| Pharmacotherapeutic group: Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin, ATC code: B01AC11This medicinal product has been authorised under Exceptional Circumstances.This means that due to the rarity of the disease it has not been possible to obtain complete information on this medicinal product.The European Medicines Agency (EMA) will review any new information which may become available every year and this SPC will be updated as necessary.Iloprost, the active substance of Ventavis, is a synthetic prostacyclin analogue. The following pharmacological effects have been observed in vitro:• Inhibition of platelet aggregation, platelet adhesion and release reaction• Dilatation of arterioles and venules• Increase of capillary density and reduction of increased vascular permeability caused by mediators such as serotonin or histamine in the microcirculation • Stimulation of endogenous fibrinolytic potentialThe pharmacological effects after inhalation of Ventavis are:Direct vasodilatation of the pulmonary arterial bed occur with consecutive significant improvement of pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output as well as mixed venous oxygen saturation. In a small, randomized, 12-week double-blinded phase, placebo-controlled study (the STEP trial), 34 patients treated with bosentan 125 mg twice per day for at least 16 weeks who were in stable haemodynamic conditions before enrolment, tolerated the addition of inhaled iloprost (up to 5 microgram 6 to 9 times per day during waking hours). The mean daily inhaled dose was 27 microgram and the mean number of inhalations per day was 5.6. The acute adverse effects in patients receiving concomitant bosentan and iloprost were consistent with those observed in the larger experience of the phase 3 study in patients receiving only iloprost. No reliable conclusion could be drawn on efficacy of the association as the sample size was limited and the study was of short duration.No clinical trial data are available comparing directly in intra-patient observations the acute haemodynamic response after intravenous to that after inhaled iloprost. The haemodynamics observed suggest an acute response with preferential effect of inhaled treatment on the pulmonary vessels. The pulmonary vasodilatory effect of each single inhalation levels off within one to two hours.However, the predictive value of these acute haemodynamic data are considered to be of limited value as acute response does not in all cases correlate with long-term benefit of treatment with inhaled iloprost.• Efficacy in adult patients with pulmonary hypertensionA randomised, double-blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled phase III trial (study RRA02997) has been conducted in 203 adult patients (inhaled iloprost: N=101; placebo n=102) with stable pulmonary hypertension. Inhaled iloprost (or placebo) was added to patients' current therapy, which could include a combination of anticoagulants, vasodilators (e.g. calcium channel blockers), diuretics, oxygen, and digitalis, but not PGI2 (prostacyclin or its analogues). 108 of the patients included were diagnosed with primary pulmonary hypertension, 95 were diagnosed with secondary pulmonary hypertension of which 56 were associated with chronic thromboembolic disease, 34 with connective tissue disease (including CREST and scleroderma) and 4 were considered appetite suppressant drug related. The baseline 6-minute walk test values reflected a moderate exercise limitation: in the iloprost group the mean was 332 metres (median value: 340 metres) and in the placebo group the mean was 315 metres (median value: 321 metres). In the iloprost group, the median daily inhaled dose was 30 micrograms (range 12.5 to 45 micrograms/day). The primary efficacy endpoint defined for this study, was a combined response criterion consisting of improvement in exercise capacity (6 minute walk test) at 12 weeks by at least 10% versus baseline, and improvement by at least one NYHA class at 12 weeks versus baseline, and no deterioration of pulmonary hypertension or death at any time before 12 weeks. The rate of responders to iloprost was 16.8% (17/101) and the rate of responders in the placebo group was 4.9% (5/102) (p=0.007). In the iloprost group, the mean change from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment in the 6 minute walking distance was an increase of 22 metres (-3.3 metres in the placebo group, no data imputation for death or missing values). In the iloprost group the NYHA class was improved in 26% of patients (placebo: 15%) (p = 0.032), unchanged in 67.7% of patients (placebo: 76%) and deteriorated in 6.3% of patients (placebo: 9%). Invasive haemodynamic parameters were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks treatment.A subgroup analysis showed that no treatment effect was observed as compared to placebo on the 6-minute walk test in the subgroup of patients with secondary pulmonary hypertension. A mean increase in the 6-minute walk test of 44.7 metres from a baseline mean value of 329 metres vs. a change of -7.4 metres from a baseline mean value of 324 metres in the placebo group (no data imputation for death or missing values) was observed in the subgroup of 49 patients with primary pulmonary hypertension receiving treatment of inhaled iloprost for 12 weeks (46 patients in the placebo group). No study has been performed with Ventavis in children with pulmonary hypertension. | |