| Section 4.2: Posology and method of administration
All references to “Navelbine soft capsules” have been replaced with just “Navelbine”
The sub-headings “In adult patients” and “Dose modification” have been added.
In the second table, “Recommended dose for the next administration” has been replaced with “Recommended dose starting with the next administration”
The sub-heading “In combination therapy” has been replaced with “For combination regimens, the dose and schedule will be adapted to the treatment protocol”
The sentence “Even for patients with BSA 2 m2 the total dose should never exceed 160 mg per week.” has been replaced with “Even for patients with BSA ³ 2m2 the total dose should never exceed
120 mg per week at 60 mg /m2 and 160 mg per week at 80 mg /m2”
The sub-heading “Elderly” has been replaced with “Administration in the elderly”
The sentence “Clinical experience has not identified relevant differences in responses in the elderly or younger patients but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.” has been replaced with “Clinical experience has not identified relevant detected any significant differences in responses in the elderly or younger patients among elderly patients with regard to the response rate, although greater sensitivity in some of these patients cannot be excluded. Age does not modify the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine: see section 5.2.”
The sub-heading “Paediatric patients” has been replaced with “Administration in children” with the following added sentence: “Administration is therefore not recommended”
In addition, the following text has been added:
“Administration in patients with liver insufficiency
Navelbine can be administered at the standard dose of 60 mg/m²/week in patients with mild liver impairment (bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN, and ALAT and/or ASAT from 1.5 to 2.5 x ULN). In patients with moderate liver impairment (bilirubin from 1.5 to 3 x ULN, whatever the levels of ALAT and ASAT), Navelbine should be administered at a dose of 50 mg/m²/week. The administration of Navelbine in patients with severe hepatic impairment is contra-indicated: see sections 4.3, 4.4, 5.2.
Administration in patients with renal insufficiency
Given the minor renal excretion, there is no pharmacokinetic justification for reducing the dose of Navelbine in patients with serious renal insufficiency: see sections 4.4, 5.2.
Administration
Navelbine is to be administered orally.
Navelbine must be swallowed whole with water, without chewing, sucking or dissolving the capsule.
It is recommended to administer the capsule with some food.
Specific instructions must be observed for administration of Navelbine :see section 6.6.”
Section 4.4: Special warnings and precautions for use
The following has been deleted:
In patients with impaired liver or kidney function no prospective study is available in order to establish guidelines for the Navelbine soft capsules dose reduction.
However, if there is significant hepatic impairment the dose of Navelbine soft capsules should be reduced. In patients with massive liver metastases (i.e.> 75% of liver volume replaced by the tumour) it is empirically suggested that the dose be reduced by 25 % and the haematological parameters closely monitored.
And replaced with:
Oral Navelbine was studied in patients with liver impairment at the following doses:
- 60 mg/m² in 7 patients with mild liver impairment (bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN, and ALAT and/or ASAT from 1.5 to 2.5 x ULN);
- 50 mg/m² in 6 patients with moderate liver impairment (bilirubin from 1.5 to 3 x ULN, whatever the levels of ALAT and ASAT).
Total clearance of vinorelbine was neither modified between mild and moderate liver impairment nor was it altered in hepatically impaired patients when compared with clearance in patients with normal liver function. Oral Navelbine was not studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment therefore its use is contra-indicated in these patients: see sections 4.2, 4.3, 5.2.
Section 5.2: Pharmacokinetic properties
The following fragment of a sentence, “…and of 50 mg/m² in patients with moderate liver impairment…” has been replaced with “...and of 50 mg/m² in 6 patients with moderate liver impairment...”
The following text has been added:
“Total clearance of vinorelbine was neither modified between mild and moderate impairment nor was it altered in hepatically impaired patients when compared with clearance in patients with normal liver function.”
|