ritonavir 50 mg 2 tablets twice daily plus at least 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and randomised them 1:1 to continue lopinavir (+) ritonavir 2 tablets twice daily (n=174 and n=178, respectively) or replace lopinavir (+) ritonavir with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily (n=174 and n=176, respectively). Patients with a prior history of virological failure were not excluded and the number of previous antiretroviral therapies was not limited.These studies were terminated after the primary efficacy analysis at Week 24 because they failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of raltegravir versus lopinavir (+) ritonavir. In both studies at Week 24, suppression of HIV RNA to less than 50 copies/ml was maintained in 84.4 % of the raltegravir group versus 90.6 % of the lopinavir (+) ritonavir group, (Non-completers = Failure). See section 4.4 regarding the need to administer raltegravir with two other active agents.Treatment-naive patients STARTMRK (ongoing multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-control trial) evaluates the safety and anti-retroviral activity of ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily vs. efavirenz 600 mg at bedtime, in a combination with emtricitabine (+) tenofovir, in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients with HIV RNA >5,000 copies/ml. Randomisation was stratified by screening HIV RNA level ( 50,000 copies/ml; and >50,000 copies/ml) and by hepatitis B or C status (positive or negative).Patient demographics (gender, age and race) and baseline characteristics were comparable between the group receiving ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily and the group receiving efavirenz 600 mg at bedtime. Results 48-week and 156-week analyses With respect to the primary efficacy endpoint, the proportion (%) of patients achieving HIV RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 156 was 212/281 (75.4%) in the group receiving ISENTRESS and 192/282 (68.1%) in the group receiving efavirenz. The treatment difference (ISENTRESS efavirenz) was 7.3% with an associated 95% CI of (-0.2, 14.7) establishing that ISENTRESS is non-inferior to efavirenz (p-value for non-inferiority <0.001). Durable outcomes (Week 48 and Week 156) for patients on the recommended dose of ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily from STARTMRK are shown in Table 3.Table 3 Efficacy Outcome at Weeks 48 and 156 | | 48 Weeks | 156 Weeks | | STARTMRK StudyParameter | ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily (N = 281) | Efavirenz 600 mg at bedtime (N = 282) | ISENTRESS 400 mg twice daily (N = 281) | Efavirenz600 mg at bedtime(N = 282) | | Percent HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml (95% CI) | | | | | | All patients | 86 (81, 90)
| 82 (77, 86)
| 75 (70, 80)
| 68 (62, 73)
| | Baseline Characteristic | | | | | | HIV-RNA > 100,000 copies/ml
| 91 (85, 95)
| 89 (83, 94)
| 86 (78, 91)
| 85 (78, 91)
| 100,000 copies/ml
| 93 (86, 97)
| 89 (82, 94)
| 94 (88, 98)
| 84 (76, 90)
| CD4-count 50 cells/mm3 | 84 (64, 95)
| 86 (67, 96)
| 70 (47, 87)
| 86 (67, 96)
| > 50 and 200
cells/mm3 | 89 (81, 95)
| 86 (77, 92)
| 90 (82, 95)
| 81 (71, 89)
| | > 200 cells/mm3 | 94 (89, 98)
| 92 (87, 96)
| 93 (87, 97)
| 87 (79, 93)
| | Viral Subtype Clade B
| 90 (85, 94)
| 89 (83, 93)
| 88 (82, 92)
| 85 (79, 90)
| | Non-Clade B
| 96 (87, 100)
| 91 (78, 97)
| 94 (83, 99)
| 85 (70, 94)
| | Mean CD4 Cell Change (95% CI), cells/mm3 | | | | | | All patients | 189 (174, 204)
| 163 (148, 178)
| 332 (309, 354)
| 295 (271, 319)
| | Baseline Characteristic | | | | | | HIV-RNA > 100,000 copies/ml
| 196 (174, 219)
| 192 (169, 214)
| 333 (302, 364)
| 320 (286, 355)
| 100,000 copies/ml
| 180 (160, 200)
| 134 (115, 153)
| 330 (298, 363)
| 269 (236, 301)
| CD4-count 50 cells/mm3 | 170 (122, 218)
| 152 (123, 180)
| 281 (199, 362)
| 268 (207, 330)
| > 50 and 200
cells/mm3 | 193 (169, 217)
| 175 (151, 198)
| 345 (311, 378)
| 302 (265, 339)
| | > 200 cells/mm3 | 190 (168, 212)
| 157 (134, 181)
| 332 (299, 364)
| 297 (261, 333)
| | Viral Subtype Clade B
| 187 (170, 204)
| 164 (147, 181)
| 340 (314, 367)
| 294 (267, 321)
| | Non-Clade B
| 189 (153, 225)
| 156 (121, 190)
| 229 (259, 338)
| 288 (233, 344)
| |
Non-completer is failure imputation: patients who discontinued prematurely are imputed as failure thereafter. Percent of patients with response and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported.
For analysis by prognostic factors, virologic failures were carried forward for percent < 50 and 400 copies/ml. For mean CD4 changes, baseline-carry-forward was used for virologic failures.
Notes: The analysis is based on all available data.
ISENTRESS and efavirenz were administered with emtricitabine (+) tenofovir. |
| |