| SPC Changes Onglyza 2.5mg & 5mg film coated tablets
Section 1
Addition of 2.5mg dose, now reads as,
“Onglyza▼2.5 mg film‑coated tablets
Onglyza▼5 mg film‑coated tablets”
Section 2
Addition of details for 2.5mg dose, now reads as,
” Each tablet contains 2.5 mg saxagliptin (as hydrochloride).
Each tablet contains 5 mg saxagliptin (as hydrochloride).
Excipients:
Each tablet contains 99 mg lactose monohydrate.
For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.”
Section 3
Additional of 2.5mg dose, now reads as,
” Film‑coated tablet (tablet).
Onglyza 2.5 mg tablets are pale yellow to light yellow, biconvex, round, film-coated tablets, with “2.5” printed on one side and “4214” printed on the other side, in blue ink.
Onglyza 5 mg tablets are pink , biconvex, round, film‑coated tablet, with “5” printed on one side and “4215” printed on the other side, in blue ink.”
Section 4.2
Text changes to Special populations, renal impairment, Elderly and Paediatric population, now reads as,
“Posology
Add‑on combination therapy
The recommended dose of Onglyza is 5 mg once daily as add‑on combination therapy with metformin, a thiazolidinedione or a sulphonylurea.
The safety and efficacy of saxagliptin as triple oral therapy in combination with metformin and a thiazolidinedione, or with metformin and a sulphonylurea, has not been established.
Special populations
Elderly (≥65 years)
No dose adjustment is recommended based solely on age. Experience in patients aged 75 years and older is very limited and caution should be exercised when treating this population (see also sections 4.4, 5.1 and 5.2.
Renal impairment
No dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild renal impairment.
The dose of Onglyza should be reduced to 2.5 mg once daily in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.
The experience in patients with severe renal impairment is very limited. Therefore, saxagliptin should be used with caution in this population. Onglyza is not recommended for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis (see section 4.4).
Because the dose of Onglyza should be limited to 2.5 mg based upon renal function, assessment of renal function is recommended prior to initiation of Onglyza, and, in keeping with routine care, renal assessment should be done periodically thereafter (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
Hepatic impairment
No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (see section 5.2). Saxagliptin should be used with caution in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, and is not recommended for use in patients with severe hepatic impairment (see section 4.4).
Paediatric population
The safety and efficacy of Onglyza in children aged birth to < 18 years have not yet been established.No data are available.
Method of administration
Onglyza can be taken with or without a meal at any time of the day. If a dose is missed, it should be taken as soon as the patient remembers. A double dose should not be taken on the same day. ”
Section 4.4
Change to first paragraph and addtiional second paragraph, ”Renal impairment”, these paragraphs now reads as,
” General
Onglyza should not be used in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus or for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis.
Renal impairment
A single dosage adjustment is recommended in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. Saxagliptin should be used with caution in patients with severe renal impairment, and is not recommended for use in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis. Assessment of renal function is recommended prior to initiation of Onglyza, and, in keeping with routine care, renal assessment should be done periodically thereafter (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).”
Section 4.7
Second paragraph, second line, word ”operating” now ”using”.
Section 4.8
Under paragraph, Tabulated list of adverse reactions, changes made to first paragraph, now reads as,
” Tabulated list of adverse reactions
Adverse reactions reported in ≥5% of patients treated with saxagliptin 5 mg and more commonly than in patients treated with placebo or that were reported in ≥2% of patients treated with saxagliptin 5 mg and ≥1% more frequently compared to placebo are shown in Table 1.
The adverse reactions are listed by system organ class and absolute frequency. Frequencies are defined as Very common (³ 1/10), Common (³ 1/100 to <1/10), Uncommon (³ 1/1,000 to 1/100), Rare (³ 1/10,000 to 1/1,000), or Very rare (<1/10,000), not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).”
Table 1: Heading change from General disorders to, ”General disorders and administration site conditions
Paragraph heading Laboratory tests now ”Invstigations”
Section 5.1
Text changes to first paragraph, now reads as,
” Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs used in diabetes. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP‑4) inhibitors, ATC code: A10BH03”
New heading and text, Patients with renal impairment, reads as,
” Patients with renal impairment
A 12 week, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study was conducted to evaluate the treatment effect of saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily compared with placebo in 170 patients (85 patients on saxagliptin and 85 on placebo) with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.0-11%) and renal impairment (moderate [N=90]; severe [N=41]; or ESRD [N=39]). In this study, 98.2% of the patients were treated with other antihyperglycaemic medication (75.3% on insulin and 31.2% on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs; some received both). Saxagliptin significantly decreased HbA1c compared with placebo; the HbA1c change for saxagliptin was -0.9% at Week 12 (HbA1c change of -0.4% for placebo). Improvements in HbA1c following treatment with saxagliptin 2.5 mg were sustained up to Week 52, however the number of patients who completed 52 weeks without modification of other antihyperglycaemic medications was low (26 subjects in the saxagliptin group versus 34 subjects in the placebo group). The incidence of confirmed hypoglycaemic events was somewhat higher in the saxagliptin group (9.4%) versus placebo group (4.7%) although the number of subjects with any hypoglycaemic event did not differ between the treatment groups. There was no adverse effect on renal function as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate or CrCL at Week 12 and Week 52.”
Section 6.1
Additional text to film coating, now reads as,
Film coating:
Polyvinyl alcohol
Macrogol/3350
Titanium dioxide (E171)
Talc (E553b)
Iron oxide red (E172) 5 mg Tablets only
Iron oxide yellow (E172) 2.5 mg Tablets only
Printing ink:
Shellac
Indigo carmine aluminium lake (E132)”
Section 6.5
Additional information for 2.5mg dose, reads as,
” 2.5 mg Tablets
Alu/Alu blister.
Pack sizes of 14, 28, and 98 film‑coated tablets in non‑perforated calendar blisters.
Pack sizes of 30x1 and 90x1 film‑coated tablets in perforated unit dose blisters.
Not all pack sizes may be marketed.”
Section 8
New first paragraph for 2.5mg dose, now reads as,
” EU/1/09/545/012 - Onglyza 2.5 mg film-coated tablet oral use non-perforated calendar blister (Alu/Alu)-28 tablets”
Section 9
Now reads as,
“5 mg Tablets- 1st October 2009
2.5 mg Tablets – 2nd March 2011”
Section 10
Now reads as,
“2nd March 2011”
|